AMD Radeon 8040S vs Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile Comparison

# AMD Radeon 8040S vs Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile

The AMD Radeon 8040S and Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile occupy different segments of the mobile graphics landscape. The Radeon 8040S is a large, high-throughput integrated GPU built on RDNA 3.5, while the Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile is a compact, power-efficient design using Intel's Xe3-LPG architecture. Their recorded specifications and available benchmark data reveal two distinct design philosophies aimed at different workloads.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon 8040S wins decisively in raw compute throughput and rendering capacity. Its recorded PassMark G3D score of 10,578 places it in the 17th percentile of all GPUs, which indicates it sits above the average mobile integrated solution. The compute score of 5,138 further confirms its capability in general-purpose GPU tasks. The Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile has an empty benchmark array in the database, meaning no recorded scores exist for comparison. Its percentile rank of 50th is listed, but without actual test results, the data cannot confirm performance in any specific workload.

The Radeon 8040S also wins on architectural resource counts. It carries 1,024 shading units, 64 texture mapping units, 32 render output units, and 16 ray tracing cores. The Intel part has 128 shading units, 8 TMUs, 4 ROPs, and 1 RT core. These numbers indicate the AMD solution is designed for heavier graphical loads, including ray tracing and high-resolution rendering. The Intel part, with its minimal execution resources, appears oriented toward basic display output and light media tasks, though the database lacks direct benchmark proof.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from different foundries and process nodes. AMD uses TSMC's 4 nm process for its Strix Halo chip, while Intel fabricates the Wildcat Lake chip on its own 3 nm node. The AMD die measures 308 mm², a substantial area that accommodates 1,024 shading units and 64 TMUs. Intel's die size is listed as unknown, but its 128 shading units and 8 TMUs suggest a much smaller implementation.

Clock behavior differs significantly. The Radeon 8040S has a base clock of 1295 MHz and a boost clock of 2800 MHz. The Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile runs at a 300 MHz base and 2300 MHz boost. Despite the lower base clock, the Intel part's boost reaches 2300 MHz, but its execution resource count is far smaller. The Radeon's pixel rate of 89.60 GPixel/s and texture rate of 179.2 GTexel/s dwarf the Intel part's 9.200 GPixel/s and 18.40 GTexel/s.

Float performance also diverges. The Radeon 8040S delivers 5.734 TFLOPS FP32 and the same 5.734 TFLOPS FP16 in a 1:1 ratio. The Intel part provides 588.8 GFLOPS FP32 and 1,177.6 GFLOPS FP16 in a 2:1 ratio. This indicates the Intel architecture favors half-precision workloads when they can be used, while the AMD part offers balanced throughput across both formats. The Radeon's power envelope is 55 W, more than double the Intel part's 25 W, which reflects the performance differential. The Radeon uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 bus interface, while the Intel part uses an IGP bus interface.

Both share system memory, with bandwidth listed as system dependent. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The Radeon 8040S launched on January 5, 2025, while the Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile has a launch date of April 15, 2026. The Radeon's predecessor is Polaris Mobile, and Intel's predecessor is HD Graphics-M.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no head-to-head benchmark entries for this pair. The wins counter shows 0 for both sides. The Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile has no recorded benchmark scores at all, which prevents direct numerical comparison. Without measured results, the only available quantitative comparison comes from the recorded specification differences and the Radeon's standalone benchmark scores.

The Radeon 8040S achieves a PassMark G3D score of 10,578, a PassMark G2D score of 1,052, and a PassMark GPU compute score of 5,138. Its legacy DirectX scores are 134 for DirectX 9, 80 for DirectX 11, 48 for DirectX 10, and 47 for DirectX 12. These numbers show the architecture is strongest in DirectX 9 workloads relative to its own scaling, while DirectX 12 performance is lower in this particular test suite.

The Radeon's average benchmark score of 2,440 places it near several rivals. The NVIDIA GeForce 710M scores 2,433, a delta of 0.3 percent, meaning the Radeon is essentially tied with that older discrete part. The Intel HD Graphics 610 scores 2,425, a delta of 0.6 percent. The NVIDIA GeForce GT 710M scores 2,422, a delta of 0.7 percent. The AMD Radeon RX 7400 scores 2,467, a delta of -1.1 percent, meaning the RX 7400 sits slightly ahead. These rivals show that the Radeon 8040S, despite its high G3D score, has an average benchmark score that clusters with lower-end parts due to weaker legacy and compute test results.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has a higher boost clock?

A: The AMD Radeon 8040S has a boost clock of 2800 MHz, while the Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile boosts to 2300 MHz.

Q: What is the process node difference between the two?

A: The AMD Radeon 8040S uses TSMC's 4 nm process, and the Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile uses Intel's 3 nm process.

Q: How do the shading unit counts compare?

A: The AMD Radeon 8040S has 1,024 shading units, while the Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile has 128 shading units.

Q: Do both GPUs support the same API versions?

A: Yes, both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Q: What is the power consumption difference?

A: The AMD Radeon 8040S has a TDP of 55 W, and the Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile has a TDP of 25 W.

Q: Does the database contain any benchmark scores for the Intel part?

A: No, the Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile has an empty benchmark array, with no recorded scores in the database.

The Verdict

The recorded data supports a clear split. The AMD Radeon 8040S is the only part with measured performance, and those measurements show a capable integrated GPU with a 10,578 G3D score and 5,138 compute score. Its 16 ray tracing cores and 5.734 TFLOPS FP32 throughput make it suitable for workloads that demand parallel processing and modern rendering features. The 55 W TDP and PCIe 5.0 x16 interface indicate it is designed for larger laptops or portable devices with adequate cooling and power delivery.

The Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile, by contrast, has no benchmark data. Its specifications show a much smaller execution footprint: 128 shading units, 8 TMUs, 4 ROPs, and 1 RT core. Its 25 W TDP suggests deployment in thin, fanless, or low-power systems where battery life matters more than graphical throughput. The 2:1 FP16 ratio indicates some half-precision capability, but the overall resource count limits its ceiling.

The Radeon's nearest rivals in the database, such as the NVIDIA GeForce 710M and Intel HD Graphics 610, all sit within a 0.7 percent delta on average benchmark score. This suggests that despite the Radeon's high G3D score, its overall average is dragged down by weaker DirectX 10 and DirectX 12 results. Users prioritizing modern API performance may find the Radeon's DirectX 12 score of 47 underwhelming relative to its G3D ranking.

The Intel part's 50th percentile rank is listed without supporting scores, which makes it impossible to verify its real-world position. The database treats it as an active product with a future launch date of April 15, 2026. Until benchmark results are recorded, the data cannot confirm whether the Intel part competes with the Radeon or occupies a lower performance tier.

For systems requiring substantial GPU compute and rendering, the AMD Radeon 8040S is the only choice with verified performance data. For ultra-portable designs where 25 W is the power budget, the Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile fits that envelope, but its actual performance remains unmeasured.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Radeon 8040S | Intel Arc Graphics 1 Xe Mobile |

|---|---|---|

| Architecture | RDNA 3.5 | Xe3-LPG |

| Process Node | 4 nm | 3 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Die Size | 308 mm² | unknown |

| Base Clock | 1295 MHz | 300 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 2800 MHz | 2300 MHz |

| Shading Units | 1024 | 128 |

| TMUs | 64 | 8 |

| ROPs | 32 | 4 |

| RT Cores | 16 | 1 |

| Pixel Rate | 89.60 GPixel/s | 9.200 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 179.2 GTexel/s | 18.40 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 5.734 TFLOPS | 588.8 GFLOPS |

| FP16 | 5.734 TFLOPS (1:1) | 1,177.6 GFLOPS (2:1) |

| TDP | 55 W | 25 W |

| Bus Interface | PCIe 5.0 x16 | IGP |

| Release Date | 2025-01-05 | 2026-04-15 |

| Predecessor | Polaris Mobile | HD Graphics-M |

| PassMark G3D | 10578 | no data |

| PassMark G2D | 1052 | no data |

| PassMark GPU Compute | 5138 | no data |

| Avg Benchmark Score | 2440 | 0 |