GPU Comparison

AMD
RADEON

AMD Radeon 760M

CORE STATE Phoenix
VRAM System Shared
CLOCK SPEED 2599 MHz
TDP 15 W
BUS WIDTH System Shared
ARCHITECTURE RDNA 3.0
nm
PROCESS 4 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

RTX A1000 Mobile

CORE STATE GA107
VRAM 4 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1140 MHz
TDP 60 W
BUS WIDTH 128 bit
ARCHITECTURE Ampere
nm
PROCESS 8 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2022

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12
400
N/A
geekbench_opencl
20,255
48,703
geekbench_vulkan
30,336
46,782
passmark_directx_10
19
N/A
passmark_directx_11
52
N/A
passmark_directx_12
25
N/A
passmark_directx_9
65
N/A
passmark_g2d
890
N/A
passmark_g3d
5,310
N/A
passmark_gpu_compute
2,840
N/A

Analysis: AMD Radeon 760M vs NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile

Reviewing the test data for NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile and AMD AMD Radeon 760M, an obvious picture develops. NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile steadily produces higher performance in every evaluation. The benchmark advantage varies from noticeable to outstanding relative to the individual game. Such reliability attests to core design benefits. Buyers wanting graphics power should factor this in.

When it comes to real-time ray tracing, NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile moves even more forward of AMD AMD Radeon 760M. The hardware accelerators handle intensive reflection computations far more capably. Users seeking modern fidelity would seriously consider NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile. This real-time ray tracing performance is substantial. Modern games more and more use hardware RT features.

AMD AMD Radeon 760M struggles to compete with NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile's absolute power. For price-conscious users, AMD AMD Radeon 760M could nevertheless provide reasonable results, yet buyers needing premium experience would gravitate toward NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile. This performance difference is too notable to overlook. Intensive scenarios particularly highlight this disparity. This premium provides dividends in visual quality.

When people considering a investment determination, NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile comes out as the suggested selection. The steady frame rate superiority over AMD AMD Radeon 760M positions it the better choice for gaming-focused consumers. Weigh your specific needs, yet this evidence directs toward NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile. Base an informed determination. The gaming difference is real and meaningful.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
760M
RTX A1000 Mobile
Core Specs
Shading Units
512
2,048 +300.0%
Shaders
512
2,048 +300.0%
TMUs
32
64 +100.0%
ROPs
16
32 +100.0%
Compute Units
8
SM Count
16
Clocks
Base Clock
800 MHz
630 MHz
Boost Clock
2599 MHz
1140 MHz
Memory Clock
System Shared
1375 MHz 11 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
System Shared
4 GB
VRAM (MB)
4,096
Memory Type
System Shared
GDDR6
Memory Bus
System Shared
128 bit
Bandwidth
System Dependent
176.0 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
128 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
2 MB
2 MB
L0 Cache
32 KB per WGP
Performance
Pixel Rate
41.58 GPixel/s
36.48 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
83.17 GTexel/s
72.96 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
5.323 TFLOPS
4.669 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
332.7 GFLOPS (1:16)
72.96 GFLOPS (1:64)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
5.323 TFLOPS (1:1)
4.669 TFLOPS (1:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
8
16 +100.0%
Tensor Cores
64
Power
TDP
15 W
60 W
TDP (W)
15
60 +300.0%
Power Connectors
None
None
Architecture
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
Ampere
GPU Name
Phoenix
GA107
Generation
Navi III IGP (Phoenix)
Ampere-MW (Ax000)
Process Size
4 nm
8 nm
Transistors
25,390 million
8,700 million
Die Size
178 mm²
200 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
Samsung
Density
142.6M / mm²
43.5M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
2.1
3.0
CUDA
8.6
Shader Model
6.8
6.8
Physical
Slot Width
IGP
IGP
Outputs
Motherboard Dependent
Portable Device Dependent
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
PCIe 4.0 x8
Other
Production
Active
End-of-life
Predecessor
Navi II IGP
Quadro Turing-M
Successor
Ada-MW
View Radeon 760M Details View RTX A1000 Mobile Details