AMD Radeon Pro 570 vs AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE Comparison

The AMD Radeon Pro 570 and AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE occupy opposite ends of the GPU spectrum, separated by six years of architectural evolution and a fundamental difference in purpose. The data shows a decisive performance gap, with the RX 7900 GRE dominating in every shared benchmark, but the Pro 570’s legacy as a mobile workstation part with a 78th percentile ranking reveals that context matters when evaluating these figures. The head-to-head results are stark, yet the comparison is not merely about raw speed; it is about how each card’s design priorities shape its capabilities.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The two shared benchmarks in the data paint an unambiguous picture of the performance chasm between these GPUs. In the Geekbench OpenCL test, the AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE scores 175,758, while the AMD Radeon Pro 570 scores 27,702. This represents a delta of -84.2% for the Pro 570, meaning the RX 7900 GRE is approximately 5.3 times faster in raw compute throughput. The margin is colossal, reflecting not just a generational leap but a fundamental shift in compute architecture and resource allocation.

The Geekbench Vulkan test narrows the gap slightly but remains overwhelmingly in favor of the newer card. The RX 7900 GRE posts a score of 99,850, against the Pro 570’s 31,974, a delta of -68%. While the Pro 570 manages to retain a larger fraction of the RX 7900 GRE’s performance in Vulkan than in OpenCL, it still trails by more than a factor of three. This suggests that the Pro 570’s GCN 4.0 architecture handles Vulkan’s explicit API model relatively better than OpenCL, but it cannot overcome the massive hardware advantages of the RDNA 3.0 part.

The benchmark data shows zero wins for the Pro 570 and two wins for the RX 7900 GRE. There is no scenario in these tests where the older card emerges ahead. The closest point of comparison comes from their average benchmark scores, where the Pro 570 averages 33,207 across its tests, while the RX 7900 GRE averages 32,456 across a broader suite. However, this is misleading, as the RX 7900 GRE’s average includes multiple Passmark tests covering DirectX 9 through 12 and 2D graphics, which are not directly comparable to the Pro 570’s Geekbench-only results. In the tests they share, the RX 7900 GRE is unequivocally superior.

Where Each One Wins

The RX 7900 GRE wins decisively in every compute-heavy workload represented by the shared benchmarks. Its OpenCL score of 175,758 indicates exceptional general-purpose compute performance, suitable for rendering, simulation, and GPU-accelerated applications. The Vulkan score of 99,850 reinforces its strength in modern graphics APIs, where its 80 ray-tracing cores and 5,120 shading units provide substantial parallel processing power. The card’s 45.98 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 91.96 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1) performance make it a formidable choice for both gaming and professional compute tasks.

The Pro 570, while losing outright, still claims a niche based on its profile. Its 3.960 TFLOPS FP32 performance, while minuscule compared to the RX 7900 GRE, is delivered within a 150 W TDP and an IGP (integrated graphics processor) form factor. This makes it suitable for compact, power-constrained systems where the RX 7900 GRE’s 260 W TDP and dual-slot design are impractical. The Pro 570’s 78th percentile ranking among all GPUs indicates it remains competitive within its class, outperforming its nearest rivals like the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile (avg score 33,170, delta 0.1%) and NVIDIA T550 Mobile (avg score 33,161, delta 0.1%). In absolute terms, the Pro 570 is not a weak card; it is simply outclassed by a much newer, larger, and more power-hungry part.

The Passmark results for the RX 7900 GRE also highlight its strengths in specific API environments. Its Passmark DirectX 11 score of 300 and DirectX 9 score of 310 indicate strong legacy API performance, while the DirectX 12 score of 107 and DirectX 10 score of 139 are lower, likely reflecting the test’s sensitivity to driver optimizations. The Passmark G3D score of 27,089 and GPU Compute score of 15,016 further demonstrate its balanced capabilities across both rasterization and compute workloads. The Pro 570 has no corresponding Passmark data, so no direct comparison is possible, but the Geekbench results are sufficient to establish the hierarchy.

Architecture Differences

The architectural gulf between these two GPUs is vast and explains the performance disparity. The Pro 570 uses the Ellesmere chip on GCN 4.0 architecture, fabricated on a 14 nm process at GlobalFoundries. It contains 5,700 million transistors on a 232 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 24.6 million per mm². The RX 7900 GRE uses the Navi 31 chip on RDNA 3.0 architecture, fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC. It packs 57,700 million transistors into a 529 mm² die, achieving a density of 109.1 million per mm². This represents a 4.4x increase in transistor density and a 10.1x increase in raw transistor count.

The memory subsystems differ dramatically as well. The Pro 570 has 4 GB of GDDR5 on a 256-bit bus, delivering 217.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The RX 7900 GRE has 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, delivering 576.0 GB/s — 2.65 times more bandwidth. This capacity and bandwidth advantage is critical for modern workloads with large datasets, such as high-resolution textures and complex compute kernels. The Pro 570’s memory clock runs at 1695 MHz (6.8 Gbps effective), while the RX 7900 GRE’s runs at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective), reflecting the newer memory technology.

Compute resources scale correspondingly. The Pro 570 has 1,792 shading units, 112 TMUs, and 32 ROPs. The RX 7900 GRE has 5,120 shading units, 320 TMUs, and 160 ROPs — 2.86x, 2.86x, and 5x more, respectively. The RX 7900 GRE also adds 80 ray-tracing cores, a feature entirely absent from the Pro 570. Pixel rate jumps from 35.36 GPixel/s to 359.2 GPixel/s, and texture rate from 123.8 GTexel/s to 718.4 GTexel/s. Clock speeds also tell a story: the Pro 570 operates at 1000 MHz base and 1105 MHz boost, while the RX 7900 GRE runs at 1287 MHz base, 1880 MHz game, and 2245 MHz boost. The combination of more cores and higher clocks produces the massive compute advantage.

Interface and feature support also differ. The Pro 570 uses PCIe 3.0 x16, while the RX 7900 GRE uses PCIe 4.0 x16, doubling the available bandwidth to the host system. DirectX support advances from 12 (12_0) to 12 Ultimate (12_2), and Vulkan from 1.3 to 1.4. The RX 7900 GRE offers modern display outputs including HDMI 2.1a, DisplayPort 2.1, and USB Type-C, while the Pro 570’s outputs are listed as "Portable Device Dependent," reflecting its integrated nature. The RX 7900 GRE is a dual-slot card with 2x 8-pin power connectors and a suggested PSU of 600 W, while the Pro 570 has no power connectors and a 150 W TDP.

FAQ

Q: Which card is faster in Geekbench OpenCL?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE scores 175,758 versus the AMD Radeon Pro 570’s 27,702, a delta of -84.2% for the Pro 570. The RX 7900 GRE is approximately 5.3 times faster.

Q: Does the AMD Radeon Pro 570 win any shared benchmark?

A: No. In the two head-to-head benchmarks (Geekbench OpenCL and Geekbench Vulkan), the RX 7900 GRE wins both. The Pro 570 records zero wins.

Q: How do their memory bandwidths compare?

A: The RX 7900 GRE has 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth from 16 GB of GDDR6, while the Pro 570 has 217.0 GB/s from 4 GB of GDDR5. The RX 7900 GRE offers 2.65 times more bandwidth.

Q: What is the transistor count difference?

A: The RX 7900 GRE has 57,700 million transistors on a 529 mm² die, while the Pro 570 has 5,700 million on a 232 mm² die. This is a 10.1x increase in transistor count.

Q: Does the RX 7900 GRE support ray tracing?

A: Yes, it has 80 dedicated ray-tracing cores. The Pro 570 has no ray-tracing cores, as its GCN 4.0 architecture predates this feature.

Q: What are their percentile rankings?

A: The Pro 570 is in the 78th percentile of all GPUs, while the RX 7900 GRE is in the 77th percentile. Despite the Pro 570’s higher percentile, this reflects its relative standing among older parts, not its absolute performance versus the RX 7900 GRE.

The Verdict

The data is unequivocal: the AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE is the superior performer in every measurable shared benchmark. Its OpenCL score of 175,758 and Vulkan score of 99,850 dwarf the Pro 570’s 27,702 and 31,974, respectively. The 84.2% and 68% deltas are not marginal improvements; they represent a generational leap in compute capability. Anyone needing maximum performance in OpenCL or Vulkan workloads should choose the RX 7900 GRE without hesitation.

The AMD Radeon Pro 570, however, retains a specific purpose. Its 150 W TDP, IGP form factor, and lack of power connectors make it suitable for systems where the RX 7900 GRE’s 260 W TDP and dual-slot footprint are prohibitive. Its 78th percentile ranking, ahead of rivals like the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile and NVIDIA T550 Mobile, shows it remains competent within its niche. The Pro 570 is not a bad card; it is simply a different class of product from an earlier era.

For users building a high-performance workstation or gaming rig, the RX 7900 GRE’s 16 GB of GDDR6 memory, 80 ray-tracing cores, and 45.98 TFLOPS FP32 performance make it the obvious choice. For those constrained by power, space, or legacy integration needs, the Pro 570 offers a functional, if dated, alternative. The benchmark results do not suggest a close contest — they document a decisive victory for modern architecture, while acknowledging that the Pro 570’s design priorities still serve a narrow but real audience.