GPU Comparison

AMD

RADEON

AMD Radeon Instinct MI300

CORE STATE Aqua Vanjaram

VRAM 128 GB

CLOCK SPEED 1700 MHz

TDP 600 W

BUS WIDTH 8192 bit

ARCHITECTURE CDNA 3.0

PROCESS 5 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2023

Intel

GPU

Arc A310

CORE STATE DG2-128

VRAM 4 GB

CLOCK SPEED 1750 MHz

TDP 30 W

BUS WIDTH 64 bit

ARCHITECTURE Xe-HPG

PROCESS 6 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2022

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

geekbench_opencl

N/A

30,607

geekbench_vulkan

N/A

28,964

passmark_directx_10

N/A

passmark_directx_11

N/A

passmark_directx_12

N/A

passmark_directx_9

N/A

passmark_g2d

N/A

625

passmark_g3d

N/A

5,433

passmark_gpu_compute

N/A

2,157

Analysis: AMD Radeon Instinct MI300 vs Intel Arc A310

The graphics card matchup between Radeon Arc A310 and AMD Radeon Instinct MI300 indicates impressively matched results. These graphics cards exchange victories throughout various tests, with not one claiming a clear lead. This benchmark figures supports this observation. None of the card wins repeatedly. Consumers have a true dilemma between them.

As opposed to fixating on slight benchmark improvements, prospective buyers should examine additional variables. thermal performance, fan noise, materials, and service quality usually play a role more than marginal FPS variations. The elements should affect the scales. Weigh further than simply scores. The full picture counts.

Considering a engineering angle, Radeon Arc A310 and AMD Radeon Instinct MI300 feature comparable capabilities. VRAM configuration, compute cores, and memory throughput are closely comparable. The specification parity accounts for the close score data. Not one has a substantial hardware lead. This competition is fair.

For people undecided between Radeon Arc A310 and AMD Radeon Instinct MI300, be assured that each selection delivers similar gaming performance. The benchmark figures confirms zero definite victor. Base your determination on other considerations and appreciate capable visual throughput either way. Either are winners in this particular regard. Go with safely.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION

Instinct MI300

A310

Core Specs

Shading Units

14,080

768 -94.5%

Shaders

14,080

768 -94.5%

TMUs

880

32 -96.4%

ROPs

16 +∞%

Compute Units

220

—

Execution Units

—

Clocks

Base Clock

1000 MHz

1750 MHz

Boost Clock

1700 MHz

1750 MHz

Memory Clock

1600 MHz 6.4 Gbps effective

1937 MHz 15.5 Gbps effective

Memory

Memory Size

128 GB

4 GB

VRAM (MB)

131,072

4,096 -96.9%

Memory Type

HBM3

GDDR6

Memory Bus

8192 bit

64 bit

Bandwidth

6.55 TB/s

124.0 GB/s

Cache

L1 Cache

16 KB (per CU)

—

L2 Cache

16 MB

4 MB

Performance

Pixel Rate

0 MPixel/s

28.00 GPixel/s

Texture Rate

1,496.0 GTexel/s

56.00 GTexel/s

FP32 (TFLOPS)

47.87 TFLOPS

2.688 TFLOPS

FP64 (TFLOPS)

47.87 TFLOPS (1:1)

672.0 GFLOPS (1:4)

FP16 (TFLOPS)

383.0 TFLOPS (8:1)

5.376 TFLOPS (2:1)

AI/RT

RT Cores

—

XMX Cores

—

Matrix Cores

880

—

Power

TDP

600 W

30 W

TDP (W)

600

30 -95.0%

Suggested PSU

1000 W

200 W

Power Connectors

2x 8-pin

None

Architecture

CDNA 3.0

Xe-HPG

GPU Name

Aqua Vanjaram

DG2-128

Generation

Radeon Instinct (MIx)

Alchemist (Arc 3)

Process Size

5 nm

6 nm

Transistors

153,000 million

7,200 million

Die Size

1017 mm²

157 mm²

Foundry

TSMC

Density

150.4M / mm²

45.9M / mm²

AMD MCM

MCM

—

API Support

DirectX

—

12 Ultimate (12_2)

OpenGL

—

4.6

Vulkan

—

1.4

OpenCL

3.0

Shader Model

—

6.6

Physical

Slot Width

—

Single-slot

Length

267 mm 10.5 inches

—

Height

111 mm 4.4 inches

—

Outputs

No outputs

4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0

Bus Interface

PCIe 5.0 x16

PCIe 4.0 x8

Other

Production

—

End-of-life

Predecessor

FirePro Data Center

Xe Graphics

Successor

—

Battlemage

View Radeon Instinct MI300 Details View Arc A310 Details