AMD Radeon 880M vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER Comparison

AMD
RADEON

AMD Radeon 880M

CORE STATE Strix Point
VRAM System Shared
CLOCK SPEED 2900 MHz
TDP 15 W
BUS WIDTH System Shared
ARCHITECTURE RDNA 3.5
nm
PROCESS 4 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER

CORE STATE GB205
VRAM 18 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2512 MHz
TDP 275 W
BUS WIDTH 192 bit
ARCHITECTURE Blackwell 2.0
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2026

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12
535
2,690
geekbench_opencl
31,285
N/A
geekbench_vulkan
40,006
N/A
passmark_directx_10
31
N/A
passmark_directx_11
73
N/A
passmark_directx_12
32
N/A
passmark_directx_9
97
N/A
passmark_g2d
969
N/A
passmark_g3d
7,615
N/A
passmark_gpu_compute
3,719
N/A

Analysis: AMD Radeon 880M vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded database contains one direct comparison between the AMD Radeon 880M and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER: the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test. In this test, the RTX 5070 SUPER scores 2690 points, while the Radeon 880M scores 535 points. This represents a delta of -80.1% for the AMD part, meaning the NVIDIA GPU delivers roughly five times the raw performance in this particular workload. The win count is 1 for the RTX 5070 SUPER and 0 for the Radeon 880M.

The gap is substantial. The RTX 5070 SUPER's score of 2690 places it in the 18th percentile of all GPUs in the database, with nearest rivals including the NVIDIA Quadro K1100M (2664, 1% slower), the NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (2662, 1.1% slower), the Intel Arc Pro B50 (2660, 1.1% slower), and the NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 (2645, 1.7% slower). These deltas are tight, showing the RTX 5070 SUPER sits at the top of a cluster of low-end discrete cards in this specific benchmark.

The Radeon 880M's score of 535 places it in the 43rd percentile of all GPUs, which is higher than the RTX 5070 SUPER's percentile ranking despite the much lower raw score. This occurs because the 880M has additional benchmark data across multiple tests, while the RTX 5070 SUPER only has the single Steel Nomad result. The 880M's nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX (8427, 0.1% faster), the NVIDIA GeForce MX330 (8458, 0.3% slower), the AMD Radeon HD 8870M (8462, 0.3% slower), and the AMD Radeon R9 M375X (8325, 1.3% faster). These figures reflect the 880M's average benchmark score of 8436 across ten tests, not just the Steel Nomad result.

The single head-to-head data point is unambiguous. The RTX 5070 SUPER dominates the 880M in the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test by a wide margin. However, the 880M shows a broader benchmark profile in the database, with scores across DirectX 9, 10, 11, 12, OpenCL, Vulkan, and compute workloads. The RTX 5070 SUPER's database entry currently lacks those additional test results, so any broader comparison must rely on the one shared test.

Where Each One Wins

Based on the recorded data, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER wins the only directly comparable benchmark. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 result shows a 2690 versus 535 score, a delta of -80.1% for the AMD part. This indicates the RTX 5070 SUPER is the stronger choice for any workload that resembles modern DirectX 12 gaming scenarios, particularly those using ray tracing or heavy geometry, given the test's nature.

The AMD Radeon 880M, despite losing the head-to-head, has a more complete benchmark record in the database. Its individual scores include a Geekbench OpenCL result of 31285, a Geekbench Vulkan score of 40006, a Passmark G3D score of 7615, and a Passmark GPU Compute score of 3719. These figures show the 880M can handle general compute and API-level tasks with reasonable efficiency for an integrated part. Its Passmark DirectX 9 score of 97 and DirectX 11 score of 73 suggest it performs better in older DirectX titles than in newer ones, while its DirectX 10 score of 31 and DirectX 12 score of 32 indicate weaker results in those API generations.

The RTX 5070 SUPER's single benchmark result does not provide data for older DirectX versions, OpenCL, Vulkan, or compute workloads. Therefore, the database cannot confirm where the RTX 5070 SUPER wins beyond the Steel Nomad test. The 880M's wins are implicit in its broader benchmark coverage, but they are not direct comparisons. The data shows the RTX 5070 SUPER as the clear winner in the one shared metric, while the 880M offers measurable performance across a wider range of tests, albeit at a much lower peak.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has the higher score in the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER scores 2690, while the AMD Radeon 880M scores 535. The RTX 5070 SUPER wins with a delta of -80.1% against the 880M.

Q: What is the average benchmark score for the AMD Radeon 880M?

A: The 880M has an average benchmark score of 8436 across ten recorded tests, including Geekbench OpenCL (31285), Geekbench Vulkan (40006), Passmark G3D (7615), and Passmark GPU Compute (3719).

Q: What is the average benchmark score for the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER?

A: The RTX 5070 SUPER has an average benchmark score of 2690, based solely on its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 result. The database currently lists no other benchmarks for this GPU.

Q: How does the Radeon 880M compare to its nearest rivals in average score?

A: The 880M's nearest rivals are the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX (8427, 0.1% faster), the NVIDIA GeForce MX330 (8458, 0.3% slower), the AMD Radeon HD 8870M (8462, 0.3% slower), and the AMD Radeon R9 M375X (8325, 1.3% faster).

Q: How does the RTX 5070 SUPER compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The RTX 5070 SUPER's nearest rivals are the NVIDIA Quadro K1100M (2664, 1% slower), the NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 (2662, 1.1% slower), the Intel Arc Pro B50 (2660, 1.1% slower), and the NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 (2645, 1.7% slower).

Q: What percentile does each GPU occupy in the database?

A: The AMD Radeon 880M is in the 43rd percentile of all GPUs, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER is in the 18th percentile.

Specification Differences

The AMD Radeon 880M and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER differ across nearly every specification field in the database. The 880M is an integrated graphics processor (IGP) with a 15 W TDP and no power connectors, while the RTX 5070 SUPER is a dual-slot discrete card with a 275 W TDP and a single 16-pin power connector.

Clock speeds diverge significantly. The 880M runs at a base clock of 400 MHz and a boost clock of 2900 MHz, while the RTX 5070 SUPER has a base clock of 2325 MHz and a boost clock of 2512 MHz. The 880M's memory is system shared, with bandwidth described as system dependent. The RTX 5070 SUPER uses 18 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering 672.0 GB/s of bandwidth at 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective).

The bus interface differs: the 880M uses PCIe 4.0 x8, while the RTX 5070 SUPER uses PCIe 5.0 x16. Display outputs also vary: the 880M's outputs are portable device dependent, while the RTX 5070 SUPER provides 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b. The RTX 5070 SUPER has physical dimensions of 245 mm length, 115 mm height, and 40 mm width; the 880M has no recorded dimensions.

Release dates differ as well. The 880M was released on 2024-07-14, while the RTX 5070 SUPER's release date is 2025-12-31. Both parts are listed as active in production, and neither has a successor recorded. The 880M's predecessor is listed as Navi II IGP; the RTX 5070 SUPER has no predecessor in the database.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs use different architectures, process nodes, and chip designs. The AMD Radeon 880M is built on the RDNA 3.5 architecture, using the Strix Point chip, and belongs to the Navi III IGP generation. It is fabricated on a 4 nm process at TSMC, with 34,000 million transistors on a 233 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 145.9M per mm². The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER uses the Blackwell 2.0 architecture with the GB205 chip, part of the GeForce 50-series. It is built on a 5 nm process at TSMC, with 31,100 million transistors on a 263 mm² die, resulting in a transistor density of 118.3M per mm².

Compute resources differ substantially. The 880M has 768 shading units, 48 texture mapping units (TMUs), 16 raster output units (ROPs), and 12 ray tracing cores. The RTX 5070 SUPER has 6400 shading units, 200 TMUs, 80 ROPs, 50 ray tracing cores, and 200 tensor cores. The 880M has no tensor cores listed. Pixel rates are 46.40 GPixel/s for the 880M versus 201.0 GPixel/s for the RTX 5070 SUPER. Texture rates are 139.2 GTexel/s versus 502.4 GTexel/s. Floating point performance shows 4.454 TFLOPS for the 880M in both FP32 and FP16 (1:1), while the RTX 5070 SUPER delivers 32.15 TFLOPS in both FP32 and FP16 (1:1).

Both GPUs support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The 880M's slot width is IGP, while the RTX 5070 SUPER is dual-slot. The 880M uses no power connectors, while the RTX 5070 SUPER uses a 1x 16-pin connector. The 880M's memory type is system shared, while the RTX 5070 SUPER uses GDDR7. These architectural differences explain the performance gap observed in the benchmark data.

The Verdict

The data indicates the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER is the stronger GPU in the only directly comparable benchmark. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2690 exceeds the AMD Radeon 880M's 535 by a delta of -80.1%. For anyone building a system where modern DirectX 12 performance is the primary requirement, the RTX 5070 SUPER is the clear choice based on this metric.

The AMD Radeon 880M, however, is an integrated part with a 15 W TDP, no power connectors, and system shared memory. Its average benchmark score of 8436 across ten tests, including strong OpenCL and Vulkan results, shows it is a capable solution for portable devices where power draw and space are constrained. Its 43rd percentile ranking, despite the low Steel Nomad score, reflects its broader benchmark coverage and its ability to handle a variety of workloads, including older DirectX versions and compute tasks.

The RTX 5070 SUPER's 18th percentile ranking is based on a single test, which limits its database profile. Its specifications, including 18 GB of GDDR7 memory, 6400 shading units, and 50 ray tracing cores, indicate a high-end discrete part, but the recorded data only confirms its dominance in Steel Nomad. The 880M's 768 shading units, 12 ray tracing cores, and 4.454 TFLOPS place it firmly in the integrated class.

The choice depends on the use case. The RTX 5070 SUPER suits a desktop build with a 275 W TDP budget, a dual-slot footprint, and a PCIe 5.0 x16 slot, where raw DirectX 12 performance matters most. The 880M suits a portable device with a 15 W TDP, no discrete power connector, and PCIe 4.0 x8 connectivity, where efficiency and a broad API support profile are more important. The benchmark data supports the RTX 5070 SUPER for performance, while the 880M's appeal lies in its integration and lower power envelope.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
880M
RTX 5070 SUPER
Core Specs
Shading Units
768
6,400 +733.3%
Shaders
768
6,400 +733.3%
TMUs
48
200 +316.7%
ROPs
16
80 +400.0%
Compute Units
12
Clocks
Base Clock
400 MHz
2325 MHz
Boost Clock
2900 MHz
2512 MHz
Memory Clock
System Shared
1750 MHz 28 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
System Shared
18 GB
VRAM (MB)
18,432
Memory Type
System Shared
GDDR7
Memory Bus
System Shared
192 bit
Bandwidth
System Dependent
672.0 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
128 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
2 MB
48 MB
L0 Cache
32 KB per WGP
Performance
Pixel Rate
46.40 GPixel/s
201.0 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
139.2 GTexel/s
502.4 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
4.454 TFLOPS
32.15 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
278.4 GFLOPS (1:16)
502.4 GFLOPS (1:64)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
4.454 TFLOPS (1:1)
32.15 TFLOPS (1:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
12
50 +316.7%
Tensor Cores
200
Power
TDP
15 W
275 W
TDP (W)
15
275 +1733.3%
Power Connectors
None
1x 16-pin
Architecture
Architecture
RDNA 3.5
Blackwell 2.0
GPU Name
Strix Point
GB205
Generation
Navi III IGP (Strix Point Mobile)
GeForce 50
Process Size
4 nm
5 nm
Transistors
34,000 million
31,100 million
Die Size
233 mm²
263 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
TSMC
Density
145.9M / mm²
118.3M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
2.1
3.0
Shader Model
6.8
6.8
Physical
Slot Width
IGP
Dual-slot
Length
245 mm 9.6 inches
Height
115 mm 4.5 inches
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
1x HDMI 2.1b 3x DisplayPort 2.1b
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
PCIe 5.0 x16
Other
Production
Active
Active
Predecessor
Navi II IGP
View Radeon 880M Details View GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER Details