AMD Radeon 760M vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER Comparison

The Verdict

The recorded data presents a stark contrast between two GPUs occupying entirely different performance tiers. The AMD Radeon 760M, an integrated processor from the Phoenix chip, delivers an average benchmark score of 6019 across its ten recorded tests. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER, a discrete Blackwell architecture card, posts a single benchmark score of 2690 in the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test. In that head-to-head comparison, the RTX 5070 SUPER wins decisively, with a delta of -85.1% relative to the Radeon 760M, meaning the integrated part trails by a wide margin in that specific workload. However, the Radeon 760M shows a broader benchmark profile with multiple tests across DirectX 9, 10, 11, and 12, plus compute and 2D workloads, while the RTX 5070 SUPER has only one recorded result.

For users seeking a dedicated graphics card with high-end memory bandwidth and substantial shading resources, the RTX 5070 SUPER is the clear choice based on the Steel Nomad result. For those constrained to an integrated solution, the Radeon 760M offers a functional baseline with competitive scores against its nearest rivals, including the RX 6400 and GTX 770M, both within 0.3% of its average. The data indicates the RTX 5070 SUPER belongs to a different performance class, despite its lower average score being skewed by a single demanding test. The Radeon 760M sits at the 35th percentile among all GPUs, while the RTX 5070 SUPER ranks at the 18th percentile, which reflects the different nature of the benchmarks recorded, not necessarily absolute capability.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs diverge fundamentally in their design philosophies. The AMD Radeon 760M uses the Phoenix chip built on a 4 nm process at TSMC, containing 25,390 million transistors across a 178 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 142.6 million per mm². It belongs to the RDNA 3.0 architecture, specifically the Navi III IGP generation, and features 512 shading units, 32 texture mapping units, 16 raster output units, and 8 ray tracing cores. Its base clock runs at 800 MHz, boosting to 2599 MHz. Memory is entirely system-shared, with no dedicated VRAM, and bandwidth is system-dependent. The 760M draws 15 W of power, uses an IGP slot width, has no power connectors, and interfaces via PCIe 4.0 x8. Its pixel rate is 41.58 GPixel/s, texture rate is 83.17 GTexel/s, and FP32 compute reaches 5.323 TFLOPS, with FP16 at the same 5.323 TFLOPS in a 1:1 ratio.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER uses the GB205 chip on a 5 nm TSMC process, with 31,100 million transistors on a 263 mm² die, giving a lower transistor density of 118.3 million per mm². It is based on Blackwell 2.0 architecture in the GeForce 50-series generation. The card houses 6400 shading units, 200 texture mapping units, 80 raster output units, 50 ray tracing cores, and 200 tensor cores. Base clock is 2325 MHz, boost reaches 2512 MHz, and memory runs at 1750 MHz with 28 Gbps effective speed. It carries 18 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering 672.0 GB/s of bandwidth. Power consumption is 275 W, it occupies a dual-slot form factor, uses a single 16-pin power connector, and connects via PCIe 5.0 x16. Its pixel rate is 201.0 GPixel/s, texture rate is 502.4 GTexel/s, and FP32 performance is 32.15 TFLOPS, with FP16 also at 32.15 TFLOPS in a 1:1 ratio. Display outputs include one HDMI 2.1b and three DisplayPort 2.1b ports, with physical dimensions of 245 mm length, 115 mm height, and 40 mm width.

Both GPUs support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The RTX 5070 SUPER adds tensor cores, which the Radeon 760M lacks entirely, and the discrete card has dedicated GDDR7 memory versus the shared system memory approach of the integrated part.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The only directly comparable benchmark in the database is the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test. The AMD Radeon 760M scores 400, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER scores 2690. This represents a delta of -85.1% for the Radeon 760M, meaning the RTX 5070 SUPER delivers roughly 6.7 times the raw score in this workload. The Steel Nomad test is a demanding modern DirectX 12 scenario, and the results confirm that the RTX 5070 SUPER's larger shading core count, higher clock speeds, and dedicated memory bandwidth translate into a massive advantage. The Radeon 760M, by contrast, relies on shared system memory and a much smaller compute footprint, which limits its performance in this specific test.

The Radeon 760M has no wins in the head-to-head comparison, while the RTX 5070 SUPER secures one win. This does not diminish the integrated part's value in other recorded benchmarks, where it shows a different performance profile. For instance, the Radeon 760M achieves a Geekbench OpenCL score of 20255 and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 30336, indicating respectable compute capabilities for an integrated solution. Its PassMark G3D score is 5310, with a PassMark G2D score of 890. In legacy DirectX tests, it scores 65 in DirectX 9, 52 in DirectX 11, 25 in DirectX 12, and 19 in DirectX 10. The PassMark GPU Compute test yields 2840. These numbers provide context for the 760M's average benchmark score of 6019, which places it near the RX 6400 (6001, delta 0.3%), GTX 770M (6000, delta 0.3%), and RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server (5996, delta 0.4%), while slightly trailing the Quadro P2000 (6049, delta -0.5%).

The RTX 5070 SUPER's single recorded benchmark limits direct comparison, but its nearest rivals in the database include the Quadro K1100M (2664, delta 1%), GT 1030 (2662, delta 1.1%), Intel Arc Pro B50 (2660, delta 1.1%), and GT 440 (2645, delta 1.7%). This proximity suggests the RTX 5070 SUPER's score aligns with those older or lower-tier parts in the Steel Nomad test, which is notable given its modern architecture and high-end specifications. The disparity between its architectural resources and its benchmark placement indicates that the single test may not fully represent its capabilities, but the data does not include additional results to clarify this.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Radeon 760M has an average benchmark score of 6019, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER has an average of 2690. The Radeon 760M's average is derived from ten tests, whereas the RTX 5070 SUPER's average comes from a single 3DMark Steel Nomad result.

Q: How do the two GPUs compare in the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test?

A: The RTX 5070 SUPER scores 2690, and the Radeon 760M scores 400, giving the RTX 5070 SUPER a delta of -85.1% over the Radeon 760M. The discrete card wins this head-to-head comparison decisively.

Q: What are the memory configurations of each GPU?

A: The Radeon 760M uses system-shared memory with system-dependent bandwidth and no dedicated VRAM. The RTX 5070 SUPER has 18 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering 672.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: Which GPU has more shading units and ray tracing cores?

A: The RTX 5070 SUPER has 6400 shading units and 50 ray tracing cores. The Radeon 760M has 512 shading units and 8 ray tracing cores. The RTX 5070 SUPER also includes 200 tensor cores, which the Radeon 760M does not have.

Q: What are the power consumption figures?

A: The Radeon 760M has a TDP of 15 W and uses no power connectors. The RTX 5070 SUPER has a TDP of 275 W and uses a single 16-pin power connector.

Q: How does the Radeon 760M compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Radeon 760M sits within 0.3% of the RX 6400 (6001) and GTX 770M (6000), and within 0.4% of the RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server (5996). It trails the Quadro P2000 (6049) by -0.5%.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon 760M wins in scenarios requiring integrated graphics with minimal power draw. Its 15 W TDP and lack of external power connectors make it suitable for compact systems where discrete cards are impractical. Its benchmark breadth across DirectX 9 through 12, plus compute and 2D tests, shows versatility in legacy and lighter workloads. The PassMark G2D score of 890 and PassMark G3D score of 5310 indicate competent 2D and general 3D performance for an IGP. Its Geekbench Vulkan score of 30336 demonstrates strong compute throughput relative to its size, and the average benchmark score of 6019 places it statistically near the RX 6400 and GTX 770M, meaning it competes with entry-level discrete options from previous generations. The 760M also uses a 4 nm process with a higher transistor density of 142.6M per mm², reflecting an efficient design.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 SUPER wins in raw modern gaming performance, as evidenced by its 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 2690 versus the Radeon 760M's 400. Its 32.15 TFLOPS FP32 compute, 672.0 GB/s memory bandwidth, and 18 GB GDDR7 capacity provide substantial resources for high-resolution textures and complex shaders. The 200 tensor cores enable AI-accelerated workloads, a feature absent in the Radeon 760M. The RTX 5070 SUPER's 275 W TDP and dual-slot design indicate a dedicated power delivery system, and its PCIe 5.0 x16 interface offers higher bandwidth than the Radeon 760M's PCIe 4.0 x8. The card's pixel rate of 201.0 GPixel/s and texture rate of 502.4 GTexel/s far exceed the 760M's corresponding rates of 41.58 GPixel/s and 83.17 GTexel/s, confirming its advantage in fill-rate-limited scenarios. For workloads that stress modern DirectX 12 pipelines, such as the Steel Nomad test, the RTX 5070 SUPER is the clear winner. The data does not include additional benchmarks for the RTX 5070 SUPER, so its performance in other tests remains unrecorded, but the architectural specifications support its positioning as a high-end discrete solution.