AMD Radeon 880M vs AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT Comparison

# AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT vs AMD Radeon 880M

The AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT and AMD Radeon 880M occupy completely different corners of the graphics market. The RX 6750 XT is a discrete, dual-slot expansion card built on the RDNA 2.0 architecture, while the 880M is an integrated graphics processor (IGP) within AMD’s Strix Point mobile chips using RDNA 3.5. Despite this, their average benchmark scores are remarkably close—35,327 for the RX 6750 XT versus 35,646 for the 880M—placing both in the 79th percentile of all GPUs. However, the data reveals that these averages hide a massive divergence in how each part performs across different workloads.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Radeon 880M edges out the RX 6750 XT with an average benchmark score of 35,646, compared to 35,327 for the RX 6750 XT—a difference of 319 points, or roughly 0.9% in favor of the 880M.

Q: How do the two compare in the Geekbench OpenCL test?

A: The RX 6750 XT dominates with a score of 107,621, while the 880M scores 31,285. That gives the RX 6750 XT a 244% lead—more than triple the integrated GPU’s result.

Q: What about Vulkan performance?

A: The RX 6750 XT again wins decisively, scoring 109,310 versus 40,006 for the 880M, a 173.2% advantage. The discrete card is roughly 2.7 times faster in this API.

Q: What are the nearest rivals to each card according to the data?

A: For the RX 6750 XT, the closest competitors are the AMD Radeon RX 5600M (35,264, +0.2% faster than the RX 6750 XT), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile (35,435, -0.3%), and the 880M itself (35,646, -0.9%). The 880M’s nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon Pro Duo (35,860, -0.6%), the RTX 3080 (35,787, -0.4%), and the RX 6750 XT (35,327, +0.9%).

Q: Which GPU has more shading units?

A: The RX 6750 XT has 2,560 shading units, while the 880M has only 768. This is a 3.33:1 ratio in favor of the discrete card, explaining its massive lead in compute-heavy benchmarks.

Q: What are the power requirements for each?

A: The RX 6750 XT has a TDP of 250 W and requires a 600 W power supply, using one 6-pin and one 8-pin power connector. The 880M has a TDP of just 15 W, requires no power connectors, and has no suggested PSU rating.

The Verdict

The data paints a clear picture: the RX 6750 XT is the brute-force performer, while the 880M is a low-power integrated solution that somehow posts comparable average scores. If you are building a desktop with room for a dual-slot card and a 600 W PSU, the RX 6750 XT is the obvious choice—it wins both head-to-head benchmarks by margins of 244% and 173.2%. Its 12 GB of dedicated GDDR6 memory with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth dwarfs the 880M’s system-shared memory, and its 13.31 TFLOPS FP32 compute is nearly triple the 880M’s 4.454 TFLOPS.

However, the 880M’s average score of 35,646—slightly higher than the RX 6750 XT’s 35,327—suggests it benefits from being compared across a different set of benchmarks. The 880M is an IGP with a 15 W TDP, making it suitable for thin-and-light laptops where a discrete GPU is physically impossible. It ties the RX 6750 XT in percentile ranking (79th) despite having only 768 shading units, 48 TMUs, and 16 ROPs. For users on the move who need decent graphics without a dGPU, the 880M is the only realistic option here. For anyone with a desktop chassis and a PSU that can handle 250 W, the RX 6750 XT is the performance winner.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head comparison in the FACT PACK includes only two tests, and the RX 6750 XT wins both decisively. In Geekbench OpenCL, the RX 6750 XT scores 107,621 against 31,285 for the 880M—a 244% delta. This means the discrete card delivers more than three times the raw compute throughput in this API. The GPGPU workloads driving OpenCL scores—physics simulations, video encoding, and data-parallel tasks—heavily favor the RX 6750 XT’s 2,560 shading units and 160 TMUs.

In Geekbench Vulkan, the RX 6750 XT scores 109,310 versus 40,006 for the 880M, a 173.2% lead. Vulkan is a lower-level API that scales well with raw hardware resources, and the RX 6750 XT’s 64 ROPs and 40 RT cores give it substantial advantages in both rasterization and ray-traced workloads. The 880M’s 12 RT cores and 16 ROPs simply cannot keep pace.

The wins tally reflects this: the RX 6750 XT claims 2 wins, the 880M has 0. Yet the average benchmark scores—including tests outside this head-to-head set—show the 880M within 0.9% of the RX 6750 XT. This suggests the 880M excels in other, unlisted tests (likely including integrated-specific workloads like memory-bandwidth-sensitive tasks), but in the two tests where both were measured side-by-side, the RX 6750 XT is overwhelmingly superior.

Specification Differences

The most glaring difference is memory. The RX 6750 XT has 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, yielding 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The 880M uses system-shared memory with a system-dependent bus width and bandwidth. This means the 880M’s performance is heavily influenced by the host system’s RAM speed and capacity, while the RX 6750 XT has dedicated, consistent bandwidth.

Clock speeds also differ dramatically. The RX 6750 XT runs at a 2150 MHz base, 2495 MHz game clock, and 2600 MHz boost. The 880M has a 400 MHz base and 2900 MHz boost—a much wider range, but the low base clock indicates aggressive power-saving behavior typical of an IGP. Memory clocks are 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective) for the RX 6750 XT versus system-shared for the 880M.

Compute resources: the RX 6750 XT has 2,560 shading units, 160 TMUs, 64 ROPs, and 40 RT cores. The 880M has 768 shading units, 48 TMUs, 16 ROPs, and 12 RT cores. Pixel rate is 166.4 GPixel/s for the RX 6750 XT versus 46.40 GPixel/s for the 880M. Texture rate is 416.0 GTexel/s versus 139.2 GTexel/s. FP32 compute is 13.31 TFLOPS versus 4.454 TFLOPS.

Physical and power specs diverge completely. The RX 6750 XT is a 267 mm dual-slot card requiring 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin power connectors, with a 250 W TDP and 600 W suggested PSU. The 880M is an IGP with no slot width, no power connectors, and a 15 W TDP. The RX 6750 XT uses PCIe 4.0 x16; the 880M uses PCIe 4.0 x8. Display outputs: the RX 6750 XT has 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a; the 880M is portable-device dependent.

Architecture Differences

The RX 6750 XT uses the Navi 22 chip on RDNA 2.0 architecture, manufactured on TSMC’s 7 nm process. It has 17,200 million transistors on a 335 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 51.3M per mm². The 880M uses the Strix Point chip on RDNA 3.5 architecture, built on TSMC’s 4 nm process. It packs 34,000 million transistors on a 233 mm² die—a density of 145.9M per mm². The 880M is thus far denser, with nearly double the transistor count in a smaller area, proof of the newer 4 nm node.

The RX 6750 XT belongs to the Navi II (RX 6000) generation, while the 880M is part of the Navi III IGP (Strix Point Mobile) family. The RX 6750 XT’s predecessor is Navi, and its successor is Navi III; the 880M’s predecessor is Navi II IGP, with no successor listed. The RX 6750 XT is end-of-life as of its March 2022 release, while the 880M is active, released in July 2024.

Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. Neither has tensor cores. The RX 6750 XT’s FP16 performance is 26.62 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio), while the 880M delivers 8.909 TFLOPS FP16. The 880M’s RDNA 3.5 architecture brings architectural improvements over the older RDNA 2.0, particularly in power efficiency—evidenced by its 15 W TDP against the RX 6750 XT’s 250 W—but the raw resource disparity is too large for the 880M to overcome in head-to-head tests.

Where Each One Wins

The RX 6750 XT wins in every directly comparable benchmark. Its 244% OpenCL lead and 173.2% Vulkan lead make it the clear choice for compute-heavy applications like GPGPU processing, video rendering, and high-fidelity gaming at 1440p or 4K. Its 12 GB of dedicated GDDR6 memory at 432.0 GB/s bandwidth is essential for large textures and datasets. The 64 ROPs and 40 RT cores provide strong rasterization and ray-tracing throughput. With a 79th percentile ranking and an average score of 35,327, it sits within 0.3% of the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile and 1.3% of the RTX 3080, making it a competitive desktop option.

The 880M wins in efficiency and portability. Its 15 W TDP is 16.7 times lower than the RX 6750 XT’s 250 W. It requires no power connectors and no dedicated PSU, making it viable in laptops where power and space are constrained. Its average benchmark score of 35,646 actually exceeds the RX 6750 XT’s average, and it sits within 0.6% of the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile and 0.4% of the RTX 3080 in its own rival list. For users who need integrated graphics that can handle light gaming, media playback, and general productivity without a discrete GPU, the 880M is the only sensible choice. The RX 6750 XT cannot be installed in a thin laptop; the 880M cannot be installed in a desktop PCIe slot as a discrete card.

The data does not show a single scenario where the 880M beats the RX 6750 XT in a head-to-head test. However, its competitive average score suggests the 880M performs well in integrated-specific workloads not captured in the two shared benchmarks. If your priority is raw performance, pick the RX 6750 XT. If your priority is a low-power, space-constrained system, the 880M is the only option that fits.