AMD Radeon Pro 570 vs NVIDIA GRID M60-1Q Comparison

The AMD Radeon Pro 570 and NVIDIA GRID M60-1Q represent two distinct approaches to GPU design, targeting different segments of the market. The Radeon Pro 570 is a mobile-oriented integrated graphics processor built for Apple's Mac systems, while the GRID M60-1Q is a dual-slot server card designed for virtualized workloads. The benchmark data shows a narrow but definitive win for the AMD part, with the Radeon Pro 570 achieving a 2.4% higher score in the only shared test, the Geekbench Vulkan benchmark. This advantage, however, masks significant architectural and specification differences that make each card better suited for different use cases.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The only direct comparison available is the Geekbench Vulkan test, and it is a close contest. The AMD Radeon Pro 570 scores 31974, while the NVIDIA GRID M60-1Q scores 31220. This gives the AMD part a 2.4% lead, which is a relatively small margin but noteworthy given the different design philosophies of the two cards. In practical terms, this means the Radeon Pro 570 holds a slight edge in Vulkan-based compute or rendering tasks, though the delta is small enough that real-world performance differences would be minimal in most workloads.

The average benchmark scores across all available tests further reinforce this picture. The Radeon Pro 570 achieves an average score of 33207, which places it in the 78th percentile of all GPUs. This is derived from its three benchmark results: 39945 in Geekbench Metal, 27702 in Geekbench OpenCL, and 31974 in Geekbench Vulkan. The GRID M60-1Q, with only its single Vulkan score of 31220, lands in the 76th percentile of all GPUs. This 2-percentile difference aligns with the 2.4% delta in the head-to-head test, suggesting that the Radeon Pro 570 is consistently slightly faster than the GRID M60-1Q in raw compute performance.

Looking at the nearest rivals for each card provides additional context. The Radeon Pro 570's average score of 33207 is nearly identical to that of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile (33170, a 0.1% difference) and the NVIDIA T550 Mobile (33161, also 0.1% off). It is also within 1.1% of the NVIDIA T600 Mobile (32849). This positions the Radeon Pro 570 as a solid mid-range performer, competitive with modern mobile GPUs. The GRID M60-1Q's average score of 31220 is similarly aligned with the NVIDIA Quadro M5000 (31206, a 0% difference) and the NVIDIA TITAN RTX (31676, which is 1.4% faster). Interestingly, the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER scores 31087, which is 0.4% lower than the GRID, and the RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell scores 31532, which is 1% higher. This shows the GRID M60-1Q, despite its age, still performs competitively against much newer and more expensive cards in synthetic benchmarks.

The data indicates that the Radeon Pro 570 wins the only direct benchmark, and its broader benchmark suite suggests it has a slight but consistent performance advantage. However, the GRID M60-1Q is not far behind, and its performance profile is tailored for a very different purpose.

Architecture Differences

The architectural gap between these two GPUs is substantial, reflecting their different release timelines and target markets. The AMD Radeon Pro 570 is built on the Ellesmere chip using the GCN 4.0 architecture, fabricated on a 14 nm process at GlobalFoundries. This newer node allows for a transistor density of 24.6 million per square millimeter, resulting in 5,700 million transistors packed into a 232 mm² die. In contrast, the NVIDIA GRID M60-1Q uses the GM204 chip based on the older Maxwell 2.0 architecture, produced on a 28 nm process at TSMC. This larger node yields a transistor density of only 13.1 million per square millimeter, meaning NVIDIA needed a much larger 398 mm² die to house its 5,200 million transistors. The newer, denser process gives AMD a significant manufacturing advantage, though the raw compute potential tells a different story.

In terms of core configuration, the GRID M60-1Q actually has more raw processing units. It features 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 render output units. The Radeon Pro 570 has fewer units overall with 1792 shading units, 112 TMUs, and 32 ROPs. This gives the NVIDIA card a theoretical peak pixel rate of 75.39 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 150.8 GTexel/s, compared to 35.36 GPixel/s and 123.8 GTexel/s for the AMD card. The GRID M60-1Q also leads in theoretical FP32 performance with 4.825 TFLOPS versus 3.960 TFLOPS for the Radeon Pro 570. The AMD card does support FP16 at a 1:1 ratio with FP32 (both 3.960 TFLOPS), while the NVIDIA card has no listed FP16 capability, but this is less relevant for most professional workloads.

The memory subsystems also differ significantly. The Radeon Pro 570 uses 4 GB of GDDR5 memory on a 256-bit bus with a bandwidth of 217.0 GB/s. The GRID M60-1Q has only 1024 MB of GDDR5 memory on the same 256-bit bus, but its bandwidth is lower at 160.4 GB/s. The GRID's memory clock is 1253 MHz (5 Gbps effective), while the Radeon Pro 570 runs at 1695 MHz (6.8 Gbps effective). This gives the AMD card a 35% bandwidth advantage, which is crucial for memory-intensive tasks, but the NVIDIA card's much smaller frame buffer is a severe limitation for modern workloads. The clock speeds also differ, with the Radeon Pro 570 having a base clock of 1000 MHz and a boost of 1105 MHz, while the GRID M60-1Q has a base of only 557 MHz but a boost of 1178 MHz. The NVIDIA card's low base clock suggests aggressive power management, but its boost clock is higher than AMD's.

FAQ

Q: Which card has better overall benchmark performance?

A: The AMD Radeon Pro 570 has a higher average benchmark score of 33207 compared to 31220 for the NVIDIA GRID M60-1Q. This places the AMD card in the 78th percentile of all GPUs, versus 76th for the NVIDIA card. In the only direct head-to-head test (Geekbench Vulkan), the Radeon Pro 570 wins with a 2.4% higher score.

Q: How does the GRID M60-1Q compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The GRID M60-1Q's average score of 31220 is essentially tied with the NVIDIA Quadro M5000 (31206, 0% difference). It is 0.4% faster than the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER (31087) but 1% slower than the RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell (31532) and 1.4% slower than the TITAN RTX (31676). This indicates it still holds its own against much newer hardware.

Q: What is the main performance weakness of the GRID M60-1Q?

A: The most significant limitation is its memory capacity of only 1024 MB. This is a very small frame buffer for modern applications, especially for virtualization workloads where multiple users may need concurrent memory allocations. Its bandwidth of 160.4 GB/s is also lower than the AMD card's 217.0 GB/s.

Q: Does the Radeon Pro 570 support more modern APIs?

A: Both cards support DirectX 12 and OpenGL 4.6. The NVIDIA GRID M60-1Q supports Vulkan 1.4, while the AMD Radeon Pro 570 supports Vulkan 1.3. The NVIDIA card also supports DirectX 12_1, whereas the AMD card is limited to 12_0. This gives NVIDIA a slight edge in terms of the latest API feature levels.

Q: Which card has higher theoretical compute throughput?

A: The NVIDIA GRID M60-1Q has higher theoretical FP32 throughput at 4.825 TFLOPS, compared to 3.960 TFLOPS for the AMD Radeon Pro 570. The NVIDIA card also leads in pixel rate (75.39 GPixel/s vs 35.36 GPixel/s) and texture rate (150.8 GTexel/s vs 123.8 GTexel/s), despite having a lower average benchmark score.

Q: What is the physical form factor difference?

A: The AMD Radeon Pro 570 is an integrated graphics processor (IGP) with no slot width, no power connectors, and portable device dependent display outputs. The NVIDIA GRID M60-1Q is a dual-slot card that is 267 mm (10.5 inches) long, requires a single 8-pin power connector, and has no display outputs at all.

Specification Differences

The following specifications differ between the two cards:

| Specification | AMD Radeon Pro 570 | NVIDIA GRID M60-1Q |

|---|---|---|

| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |

| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |

| Foundry | GlobalFoundries | TSMC |

| Transistors | 5,700 million | 5,200 million |

| Die Size | 232 mm² | 398 mm² |

| Transistor Density | 24.6M / mm² | 13.1M / mm² |

| Base Clock | 1000 MHz | 557 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 1105 MHz | 1178 MHz |

| Memory Clock | 1695 MHz (6.8 Gbps effective) | 1253 MHz (5 Gbps effective) |

| Memory Size | 4 GB | 1024 MB |

| Memory Bandwidth | 217.0 GB/s | 160.4 GB/s |

| Shading Units | 1792 | 2048 |

| TMUs | 112 | 128 |

| ROPs | 32 | 64 |

| Pixel Rate | 35.36 GPixel/s | 75.39 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 123.8 GTexel/s | 150.8 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 3.960 TFLOPS | 4.825 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 3.960 TFLOPS | null |

| TDP | 150 W | 225 W |

| Slot Width | IGP | Dual-slot |

| Power Connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |

| Suggested PSU | null | 550 W |

| Display Outputs | Portable Device Dependent | No outputs |

| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 12 (12_1) |

| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4 |

| Length | null | 267 mm (10.5 inches) |

| Release Date | 2017-06-04 | 2015-08-29 |

| Vulkan Benchmark | 31974 | 31220 |

| Average Benchmark Score | 33207 | 31220 |

| Percentile | 78 | 76 |

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon Pro 570 wins in the benchmark comparison, but its advantages are specific. It has a clear lead in memory capacity (4 GB vs 1024 MB) and bandwidth (217.0 GB/s vs 160.4 GB/s), which makes it better suited for workloads that require larger datasets or higher memory throughput. Its higher average benchmark score and 78th percentile ranking indicate it is generally faster in compute tasks. The Radeon Pro 570 also benefits from a much newer manufacturing process (14 nm vs 28 nm), resulting in lower power consumption (150 W vs 225 W) despite being an integrated part. Its support for FP16 at a 1:1 ratio with FP32 could be beneficial for certain machine learning or compute tasks that leverage reduced precision. This card is better for users who need a versatile, power-efficient GPU with modern memory capacity, such as those running macOS-based creative or development workflows.

The NVIDIA GRID M60-1Q wins in raw theoretical specifications. It offers higher shading unit count (2048 vs 1792), more ROPs (64 vs 32), and higher pixel and texture rates. Its peak FP32 throughput of 4.825 TFLOPS is 22% higher than the AMD card's 3.960 TFLOPS. This suggests that in perfectly optimized scenarios with no memory constraints, the GRID M60-1Q could outperform the Radeon Pro 570. It also supports the newer Vulkan 1.4 API and DirectX 12_1, making it slightly more future-proof in terms of software compatibility. However, its severely limited 1024 MB frame buffer is a critical bottleneck that likely explains why its real-world benchmark score is lower. This card is better suited for virtualized environments where its design as a server card with no display outputs and a dual-slot form factor is an asset, and where its theoretical throughput can be leveraged in compute-heavy tasks that do not require large memory footprints. Its boost clock of 1178 MHz is also higher than the AMD card's 1105 MHz, giving it a peak clock advantage. Ultimately, the GRID M60-1Q wins on paper but loses in practice, while the Radeon Pro 570 delivers better actual benchmark performance.