AMD Radeon 760M vs NVIDIA RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell Server Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark results for the AMD Radeon 760M versus the NVIDIA RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell Server. The head-to-head comparison table is empty, and neither part records wins in any shared test. This means the two products have never been measured against each other in the same benchmark session within the database.

What can be established is the AMD Radeon 760M's position in the broader performance landscape. Its average benchmark score is 6019, placing it at the 35th percentile among all GPUs. The closest rival in the database is the AMD Radeon RX 6400 with an average score of 6001, a 0.3% difference. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M also sits at 6000, again a 0.3% gap. The NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server records a 5996 average score, which is 0.4% behind the 760M. On the other side, the NVIDIA Quadro P2000 scores 6049, putting it 0.5% ahead of the 760M.

These narrow margins indicate the Radeon 760M operates in a tightly clustered performance band. A 0.3% lead over the RX 6400 and GTX 770M, and a 0.4% lead over the RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server, are statistically minor. The 0.5% deficit to the Quadro P2000 is equally small. The data shows the 760M sits near the middle of its immediate rivals, neither dominating nor being dominated by any of them.

The NVIDIA RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell Server has no recorded benchmark scores, no average score, and no nearest rivals in the database. Its percentile ranking of 50 is listed, but without any actual measurements, the database cannot substantiate that position with test data. The RTX PRO 4500's performance profile remains unquantified in the recorded measurements, so any direct numeric comparison with the Radeon 760M is impossible from the available facts.

The 760M's individual benchmark results show its strengths across different APIs. In Geekbench Vulkan, it scores 30336, while Geekbench OpenCL records 20255. Passmark G3D yields 5310, and Passmark G2D reaches 890. Compute workloads produce a Passmark GPU compute score of 2840. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test returns 400. Legacy DirectX tests show lower numbers: Passmark DirectX 9 scores 65, DirectX 11 scores 52, DirectX 12 scores 25, and DirectX 10 scores 19. These figures reveal a GPU that performs substantially better in modern compute and Vulkan workloads than in older DirectX rasterization tests.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from fundamentally different design philosophies. The AMD Radeon 760M uses the Phoenix chip built on RDNA 3.0 architecture, part of the Navi III IGP generation. It is manufactured on a 4 nm process at TSMC with 25,390 million transistors on a 178 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 142.6 million per mm². The NVIDIA RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell Server uses the GB203 chip with Blackwell 2.0 architecture from the Server Blackwell generation. It is built on a 5 nm process, also at TSMC, with 45,600 million transistors across a 378 mm² die, for a transistor density of 120.6 million per mm².

The process node difference is significant. The 4 nm process gives the AMD part a higher transistor density despite the much smaller die. The NVIDIA chip uses a larger die and packs nearly twice the transistor count, 45,600 million versus 25,390 million, but at a lower density. The die size disparity is stark: 378 mm² versus 178 mm², meaning the RTX PRO 4500 physically occupies more than twice the silicon area.

Shader resources differ by an order of magnitude. The Radeon 760M has 512 shading units, 32 texture mapping units, 16 render output units, and 8 ray tracing cores. The RTX PRO 4500 has 10,496 shading units, 328 TMUs, 112 ROPs, and 82 RT cores. It also adds 328 tensor cores, a feature the AMD part lacks entirely. The NVIDIA GPU's raw throughput numbers reflect this scale: FP32 performance is 50.70 TFLOPS versus 5.323 TFLOPS for the AMD part, a roughly 9.5x difference. Pixel rate is 270.5 GPixel/s versus 41.58 GPixel/s, and texture rate is 792.1 GTexel/s versus 83.17 GTexel/s. Both parts list FP16 at a 1:1 ratio with FP32, meaning the RTX PRO 4500's FP16 is also 50.70 TFLOPS and the 760M's is 5.323 TFLOPS.

Clock behavior differs as well. The AMD chip has a base clock of 800 MHz and a boost of 2599 MHz. The NVIDIA chip has a base of 1215 MHz and a boost of 2415 MHz. The AMD part boosts higher, but the NVIDIA part starts from a higher base. Memory architecture is entirely different. The Radeon 760M uses system shared memory with system dependent bandwidth. The RTX PRO 4500 uses 32 GB of GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus with 800.3 GB/s of bandwidth, and its memory clock is listed as 1563 MHz with 25 Gbps effective.

The power envelopes are not comparable. The Radeon 760M is an integrated graphics processor with a 15 W TDP, no power connectors, and an IGP slot width. The RTX PRO 4500 is a discrete single-slot card with a 165 W TDP, a single 16-pin power connector, and a suggested PSU of 450 W. The RTX PRO 4500 measures 267 mm in length, 111 mm in height, and 40 mm in width. The AMD part has no listed dimensions. Bus interfaces also differ: PCIe 4.0 x8 for the AMD IGP versus PCIe 5.0 x16 for the NVIDIA server card. Display outputs are motherboard dependent for the AMD part, while the NVIDIA card has no outputs at all.

The Verdict

The recorded data makes one point clear: these are not competing products. The AMD Radeon 760M is an integrated GPU with a 15 W TDP, system shared memory, and a 35th percentile ranking. The NVIDIA RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell Server is a discrete server card with 32 GB of dedicated GDDR7, a 165 W TDP, and no display outputs. The RTX PRO 4500 has no benchmark scores in the database, so its measured performance cannot be compared directly. The 760M has a full set of benchmarks and a documented average score of 6019.

For workloads that require the Radeon 760M's capabilities, the data shows it is competitive with its nearest rivals. It sits within 0.5% of the Quadro P2000, RX 6400, GTX 770M, and RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server in average score. This is a tightly grouped field where small margins separate the participants. The 760M's strong Vulkan and OpenCL scores suggest it handles modern compute APIs well, while its legacy DirectX scores are comparatively low.

For server workloads that would target the RTX PRO 4500, the database offers no measured evidence of its performance. Its 50th percentile ranking is listed but unsupported by any actual test scores. The hardware specifications indicate a very large compute resource: 10,496 shading units, 328 tensor cores, 50.70 TFLOPS FP32, and 800.3 GB/s of memory bandwidth. But without benchmark data, the database cannot confirm how that hardware translates into real-world results.

The choice between these two parts depends entirely on the target platform. The Radeon 760M is an IGP for systems where a discrete GPU is not present, and its 15 W TDP and system shared memory reflect that role. The RTX PRO 4500 is a server card with no display outputs, intended for compute environments where rendering to a screen is unnecessary. The data does not support using one in place of the other.

Specification Differences

The two GPUs differ in nearly every specification category recorded in the database.

Process and die: The AMD part uses 4 nm at TSMC with a 178 mm² die and 25,390 million transistors. The NVIDIA part uses 5 nm at TSMC with a 378 mm² die and 45,600 million transistors. Transistor density is 142.6M per mm² for AMD and 120.6M per mm² for NVIDIA.

Clocks: AMD base is 800 MHz, boost is 2599 MHz. NVIDIA base is 1215 MHz, boost is 2415 MHz. AMD memory clock is system shared; NVIDIA memory clock is 1563 MHz with 25 Gbps effective.

Memory: AMD has system shared size, type, bus width, and system dependent bandwidth. NVIDIA has 32 GB of GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus with 800.3 GB/s bandwidth.

Compute units: AMD has 512 shading units, 32 TMUs, 16 ROPs, and 8 RT cores. NVIDIA has 10,496 shading units, 328 TMUs, 112 ROPs, and 82 RT cores, plus 328 tensor cores which AMD does not have.

Throughput: AMD pixel rate is 41.58 GPixel/s, texture rate is 83.17 GTexel/s, FP32 is 5.323 TFLOPS, FP16 is 5.323 TFLOPS. NVIDIA pixel rate is 270.5 GPixel/s, texture rate is 792.1 GTexel/s, FP32 is 50.70 TFLOPS, FP16 is 50.70 TFLOPS.

Power and cooling: AMD TDP is 15 W, slot width is IGP, power connectors are none. NVIDIA TDP is 165 W, slot width is single-slot, power connector is 1x 16-pin, suggested PSU is 450 W.

Physical: AMD has no listed dimensions. NVIDIA is 267 mm long, 111 mm high, and 40 mm wide.

Interface: AMD uses PCIe 4.0 x8. NVIDIA uses PCIe 5.0 x16.

Display: AMD display outputs are motherboard dependent. NVIDIA has no outputs.

Release and lineage: AMD released on 2024-01-30, with predecessor Navi II IGP and no successor listed. NVIDIA released on 2026-03-16, with predecessor Server Hopper and successor Server Rubin.

API support: Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Benchmark presence: AMD has 10 recorded benchmark scores and an average of 6019. NVIDIA has no recorded scores and an average of 0.

FAQ

Q: What is the average benchmark score of the AMD Radeon 760M?

A: The Radeon 760M has an average benchmark score of 6019, placing it at the 35th percentile among all GPUs.

Q: Does the NVIDIA RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell Server have any recorded benchmark scores?

A: No. The database lists no benchmark results for the RTX PRO 4500, and its average score is recorded as 0.

Q: How does the Radeon 760M compare to its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 6400?

A: The Radeon 760M scores 6019 on average, while the RX 6400 scores 6001, a difference of 0.3% in favor of the 760M.

Q: What memory configuration does each GPU use?

A: The Radeon 760M uses system shared memory with system dependent bandwidth. The RTX PRO 4500 uses 32 GB of GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus with 800.3 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: What is the TDP of each part?

A: The Radeon 760M has a TDP of 15 W. The RTX PRO 4500 has a TDP of 165 W and a suggested PSU of 450 W.

Q: Which GPU has tensor cores?

A: The NVIDIA RTX PRO 4500 has 328 tensor cores. The AMD Radeon 760M has no tensor cores listed.