AMD Radeon 8065S vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The data available for the AMD Radeon 8065S is limited: the database contains no recorded benchmark scores for this part, and its average benchmark score is listed as 0. Its percentile ranking versus all GPUs sits at 50, placing it at the midpoint of the database distribution. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER, by contrast, has a full set of ten recorded benchmark results and an average benchmark score of 43223, with a percentile ranking of 83. This means the RTX 4070 SUPER sits in the upper tier of all GPUs in the database, while the Radeon 8065S has no measured performance data to compare directly.

For the RTX 4070 SUPER, the strongest result comes from Geekbench Vulkan, where it scores 205624. Its Geekbench OpenCL result is 172795, a gap of 15.9% within NVIDIA's own results. In Passmark, the G3D score is 29995, which is the primary gaming-oriented metric in that suite. The GPU compute score is 17108, indicating compute workloads are substantially below the G3D result. The DirectX 12 Passmark score is 110, while DirectX 11 scores 273 and DirectX 9 scores 344, showing a regression in newer API tests within that specific benchmark. The DirectX 10 score is 167, and the G2D score is 1184.

The RTX 4070 SUPER's nearest rivals in the database are all NVIDIA parts. The Quadro M6000 24 GB scores 43262, which is 0.1% higher than the RTX 4070 SUPER's 43223. The RTX 5050 Mobile scores 43268, also 0.1% higher. The Quadro M6000 scores 43301, 0.2% higher. The RTX 4090 Mobile scores 43667, which is 1% higher. These delta values are all negative from the perspective of the RTX 4070 SUPER, meaning it trails each rival by less than one percentage point except for the RTX 4090 Mobile, which leads by a full percent. The tight clustering of these scores indicates the RTX 4070 SUPER performs within a narrow band of these other NVIDIA products.

Because the Radeon 8065S has no benchmark entries, the head-to-head comparison is one-sided. The database records zero wins for the AMD part and zero wins for the NVIDIA part in direct head-to-head tests, as no such tests exist. The RTX 4070 SUPER's measured scores provide the only quantitative performance picture. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 4627, which is the only dedicated modern gaming benchmark in its record. This figure, combined with the Passmark G3D score of 29995, gives a clear view of its rasterization performance in the database's testing methodology.

The Verdict

The data supports selecting the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER for any workload where measured performance is required. It has a complete benchmark record, an average score of 43223, and a percentile rank of 83. The AMD Radeon 8065S has no recorded benchmarks, an average score of 0, and a percentile rank of 50. A percentile rank of 50 means the Radeon 8065S sits exactly at the median of all GPUs in the database, but without any actual test scores, this rank cannot be verified against real workloads. The RTX 4070 SUPER's rank of 83 places it clearly above the median, and its nearest rivals are all within 1% of its average score, confirming it performs at a consistent level across the database's test suite.

The RTX 4070 SUPER is also the only one of the two with a production status of end-of-life, while the Radeon 8065S is listed as active. The Radeon 8065S has a launch date of 2025-12-31, which is later than the RTX 4070 SUPER's launch date of 2024-01-16. The Radeon 8065S has no launch MSRP in the database, while the RTX 4070 SUPER has a launch MSRP of 599 USD. The RTX 4070 SUPER's successor is listed as GeForce 50, and its predecessor is GeForce 30. The Radeon 8065S's predecessor is Polaris Mobile, and it has no successor listed.

For users who rely on database scores to guide hardware selection, the RTX 4070 SUPER is the only option with demonstrated results. The Radeon 8065S may be newer and active, but its lack of measured data means no performance conclusions can be drawn from the database. The RTX 4070 SUPER's scores across OpenCL, Vulkan, and multiple DirectX versions indicate broad software compatibility. Its Passmark G3D score of 29995 shows strong rasterization, and its Geekbench Vulkan score of 205624 shows good API utilization.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Radeon 8065S uses the Gorgon Halo chip with RDNA 3.5 architecture, built on a 4 nm process at TSMC. Its die size is 308 mm². The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER uses the AD104 chip with Ada Lovelace architecture, built on a 5 nm process at TSMC. Its die size is 294 mm², and it has 35,800 million transistors with a transistor density of 121.8M per mm². The Radeon 8065S has an unknown transistor count.

The Radeon 8065S has 2560 shading units, 160 texture mapping units, and 64 render output units. It includes 40 ray tracing cores and no tensor cores. The RTX 4070 SUPER has 7168 shading units, 224 texture mapping units, and 80 render output units. It includes 56 ray tracing cores and 224 tensor cores. The NVIDIA part has significantly more shading units, TMUs, and ROPs, plus dedicated tensor cores for AI workloads, which the AMD part lacks entirely.

Clock behavior differs substantially. The Radeon 8065S has a base clock of 1295 MHz and a boost clock of 3000 MHz. The RTX 4070 SUPER has a base clock of 1980 MHz and a boost clock of 2475 MHz. The AMD part has a higher boost clock by 525 MHz, but the NVIDIA part has a higher base clock by 685 MHz. The Radeon 8065S's memory is system shared with no dedicated size, type, bus width, or bandwidth; bandwidth is listed as system dependent. The RTX 4070 SUPER has 12 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 192 bit bus with 504.2 GB/s bandwidth and a memory clock of 1313 MHz (21 Gbps effective).

Pixel and texture rates reflect the core differences. The Radeon 8065S delivers 192.0 GPixel/s and 480.0 GTexel/s. The RTX 4070 SUPER delivers 198.0 GPixel/s and 554.4 GTexel/s. The NVIDIA part leads by 3.1% in pixel rate and 15.5% in texture rate. FP32 compute is 15.36 TFLOPS for the Radeon 8065S and 35.48 TFLOPS for the RTX 4070 SUPER, a 130.9% advantage for NVIDIA. FP16 is also 1:1 for both, with the same respective figures.

Power and physical specifications differ sharply. The Radeon 8065S has a TDP of 55 W and is an IGP with no power connectors. The RTX 4070 SUPER has a TDP of 220 W, is dual-slot, and uses one 16-pin power connector with a suggested PSU of 550 W. The Radeon 8065S uses PCIe 5.0 x16, while the RTX 4070 SUPER uses PCIe 4.0 x16. Display outputs for the Radeon 8065S are portable device dependent, while the RTX 4070 SUPER has 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a. The RTX 4070 SUPER has physical dimensions of 267 mm length, 112 mm height, and 42 mm width. The Radeon 8065S has no listed dimensions.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has a higher average benchmark score in the database?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER has an average benchmark score of 43223. The AMD Radeon 8065S has an average benchmark score of 0, with no recorded benchmark entries.

Q: How does the RTX 4070 SUPER compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The RTX 4070 SUPER scores 43223. The Quadro M6000 24 GB scores 43262 (0.1% higher), the RTX 5050 Mobile scores 43268 (0.1% higher), the Quadro M6000 scores 43301 (0.2% higher), and the RTX 4090 Mobile scores 43667 (1% higher).

Q: What are the FP32 compute figures for each GPU?

A: The AMD Radeon 8065S delivers 15.36 TFLOPS FP32. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER delivers 35.48 TFLOPS FP32, which is 130.9% higher.

Q: Which GPU has more ray tracing cores?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER has 56 ray tracing cores. The AMD Radeon 8065S has 40 ray tracing cores. The RTX 4070 SUPER also has 224 tensor cores, while the Radeon 8065S has none.

Q: What is the memory configuration of each GPU?

A: The AMD Radeon 8065S uses system shared memory with no fixed size, type, bus width, or bandwidth; bandwidth is system dependent. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER has 12 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 192 bit bus with 504.2 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: What are the production statuses of the two GPUs?

A: The AMD Radeon 8065S is listed as active. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER is listed as end-of-life, with its successor being the GeForce 50 series.

Where Each One Wins

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER wins every category where the database has measured data. Its benchmark record covers Geekbench OpenCL (172795), Geekbench Vulkan (205624), Passmark DirectX 9 (344), DirectX 10 (167), DirectX 11 (273), DirectX 12 (110), G2D (1184), G3D (29995), GPU compute (17108), and 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 (4627). These scores span compute, rasterization, and modern API workloads. Its average score of 43223 and percentile rank of 83 confirm strong overall placement.

The AMD Radeon 8065S has no wins in any recorded category because it has no recorded scores. Its wins are only theoretical, based on architectural specifications. It has a higher boost clock at 3000 MHz versus 2475 MHz for the RTX 4070 SUPER. It uses a smaller 4 nm process versus 5 nm for NVIDIA. It has a lower TDP at 55 W versus 220 W, and it uses PCIe 5.0 x16 versus PCIe 4.0 x16 for the RTX 4070 SUPER. Its die size is 308 mm², slightly larger than the RTX 4070 SUPER's 294 mm².

For integrated use cases, the Radeon 8065S is an IGP with no power connectors, making it suitable for portable devices where power draw is minimal. The RTX 4070 SUPER is a dual-slot discrete card requiring a 550 W PSU and a 16-pin connector. The Radeon 8065S's memory is system shared, meaning it relies on system RAM, while the RTX 4070 SUPER has dedicated 12 GB GDDR6X. The RTX 4070 SUPER's texture rate of 554.4 GTexel/s exceeds the Radeon 8065S's 480.0 GTexel/s. Its pixel rate of 198.0 GPixel/s exceeds the Radeon 8065S's 192.0 GPixel/s.

The RTX 4070 SUPER leads in shading units (7168 versus 2560), TMUs (224 versus 160), ROPs (80 versus 64), ray tracing cores (56 versus 40), and tensor cores (224 versus none). Its FP32 compute of 35.48 TFLOPS is more than double the Radeon 8065S's 15.36 TFLOPS. The RTX 4070 SUPER also has a higher base clock at 1980 MHz versus 1295 MHz. The Radeon 8065S's only clock advantage is its boost clock of 3000 MHz.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Radeon 8065S | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |

|---|---|---|

| Architecture | RDNA 3.5 | Ada Lovelace |

| Process node | 4 nm | 5 nm |

| Die size | 308 mm² | 294 mm² |

| Transistors | Unknown | 35,800 million |

| Transistor density | Not listed | 121.8M / mm² |

| Base clock | 1295 MHz | 1980 MHz |

| Boost clock | 3000 MHz | 2475 MHz |

| Memory | System Shared | 12 GB GDDR6X |

| Memory bus | System Shared | 192 bit |

| Memory bandwidth | System Dependent | 504.2 GB/s |

| Shading units | 2560 | 7168 |

| TMUs | 160 | 224 |

| ROPs | 64 | 80 |

| Ray tracing cores | 40 | 56 |

| Tensor cores | None | 224 |

| Pixel rate | 192.0 GPixel/s | 198.0 GPixel/s |

| Texture rate | 480.0 GTexel/s | 554.4 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 15.36 TFLOPS | 35.48 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 15.36 TFLOPS (1:1) | 35.48 TFLOPS (1:1) |

| TDP | 55 W | 220 W |

| Slot width | IGP | Dual-slot |

| Power connectors | None | 1x 16-pin |

| Suggested PSU | Not listed | 550 W |

| Bus interface | PCIe 5.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |

| Display outputs | Portable Device Dependent | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |

| Dimensions | Not listed | 267 mm x 112 mm x 42 mm |

| Production status | Active | End-of-life |

| Release date | 2025-12-31 | 2024-01-16 |

| Predecessor | Polaris Mobile | GeForce 30 |

| Successor | None listed | GeForce 50 |

| Launch MSRP | None listed | 599 USD |

| Average benchmark score | 0 | 43223 |

| Percentile vs all GPUs | 50 | 83 |