AMD Radeon 780M vs NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Comparison

The AMD Radeon 780M and NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell occupy opposite ends of the graphics spectrum, yet both appear in the same database with surprisingly close overall percentiles. The data shows the 780M sits at the 61st percentile of all GPUs, while the RTX PRO 6000 lands at the 59th percentile. This near-parity in ranking, despite a colossal gulf in raw capability, stems from the fact that the 780M’s average benchmark score of 17,588 is actually higher than the RTX PRO 6000’s 16,408. The only shared benchmark in the head-to-head data, however, tells a far more dramatic story, with the NVIDIA part delivering a 3dmark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 16,408 against the AMD’s 480 — a -97.1% delta for the integrated graphics part.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The single direct comparison available — 3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12 — is a landslide. The NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell scores 16,408, while the AMD Radeon 780M scores 480. That is a 97.1% deficit for the 780M, meaning the NVIDIA card delivers roughly 34 times the performance in this specific DirectX 12 workload. This is not a close contest; the delta is so extreme that it effectively places the two products in different performance universes for this test.

However, the aggregate benchmark picture complicates the narrative. The 780M’s average benchmark score of 17,588 is built from three tests: 3dmark Steel Nomad (480), Geekbench OpenCL (18,602), and Geekbench Vulkan (33,683). The RTX PRO 6000’s average of 16,408 comes from only that single 3dmark run. This means the 780M’s average is inflated by its strong Geekbench scores, particularly the Vulkan result, which is nearly double its OpenCL score. The RTX PRO 6000, with only one data point, cannot benefit from any additional tests that might raise or lower its average.

The nearest rivals for each part underscore how different the competitive landscapes are. The 780M’s closest competitor is the AMD Radeon Pro 560, with an average score of 17,551 and a delta of just 0.2%. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 sits at 17,639 (-0.3%), and the AMD Radeon HD 7790 at 17,666 (-0.4%). These are all within a fraction of a percent, showing the 780M is tightly clustered with a diverse set of discrete and prosumer GPUs. The RTX PRO 6000, meanwhile, is bracketed by the AMD Radeon PRO W7500 at 16,415 (0% delta), the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT at 16,361 (+0.3%), and the AMD Radeon Pro 5600M at 16,351 (+0.4%). The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 is just 0.6% ahead at 16,504. This clustering suggests the RTX PRO 6000’s single benchmark score places it in a mid-range performance tier, despite its workstation pedigree.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU wins the only direct benchmark comparison?

A: The NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell wins decisively. In the 3dmark Steel Nomad DX12 test, it scores 16,408 against the AMD Radeon 780M’s 480, a delta of -97.1% for the AMD part.

Q: How does the AMD Radeon 780M’s average benchmark score compare to the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell’s?

A: The 780M has a higher average benchmark score of 17,588, compared to the RTX PRO 6000’s 16,408. This is because the 780M’s average includes strong Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan scores of 18,602 and 33,683, respectively, while the NVIDIA part’s average is based solely on its 3dmark result.

Q: What is the percentile ranking for each GPU?

A: The AMD Radeon 780M ranks at the 61st percentile of all GPUs, while the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell ranks at the 59th percentile. Despite the NVIDIA card’s massive lead in the 3dmark test, its single benchmark result places it slightly lower in the overall distribution.

Q: Which rivals are closest to the AMD Radeon 780M in average score?

A: The AMD Radeon Pro 560 is the nearest rival with an average score of 17,551, a mere 0.2% behind. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 is 0.3% ahead at 17,639, and the AMD Radeon HD 7790 is 0.4% ahead at 17,666.

Q: Which rivals are closest to the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell in average score?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7500 matches it exactly at 16,415 with a 0% delta. The AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT is 0.3% ahead at 16,361, and the AMD Radeon Pro 5600M is 0.4% ahead at 16,351. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 leads by 0.6% with a score of 16,504.

Q: What does the benchmark data imply about the RTX PRO 6000’s single test score?

A: The data implies the RTX PRO 6000’s 3dmark Steel Nomad score of 16,408 places it in a performance bracket occupied by mid-range GPUs like the Radeon RX 5700 XT and GeForce RTX 5090 D V2. It does not exhibit the dominance one might expect from a 600 W workstation card in this particular aggregate context.

Architecture Differences

The architectural gulf between these two is vast, starting with the manufacturing process. The AMD Radeon 780M uses a 4 nm TSMC node, while the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell uses a 5 nm TSMC node. Die size and transistor count paint an even starker picture: the 780M’s Phoenix chip packs 25,390 million transistors into 178 mm², yielding a density of 142.6M / mm². The RTX PRO 6000’s GB202 die is 750 mm² with 92,200 million transistors, resulting in a lower density of 122.9M / mm². The NVIDIA chip is over four times larger in area and holds nearly four times the transistors, yet its density is lower due to the older process node.

The compute architectures are fundamentally different generations. The 780M is built on RDNA 3.0 and belongs to the Navi III IGP (Phoenix) generation. The RTX PRO 6000 uses Blackwell 2.0 and is part of the Blackwell PRO W (x000) generation. This is not a minor revision; it is a leap from an integrated graphics design to a dedicated workstation compute monster. The RTX PRO 6000 features 188 ray tracing cores and 752 tensor cores, while the 780M has 12 RT cores and no tensor cores listed. The NVIDIA card also has 752 texture mapping units and 192 render output units, dwarfing the 780M’s 48 TMUs and 32 ROPs.

Memory architecture is another chasm. The 780M uses system shared memory, with its bandwidth described as "System Dependent." The RTX PRO 6000 has 96 GB of GDDR7 on a 512-bit bus, delivering 1.79 TB/s of bandwidth. The NVIDIA card’s memory clock is 1750 MHz with 28 Gbps effective speed, while the AMD part’s memory clock is simply "System Shared." The RTX PRO 6000’s pixel rate of 502.5 GPixel/s and texture rate of 1,968.0 GTexel/s compare to 92.80 GPixel/s and 139.2 GTexel/s for the 780M. Floating-point performance follows suit: the NVIDIA card delivers 126.0 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16, while the 780M manages 8.909 TFLOPS for both.

Specification Differences

The two GPUs differ in nearly every measurable specification. The 780M has a base clock of 800 MHz and a boost clock of 2900 MHz, while the RTX PRO 6000 has a base of 1590 MHz and a boost of 2617 MHz. The AMD part’s lower base clock but higher boost suggests a power-optimized design. Shading units are 768 for the 780M versus 24,064 for the RTX PRO 6000. The NVIDIA card’s TDP is 600 W, compared to just 15 W for the AMD integrated solution. Slot width differs: the 780M is an IGP, while the RTX PRO 6000 is dual-slot. Power connectors are "None" for the 780M, while the NVIDIA card requires a single 16-pin connector and a suggested PSU of 1000 W.

The bus interface is another differentiator: PCIe 4.0 x8 for the 780M versus PCIe 5.0 x16 for the RTX PRO 6000. Display outputs are motherboard-dependent for the AMD part, while the NVIDIA card offers 4x DisplayPort 2.1b. Physical dimensions are only listed for the NVIDIA card: 304 mm in length, 137 mm in height, and 40 mm in width. The release dates are also distinct, with the 780M launching on 2024-01-30 and the RTX PRO 6000 on 2025-03-17. The 780M’s predecessor is Navi II IGP and its successor is Navi III IGP, while the RTX PRO 6000’s predecessor is Workstation Ada. The RTX PRO 6000 has a launch MSRP of 8,565 USD, while the 780M has no listed MSRP. DirectX, OpenGL, and Vulkan API support are identical for both: 12 Ultimate (12_2), 4.6, and 1.4, respectively.

The Verdict

The data presents a paradox. If you prioritize the single 3dmark Steel Nomad DX12 benchmark, the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell is the unequivocal winner, outperforming the AMD Radeon 780M by 97.1%. That score of 16,408 versus 480 is not a marginal victory; it is a generational obliteration in raw rasterization and ray tracing workload. For any application that relies heavily on that specific DirectX 12 test, the choice is clear.

However, the average benchmark score tells a different story. The 780M’s 17,588 average, driven by its Geekbench Vulkan score of 33,683, exceeds the RTX PRO 6000’s 16,408. This suggests that in compute-oriented synthetic tests, the integrated AMD part can hold its own or even surpass the workstation NVIDIA card. The 780M’s higher percentile ranking (61st vs 59th) reinforces this, indicating that across the database’s full test suite, the AMD part is not the underdog its 15 W TDP might suggest.

The verdict depends entirely on workload. The RTX PRO 6000 is a 600 W, dual-slot, 96 GB GDDR7 behemoth designed for maximum throughput in a single, demanding scenario. The 780M is a 15 W IGP that excels in varied compute benchmarks, particularly Vulkan. The data does not support a universal winner; it supports a clear split based on the specific test being run. The RTX PRO 6000 wins the head-to-head, but the 780M wins the aggregate.

Where Each One Wins

NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell wins in the 3dmark Steel Nomad DX12 test, and by an enormous margin. Its 16,408 score against the 780M’s 480 makes it the choice for any workload that mirrors this DirectX 12 benchmark. Its 188 RT cores, 752 tensor cores, and 1.79 TB/s of memory bandwidth are all architectural advantages that translate to this specific test. The 96 GB GDDR7 frame buffer is also a differentiator, though the head-to-head data does not directly measure its impact. For users prioritizing this single metric, the RTX PRO 6000 is the definitive pick.

AMD Radeon 780M wins in aggregate benchmark performance. Its average score of 17,588 is 7.2% higher than the RTX PRO 6000’s 16,408. This is driven by its Geekbench Vulkan score of 33,683, which is more than double its own 3dmark result and far above the NVIDIA card’s single score. The 780M also wins on efficiency, with a 15 W TDP compared to 600 W, though no power-performance ratio is directly given in the data. Its high transistor density of 142.6M / mm² versus 122.9M / mm² suggests a more compact, efficient design. For users running Vulkan-based compute workloads or seeking a more balanced profile across multiple benchmark types, the 780M’s data makes it the surprising victor.