AMD Radeon AI PRO 9600D vs Intel UHD Graphics 770 Mobile Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark comparisons between the AMD Radeon AI PRO 9600D and the Intel UHD Graphics 770 Mobile. Both entries show zero benchmark scores, zero wins in head-to-head testing, and identical percentile placements at the 50th percentile against all GPUs. The absence of measured performance data means the analysis must rely entirely on the architectural and specification differences documented in the database.

The AMD Radeon AI PRO 9600D delivers 24.82 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, while the Intel UHD Graphics 770 Mobile delivers 819.2 GFLOPS. This represents a 30.3x difference in raw floating-point throughput. The AMD part also produces 387.8 GTexel/s texture fill rate versus 25.60 GTexel/s for Intel, a 15.1x gap. Pixel throughput shows 193.9 GPixel/s versus 12.80 GPixel/s, a 15.1x difference as well. These ratios are derived directly from the recorded specification values.

The Intel UHD Graphics 770 Mobile operates at a base clock of 300 MHz and boosts to 1600 MHz, while the AMD Radeon AI PRO 9600D runs at 1080 MHz base and 2020 MHz boost. Clock speeds alone do not explain the performance gap; the AMD part packs 3072 shading units against Intel's 256, which is a 12x difference in execution resources. The AMD GPU also carries 192 texture mapping units versus 16, and 96 ROPs versus 8.

Memory bandwidth tells a similar story. The AMD Radeon AI PRO 9600D accesses 576.0 GB/s through a 256-bit GDDR6 interface with 32 GB of memory. The Intel integrated solution shares system memory with bandwidth listed as "System Dependent" and no dedicated memory size. The database records no comparable bandwidth figure for the Intel part, so a direct numerical comparison is not possible.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has higher FP32 compute performance?

A: The AMD Radeon AI PRO 9600D records 24.82 TFLOPS of FP32 throughput, while the Intel UHD Graphics 770 Mobile records 819.2 GFLOPS. The AMD part delivers roughly 30 times the FP32 compute of the Intel integrated graphics.

Q: What are the memory configurations of these two GPUs?

A: The AMD Radeon AI PRO 9600D uses 32 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The Intel UHD Graphics 770 Mobile uses "System Shared" memory with a "System Dependent" bandwidth figure, meaning the database records no dedicated VRAM or fixed bandwidth for the Intel part.

Q: Which GPU supports more advanced DirectX features?

A: The AMD Radeon AI PRO 9600D supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), whereas the Intel UHD Graphics 770 Mobile supports DirectX 12 (12_1). Both support OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.4.

Q: What process nodes are used for each GPU?

A: The AMD Radeon AI PRO 9600D is built on TSMC's 4 nm process, while the Intel UHD Graphics 770 Mobile uses Intel's 10 nm process. The AMD chip contains 53,900 million transistors on a 357 mm² die, while the Intel part has no transistor count or die size recorded.

Q: Do both GPUs support hardware ray tracing?

A: The AMD Radeon AI PRO 9600D includes 48 ray tracing cores. The Intel UHD Graphics 770 Mobile has no ray tracing core count listed in the database, indicating no dedicated RT hardware is recorded.

Q: What are the power targets of these two GPUs?

A: The AMD Radeon AI PRO 9600D has a TDP of 150 W and requires a 450 W suggested power supply. The Intel UHD Graphics 770 Mobile has a TDP of 15 W and no power supply recommendation, as it is an integrated graphics processor.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Radeon AI PRO 9600D uses the Navi 48 chip built on RDNA 4.0 architecture, part of the Radeon Pro Navi (Navi IV Series) generation. It is fabricated on a 4 nm process at TSMC with 53,900 million transistors on a 357 mm² die, producing a transistor density of 151.0M per mm². The architecture implements 3072 shading units, 192 TMUs, 96 ROPs, and 48 dedicated ray tracing cores. The FP32 and FP16 rates are identical at 24.82 TFLOPS, indicating a 1:1 ratio for these compute paths. The GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, and connects via PCIe 5.0 x16.

The Intel UHD Graphics 770 Mobile is based on the Raptor Lake chip using Generation 12.2 architecture, from the HD Graphics-M (Raptor Lake) family. It is built on Intel's 10 nm process, with no transistor count or die size recorded. The GPU has 256 shading units, 16 TMUs, and 8 ROPs, with no ray tracing cores listed. Its FP32 throughput is 819.2 GFLOPS, while FP16 reaches 1.638 TFLOPS on a 2:1 ratio. It supports DirectX 12 (12_1), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, and connects via a Ring Bus interface.

The architectural gap is substantial. The AMD part uses a discrete GPU design with dedicated GDDR6 memory and a single-slot form factor, while the Intel part is an integrated graphics processor (IGP) that shares system memory. The AMD GPU includes hardware ray tracing cores; the Intel part records none. The AMD GPU's RDNA 4.0 architecture pairs 48 RT cores with 3072 shading units, while Intel's Generation 12.2 design relies on 256 shading units without dedicated RT hardware. The AMD part also features a 1:1 FP16 to FP32 ratio, while Intel's FP16 runs at 2:1, meaning the AMD architecture can maintain full throughput on half-precision workloads.

The display outputs differ as well. The AMD Radeon AI PRO 9600D provides a single DisplayPort 2.1a output, while the Intel UHD Graphics 770 Mobile's outputs are listed as "Portable Device Dependent," reflecting its role as an integrated solution in mobile platforms.

The Verdict

The benchmark database contains no measured performance scores for either GPU, so the verdict rests on the recorded architectural specifications. The AMD Radeon AI PRO 9600D is a discrete workstation-class GPU with 150 W TDP, 32 GB of dedicated GDDR6 memory, 576.0 GB/s bandwidth, 24.82 TFLOPS FP32 compute, and 48 ray tracing cores. The Intel UHD Graphics 770 Mobile is a 15 W integrated GPU with 256 shading units, system-shared memory, 819.2 GFLOPS FP32 compute, and no ray tracing hardware.

For workloads that demand high compute throughput, dedicated memory bandwidth, or hardware ray tracing, the AMD part is the only viable option between these two. The 30.3x FP32 advantage, 15.1x texture rate advantage, and 15.1x pixel rate advantage place it in a completely different performance class. The AMD GPU also supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, whereas Intel's integrated part stops at DirectX 12 (12_1), limiting access to the newest graphics feature sets.

For ultra-low-power mobile systems where battery life and thermal constraints dominate, the Intel UHD Graphics 770 Mobile at 15 W presents a far lighter power footprint. The AMD part requires a 450 W suggested power supply, a 16-pin power connector, and a single-slot physical footprint measuring 241 mm in length. The Intel IGP needs no power connectors and occupies no expansion slot.

The database records both parts as "Active" in production status. The AMD Radeon AI PRO 9600D lists a release date of 2025-12-10, while the Intel UHD Graphics 770 Mobile was released on 2023-01-03. The Intel part has a recorded successor, Arc Graphics-M, while the AMD part lists its predecessor as Radeon Pro Vega with no successor recorded.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Radeon AI PRO 9600D | Intel UHD Graphics 770 Mobile |

|---|---|---|

| Chip | Navi 48 | Raptor Lake |

| Architecture | RDNA 4.0 | Generation 12.2 |

| Process Node | 4 nm (TSMC) | 10 nm (Intel) |

| Transistors | 53,900 million | Not recorded |

| Die Size | 357 mm² | Not recorded |

| Base Clock | 1080 MHz | 300 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 2020 MHz | 1600 MHz |

| Memory Size | 32 GB GDDR6 | System Shared |

| Memory Bus | 256 bit | System Shared |

| Memory Bandwidth | 576.0 GB/s | System Dependent |

| Shading Units | 3072 | 256 |

| TMUs | 192 | 16 |

| ROPs | 96 | 8 |

| Ray Tracing Cores | 48 | Not recorded |

| FP32 Compute | 24.82 TFLOPS | 819.2 GFLOPS |

| FP16 Compute | 24.82 TFLOPS (1:1) | 1.638 TFLOPS (2:1) |

| Pixel Rate | 193.9 GPixel/s | 12.80 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 387.8 GTexel/s | 25.60 GTexel/s |

| TDP | 150 W | 15 W |

| Slot Width | Single-slot | IGP |

| Power Connectors | 1x 16-pin | Not recorded |

| Suggested PSU | 450 W | Not recorded |

| Bus Interface | PCIe 5.0 x16 | Ring Bus |

| Display Outputs | 1x DisplayPort 2.1a | Portable Device Dependent |

| DirectX Support | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 (12_1) |

| OpenGL Support | 4.6 | 4.6 |

| Vulkan Support | 1.4 | 1.4 |

| Release Date | 2025-12-10 | 2023-01-03 |

| Predecessor | Radeon Pro Vega | Not recorded |

| Successor | Not recorded | Arc Graphics-M |

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon AI PRO 9600D wins in every recorded compute-oriented category. It delivers 24.82 TFLOPS FP32 versus 819.2 GFLOPS, a 30.3x margin that suits heavy parallel workloads such as rendering, simulation, or GPU compute tasks. Its 576.0 GB/s dedicated memory bandwidth removes the system-memory bottleneck that limits integrated graphics. The 48 ray tracing cores provide hardware acceleration for ray-traced workloads, which the Intel part cannot offer. The 32 GB memory capacity supports large datasets without spilling to system RAM. The DirectX 12 Ultimate support enables the latest graphics feature level, while Intel's 12_1 support stops one tier short. The PCIe 5.0 x16 interface provides high-bandwidth host connectivity, and the single DisplayPort 2.1a output supports high-resolution displays.

The Intel UHD Graphics 770 Mobile wins in power efficiency and integration. Its 15 W TDP is one-tenth the 150 W TDP of the AMD part, making it suitable for thin-and-light mobile devices where cooling and battery capacity are limited. It requires no power connectors, no expansion slot, and no dedicated power supply recommendation. Its "Portable Device Dependent" display outputs reflect a design that adapts to the host platform's display panel. The Ring Bus interface integrates directly into the Raptor Lake processor, eliminating the need for a separate GPU package. Its 2023 release date makes it an established part in the mobile ecosystem, while the AMD part's 2025 release date is newer. The Intel GPU has a recorded successor in Arc Graphics-M, indicating an active upgrade path within Intel's integrated graphics lineup.