AMD Radeon 890M vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 GB205 Comparison

AMD
RADEON

AMD Radeon 890M

CORE STATE Strix Point
VRAM System Shared
CLOCK SPEED 2900 MHz
TDP 15 W
BUS WIDTH System Shared
ARCHITECTURE RDNA 3.5
nm
PROCESS 4 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

GeForce RTX 5060 GB205

CORE STATE GB205
VRAM 8 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2497 MHz
TDP 145 W
BUS WIDTH 128 bit
ARCHITECTURE Blackwell 2.0
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2026

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12
590
N/A
geekbench_opencl
37,254
N/A
geekbench_vulkan
40,808
N/A
passmark_directx_10
33
N/A
passmark_directx_11
73
N/A
passmark_directx_12
37
N/A
passmark_directx_9
97
N/A
passmark_g2d
979
N/A
passmark_g3d
8,076
N/A
passmark_gpu_compute
4,157
N/A

Analysis: AMD Radeon 890M vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 GB205

Where Each One Wins

The data presents an unusual comparison: the AMD Radeon 890M currently has ten recorded benchmark scores, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 GB205 has none. This asymmetry shapes the entire analysis. The 890M can be positioned against its nearest rivals, but the RTX 5060 GB205 sits in the database with an empty benchmark profile, making direct head-to-head measurements impossible.

The 890M demonstrates its strongest showing in Geekbench Vulkan, where it records 40,808 points, and Geekbench OpenCL with 37,254 points. These compute-oriented results suggest the integrated GPU handles API-accelerated workloads competently. Its Passmark G3D score of 8,076 places it in the 45th percentile among all GPUs, meaning it outperforms roughly half of the recorded graphics processors in that test. The Passmark DirectX 9 result of 97 stands as its highest legacy API score, while DirectX 11 (73) and DirectX 12 (37) trail notably, indicating a larger performance gap in more recent graphics APIs.

The RTX 5060 GB205, by contrast, has no recorded wins because no benchmark data exists for it. Its 50th percentile rating appears to be a placeholder value, and its average benchmark score is listed as zero. The database shows this card as a dual-slot discrete solution with a 145 W TDP, 8 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 128-bit bus, and 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth, but without test results, its actual performance profile remains undocumented.

The use-case split therefore falls along data availability rather than measured capability. The 890M wins in legacy compatibility and compute API performance, as evidenced by its recorded scores. The RTX 5060 GB205 wins in theoretical specifications, offering 3,840 shading units, 120 tensor cores, and 19.18 TFLOPS of FP32 throughput, but these numbers have no benchmark confirmation behind them.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from fundamentally different design philosophies. The AMD Radeon 890M uses the Strix Point chip built on RDNA 3.5 architecture, fabricated on a 4 nm process at TSMC. It packs 34,000 million transistors into a 233 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 145.9M per mm². This is an integrated graphics processor, an IGP, with no dedicated memory of its own. It shares system memory, with the bus width, memory type, and bandwidth all marked as "System Shared" or "System Dependent." The 890M's power envelope is minimal at 15 W, and it requires no power connectors, fitting into an IGP slot width.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 GB205 uses the GB205 chip on Blackwell 2.0 architecture, fabricated on a 5 nm process, also at TSMC. It contains 31,100 million transistors across a larger 263 mm² die, with a lower transistor density of 118.3M per mm². This is a discrete card with dedicated 8 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth. Its memory clock runs at 1750 MHz with 28 Gbps effective speed. The card consumes 145 W, requires a single 8-pin power connector, and a 300 W suggested PSU. It occupies a dual-slot form factor measuring 241 mm in length, 111 mm in height, and 40 mm in width.

Core counts differ substantially. The 890M has 1,024 shading units, 64 texture mapping units, 32 render output units, and 16 ray tracing cores. The RTX 5060 GB205 has 3,840 shading units, 120 TMUs, 48 ROPs, 30 RT cores, and 120 tensor cores. The clock behavior also diverges: the 890M runs at a 400 MHz base and 2,900 MHz boost, while the RTX 5060 GB205 operates at 2,280 MHz base and 2,497 MHz boost. Despite the lower boost clock, the NVIDIA part achieves higher pixel and texture rates: 119.9 GPixel/s and 299.6 GTexel/s versus 92.80 GPixel/s and 185.6 GTexel/s for the AMD part.

Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The bus interfaces differ, with the 890M using PCIe 4.0 x8 and the RTX 5060 GB205 using PCIe 5.0 x8. Display outputs also differ, with the 890M being portable device dependent and the RTX 5060 GB205 offering 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b. Release dates sit roughly two years apart: the 890M launched on 2024-07-14, while the RTX 5060 GB205 is dated 2026-05-31. The 890M's predecessor is Navi II IGP, while the RTX 5060 GB205 follows the GeForce 40 series and precedes the GeForce 60 series.

The Verdict

The recorded data supports only one verdict: the AMD Radeon 890M is a measured, benchmarked product, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 GB205 exists in the database as a specification sheet without performance validation. Anyone consulting this database for comparative purposes must recognize that no head-to-head results exist, no wins are recorded for either side, and the RTX 5060 GB205's average benchmark score is zero.

For the 890M, the nearest rivals in the database are the AMD Radeon Vega 8 with an average score of 9,221 and a delta of -0.1%, the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 at 9,273 with -0.7%, the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 at 9,294 with -0.9%, and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M at 9,302 with -1%. These deltas show the 890M trailing each rival by less than one percent, placing it in a tight cluster of older discrete and integrated solutions. Its own average benchmark score is 9,210.

The RTX 5060 GB205 has no nearest rivals listed, no benchmark scores, and no percentile data beyond a nominal 50. The database cannot confirm any performance claim for this card. Its launch MSRP is 299 USD, but that figure does not translate into measured capability. The verdict from the data is clear: the 890M is the only one of these two with empirical results, and even those results place it at roughly the level of a GeForce GTX 960 or GTX 465, not in the range of modern discrete graphics.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has better benchmark scores in the database?

A: The AMD Radeon 890M has ten recorded benchmark scores, including 40,808 in Geekbench Vulkan and 37,254 in Geekbench OpenCL. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 GB205 has no recorded benchmark scores.

Q: How does the 890M compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The 890M trails the AMD Radeon Vega 8 by 0.1%, the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 by 0.7%, the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 by 0.9%, and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M by 1%. Its average benchmark score is 9,210.

Q: What are the memory configurations of each GPU?

A: The 890M uses system shared memory with no dedicated VRAM, and bandwidth is system dependent. The RTX 5060 GB205 has 8 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 128-bit bus with 448.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: What is the transistor count and die size difference?

A: The 890M has 34,000 million transistors on a 233 mm² die with 145.9M transistors per mm². The RTX 5060 GB205 has 31,100 million transistors on a 263 mm² die with 118.3M transistors per mm².

Q: Which GPU has more shading units and ray tracing cores?

A: The RTX 5060 GB205 has 3,840 shading units and 30 ray tracing cores. The 890M has 1,024 shading units and 16 ray tracing cores.

Q: What power and cooling requirements do the two GPUs have?

A: The 890M has a 15 W TDP, is an IGP, and requires no power connectors. The RTX 5060 GB205 has a 145 W TDP, is dual-slot, requires one 8-pin power connector, and has a 300 W suggested PSU.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

No head-to-head benchmark results exist in the database for these two products. The headToHeadBenchmarks field is empty, winsA is zero, and winsB is zero. This absence of data is itself informative: the RTX 5060 GB205 has never been tested under the database's recording protocols, while the 890M has a full suite of results.

The 890M's strongest recorded performance comes in Geekbench Vulkan at 40,808 points, followed by Geekbench OpenCL at 37,254 points. Its Passmark G3D score of 8,076 and Passmark GPU Compute score of 4,157 round out the compute-oriented results. In legacy DirectX tests, it scores 97 in DirectX 9, 73 in DirectX 11, 37 in DirectX 12, and 33 in DirectX 10. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 590, and the Passmark G2D score is 979.

These numbers indicate that the 890M performs best in compute-heavy workloads and older API tests, with a noticeable drop in DirectX 12 performance relative to DirectX 9. The 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 590 is a modern DirectX 12 ray tracing test, and it sits far below the legacy scores, suggesting that the integrated GPU struggles with contemporary rendering workloads.

For the RTX 5060 GB205, the only comparable data points are its theoretical specifications: 19.18 TFLOPS FP32, 119.9 GPixel/s pixel rate, 299.6 GTexel/s texture rate, and 448.0 GB/s memory bandwidth. These figures are multiples of the 890M's capabilities, but without benchmark confirmation, they remain projections. The database records no score for the RTX 5060 GB205 in any test, so no exact comparison can be made.

Specification Differences

The two GPUs differ across nearly every specification field. The 890M is built on a 4 nm process, while the RTX 5060 GB205 uses a 5 nm process. The 890M has more transistors (34,000 million versus 31,100 million) but a smaller die (233 mm² versus 263 mm²), giving it a higher transistor density of 145.9M per mm² compared to 118.3M per mm².

Clock speeds diverge sharply. The 890M has a base clock of 400 MHz and a boost clock of 2,900 MHz. The RTX 5060 GB205 has a base clock of 2,280 MHz and a boost clock of 2,497 MHz. Memory clocks differ as well: the 890M uses system shared memory with no dedicated clock, while the RTX 5060 GB205 runs at 1750 MHz with 28 Gbps effective speed.

Memory capacity, type, bus width, and bandwidth all differ. The 890M has system shared memory of an unspecified type and width. The RTX 5060 GB205 has 8 GB of GDDR7 on a 128-bit bus with 448.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Core configurations are substantially different. The 890M has 1,024 shading units, 64 TMUs, 32 ROPs, and 16 RT cores. The RTX 5060 GB205 has 3,840 shading units, 120 TMUs, 48 ROPs, 30 RT cores, and 120 tensor cores. The 890M has no tensor cores listed.

Pixel and texture rates favor the RTX 5060 GB205: 119.9 GPixel/s versus 92.80 GPixel/s, and 299.6 GTexel/s versus 185.6 GTexel/s. FP32 and FP16 performance both stand at 19.18 TFLOPS for NVIDIA and 5.939 TFLOPS for AMD, with both maintaining a 1:1 ratio.

Power and physical specifications differ completely. The 890M has a 15 W TDP, IGP slot width, no power connectors, and no suggested PSU. The RTX 5060 GB205 has a 145 W TDP, dual-slot width, one 8-pin power connector, and a 300 W suggested PSU. The RTX 5060 GB205 measures 241 mm by 111 mm by 40 mm. The 890M has no recorded dimensions.

Bus interfaces differ: PCIe 4.0 x8 for AMD, PCIe 5.0 x8 for NVIDIA. Display outputs also differ: portable device dependent for the 890M, and 1x HDMI 2.1b plus 3x DisplayPort 2.1b for the RTX 5060 GB205. Release dates are 2024-07-14 for the 890M and 2026-05-31 for the RTX 5060 GB205. The RTX 5060 GB205 has a launch MSRP of 299 USD; the 890M has none. The 890M's predecessor is Navi II IGP, while the RTX 5060 GB205 follows the GeForce 40 series and lists the GeForce 60 as its successor.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
890M
RTX 5060 GB205
Core Specs
Shading Units
1,024
3,840 +275.0%
Shaders
1,024
3,840 +275.0%
TMUs
64
120 +87.5%
ROPs
32
48 +50.0%
Compute Units
16
—
SM Count
—
30
Clocks
Base Clock
400 MHz
2280 MHz
Boost Clock
2900 MHz
2497 MHz
Memory Clock
System Shared
1750 MHz 28 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
System Shared
8 GB
VRAM (MB)
—
8,192
Memory Type
System Shared
GDDR7
Memory Bus
System Shared
128 bit
Bandwidth
System Dependent
448.0 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
128 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
2 MB
32 MB
L0 Cache
32 KB per WGP
—
Performance
Pixel Rate
92.80 GPixel/s
119.9 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
185.6 GTexel/s
299.6 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
5.939 TFLOPS
19.18 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
371.2 GFLOPS (1:16)
299.6 GFLOPS (1:64)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
5.939 TFLOPS (1:1)
19.18 TFLOPS (1:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
16
30 +87.5%
Tensor Cores
—
120
Power
TDP
15 W
145 W
TDP (W)
15
145 +866.7%
Suggested PSU
—
300 W
Power Connectors
None
1x 8-pin
Architecture
Architecture
RDNA 3.5
Blackwell 2.0
GPU Name
Strix Point
GB205
Generation
Navi III IGP (Strix Point Mobile)
GeForce 50
Process Size
4 nm
5 nm
Transistors
34,000 million
31,100 million
Die Size
233 mm²
263 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
TSMC
Density
145.9M / mm²
118.3M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
2.1
3.0
CUDA
—
12.0
Shader Model
6.8
6.9
Physical
Slot Width
IGP
Dual-slot
Length
—
241 mm 9.5 inches
Height
—
111 mm 4.4 inches
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
1x HDMI 2.1b3x DisplayPort 2.1b
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
PCIe 5.0 x8
Other
Launch Price
—
299 USD
Production
Active
Active
Predecessor
Navi II IGP
GeForce 40
Successor
—
GeForce 60
View Radeon 890M Details View GeForce RTX 5060 GB205 Details