AMD Radeon 8065S vs Intel Arc B370 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data for the AMD Radeon 8065S and Intel Arc B370 presents an unusual situation. The database contains a single benchmark result for the Intel Arc B370, while the AMD Radeon 8065S has no recorded benchmark scores at all. The head-to-head comparison table is empty, indicating that no direct benchmark runs have been completed for both products under identical test conditions.

For the Intel Arc B370, the only available measurement comes from 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, where it scored 1184 points. This result places the Arc B370 in the 5th percentile of all GPUs tracked in the database. The nearest rivals in the database provide context for this score. The ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 averages 1186 points, which is a 0.2% delta from the Arc B370's result. The ATI Radeon HD 5770 averages 1190 points, representing a 0.5% delta. The AMD Radeon HD 7650M sits at 1192 points, a 0.7% delta. On the other side, the AMD FirePro M2000 averages 1168 points, which is 1.4% lower than the Arc B370's score.

These deltas are remarkably tight. The Intel Arc B370's single recorded score of 1184 falls almost exactly in the middle of this cluster of legacy mobile and desktop GPUs. It trails the HD 7650M by a mere 0.7%, while leading the FirePro M2000 by 1.4%. The performance envelope here is narrow, with the spread from the fastest rival to the slowest rival covering only about 2% of relative performance.

The AMD Radeon 8065S has no benchmark entries, no average score, and no nearest rivals listed. Its percentile rank of 50 sits at the midpoint of all GPUs, but this figure is based on no recorded measurements. The database shows zero wins for either product in head-to-head testing, as no direct comparisons exist.

Without a recorded score for the Radeon 8065S, any numerical comparison between the two is impossible. The raw specifications do provide some indication of relative capability, but the absence of benchmark data means the measured performance delta cannot be quantified. The Intel Arc B370's position in the 5th percentile suggests it operates at the low end of the performance spectrum, though this is based on a single test run.

FAQ

Q: What benchmark results exist for the AMD Radeon 8065S?

A: The database contains no benchmark scores for the AMD Radeon 8065S. Its average benchmark score is recorded as 0, and no nearest rivals are listed for comparison.

Q: How did the Intel Arc B370 perform in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12?

A: The Intel Arc B370 scored 1184 points in the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test. This places it in the 5th percentile of all GPUs tracked in the database.

Q: Which GPU is closest in performance to the Intel Arc B370?

A: The ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 is the closest rival, with an average score of 1186 points, representing a 0.2% delta from the Arc B370's 1184 points.

Q: Does the AMD Radeon 8065S have any recorded wins against the Intel Arc B370?

A: No. The head-to-head benchmark table is empty, and the database records zero wins for either product.

Q: What is the average benchmark score for the Intel Arc B370?

A: The average benchmark score for the Intel Arc B370 is 1184 points, derived from its single recorded 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 result.

Q: How does the Intel Arc B370 compare to the AMD FirePro M2000?

A: The Intel Arc B370 scores 1184 points, while the AMD FirePro M2000 averages 1168 points. This gives the Arc B370 a 1.4% advantage over the FirePro M2000.

Where Each One Wins

The data permits only limited conclusions about performance advantages, as the AMD Radeon 8065S has no recorded benchmark results. The Intel Arc B370 has one confirmed score in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, where it achieved 1184 points.

For the Intel Arc B370, the recorded data shows it outperforms the AMD FirePro M2000 by 1.4%, based on the FirePro's average score of 1168 points. This represents the only positive delta in its rival group. The Arc B370 trails the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 by 0.2%, the ATI Radeon HD 5770 by 0.5%, and the AMD Radeon HD 7650M by 0.7%. These margins are small, indicating the Arc B370 operates in a tightly clustered performance band.

The AMD Radeon 8065S cannot be assigned any wins based on measured data. Its specification sheet does indicate higher theoretical throughput, with FP32 compute rated at 15.36 TFLOPS compared to the Arc B370's 6.144 TFLOPS, but no benchmark confirms this translates into real-world advantages.

The specification differences suggest the Radeon 8065S would likely dominate in compute-heavy workloads. Its pixel rate of 192.0 GPixel/s is four times the Arc B370's 48.00 GPixel/s. The texture rate of 480.0 GTexel/s similarly dwarfs the Arc B370's 96.00 GTexel/s. These figures point to substantially higher fill-rate capabilities, though no measured data validates this expectation.

For memory-bound workloads, both products use system shared memory with system dependent bandwidth, so no comparative conclusion can be drawn from the database.

Specification Differences

The two GPUs differ across nearly every recorded specification field. The AMD Radeon 8065S uses a 4 nm process node fabricated by TSMC, while the Intel Arc B370 uses a 3 nm node from Intel's own foundry. Die size is listed as 308 mm² for the Radeon 8065S, while the Arc B370's die size is unknown.

Clock speeds show a significant divergence. The Radeon 8065S has a base clock of 1295 MHz and a boost clock of 3000 MHz. The Arc B370 operates at a 300 MHz base clock and a 2400 MHz boost clock. The Radeon's boost clock is 600 MHz higher, and its base clock is nearly four times the Arc's.

Compute resources differ substantially. The Radeon 8065S contains 2560 shading units, 160 texture mapping units, 64 raster output units, and 40 ray tracing cores. The Arc B370 has 1280 shading units, 40 TMUs, 20 ROPs, and 10 RT cores. In every category, the Radeon 8065S has exactly double the resources of the Arc B370, except for ROPs where the ratio is 64 to 20.

Rates and throughput figures amplify these differences. The Radeon 8065S delivers 192.0 GPixel/s pixel rate and 480.0 GTexel/s texture rate. The Arc B370 delivers 48.00 GPixel/s and 96.00 GTexel/s respectively. FP32 compute is rated at 15.36 TFLOPS for the Radeon and 6.144 TFLOPS for the Arc. FP16 performance shows a different ratio: the Radeon achieves 15.36 TFLOPS with a 1:1 ratio to FP32, while the Arc achieves 12.29 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio.

Power consumption differs by more than a factor of two. The Radeon 8065S has a TDP of 55 W, while the Arc B370 is rated at 25 W. Both are integrated graphics products with no power connectors and no suggested PSU listed.

The bus interface also differs. The Radeon 8065S uses PCIe 5.0 x16, while the Arc B370 is listed as IGP. Both use system shared memory with system dependent bandwidth.

Release dates place the Radeon 8065S in the market first, with a release date of December 31, 2025. The Arc B370 follows with a release date of January 26, 2026. Both are listed as Active production status.

Architecture Differences

The underlying architectures reflect different design philosophies from each manufacturer. AMD's Radeon 8065S is built on the RDNA 3.5 architecture, using the Gorgon Halo chip. Intel's Arc B370 uses the Xe3-LPG architecture with the Panther Lake chip.

The Radeon 8065S belongs to the Navi Mobile generation under the RX 8000M series. The Arc B370 belongs to the Arc Graphics-M generation under the Panther Lake umbrella. Each product represents its respective company's mobile integrated graphics approach.

Shading unit counts directly reflect the architectural scaling. The Radeon 8065S packs 2560 shading units into its 308 mm² die, while the Arc B370 manages 1280 shading units on an unknown die size. The Radeon's 160 TMUs and 64 ROPs versus the Arc's 40 TMUs and 20 ROPs indicate a wider memory pipeline and higher fill-rate design.

Ray tracing hardware scales similarly. The Radeon 8065S includes 40 ray tracing cores, quadruple the Arc B370's 10. This suggests substantially higher ray tracing throughput potential, though no benchmark data confirms this.

FP16 processing differs in ratio. The Radeon 8065S executes FP16 at a 1:1 ratio with FP32, meaning it treats both precision levels with equal throughput. The Arc B370 uses a 2:1 ratio, achieving 12.29 TFLOPS FP16 against 6.144 TFLOPS FP32. This architectural choice indicates Intel's design favors FP16 workloads such as AI inference, while AMD's approach maintains symmetric compute throughput.

Process technology differs by manufacturer. TSMC's 4 nm node is used for the Radeon 8065S, while Intel's 3 nm node is used for the Arc B370. The Radeon 8065S is fabricated at 4 nm, and the Arc B370 at 3 nm.

Both products support DirectX 12 Ultimate with feature level 12_2, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The API feature sets are identical, ensuring compatibility across the same software stacks.

The predecessor field shows the Radeon 8065S succeeds Polaris Mobile, while the Arc B370 has no listed predecessor. The Radeon 8065S's integrated design with PCIe 5.0 x16 interface differs from the Arc B370's IGP bus interface, reflecting different integration strategies within their respective platforms.