AMD Radeon 8065S vs AMD Radeon PRO W7700 Comparison
AMD Radeon 8065S
Radeon PRO W7700
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: AMD Radeon 8065S vs AMD Radeon PRO W7700
The Verdict
The AMD Radeon 8065S and AMD Radeon PRO W7700 serve entirely different purposes, and the data supports a clear split. The Radeon PRO W7700 is the performance leader by a wide margin, delivering 31.95 TFLOPS FP32 versus 15.36 TFLOPS for the 8065S, more than double the compute throughput. It also carries 16 GB of dedicated GDDR6 memory with 576.0 GB/s bandwidth, while the 8065S relies on System Shared memory with bandwidth described as System Dependent. For anyone needing sustained professional rendering, simulation, or compute workloads, the PRO W7700 is the only choice from this comparison.
The Radeon 8065S, however, is an integrated graphics processor (IGP) with a 55 W TDP, fitting into a portable device with no power connectors and no slot width. The PRO W7700 is a dual-slot add-in card requiring a 450 W suggested PSU and a single 8-pin connector. The 8065S targets thin-and-light systems where the GPU shares system memory and the entire platform stays within a mobile power envelope. The PRO W7700 targets workstations where performance and dedicated memory matter more than size or power draw.
The PRO W7700 holds a 95th percentile ranking among all GPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 118,976. The 8065S has no recorded benchmark scores and sits at the 50th percentile, indicating it is an unproven entity in the database. The verdict is straightforward: the PRO W7700 for professional performance, the 8065S for integrated mobile graphics.
Architecture Differences
The two GPUs come from different RDNA generations. The Radeon 8065S uses RDNA 3.5 architecture on TSMC's 4 nm process, built on the Gorgon Halo chip within the Navi Mobile (RX 8000M) generation. The Radeon PRO W7700 uses RDNA 3.0 architecture on TSMC's 5 nm process, built on the Navi 32 chip with the codename Wheat Nas, part of the Radeon Pro Navi (Navi III Series) generation.
The process node difference is significant: 4 nm for the 8065S versus 5 nm for the PRO W7700. The PRO W7700 has a larger die at 346 mm² compared to 308 mm² for the 8065S, and it carries 28,100 million transistors with a density of 81.2M per mm². The 8065S transistor count is listed as unknown in the database, so no direct comparison is possible on that metric.
The PRO W7700 deploys more execution resources across the board. It has 3,072 shading units versus 2,560 for the 8065S, 192 texture mapping units versus 160, 96 render output units versus 64, and 48 ray tracing cores versus 40. Neither card lists tensor cores.
The clock behavior differs sharply. The 8065S has a base clock of 1295 MHz and a boost clock of 3000 MHz, which is a larger clock range. The PRO W7700 has a base clock of 1900 MHz and a boost of 2600 MHz, a smaller range but a much higher floor. The 8065S's memory clock is listed as System Shared, while the PRO W7700 runs its GDDR6 at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective.
The memory architecture is the fundamental split. The 8065S uses System Shared memory for size, type, and bus width, with System Dependent bandwidth. The PRO W7700 has 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus with 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This dedicated memory arrangement gives the PRO W7700 predictable performance in memory-bound workloads, whereas the 8065S depends entirely on the host system's memory configuration.
The bus interface also differs: the 8065S uses PCIe 5.0 x16, while the PRO W7700 uses PCIe 4.0 x16. The 8065S's display outputs are Portable Device Dependent, while the PRO W7700 offers 4x DisplayPort 2.1. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
The database records no direct head-to-head benchmark comparisons between the Radeon 8065S and the Radeon PRO W7700. The headToHeadBenchmarks field is empty, and the wins counters show zero for both sides. However, the PRO W7700 has its own recorded benchmark results, and the 8065S has none.
The PRO W7700 scores 108,245 in Geekbench OpenCL and 129,706 in Geekbench Vulkan. Its average benchmark score across all tests is 118,976. The 8065S lists no benchmark scores at all, so no direct numerical comparison can be made from the recorded data.
The PRO W7700's nearest rivals provide context for its performance tier. The NVIDIA GB10 averages 117,393, which puts the PRO W7700 1.3 percent ahead. The NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation averages 117,088, with the PRO W7700 ahead by 1.6 percent. The NVIDIA Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB averages 114,395, a 4 percent gap. The NVIDIA RTX A5500 Mobile averages 113,944, with the PRO W7700 leading by 4.4 percent.
These deltas show the PRO W7700 sits at the top of a competitive cluster. It edges out all four nearest rivals, though the margins are modest, ranging from 1.3 to 4.4 percent. This places the PRO W7700 in the upper echelon of workstation-class GPUs in the database.
The 8065S has no such rival data. Its percentile rank of 50 suggests it falls in the middle of the database distribution, but without benchmark scores, this ranking cannot be verified against specific competitors. The PRO W7700's 95th percentile rank, by contrast, is backed by concrete scores.
The compute throughput difference is stark. The PRO W7700 delivers 31.95 TFLOPS FP32, more than double the 8065S's 15.36 TFLOPS. In FP16, the PRO W7700 reaches 63.90 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio, while the 8065S manages 15.36 TFLOPS with a 1:1 ratio, meaning the PRO W7700 has over four times the FP16 throughput. The texture rate tells a similar story: 499.2 GTexel/s for the PRO W7700 versus 480.0 GTexel/s for the 8065S, a narrower but still meaningful gap. The pixel rate is 249.6 GPixel/s for the PRO W7700 versus 192.0 GPixel/s for the 8065S.
FAQ
Q: Which GPU has higher FP32 compute performance?
A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7700 delivers 31.95 TFLOPS FP32, while the AMD Radeon 8065S delivers 15.36 TFLOPS FP32. The PRO W7700 has more than double the single-precision throughput.
Q: How does memory differ between the two?
A: The Radeon PRO W7700 has 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus with 576.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Radeon 8065S uses System Shared memory with System Dependent bandwidth, meaning it relies on the host system's memory rather than dedicated VRAM.
Q: What is the power draw difference?
A: The Radeon 8065S has a 55 W TDP and requires no power connectors, fitting as an integrated GPU. The Radeon PRO W7700 has a 190 W TDP, uses a single 8-pin power connector, and has a suggested PSU of 450 W.
Q: Which card has better benchmark scores?
A: The Radeon PRO W7700 scores 108,245 in Geekbench OpenCL and 129,706 in Geekbench Vulkan, with an average score of 118,976. The Radeon 8065S has no recorded benchmark scores in the database.
Q: How do the architectures differ?
A: The Radeon 8065S uses RDNA 3.5 on a 4 nm process with the Gorgon Halo chip. The Radeon PRO W7700 uses RDNA 3.0 on a 5 nm process with the Navi 32 chip.
Q: What are the physical form factor differences?
A: The Radeon 8065S is an IGP with no slot width, designed for portable devices. The Radeon PRO W7700 is a dual-slot card measuring 241 mm in length and 111 mm in height, with 4x DisplayPort 2.1 outputs.
Where Each One Wins
The Radeon PRO W7700 wins in every measured performance category. Its FP32 throughput of 31.95 TFLOPS versus 15.36 TFLOPS makes it the clear choice for compute-heavy rendering, simulation, and AI inference workloads. The FP16 advantage is even larger: 63.90 TFLOPS versus 15.36 TFLOPS, a four-fold difference that matters for machine learning and certain scientific workloads. The dedicated 16 GB GDDR6 memory with 576.0 GB/s bandwidth ensures memory-intensive tasks run without the unpredictability of shared system memory.
The PRO W7700 also wins on raw throughput metrics. Its 499.2 GTexel/s texture rate and 249.6 GPixel/s pixel rate exceed the 8065S's 480.0 GTexel/s and 192.0 GPixel/s. The higher base clock of 1900 MHz versus 1295 MHz gives the PRO W7700 more consistent sustained performance. Its 96 ROPs and 48 RT cores outnumber the 8065S's 64 ROPs and 40 RT cores.
The 8065S wins on integration and efficiency. Its 55 W TDP versus 190 W means it can operate in systems where a discrete card would be impossible. The 4 nm process node gives it a manufacturing advantage, and the 3000 MHz boost clock is higher than the PRO W7700's 2600 MHz. The PCIe 5.0 x16 interface is newer than the PRO W7700's PCIe 4.0 x16. For portable devices where the GPU must share the thermal and power budget of the entire system, the 8065S is the only viable option between these two.
The 8065S also wins on physical footprint, requiring no slot width and no power connectors, making it suitable for thin laptops and all-in-one systems. Its display outputs are Portable Device Dependent, meaning the manufacturer can integrate them as needed. The PRO W7700, by contrast, is a dual-slot card with fixed DisplayPort 2.1 outputs, suited for desktop workstations.
Specification Differences
The two GPUs differ across nearly every specification field. The process node is 4 nm for the 8065S versus 5 nm for the PRO W7700. The die size is 308 mm² for the 8065S versus 346 mm² for the PRO W7700, with the PRO W7700 carrying 28,100 million transistors at a density of 81.2M per mm², while the 8065S transistor count is unknown.
Base clocks are 1295 MHz for the 8065S versus 1900 MHz for the PRO W7700. Boost clocks are 3000 MHz for the 8065S versus 2600 MHz for the PRO W7700. Memory clock is System Shared for the 8065S versus 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective for the PRO W7700.
Memory size is System Shared for the 8065S versus 16 GB for the PRO W7700. Memory type is System Shared versus GDDR6. Bus width is System Shared versus 256 bit. Bandwidth is System Dependent versus 576.0 GB/s.
The 8065S has 2,560 shading units, 160 TMUs, 64 ROPs, and 40 RT cores. The PRO W7700 has 3,072 shading units, 192 TMUs, 96 ROPs, and 48 RT cores. Pixel rate is 192.0 GPixel/s for the 8065S versus 249.6 GPixel/s for the PRO W7700. Texture rate is 480.0 GTexel/s versus 499.2 GTexel/s. FP32 is 15.36 TFLOPS versus 31.95 TFLOPS. FP16 is 15.36 TFLOPS (1:1) versus 63.90 TFLOPS (2:1).
TDP is 55 W for the 8065S versus 190 W for the PRO W7700. Slot width is IGP versus Dual-slot. Power connectors are None versus 1x 8-pin. The suggested PSU for the PRO W7700 is 450 W, while the 8065S has none listed. Bus interface is PCIe 5.0 x16 versus PCIe 4.0 x16. Display outputs are Portable Device Dependent for the 8065S versus 4x DisplayPort 2.1 for the PRO W7700.
The PRO W7700 measures 241 mm in length and 111 mm in height, while the 8065S dimensions are not listed. The PRO W7700 has a launch MSRP of 999 USD, a release date in late 2023, and a predecessor of Radeon Pro Vega. The 8065S has a release date at the end of 2025, a predecessor of Polaris Mobile, and no launch MSRP listed. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.