AMD Radeon 8040S vs Lisuan Tech LX PRO Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The AMD Radeon 8040S and the Lisuan Tech LX PRO occupy very different positions in the database, and their head-to-head comparison is defined more by what the data records than by direct benchmark duels. The Radeon 8040S has a complete set of PassMark scores across seven tests, while the LX PRO has no recorded benchmark entries, leaving its average score at zero and its percentile at 50 versus the 8040S’s 17th percentile among all GPUs.

For the AMD part, the strongest recorded result is the PassMark G3D score of 10578, which drives its average benchmark score to 2440. The G2D score of 1052 is the second-largest contributor, indicating solid 2D performance for an integrated part. The compute score sits at 5138, while legacy DirectX tests show lower figures: DirectX 9 scores 134, DirectX 11 scores 80, DirectX 10 scores 48, and DirectX 12 scores 47. These numbers suggest that the Radeon 8040S delivers its best results in modern workloads and falls off sharply in older API tests.

The Lisuan Tech LX PRO lacks any benchmark scores in the database. Its average benchmark score is recorded as 0, and there are no nearest rivals listed for it. The data cannot confirm any performance wins for the LX PRO because no measurements exist. The Radeon 8040S, by contrast, is surrounded by close competitors: the NVIDIA GeForce 710M averages 2433, which is 0.3% behind the 8040S; the Intel HD Graphics 610 averages 2425, 0.6% behind; the NVIDIA GeForce GT 710M averages 2422, 0.7% behind; and the AMD Radeon RX 7400 averages 2467, which is 1.1% ahead of the 8040S. These narrow margins place the 8040S in a tightly contested field of low-end and integrated GPUs.

The benchmark data shows that the Radeon 8040S is competitive with its nearest rivals, sitting within 1.1% of all four. The RX 7400 is the only one that edges ahead, and only by a small margin. The 8040S’s 2440 average score is just above the 710M, the HD 610, and the GT 710M, making it a marginal leader in that group. For the LX PRO, the absence of recorded scores means no direct comparison is possible from the database, and any head-to-head analysis must rely on the architectural and memory specifications listed for each part.

The Verdict

The recorded data points to a clear split between these two products. The AMD Radeon 8040S is a 55 W integrated graphics processor (IGP) with a 17th percentile rank among all GPUs and an average benchmark score of 2440. It is designed for portable devices, uses system-shared memory, and fits into a slot width described as “IGP.” Its performance class, based on nearest rivals, is entry-level: it trades tiny margins with mobile discrete GPUs from several generations ago and with an integrated Intel solution.

The Lisuan Tech LX PRO is a 225 W dual-slot discrete card with a 50th percentile rank and no recorded benchmark scores. Its specifications are far more substantial on paper: 24 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth, 6144 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 96 render output units. The FP32 throughput is 24.58 TFLOPS, and the FP16 throughput is 49.15 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio. The LX PRO uses a 6 nm TSMC process and a chip labeled “7G105” under the “TrueGPU” architecture, with a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface and four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs.

Because the LX PRO has no benchmark entries, the database cannot verify whether its higher specifications translate into actual performance wins. The verdict from the data is therefore conditional: the Radeon 8040S is the only one of the two with measurable performance, and it sits at the low end of the GPU spectrum. The LX PRO, on paper, belongs to a much higher performance tier, but the absence of any recorded scores means its position is unverified. Users who rely on measured data would find the 8040S fully characterized, while the LX PRO remains an unknown quantity in terms of real-world results.

Where Each One Wins

The Radeon 8040S wins in the only category where the database has direct evidence: recorded benchmark scores. Its PassMark G3D score of 10578 and G2D score of 1052 show that it can handle 2D and general 3D workloads at an entry-level pace. Its average score of 2440 places it above the GeForce 710M, the HD 610, and the GT 710M by margins of 0.3%, 0.6%, and 0.7%, respectively. It also wins on power efficiency, with a 55 W TDP, no power connectors, and a slot width of “IGP,” meaning it requires no external power and fits directly into a portable device’s motherboard. Its release date of January 5, 2025, makes it a recent integrated solution, and it uses the RDNA 3.5 architecture on a 4 nm TSMC node.

The Lisuan Tech LX PRO wins on raw specification comparisons. Its 24 GB GDDR6 memory dwarfs the 8040S’s system-shared memory, and its 432.0 GB/s bandwidth is a fixed figure versus the 8040S’s “System Dependent” bandwidth. The LX PRO’s 6144 shading units are six times the 8040S’s 1024, its 192 TMUs triple the 8040S’s 64, and its 96 ROPs triple the 8040S’s 32. The pixel rate of 192.0 GPixel/s is more than double the 8040S’s 89.60 GPixel/s, and the texture rate of 384.0 GTexel/s is more than double the 8040S’s 179.2 GTexel/s. FP32 throughput is 24.58 TFLOPS versus 5.734 TFLOPS, and FP16 throughput is 49.15 TFLOPS versus 5.734 TFLOPS. The LX PRO also has dedicated 24 GB of GDDR6, while the 8040S shares system memory. The LX PRO’s 225 W TDP and 550 W suggested PSU indicate a desktop-oriented card with a dual-slot cooler and a 1x 16-pin power connector.

Use-case splits follow these numbers. The Radeon 8040S suits portable devices where low power and integrated packaging matter, and where the workload is light 2D or moderate 3D. The LX PRO targets desktop builds that need high memory capacity and high throughput, provided the user accepts its 225 W TDP and dual-slot footprint. The data does not show any measured performance advantage for the LX PRO, so its wins are entirely specification-based.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Radeon 8040S has an average benchmark score of 2440. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has an average benchmark score of 0, as no benchmark entries are recorded for it.

Q: How does the Radeon 8040S compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Radeon 8040S averages 2440, which is 0.3% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce 710M (2433), 0.6% ahead of the Intel HD Graphics 610 (2425), and 0.7% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce GT 710M (2422). The AMD Radeon RX 7400 (2467) is 1.1% ahead of the 8040S.

Q: What memory configurations do the two GPUs use?

A: The Radeon 8040S uses system-shared memory with system-dependent bandwidth. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO uses 24 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth and a memory clock of 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective).

Q: Which GPU has more shading units?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has 6144 shading units. The AMD Radeon 8040S has 1024 shading units.

Q: What are the TDPs of these GPUs?

A: The AMD Radeon 8040S has a TDP of 55 W. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has a TDP of 225 W and a suggested PSU of 550 W.

Q: What process nodes are used?

A: The AMD Radeon 8040S uses a 4 nm process at TSMC. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO uses a 6 nm process at TSMC.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Radeon 8040S is built on the RDNA 3.5 architecture and uses the Strix Halo chip, belonging to the Navi Mobile (RX 8000M) generation. It has a die size of 308 mm², a base clock of 1295 MHz, and a boost clock of 2800 MHz. Its 1024 shading units, 64 TMUs, and 32 ROPs are paired with 16 ray tracing cores. The FP32 throughput is 5.734 TFLOPS, and FP16 throughput matches at 5.734 TFLOPS with a 1:1 ratio. The memory subsystem is entirely system-shared, with no dedicated VRAM, and the bus interface is PCIe 5.0 x16. The 8040S supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. It is an integrated part with no power connectors and a slot width of “IGP.” Its production status is Active, and its predecessor is listed as Polaris Mobile.

The Lisuan Tech LX PRO uses the “TrueGPU” architecture with the 7G105 chip, part of the 7G100 generation. It is manufactured on a 6 nm TSMC process, though die size and transistor count are unknown. The card has 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs, with no ray tracing cores listed. FP32 throughput is 24.58 TFLOPS, and FP16 throughput is 49.15 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio. The memory is 24 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, providing 432.0 GB/s bandwidth. The LX PRO uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface and has four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs. Its dimensions are 248 mm in length, 118 mm in height, and 48 mm in width. It is a dual-slot card with a 1x 16-pin power connector and a 225 W TDP. The supported APIs include DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.3. The release date is March 16, 2026.

Key differences in architecture include the process node (4 nm versus 6 nm), the memory architecture (system-shared versus 24 GB GDDR6), the interface (PCIe 5.0 x16 versus PCIe 4.0 x16), and the presence of ray tracing cores on the AMD part (16) versus none listed on the LX PRO. The LX PRO has a much larger compute resource count across shading units, TMUs, and ROPs, and it supports a higher FP16 throughput via its 2:1 ratio, while the 8040S has a 1:1 FP16 ratio. The AMD part is an IGP with no power connectors, while the LX PRO is a dual-slot discrete card with a 16-pin connector and a 550 W suggested PSU. The LX PRO’s display outputs are fixed at four DisplayPort 1.4a ports, whereas the 8040S’s outputs are listed as “Portable Device Dependent.” Both are Active in production status, and neither has a successor listed in the database.