AMD Radeon 880M vs NVIDIA TITAN V CEO Edition Comparison

The NVIDIA TITAN V CEO Edition and AMD Radeon 880M occupy opposite ends of the GPU spectrum: one is a 2018 flagship discrete accelerator with a 250 W TDP, the other a 2024 integrated processor solution drawing 15 W. Benchmark data shows a decisive performance gap, but the 880M’s feature set and efficiency profile make it relevant for a different class of system. The TITAN V wins every head-to-head test recorded, yet the 880M counters with modern API support and a much smaller physical footprint.

Where Each One Wins

The NVIDIA TITAN V CEO Edition is the clear performance winner in all direct comparisons. In the two shared benchmark tests, it leads by 12.1% in 2D graphics and by an enormous 123.1% in 3D graphics. Its Passmark G3D score of 16,988 places it far above the 880M’s 7,615, and its average benchmark score of 9,037 versus 8,436 reflects a consistent advantage across workloads. The TITAN V also holds a higher percentile ranking (45th vs 43rd among all GPUs), though both sit near the middle of the distribution.

The AMD Radeon 880M’s wins are not in raw performance but in efficiency and integration. Its 15 W TDP is 235 W lower than the TITAN V’s, making it suitable for compact, battery-powered devices. The 880M supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), while the TITAN V is limited to DirectX 12 (12_1), giving the AMD part access to newer rendering features. The 880M also has dedicated ray tracing cores (12 of them), which the TITAN V lacks entirely. For systems where space, power, and modern API compliance matter more than peak frame rates, the 880M is the practical choice.

FAQ

Q: How much faster is the NVIDIA TITAN V CEO Edition in 3D benchmarks?

A: The TITAN V scores 16,988 in Passmark G3D versus 7,615 for the 880M, a delta of 123.1%. This is the largest margin in any shared test.

Q: Does the AMD Radeon 880M support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the 880M includes 12 dedicated ray tracing cores. The NVIDIA TITAN V CEO Edition has no RT cores listed, so it cannot perform hardware-accelerated ray tracing.

Q: Which GPU has higher memory bandwidth?

A: The TITAN V features 32 GB of HBM2 memory on a 4096-bit bus with 868.4 GB/s bandwidth. The 880M uses system shared memory, with bandwidth described as "System Dependent."

Q: What is the power consumption difference?

A: The TITAN V has a 250 W TDP, while the 880M is rated at 15 W. The 880M is an integrated graphics processor (IGP) with no power connectors, whereas the TITAN V requires a 6-pin plus an 8-pin connector and a 600 W suggested PSU.

Q: Which GPU supports newer DirectX features?

A: The AMD Radeon 880M supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), while the NVIDIA TITAN V CEO Edition supports DirectX 12 (12_1). This gives the 880M access to newer shading and feature levels.

Q: How do their average benchmark scores compare?

A: The TITAN V averages 9,037 across all tests, versus 8,436 for the 880M. The TITAN V’s nearest rival is the GTX 660 (0.2% delta), while the 880M’s nearest is the GTX 675MX (0.1% delta).

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The two GPUs share only two benchmark results in the data: Passmark G2D and Passmark G3D. In both, the NVIDIA TITAN V CEO Edition emerges victorious, but the magnitude differs sharply.

In Passmark G2D (2D graphics and desktop composition), the TITAN V scores 1,086 against the 880M’s 969. The 12.1% delta is modest and suggests that for basic 2D workloads, the integrated AMD part is not far behind. This makes sense given that 2D performance is rarely a bottleneck even for low-power graphics solutions. The 880M’s G2D score of 969 is competitive with discrete GPUs from its nearest rivals, such as the GTX 675MX (8,427 average overall) and MX330 (8,458 average).

Passmark G3D (3D rendering and gaming) tells a completely different story. The TITAN V’s score of 16,988 is more than double the 880M’s 7,615, a 123.1% advantage. This is a generational and architectural chasm: the TITAN V’s 5,120 shading units, 320 TMUs, and 128 ROPs vastly outnumber the 880M’s 768 shading units, 48 TMUs, and 16 ROPs. The TITAN V’s FP32 throughput of 14.90 TFLOPS is 3.3 times the 880M’s 4.454 TFLOPS. Even the TITAN V’s texture rate (465.6 GTexel/s) and pixel rate (186.2 GPixel/s) dwarf the 880M’s 139.2 GTexel/s and 46.40 GPixel/s.

While the 880M lacks a direct 3DMark or Geekbench score to compare, its overall average benchmark score of 8,436 places it in the same league as the TITAN V’s 9,037 average. This is misleading, however, because the TITAN V’s average is dragged down by its relatively low Passmark G2D score (1,086) and the fact that it has only two benchmark entries. The 880M’s average includes ten tests, several of which (like Geekbench OpenCL at 31,285 and Vulkan at 40,006) are compute-heavy and favor its modern architecture. In pure graphics, the TITAN V is unambiguously superior.

Specification Differences

The two GPUs differ in almost every measurable specification, reflecting their different design goals. The TITAN V uses 32 GB of HBM2 memory on a 4096-bit bus, delivering 868.4 GB/s bandwidth. The 880M uses system shared memory, with no dedicated VRAM, bus width, or fixed bandwidth. This is the most fundamental difference: one is a discrete card with its own high-speed memory pool, the other relies on the host system’s RAM.

Clock speeds also diverge sharply. The TITAN V runs at a 1200 MHz base and 1455 MHz boost, while the 880M has a 400 MHz base and a 2900 MHz boost. The AMD part’s higher boost clock partially compensates for its lower core count, but not enough to close the performance gap. Memory clocks are not comparable, as the TITAN V’s memory runs at 848 MHz (1696 Mbps effective) while the 880M’s is system dependent.

The TITAN V supports PCIe 3.0 x16, while the 880M uses PCIe 4.0 x8. The newer PCIe standard on the AMD part offers higher per-lane bandwidth, but the x8 link width limits total throughput. Display outputs differ as well: the TITAN V has 1x HDMI 2.0 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a, while the 880M’s outputs are "Portable Device Dependent." Physical dimensions are only listed for the TITAN V (267 mm length, 112 mm height, 40 mm width), as the 880M is an IGP with no standalone card.

Architecture Differences

The NVIDIA TITAN V CEO Edition is built on the GV100 chip using Volta architecture, manufactured on a 12 nm process at TSMC. It contains 21,100 million transistors on a 815 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 25.9M per mm². The chip includes 5,120 shading units, 320 TMUs, 128 ROPs, and 640 tensor cores. There are no ray tracing cores. Its FP16 performance is 29.80 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio), double its FP32 rate.

The AMD Radeon 880M uses the Strix Point chip with RDNA 3.5 architecture, built on a 4 nm process at TSMC. It packs 34,000 million transistors into a 233 mm² die, achieving a much higher density of 145.9M per mm². The 880M has 768 shading units, 48 TMUs, 16 ROPs, and 12 ray tracing cores, but no tensor cores. Its FP16 performance is identical to FP32 at 4.454 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio), indicating a different compute strategy than the TITAN V’s 2:1 FP16 boost.

The generation gap is stark: the TITAN V is from the GeForce 10 era (successor to GeForce 900, succeeded by GeForce 20), while the 880M is part of the Navi III IGP line for Strix Point Mobile (successor to Navi II IGP). The TITAN V is end-of-life, released in June 2018, whereas the 880M is active and launched in July 2024. The 880M’s RDNA 3.5 architecture brings DirectX 12 Ultimate support, which the Volta-based TITAN V cannot match. Both support OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.4, but the 880M’s ray tracing capability is a significant architectural advantage for modern workloads. The TITAN V compensates with sheer compute muscle: its 14.90 TFLOPS FP32 is more than triple the 880M’s, and its 640 tensor cores provide AI acceleration that the AMD part lacks entirely.