AMD Radeon Pro 570 vs AMD Radeon RX 7700S Comparison

The AMD Radeon RX 7700S and AMD Radeon Pro 570 represent two very different eras of mobile graphics, separated by nearly six years of architectural evolution. The RX 7700S, built on the modern RDNA 3.0 architecture, is an active product designed for high-performance gaming laptops, while the Pro 570, based on the aging GCN 4.0 architecture, is an end-of-life professional solution from the Radeon Pro Mac series. Benchmark data shows the RX 7700S delivering a commanding lead in compute workloads, but the Pro 570 holds its own in specific API tests, making this a comparison of generational efficiency versus legacy specialization.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7700S has a higher average benchmark score of 33,849 compared to the AMD Radeon Pro 570's 33,207, a difference of 642 points. Both GPUs sit at the 78th percentile among all GPUs, indicating they occupy a similar overall performance tier despite their architectural differences.

Q: How large is the performance gap in the Geekbench OpenCL test?

A: The RX 7700S scores 62,983 in Geekbench OpenCL, which is 127.4% higher than the Pro 570's score of 27,702. This represents the single largest performance delta between the two cards in any benchmark test, reflecting the RX 7700S's massive compute advantage.

Q: Does the Pro 570 win any head-to-head benchmark?

A: No, the RX 7700S wins both head-to-head benchmarks. In addition to the OpenCL result, the RX 7700S leads in Geekbench Vulkan with a score of 36,380 versus 31,974 for the Pro 570, a 13.8% advantage. The data records 2 wins for the RX 7700S and 0 for the Pro 570.

Q: What is the process node difference between the two GPUs?

A: The RX 7700S is manufactured on a 6 nm process at TSMC, while the Pro 570 uses a 14 nm process at GlobalFoundries. This process difference contributes significantly to the RX 7700S's higher transistor density of 65.2M per mm² versus 24.6M per mm² for the Pro 570.

Q: Which GPU has more memory bandwidth?

A: The RX 7700S has 288.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth from its 8 GB GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus. The Pro 570 has 217.0 GB/s from 4 GB GDDR5 memory on a 256-bit bus, meaning the RX 7700S delivers 32.7% more bandwidth despite having a narrower bus.

Q: Are these GPUs in the same performance percentile?

A: Yes, both the RX 7700S and the Pro 570 are at the 78th percentile of all GPUs. This places them in the same overall performance bracket, even though their nearest rivals differ — the RX 7700S rivals include the AMD Radeon HD 7950 and RX 480, while the Pro 570 rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile and T550 Mobile.

Architecture Differences

The architectural gap between these two GPUs is substantial. The RX 7700S is built on RDNA 3.0 with the Navi 33 chip, codenamed "Hotpink Bonefish," and belongs to the Navi Mobile generation. In contrast, the Pro 570 uses the Ellesmere chip with the much older GCN 4.0 architecture from the Radeon Pro Mac generation. This represents a fundamental shift in AMD's GPU design philosophy, from the compute-oriented GCN design to the gaming-focused RDNA layout.

The manufacturing process tells a clear story of generational progress. The RX 7700S uses a 6 nm process at TSMC with 13,300 million transistors packed into a 204 mm² die, achieving a transistor density of 65.2M per mm². The Pro 570, by contrast, uses a 14 nm process at GlobalFoundries with only 5,700 million transistors on a larger 232 mm² die, yielding just 24.6M per mm². This means the RX 7700S packs more than twice the transistors into a smaller physical area, enabling its significantly higher clock speeds.

Clock speeds amplify the architectural differences. The RX 7700S runs at a 1500 MHz base clock and boosts to 2500 MHz, with a game clock of 2200 MHz. The Pro 570 is far more conservative, with a 1000 MHz base and 1105 MHz boost. The RX 7700S also runs its memory at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective) compared to the Pro 570's 1695 MHz (6.8 Gbps effective). These clock advantages, combined with the newer architecture, produce massive throughput differences.

Feature support diverges sharply. The RX 7700S supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and Vulkan 1.4, while the Pro 570 is limited to DirectX 12 (12_0) and Vulkan 1.3. The RX 7700S includes 32 ray tracing cores, which the Pro 570 lacks entirely. The RX 7700S also connects via PCIe 4.0 x16, whereas the Pro 570 uses the older PCIe 3.0 x16 interface. Both GPUs are integrated into portable devices with no power connectors and IGP slot width, but the RX 7700S has a lower TDP of 100 W versus 150 W for the Pro 570.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Geekbench OpenCL result is the dominant data point in this comparison. The RX 7700S scores 62,983, which is 127.4% higher than the Pro 570's 27,702. This more than doubles the Pro 570's output, a dramatic margin that reflects the cumulative effects of the newer process node, higher clocks, and more advanced compute units. The RX 7700S's FP32 throughput of 20.48 TFLOPS versus 3.960 TFLOPS for the Pro 570 explains this gulf — the RX 7700S delivers over five times the raw floating-point performance.

The Vulkan test shows a closer contest, though the RX 7700S still wins decisively. Its score of 36,380 is 13.8% ahead of the Pro 570's 31,974. This narrower margin suggests that the Pro 570's GCN architecture retains some efficiency in driver-overhead-sensitive workloads, but the RX 7700S's superior hardware ultimately prevails. The RX 7700S also has a higher pixel rate of 160.0 GPixel/s versus 35.36 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 320.0 GTexel/s versus 123.8 GTexel/s, indicating advantages in rasterization-heavy tasks.

The average benchmark scores place these GPUs closer than the head-to-head results suggest. The RX 7700S averages 33,849, while the Pro 570 averages 33,207, a difference of just 1.9%. This is because the Pro 570 has a Geekbench Metal score of 39,945, which is not compared directly against the RX 7700S but contributes to its overall average. The RX 7700S also has a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,185, a test the Pro 570 does not have data for.

Rival comparisons reinforce the generational split. The RX 7700S's nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon HD 7950 (average score 33,951, delta -0.3%) and the AMD Radeon RX 480 (33,997, delta -0.4%), showing it sits slightly below those older cards in average score. The Pro 570's nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile (33,170, delta 0.1%) and the NVIDIA T550 Mobile (33,161, delta 0.1%), placing it essentially at parity with those modern mobile options.

The Verdict

The data makes a clear case for the RX 7700S as the superior performer in raw compute and modern API workloads. Its 127.4% lead in Geekbench OpenCL and 13.8% lead in Vulkan are significant, and its 20.48 TFLOPS FP32 throughput dwarfs the Pro 570's 3.960 TFLOPS. For any workload that leverages compute shaders, ray tracing, or modern DirectX 12 Ultimate features, the RX 7700S is the only viable choice between these two.

However, the Pro 570 is not without merit in specific contexts. Its Geekbench Metal score of 39,945 is its strongest benchmark result, and this GPU was designed for the Radeon Pro Mac lineup, where Metal is the primary API. Its 256-bit memory bus, while slower in total bandwidth, may offer better latency characteristics in certain legacy workloads. The Pro 570's end-of-life status and 150 W TDP make it a less attractive option for new systems, but its 78th percentile ranking shows it still performs admirably for its age.

The choice depends entirely on the use case. Gamers and content creators running modern applications should pick the RX 7700S without hesitation, as it offers double-digit percentage wins in both shared benchmarks and supports ray tracing that the Pro 570 cannot. Users constrained to macOS environments with Metal-based applications might find the Pro 570's 39,945 Metal score worth consideration, though the RX 7700S's overall compute dominance suggests it would likely win those workloads too if benchmarked. The RX 7700S also consumes 50 W less power, making it more efficient for mobile deployments.

Specification Differences

The two GPUs differ across nearly every specification category. The RX 7700S uses the Navi 33 chip with RDNA 3.0 architecture, while the Pro 570 uses the Ellesmere chip with GCN 4.0. The process node is 6 nm versus 14 nm, and the RX 7700S has 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die, whereas the Pro 570 has 5,700 million on a 232 mm² die. Transistor density is 65.2M per mm² for the RX 7700S versus 24.6M per mm² for the Pro 570.

Clock speeds show the RX 7700S at 1500 MHz base and 2500 MHz boost, with a 2200 MHz game clock, compared to the Pro 570's 1000 MHz base and 1105 MHz boost. Memory configurations differ significantly: the RX 7700S has 8 GB GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth, while the Pro 570 has 4 GB GDDR5 on a 256-bit bus with 217.0 GB/s bandwidth. Memory clock is 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective) versus 1695 MHz (6.8 Gbps effective).

Compute resources favor the RX 7700S with 2048 shading units, 128 TMUs, 64 ROPs, and 32 ray tracing cores, while the Pro 570 has 1792 shading units, 112 TMUs, 32 ROPs, and no ray tracing cores. Pixel rate is 160.0 GPixel/s versus 35.36 GPixel/s, and texture rate is 320.0 GTexel/s versus 123.8 GTexel/s. FP32 performance is 20.48 TFLOPS versus 3.960 TFLOPS, with the RX 7700S achieving 40.96 TFLOPS FP16 (2:1) versus the Pro 570's 3.960 TFLOPS FP16 (1:1).

Power and interface specs also diverge. The RX 7700S has a 100 W TDP versus 150 W for the Pro 570. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x16 versus PCIe 3.0 x16. API support differs with DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) versus DirectX 12 (12_0), and Vulkan 1.4 versus 1.3. The RX 7700S was released on 2023-01-03 and is Active, while the Pro 570 was released on 2017-06-04 and is End-of-life. The RX 7700S has a predecessor of Polaris Mobile, while the Pro 570 has none listed.