AMD Radeon HD 7730M vs Intel UHD Graphics 750 Comparison
AMD Radeon HD 7730M
UHD Graphics 750
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: AMD Radeon HD 7730M vs Intel UHD Graphics 750
FAQ
Q: Which GPU has the higher average benchmark score?
A: The Intel UHD Graphics 750 has an average benchmark score of 7441, while the AMD Radeon HD 7730M records 6581. The Intel part sits at the 40th percentile of all GPUs, and the AMD part at the 38th percentile.
Q: How do the two compare in the Geekbench OpenCL test?
A: The Intel UHD Graphics 750 scores 6743, while the AMD Radeon HD 7730M scores 6581. That is a 2.5% advantage for the Intel chip in the only head-to-head benchmark recorded.
Q: What are the nearest rivals for each GPU in the database?
A: For the Intel UHD Graphics 750, the nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon HD 8850M (7447, 0.1% higher), the AMD Radeon R7 350 (7425, 0.2% lower), the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (7472, 0.4% higher), and the Intel Arc A310 (7550, 1.4% higher). For the AMD Radeon HD 7730M, the nearest rivals are the Intel UHD Graphics P750 (6554, 0.4% lower), the AMD Radeon R7 M460 (6612, 0.5% higher), the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M (6513, 1% lower), and the NVIDIA GeForce GT 555M (6493, 1.4% lower).
Q: What is the difference in shading units between the two GPUs?
A: The AMD Radeon HD 7730M has 512 shading units, while the Intel UHD Graphics 750 has 256 shading units. The AMD part also has 32 texture mapping units and 16 ROPs, versus 16 TMUs and 8 ROPs for the Intel part.
Q: Which GPU has dedicated memory?
A: The AMD Radeon HD 7730M has 2 GB of DDR3 memory on a 128-bit bus with a bandwidth of 28.80 GB/s. The Intel UHD Graphics 750 uses system shared memory with system dependent bandwidth.
Q: What API versions does each GPU support?
A: The Intel UHD Graphics 750 supports DirectX 12 (12_1), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The AMD Radeon HD 7730M supports DirectX 12 (11_1), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.2.170.
The Verdict
The benchmark data points to a clear but narrow winner. The Intel UHD Graphics 750 takes the only recorded head-to-head test, the Geekbench OpenCL benchmark, by 2.5%. Its average score of 7441 places it 13.1% above the AMD Radeon HD 7730M's average of 6581. For users choosing between these two end-of-life parts based strictly on measured compute performance, the Intel UHD Graphics 750 is the stronger pick.
That said, the AMD Radeon HD 7730M remains competitive in specific contexts. It carries twice the shading units, twice the texture mapping units, and twice the ROPs of the Intel part, and it has dedicated 2 GB DDR3 memory. The Intel chip relies on system shared memory, which makes its memory behavior system dependent. The AMD part also draws 25 W versus 15 W for the Intel part, so the Intel chip wins on power efficiency on paper.
The verdict depends on the use case. The Intel UHD Graphics 750 is the better choice for users who prioritize raw OpenCL compute results, a higher percentile standing, and lower power draw. The AMD Radeon HD 7730M is the better choice for users who need dedicated memory, a wider memory bus, and a larger number of execution units, even though its recorded benchmark scores trail slightly.
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
The database contains one direct head-to-head result: Geekbench OpenCL. The Intel UHD Graphics 750 scores 6743, and the AMD Radeon HD 7730M scores 6581. The Intel part wins by 2.5%.
Context from the nearest rivals clarifies the meaning of that margin. The Intel UHD Graphics 750's average score of 7441 places it between the AMD Radeon HD 8850M (7447, 0.1% higher) and the AMD Radeon R7 350 (7425, 0.2% lower). It sits just 0.4% behind the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (7472) and 1.4% behind the Intel Arc A310 (7550). This means the Intel part is essentially at parity with a desktop card like the GTX 1650 in this database's aggregate metric.
The AMD Radeon HD 7730M's average of 6581 places it 0.4% above the Intel UHD Graphics P750 (6554) and 0.5% below the AMD Radeon R7 M460 (6612). It sits 1% above the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670M (6513) and 1.4% above the NVIDIA GeForce GT 555M (6493). The AMD part's aggregate standing is roughly 11.6% below the Intel UHD Graphics 750's aggregate score.
The recorded data shows a modest but consistent gap. The Intel part wins the only direct test, and its aggregate score places it in a higher performance tier among nearby GPUs. The AMD part holds its own against older mobile and desktop parts, but it does not close the gap to the Intel chip in measured compute workloads.
Specification Differences
The two GPUs differ across nearly every major specification field.
The Intel UHD Graphics 750 has a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 1300 MHz. The AMD Radeon HD 7730M has a base clock of 575 MHz and a boost clock of 675 MHz. The AMD part runs its memory at 900 MHz, or 1800 Mbps effective.
Memory configuration differs fundamentally. The Intel part uses system shared memory with a system dependent bus width and bandwidth. The AMD part has 2 GB of DDR3 memory on a 128-bit bus with a fixed bandwidth of 28.80 GB/s.
The compute unit counts differ substantially. The Intel part has 256 shading units, 16 TMUs, and 8 ROPs. The AMD part has 512 shading units, 32 TMUs, and 16 ROPs.
Pixel and texture rates are close despite the unit count differences. The Intel part achieves 10.40 GPixel/s and 20.80 GTexel/s. The AMD part achieves 10.80 GPixel/s and 21.60 GTexel/s.
Floating-point performance is also close. The Intel part delivers 665.6 GFLOPS FP32 and 1,331.2 GFLOPS FP16 (2:1). The AMD part delivers 691.2 GFLOPS FP32 with no recorded FP16 figure.
Power draw differs: the Intel part is rated at 15 W, the AMD part at 25 W.
The bus interface differs. The Intel part uses Ring Bus, the AMD part uses PCIe 2.0 x16.
The display outputs differ: the Intel part is motherboard dependent, the AMD part is portable device dependent.
The process nodes differ: the Intel part is built on 14 nm+++, the AMD part on 28 nm by TSMC.
Architecture Differences
The Intel UHD Graphics 750 is built on Intel's Generation 12.1 architecture and uses the Rocket Lake chip. It is part of the HD Graphics (Rocket Lake) generation. The AMD Radeon HD 7730M is built on GCN 1.0 architecture and uses the Chelsea chip. It belongs to the London (HD 7700M) generation.
The manufacturing approach differs completely. The Intel part uses Intel's 14 nm+++ process at Intel's own foundry. The AMD part uses TSMC's 28 nm process. The AMD die measures 123 mm² and contains 1,500 million transistors, giving a transistor density of 12.2 million transistors per mm². The Intel part has no recorded die size or transistor count in the database.
The AMD part has a known predecessor and successor: Vancouver and Solar System, respectively. The Intel part has no recorded predecessor or successor.
API support differs in DirectX and Vulkan versions. The Intel part supports DirectX 12 (12_1) and Vulkan 1.4. The AMD part supports DirectX 12 (11_1) and Vulkan 1.2.170. Both support OpenGL 4.6.
The Intel part does not list a slot width, but it is classified as an IGP. The AMD part has no recorded slot width. Memory technology differs: the Intel part uses system shared memory, the AMD part uses DDR3.
Where Each One Wins
The Intel UHD Graphics 750 wins in measured benchmark performance. It takes the only head-to-head test, Geekbench OpenCL, by 2.5%. Its average score of 7441 is 13.1% higher than the AMD part's 6581. It also holds a higher percentile ranking among all GPUs, at the 40th percentile versus the 38th percentile. Users who rely on OpenCL compute results should favor the Intel part.
The Intel part also wins on power draw. Its 15 W rating compares favorably to the AMD part's 25 W, making it the more efficient choice for systems where thermal and power budgets are tight. Its boost clock of 1300 MHz is nearly double the AMD part's 675 MHz, and its base clock of 300 MHz is lower, indicating a wider dynamic range.
The AMD Radeon HD 7730M wins on hardware resources. It has 512 shading units, 32 TMUs, and 16 ROPs, exactly double the Intel part's counts. It has dedicated 2 GB DDR3 memory with a fixed 128-bit bus and 28.80 GB/s bandwidth, which matters for workloads sensitive to memory latency and consistency, since the Intel part's memory performance is system dependent.
The AMD part also wins on raw peak throughput in two metrics. Its FP32 output of 691.2 GFLOPS exceeds the Intel part's 665.6 GFLOPS. Its pixel rate of 10.80 GPixel/s and texture rate of 21.60 GTexel/s both edge out the Intel part's 10.40 GPixel/s and 20.80 GTexel/s.
The AMD part's memory clock of 900 MHz (1800 Mbps effective) is a fixed specification, whereas the Intel part's memory clock is listed as system shared. For portable devices where the AMD part's display outputs are portable device dependent, this GPU may integrate more predictably into a mobile chassis.
The split is straightforward: the Intel UHD Graphics 750 wins on recorded benchmark scores, efficiency, and API versions. The AMD Radeon HD 7730M wins on raw hardware resources, dedicated memory, and peak throughput rates. Users prioritizing measured compute results should choose the Intel part; users prioritizing dedicated memory and a larger execution unit pool should choose the AMD part.