AMD Radeon 860M vs Lisuan Tech LX PRO Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark comparison between the AMD Radeon 860M and the Lisuan Tech LX PRO is unusual because the database contains no overlapping test results. The Radeon 860M has two recorded benchmark scores: 22,759 in Geekbench OpenCL and 30,043 in Geekbench Vulkan. The LX PRO has no recorded benchmark scores in the database, which means direct numerical comparisons cannot be made from measured data.

The Radeon 860M achieves an average benchmark score of 26,401 across its two tests. This places it in the 72nd percentile among all GPUs in the database. Its nearest recorded rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce MX550 with an average score of 26,421 (0.1% behind the 860M), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 at 26,331 (0.3% ahead of the 860M), the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary at 26,553 (0.6% behind), and the NVIDIA RTX A4000 at 26,683 (1.1% behind). These delta values indicate that the 860M sits in a tightly contested performance band where single-digit percentage differences separate it from several established discrete GPUs.

The LX PRO has an average benchmark score of zero and a percentile ranking of 50, which reflects the absence of recorded data rather than actual performance. Without any benchmark entries, the database cannot establish a performance baseline for the LX PRO. The head-to-head benchmark table is empty, confirming that no direct test comparisons exist.

The Radeon 860M shows a notable spread between its OpenCL and Vulkan scores. The Vulkan result of 30,043 exceeds the OpenCL result of 22,759 by roughly 32%, indicating that the architecture responds differently to these two APIs. The OpenCL score sits below the average of its nearest rivals, while the Vulkan score sits above them. This suggests the 860M delivers stronger performance in Vulkan workloads relative to its competition.

Where Each One Wins

The Radeon 860M wins in any scenario where benchmark data matters, simply because it has measurable results. Its 72nd percentile ranking places it above the median GPU in the database. The recorded data shows it performs within 1.1% of the RTX A4000 and within 0.3% of the RTX 5060, which positions it as a competitive integrated graphics solution near entry-level discrete GPUs.

The LX PRO has no wins in the database because no benchmark scores exist for it. Its 50th percentile ranking is a default value tied to the missing data, not a measured performance level. The absence of results means the database cannot certify any workload where the LX PRO outperforms the 860M.

For specific use cases, the Radeon 860M's Vulkan score of 30,043 indicates strong suitability for applications that leverage Vulkan rendering. The OpenCL score of 22,759 indicates more moderate compute performance. The LX PRO, with its 24 GB of GDDR6 memory, 192-bit bus, and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth, would theoretically handle memory-intensive workloads, but the database contains no tests to confirm any such advantage.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from entirely different design lineages. The Radeon 860M uses AMD's RDNA 3.5 architecture on a 4 nm TSMC process, belonging to the Navi III IGP generation for Strix Point Mobile. The LX PRO uses an architecture labeled TrueGPU on a 6 nm TSMC process, belonging to the 7G100 generation with the 7G105 chip.

Core configurations differ substantially. The Radeon 860M has 512 shading units, 32 texture mapping units, 16 ROPs, and 8 ray tracing cores. The LX PRO has 6,144 shading units, 192 TMUs, 96 ROPs, and no listed ray tracing cores. The LX PRO's shading unit count is 12 times higher than the 860M's, and its TMU and ROP counts are 6 times higher.

Clock behavior also differs. The Radeon 860M has a base clock of 600 MHz and a boost clock of 3000 MHz. The LX PRO has no base or boost clock listed, but its memory runs at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed. The Radeon 860M uses system shared memory with system dependent bandwidth, while the LX PRO has dedicated 24 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus delivering 432.0 GB/s.

The Radeon 860M's FP32 throughput is 3.072 TFLOPS, while the LX PRO delivers 24.58 TFLOPS, an 8-fold difference. FP16 rates are 3.072 TFLOPS (1:1) for the 860M and 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1) for the LX PRO. Pixel rates are 48.00 GPixel/s versus 192.0 GPixel/s, and texture rates are 96.00 GTexel/s versus 384.0 GTexel/s.

The power envelopes are far apart. The Radeon 860M is an integrated GPU rated at 15 W with no power connectors and an IGP slot width. The LX PRO is a dual-slot discrete card rated at 225 W with a single 16-pin power connector and a suggested PSU of 550 W. The LX PRO measures 248 mm in length, 118 mm in height, and 48 mm in width, while the 860M has no listed dimensions.

Interface and output differences follow the form factor split. The Radeon 860M uses PCIe 4.0 x8 and has portable device dependent display outputs. The LX PRO uses PCIe 4.0 x16 and provides 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6, but the Radeon 860M supports Vulkan 1.4 while the LX PRO supports Vulkan 1.3.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has higher recorded benchmark scores?

A: The AMD Radeon 860M has recorded scores of 22,759 in Geekbench OpenCL and 30,043 in Geekbench Vulkan. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has no recorded benchmark scores in the database.

Q: How does the Radeon 860M compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Radeon 860M's average score of 26,401 is 0.1% behind the NVIDIA GeForce MX550, 0.3% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060, 0.6% behind the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary, and 1.1% behind the NVIDIA RTX A4000.

Q: What are the memory specifications of each GPU?

A: The Radeon 860M uses system shared memory with system dependent bandwidth. The LX PRO has 24 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth and an effective memory speed of 18 Gbps.

Q: Which GPU supports newer Vulkan API versions?

A: The Radeon 860M supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX PRO supports Vulkan 1.3. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6.

Q: What is the power requirement difference?

A: The Radeon 860M is rated at 15 W with no power connectors and no suggested PSU. The LX PRO is rated at 225 W, requires a 1x 16-pin power connector, and has a suggested PSU of 550 W.

Q: How do the shading unit counts compare?

A: The Radeon 860M has 512 shading units, 32 TMUs, and 16 ROPs. The LX PRO has 6,144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. The LX PRO also has 8 ray tracing cores listed, while the Radeon 860M has no ray tracing core count listed.

The Verdict

The data supports selecting the AMD Radeon 860M for any scenario requiring verified performance, since it has measurable benchmark results. Its 72nd percentile ranking and proximity to several discrete GPUs within 1.1% demonstrate that it competes effectively in its class. The Vulkan score of 30,043 is particularly strong and exceeds all of its nearest rivals' average scores.

The Lisuan Tech LX PRO cannot be recommended on the basis of measured performance because the database contains zero benchmark results for it. Its theoretical specifications, including 24.58 TFLOPS FP32, 24 GB GDDR6, and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth, suggest a much higher capability ceiling, but no recorded data confirms this. The 50th percentile ranking is a placeholder, not evidence of performance.

Users who need a low-power integrated solution for portable devices should consider the Radeon 860M, given its 15 W TDP and IGP form factor. Users who require a discrete, dual-slot card with dedicated memory and high compute throughput would look toward the LX PRO based on its specifications, but the database lacks any verification of its actual performance. The Radeon 860M is the only one of the two with validated results.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Radeon 860M | Lisuan Tech LX PRO |

|---|---|---|

| Architecture | RDNA 3.5 | TrueGPU |

| Process Node | 4 nm | 6 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | TSMC |

| Base Clock | 600 MHz | Not listed |

| Boost Clock | 3000 MHz | Not listed |

| Memory Size | System Shared | 24 GB |

| Memory Type | System Shared | GDDR6 |

| Memory Bus Width | System Shared | 192 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | System Dependent | 432.0 GB/s |

| Shading Units | 512 | 6,144 |

| TMUs | 32 | 192 |

| ROPs | 16 | 96 |

| RT Cores | 8 | Not listed |

| Pixel Rate | 48.00 GPixel/s | 192.0 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 96.00 GTexel/s | 384.0 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 3.072 TFLOPS | 24.58 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 3.072 TFLOPS (1:1) | 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1) |

| TDP | 15 W | 225 W |

| Slot Width | IGP | Dual-slot |

| Power Connectors | None | 1x 16-pin |

| Suggested PSU | Not listed | 550 W |

| Bus Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |

| Display Outputs | Portable Device Dependent | 4x DisplayPort 1.4a |

| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.3 |

| Length | Not listed | 248 mm |

| Height | Not listed | 118 mm |

| Width | Not listed | 48 mm |

| Release Date | 2025-02-28 | 2026-03-16 |