AMD Radeon Pro 570 vs AMD Radeon Pro 570X Comparison

The AMD Radeon Pro 570 and the AMD Radeon Pro 570X are two nearly identical workstation-class graphics solutions built for Apple’s Mac ecosystem. Both are based on the same Ellesmere chip and GCN 4.0 architecture, fabricated on a 14 nm process at GlobalFoundries, with 5,700 million transistors on a 232 mm² die. The data shows a striking similarity in raw specifications, with the primary differentiators appearing in benchmark results and overall percentile rankings. The Radeon Pro 570 holds a 78th percentile ranking among all GPUs with an average benchmark score of 33,207, while the Radeon Pro 570X sits at the 76th percentile with an average score of 32,176. This places the two cards in adjacent performance tiers, with the original 570 edging out the X-variant in overall average score by approximately 1,031 points.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Radeon Pro 570 leads with an average benchmark score of 33,207, compared to the AMD Radeon Pro 570X’s 32,176. This represents a performance gap of roughly 3.2% in favor of the original card.

Q: How do the two cards compare in Geekbench Metal performance?

A: The AMD Radeon Pro 570X wins the Metal test with a score of 40,066, narrowly defeating the AMD Radeon Pro 570’s 39,945. The delta is minimal, with the X-variant leading by just 0.3%.

Q: What is the biggest performance difference between the two cards?

A: The largest discrepancy appears in Geekbench Vulkan, where the AMD Radeon Pro 570 scores 31,974 against the 570X’s 28,859. This gives the original card a decisive 10.8% advantage in Vulkan workloads.

Q: Are the core specifications identical between the two models?

A: Yes, the data shows complete parity in core hardware. Both use the Ellesmere chip with GCN 4.0 architecture, 1,792 shading units, 112 TMUs, 32 ROPs, 4 GB of GDDR5 memory on a 256-bit bus, and identical clock speeds of 1000 MHz base and 1105 MHz boost.

Q: What are the nearest rivals for each card?

A: The Radeon Pro 570 sits closest to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile at a 0.1% delta, while the Radeon Pro 570X is most comparable to the AMD FirePro S10000, which trails by 0.7%. The 570X also sits near the AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE, which is 0.9% faster.

Q: Which card has the higher number of benchmark wins?

A: The AMD Radeon Pro 570 wins two out of three head-to-head benchmarks (OpenCL and Vulkan), while the AMD Radeon Pro 570X claims victory in only one (Metal).

Where Each One Wins

The benchmark data reveals a clear split in workload preferences between these two cards. The AMD Radeon Pro 570 demonstrates superiority in compute-oriented and cross-platform graphics workloads. Its Geekbench OpenCL score of 27,702 edges out the 570X’s 27,604, a narrow 0.4% victory that suggests slightly better raw compute efficiency. More significantly, the Vulkan test shows a substantial 10.8% advantage, with the 570 scoring 31,974 versus 28,859 for the 570X. This makes the original 570 the stronger choice for Vulkan-based applications and general compute tasks where OpenCL is utilized.

The AMD Radeon Pro 570X claims a single, narrow win in Geekbench Metal. Its score of 40,066 surpasses the 570’s 39,945 by just 0.3%, a margin that falls within typical run-to-run variance but nonetheless represents a measurable lead in Apple’s native graphics API. For users whose workflows are heavily optimized for Metal — common in macOS creative applications — the 570X holds a slight edge, though the practical difference is negligible.

Beyond the head-to-head tests, the overall average benchmark score favors the 570 at 33,207 versus 32,176 for the 570X. This broader metric, which aggregates across multiple test types, reinforces the 570’s position as the more consistently capable card. The 570 also achieves a higher percentile ranking at 78% versus 76% for the 570X, indicating it performs better relative to the entire GPU landscape.

Architecture Differences

Despite their distinct model names and slightly divergent benchmark outcomes, the architectural profiles of the AMD Radeon Pro 570 and the AMD Radeon Pro 570X are identical across every measured parameter. Both utilize the Ellesmere chip built on the GCN 4.0 architecture, a design that AMD also employed across its mainstream desktop Radeon lineup. The process node is 14 nm, manufactured by GlobalFoundries, with a transistor count of 5,700 million packed into a 232 mm² die. This yields a transistor density of 24.6 million transistors per square millimeter — a figure that is precisely the same for both cards.

The compute layout shows no divergence: each card features 1,792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units, and 32 render output units. Neither card includes dedicated ray tracing cores or tensor cores, which is consistent with the GCN 4.0 architecture’s design era. The pixel fill rate is 35.36 GPixel/s and the texture fill rate is 123.8 GTexel/s for both. Floating-point performance is also matched, with FP32 and FP16 both rated at 3.960 TFLOPS, and the FP16 ratio is 1:1, indicating no separate half-rate path.

Memory architecture is equally consistent. Both cards carry 4 GB of GDDR5 memory across a 256-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 217.0 GB/s. The memory clock runs at 1695 MHz, translating to 6.8 Gbps effective. The power envelope is also the same at 150 W TDP, with no external power connectors required and a slot width designated as IGP. Both cards interface via PCIe 3.0 x16 and support DirectX 12 (12_0), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.3.

The only meaningful architectural difference lies in the generation naming: the 570 belongs to the “Radeon Pro Mac (500 Series)” generation, while the 570X is part of the “(500X Series)”. This nomenclature distinction does not correspond to any hardware change in the data provided.

Specification Differences

When comparing the specification sheets side by side, the two cards are functionally indistinguishable. The chip, architecture, process node, foundry, transistor count, die size, and transistor density are all identical. Clock speeds match exactly: 1000 MHz base, 1105 MHz boost, and memory at 1695 MHz or 6.8 Gbps effective. Memory size, type, bus width, and bandwidth are all the same at 4 GB GDDR5, 256-bit, and 217.0 GB/s respectively.

The shading units, TMUs, and ROPs are identical at 1,792, 112, and 32. Pixel rate, texture rate, FP32, and FP16 performance are all equal. TDP is 150 W for both, with the same IGP slot width and no power connectors. The bus interface, display outputs, and API support are also mirrored. Even the production status is the same: both are end-of-life products.

The only specification differences that exist are the release dates and the generation label. The AMD Radeon Pro 570 was released on June 4, 2017, while the AMD Radeon Pro 570X followed on March 17, 2019 — a gap of roughly two years. This timing suggests the 570X was a refresh or rebranding exercise rather than a hardware revision. Neither card has a launch MSRP listed, and both lack predecessor or successor entries in the data.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The three Geekbench tests provide a comprehensive view of how these two cards perform across different API environments. Starting with Geekbench Metal, the AMD Radeon Pro 570X takes the win with a score of 40,066 against the 570’s 39,945. The delta is a mere 0.3%, which places this result well within the margin of experimental error. In practical terms, Metal performance is effectively tied, though the X-variant technically holds the record.

In Geekbench OpenCL, the AMD Radeon Pro 570 reclaims the lead with a score of 27,702 versus 27,604 for the 570X. The 0.4% delta is again very small, but the direction is consistent with the 570’s slightly higher average benchmark score. OpenCL workloads, which are common in scientific computing and certain rendering pipelines, show a marginal preference for the original card.

The decisive difference arrives in Geekbench Vulkan. The AMD Radeon Pro 570 scores 31,974, while the AMD Radeon Pro 570X manages only 28,859. This 10.8% delta is the largest performance gap between the two cards in any test. Vulkan is increasingly used in professional visualization and cross-platform gaming, and this result indicates that the 570 has a substantial advantage in that environment. The magnitude of this difference is surprising given the otherwise identical specifications, but the data is unambiguous.

Looking at the broader benchmark landscape, the 570’s nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile at an average score of 33,170 (0.1% delta), the NVIDIA T550 Mobile at 33,161 (0.1%), and the NVIDIA P104-100 at 32,982 (0.7%). The 570X, by contrast, sits near the AMD FirePro S10000 at 32,388 (0.7% slower), the AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE at 32,456 (0.9% faster), and the Intel Arc Pro A30M at 31,894 (0.9% slower). These rival comparisons place both cards in a similar performance tier, but the 570 consistently aligns with faster competitors. The win count — 2 for the 570 and 1 for the 570X — mirrors the average score advantage and the Vulkan dominance. For users choosing between the two, the data supports the original Radeon Pro 570 as the more balanced performer, with the 570X offering only a negligible Metal-specific edge.