AMD Radeon 890M vs NVIDIA Quadro P2200 Comparison

The AMD Radeon 890M and NVIDIA Quadro P2200 represent two very different approaches to graphics hardware: a modern integrated processor from 2024 built on a leading-edge node, and a dedicated workstation card from 2019 built on a mature process. The benchmark data reveals a surprisingly competitive matchup, with the 890M winning six of the nine head-to-head tests, though the Quadro P2200 takes decisive victories in specific legacy and rasterization workloads. This analysis walks through the data to identify where each GPU excels, what the numbers mean for potential use cases, and how the architectural differences explain the results.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The most striking result is in the Geekbench Vulkan test, where the AMD Radeon 890M scores 40,808 against the Quadro P2200’s 31,351, a 30.2% advantage. This is the largest margin of victory anywhere in the comparison and indicates a substantial lead in modern, low-level API performance. The 890M also wins the Geekbench OpenCL test, scoring 37,254 versus 32,344, a 15.2% advantage, showing consistent strength in compute-oriented workloads.

In the Passmark suite, the 890M takes three of the five DirectX-related tests. It wins DirectX 11 with a score of 73 against 70, a narrow 4.3% margin, and DirectX 12 with 37 against 33, a 12.1% advantage. The 890M also dominates the 2D graphics test, scoring 979 against 881, an 11.1% lead. In the GPU compute test, the 890M again comes out ahead, posting 4,157 versus 3,921, a 6% margin.

The Quadro P2200, however, is not without its own significant wins. Its most dominant performance comes in the Passmark DirectX 9 test, where it scores 167 against the 890M’s 97, a 41.9% advantage. This is the largest delta in the entire head-to-head set, showing a clear strength in legacy DirectX 9 workloads. The P2200 also wins the Passmark DirectX 10 test, scoring 45 against 33, a 26.7% lead. Finally, in the Passmark G3D test, which measures overall 3D graphics performance, the P2200 posts 9,364 against the 890M’s 8,076, a 13.8% advantage.

Looking at the broader context, the 890M’s average benchmark score of 9,210 places it at the 45th percentile of all GPUs, while the P2200’s average of 8,686 puts it at the 44th percentile. The 890M’s nearest rival is the AMD Radeon Vega 8 with an average score of 9,221, a negligible delta of -0.1%. The P2200’s closest competitor is the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 v2 at 8,743, a -0.7% difference. These percentile and rival figures confirm that both cards sit in a similar performance tier overall, despite their very different architectures and market positions.

The Verdict

The data presents a clear split: the AMD Radeon 890M is the better choice for users prioritizing modern API support, compute performance, and 2D acceleration, while the NVIDIA Quadro P2200 is the better option for those who need strong legacy DirectX 9/10 performance and higher raw 3D rasterization throughput. The 890M’s six wins out of nine tests, including all the Geekbench tests and the more recent DirectX 11 and 12 tests, suggest it is the more future-proof option. Its 30.2% lead in Vulkan and 15.2% lead in OpenCL indicate a significant advantage in applications that leverage these modern interfaces.

The Quadro P2200, however, wins the Passmark G3D test by 13.8%, which is often considered a representative measure of general 3D gaming and rendering performance. Its 41.9% lead in DirectX 9 is massive and would be critical for any application or game that relies on that legacy API. The P2200 also benefits from having 5 GB of dedicated GDDR5X memory with 200.2 GB/s of bandwidth, whereas the 890M relies on system-shared memory with bandwidth described as "System Dependent." For workloads with large, persistent datasets, the dedicated memory of the P2200 could be a decisive factor, despite the 890M’s higher compute scores.

Users looking for an integrated solution that can handle modern games and compute tasks without a dedicated card should lean toward the 890M. Its 45th percentile ranking, combined with a 6% win in GPU compute and 12.1% win in DirectX 12, makes it a capable modern IGP. Conversely, users who have legacy software requirements or who need consistent 3D performance in a desktop workstation environment should consider the P2200, which is a single-slot card with four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs and an end-of-life production status. The P2200’s 44th percentile ranking is only one point lower than the 890M, indicating that the overall performance gap is small.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs are built on fundamentally different architectures and process nodes. The AMD Radeon 890M uses the RDNA 3.5 architecture, manufactured by TSMC on a 4 nm process node. It is part of the Navi III IGP generation for Strix Point mobile processors. The chip contains 34,000 million transistors on a 233 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 145.9 million per mm². This high-density, modern node allows for significant compute resources in a low-power envelope.

The NVIDIA Quadro P2200, in contrast, uses the older Pascal architecture, also manufactured by TSMC but on a 16 nm process node. It is part of the Quadro Pascal generation, using the GP106 chip. The chip contains 4,400 million transistors on a 200 mm² die, resulting in a much lower transistor density of 22.0 million per mm². This older node and lower density mean the P2200 cannot match the 890M’s raw transistor count or compute density.

The 890M features 1,024 shading units, 64 texture mapping units, and 32 ROPs, along with 16 dedicated ray tracing cores. The P2200 has 1,280 shading units, 80 TMUs, and 40 ROPs, but no ray tracing cores. This explains the 890M’s support for DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), which includes ray tracing and mesh shaders, while the P2200 only supports DirectX 12 (12_1). The 890M’s FP32 performance is 5.939 TFLOPS, significantly higher than the P2200’s 3.822 TFLOPS. The 890M also offers FP16 performance at a 1:1 ratio with FP32, while the P2200’s FP16 is a meager 59.72 GFLOPS, a 1:64 ratio, showing a clear compute advantage for the AMD part.

The memory architecture also differs fundamentally. The 890M uses system-shared memory, with no dedicated VRAM, meaning its performance is dependent on the host system’s memory speed and capacity. The P2200 has 5 GB of dedicated GDDR5X memory on a 160-bit bus, delivering 200.2 GB/s of bandwidth. This dedicated memory provides consistent performance and isolation from system memory constraints, which is a critical advantage for professional workloads.

Specification Differences

The specification sheets reveal several key differences beyond the core compute and memory architecture. The 890M has a base clock of 400 MHz and a boost clock of 2,900 MHz, while the P2200 has a base clock of 1,000 MHz and a boost clock of 1,493 MHz. Despite the P2200’s higher base clock, the 890M’s much higher boost clock and newer architecture contribute to its higher pixel rate of 92.80 GPixel/s versus 59.72 GPixel/s, and a texture rate of 185.6 GTexel/s versus 119.4 GTexel/s.

The power profiles are drastically different. The 890M has a TDP of 15 W and is an IGP, meaning it requires no power connectors and is integrated into the processor. The P2200 has a TDP of 75 W, is a single-slot expansion card, also requires no power connectors, but has a suggested PSU of 250 W. This makes the 890M far more power-efficient on paper, though the P2200’s dedicated memory and higher base clock may compensate in some scenarios.

The bus interfaces also differ, with the 890M using PCIe 4.0 x8 and the P2200 using PCIe 3.0 x16. The newer PCIe 4.0 interface on the 890M provides higher bandwidth to the host system, which is important for an IGP that relies on system memory. The P2200’s older PCIe 3.0 interface is still sufficient for its dedicated memory architecture. Display outputs also differ, with the 890M being "Portable Device Dependent" while the P2200 offers four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs, making it a more flexible option for multi-monitor desktop setups.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has a higher overall average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Radeon 890M has a higher average benchmark score of 9,210, compared to the NVIDIA Quadro P2200’s 8,686.

Q: What is the largest performance difference in any single test?

A: The largest difference is in the Passmark DirectX 9 test, where the NVIDIA Quadro P2200 scores 167 against the AMD Radeon 890M’s 97, a 41.9% advantage for the P2200.

Q: Does the AMD Radeon 890M support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the 890M has 16 dedicated ray tracing cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), which includes ray tracing features. The NVIDIA Quadro P2200 has no ray tracing cores.

Q: How much memory does each GPU have?

A: The AMD Radeon 890M uses system-shared memory, so its memory size and type are "System Shared." The NVIDIA Quadro P2200 has 5 GB of dedicated GDDR5X memory with a 160-bit bus and 200.2 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Which GPU is more power-efficient on paper?

A: The AMD Radeon 890M has a TDP of 15 W, while the NVIDIA Quadro P2200 has a TDP of 75 W, making the 890M significantly lower in power draw.

Q: Which GPU has a higher percentile ranking among all GPUs?

A: The AMD Radeon 890M is at the 45th percentile, while the NVIDIA Quadro P2200 is at the 44th percentile, a difference of one percentage point.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon 890M is the clear winner in modern compute and API-forward workloads. Its 30.2% lead in Geekbench Vulkan and 15.2% lead in Geekbench OpenCL make it the superior choice for applications that leverage Vulkan or OpenCL for compute, such as modern game engines, video encoding, and scientific simulations. Its wins in DirectX 11 (4.3%) and DirectX 12 (12.1%) also position it well for contemporary games and software. The 11.1% lead in Passmark G2D indicates better 2D desktop acceleration, and the 6% lead in GPU compute further solidifies its compute advantage. The 890M’s low 15 W TDP and IGP form factor make it ideal for thin-and-light laptops or compact systems where space and power are at a premium.

The NVIDIA Quadro P2200, on the other hand, wins decisively in legacy and raw 3D rasterization. Its 41.9% lead in DirectX 9 and 26.7% lead in DirectX 10 are critical for older software, professional CAD applications, or legacy game libraries that have not been updated to newer API versions. Its 13.8% win in Passmark G3D suggests it has a general edge in traditional 3D rendering performance. The P2200’s 5 GB of dedicated GDDR5X memory with 200.2 GB/s bandwidth makes it the better choice for workloads that require large, persistent frame buffers or textures, such as high-resolution photo editing or 3D modeling. Its single-slot form factor, four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs, and end-of-life production status make it a viable option for a professional workstation with multiple monitors, despite its older architecture.