AMD Radeon AI PRO 9600D vs Intel Arc A570M Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data for the AMD Radeon AI PRO 9600D contains no benchmark scores, while the Intel Arc A570M has one recorded measurement: a Geekbench OpenCL score of 58,239. This places the Arc A570M at the 88th percentile among all GPUs in the database, a strong position for a mobile-class part. Its nearest rivals in the database are clustered tightly around it: the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT scores 58,392, which is 0.3% higher, the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM scores 58,085, which is 0.3% lower, the NVIDIA P102-100 scores 58,528, which is 0.5% higher, and the AMD Radeon PRO V710 scores 58,657, which is 0.7% higher. The Intel part is therefore effectively at parity with a group of desktop and workstation GPUs, with a spread of less than one percent across all four nearest rivals. The AMD Radeon AI PRO 9600D, by contrast, has no benchmark entries and an average score of zero, giving it a 50th percentile standing that reflects the absence of measured data rather than a performance ceiling. The head-to-head benchmark table between the two cards is empty, so no direct comparative scores can be cited. What can be stated is that the only available measured score in this pairing belongs to Intel, and that score is competitive with several established desktop parts. The AMD card's theoretical specifications suggest a much higher compute ceiling, but the database has no recorded result to confirm that in a synthetic workload.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Arc A570M wins the only measured benchmark category in the database. Its Geekbench OpenCL score of 58,239 is the sole data point available, and it stands at the 88th percentile of all GPUs. That percentile rank indicates the Arc A570M outperforms the large majority of recorded GPUs in that particular workload. Its nearest rivals, including the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT and NVIDIA P102-100, are separated by no more than 0.7%, which means the Arc A570M is essentially trading blows with those parts in OpenCL compute. The AMD Radeon AI PRO 9600D has no benchmark wins because it has no benchmark records. In terms of architectural capabilities, the AMD card has a substantially higher peak FP32 throughput at 24.82 TFLOPS compared to 5.325 TFLOPS for the Intel part, and its FP16 rate matches its FP32 rate at 24.82 TFLOPS, while the Intel card achieves 10.65 TFLOPS FP16 with a 2:1 ratio. Those figures indicate the AMD card is designed for workloads that scale with raw compute, but without a recorded benchmark, the database cannot quantify that advantage. The Intel card's 75 W TDP and IGP form factor make it a low-power integrated solution, while the AMD card's 150 W TDP and single-slot design target a different class of system. The data shows the Intel card wins in measured performance presence, while the AMD card wins in raw specification headroom.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from different manufacturers, process nodes, and design philosophies. The AMD Radeon AI PRO 9600D uses the Navi 48 chip built on RDNA 4.0 architecture, manufactured by TSMC on a 4 nm process. The Intel Arc A570M uses the DG2-256 chip built on Xe-HPG architecture, also manufactured by TSMC but on a 6 nm process. The AMD chip is substantially larger in transistor count, with 53,900 million transistors on a 357 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 151.0 million per mm². The Intel chip has 11,500 million transistors on a 269 mm² die, with a density of 42.8 million per mm². The AMD chip integrates 3072 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, 96 render output units, and 48 ray tracing cores. The Intel chip has 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, 64 render output units, and 16 ray tracing cores. Both cards support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, so API-level feature parity exists. The AMD card uses PCIe 5.0 x16, while the Intel card uses PCIe 4.0 x8. The AMD memory configuration is 32 GB of GDDR6 on a 256 bit bus with 576.0 GB/s bandwidth, while the Intel card has 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128 bit bus with 224.0 GB/s bandwidth. Memory clocks differ as well, with the AMD card at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective) and the Intel card at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective). The AMD card's pixel rate is 193.9 GPixel/s and texture rate is 387.8 GTexel/s, while the Intel card's pixel rate is 83.20 GPixel/s and texture rate is 166.4 GTexel/s. The AMD card is a discrete single-slot solution with a 1x 16-pin power connector and a suggested 450 W PSU, while the Intel card is an integrated graphics processor with no power connector and no suggested PSU listed. The AMD card has one DisplayPort 2.1a output, while the Intel card's display outputs are portable device dependent. The AMD card belongs to the Radeon Pro Navi (Navi IV Series) generation and lists the Radeon Pro Vega as its predecessor. The Intel card belongs to the Alchemist (Arc 5 Mobile) generation. The AMD card was released on 2025-12-10, while the Intel card was released on 2023-07-31. The AMD card is 241 mm long, 111 mm high, and 19 mm wide, while the Intel card has no recorded dimensions.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has a higher measured benchmark score?

A: The Intel Arc A570M has a recorded Geekbench OpenCL score of 58,239. The AMD Radeon AI PRO 9600D has no recorded benchmark scores in the database.

Q: How does the Intel Arc A570M compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Arc A570M sits at the 88th percentile of all GPUs. It trails the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT by 0.3%, the NVIDIA P102-100 by 0.5%, and the AMD Radeon PRO V710 by 0.7%, while leading the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM by 0.3%.

Q: What are the memory capacities of the two GPUs?

A: The AMD Radeon AI PRO 9600D has 32 GB of GDDR6 on a 256 bit bus with 576.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel Arc A570M has 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128 bit bus with 224.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: What process nodes are used by each GPU?

A: The AMD Radeon AI PRO 9600D is built on a 4 nm TSMC process. The Intel Arc A570M is built on a 6 nm TSMC process.

Q: What are the TDP ratings for each card?

A: The AMD Radeon AI PRO 9600D has a TDP of 150 W. The Intel Arc A570M has a TDP of 75 W.

Q: Which GPU has more ray tracing cores?

A: The AMD Radeon AI PRO 9600D has 48 ray tracing cores. The Intel Arc A570M has 16 ray tracing cores.

The Verdict

The data in the database points to a clear split between measured results and theoretical capability. The Intel Arc A570M is the only one of the two with a benchmark score, and that score places it in the 88th percentile, competitive with desktop GPUs like the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT and NVIDIA P102-100 within a 0.7% margin. For any workload measured by Geekbench OpenCL, the database confirms the Intel card delivers a solid, mid-to-high tier result. The AMD Radeon AI PRO 9600D has no recorded benchmark, so its actual performance cannot be confirmed from the database. Its specifications, however, are dramatically higher across nearly every compute metric: 24.82 TFLOPS FP32 versus 5.325 TFLOPS, 576.0 GB/s memory bandwidth versus 224.0 GB/s, 32 GB versus 8 GB of GDDR6, and 48 ray tracing cores versus 16. The AMD card also uses a newer 4 nm process, a larger transistor budget at 53,900 million versus 11,500 million, and a PCIe 5.0 x16 interface versus PCIe 4.0 x8. The Intel card is a 75 W integrated solution with no power connector, while the AMD card is a 150 W discrete single-slot card requiring a 1x 16-pin connector and a 450 W suggested PSU. The verdict from the data is straightforward: the Intel Arc A570M is the verified performer in real recorded benchmarks, while the AMD Radeon AI PRO 9600D is the specification leader whose measured performance remains unrecorded. Users choosing based on confirmed results would select the Intel card. Users choosing based on architectural headroom and memory capacity would select the AMD card, but with the caveat that the database has no evidence of its measured output.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Radeon AI PRO 9600D | Intel Arc A570M |

|---|---|---|

| Chip | Navi 48 | DG2-256 |

| Architecture | RDNA 4.0 | Xe-HPG |

| Generation | Radeon Pro Navi (Navi IV Series) | Alchemist (Arc 5 Mobile) |

| Process Node | 4 nm | 6 nm |

| Transistors | 53,900 million | 11,500 million |

| Die Size | 357 mm² | 269 mm² |

| Transistor Density | 151.0M / mm² | 42.8M / mm² |

| Base Clock | 1080 MHz | 900 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 2020 MHz | 1300 MHz |

| Memory Size | 32 GB | 8 GB |

| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |

| Memory Bus Width | 256 bit | 128 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | 576.0 GB/s | 224.0 GB/s |

| Memory Clock | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective |

| Shading Units | 3072 | 2048 |

| TMUs | 192 | 128 |

| ROPs | 96 | 64 |

| Ray Tracing Cores | 48 | 16 |

| Pixel Rate | 193.9 GPixel/s | 83.20 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 387.8 GTexel/s | 166.4 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 24.82 TFLOPS | 5.325 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 24.82 TFLOPS (1:1) | 10.65 TFLOPS (2:1) |

| TDP | 150 W | 75 W |

| Slot Width | Single-slot | IGP |

| Power Connectors | 1x 16-pin | None |

| Suggested PSU | 450 W | None |

| Bus Interface | PCIe 5.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x8 |

| Display Outputs | 1x DisplayPort 2.1a | Portable Device Dependent |

| Release Date | 2025-12-10 | 2023-07-31 |

| Dimensions | 241 mm x 111 mm x 19 mm | Not recorded |

| Geekbench OpenCL Score | None recorded | 58,239 |

| Percentile vs All GPUs | 50 | 88 |