AMD Radeon 760M vs AMD Radeon R7 M445 Comparison

AMD Radeon 760M and AMD Radeon R7 M445 represent two distinct eras of AMD mobile graphics. The 760M is a modern integrated processor built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture, while the R7 M445 is a legacy discrete part based on GCN 3.0. The benchmark data shows a decisive performance gap, but the two products occupy different roles in the market. The 760M is an active, current-generation IGP, whereas the R7 M445 is end-of-life and no longer in production. The recorded measurements place the 760M in the 35th percentile of all GPUs, while the R7 M445 sits in the 31st percentile. These percentile rankings, while close, obscure the substantial difference in raw compute output between the two.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon 760M wins the only direct head-to-head benchmark recorded in the database, the Geekbench OpenCL test. In that test, the 760M scores 20255 points against 5358 points for the R7 M445. That is a lead of 278 percent, meaning the 760M delivers nearly four times the compute performance in this workload. The 760M also holds wins across every other benchmark where data exists for both products, though the R7 M445 only has one recorded benchmark score. The 760M’s advantage is not confined to a single workload type; it dominates in compute-oriented tasks, which the OpenCL test represents.

The AMD Radeon R7 M445 has no benchmark wins in the recorded data. Its single recorded score in Geekbench OpenCL is 5358, which places it behind the 760M by a massive margin. However, the R7 M445 is a different class of product. It is a discrete GPU with its own dedicated memory, but its GCN 3.0 architecture and 28 nm process node limit its capabilities. The data shows that the R7 M445’s average benchmark score is 5358, which is lower than the 760M’s average of 6019. The R7 M445’s nearest rivals in the database include the Intel UHD Graphics P630, NVIDIA GeForce 840M, NVIDIA GeForce 930A, and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M. These rival scores range from 5308 to 5370, with the R7 M445 sitting comfortably in that cluster. The 760M, by contrast, is surrounded by a different class of competitors, including the AMD Radeon RX 6400, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M, NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server, and NVIDIA Quadro P2000. Those rivals have average scores between 5996 and 6049, which is a completely different performance tier.

For a use-case split, the 760M is the clear choice for any modern workload that relies on compute, such as OpenCL acceleration. The R7 M445, with only 588.8 GFLOPS of FP32 performance, is suited only for the lightest of legacy tasks. The 760M’s 5.323 TFLOPS FP32 output is 9 times higher, but the database only records one head-to-head test. The R7 M445 also lacks support for ray tracing, while the 760M has 8 ray tracing cores. This means the 760M is positioned for current-generation gaming and compute, while the R7 M445 is obsolete for anything beyond basic display output.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has the higher Geekbench OpenCL score?

A: The AMD Radeon 760M scores 20255, while the AMD Radeon R7 M445 scores 5358. The 760M is ahead by 278 percent in this test.

Q: What is the average benchmark score for each GPU?

A: The AMD Radeon 760M has an average benchmark score of 6019. The AMD Radeon R7 M445 has an average benchmark score of 5358.

Q: How does the R7 M445 compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The R7 M445 has an average score of 5358. Its nearest rivals include the Intel UHD Graphics P630 with an average score of 5370, which is 0.2 percent ahead, and the NVIDIA GeForce 840M with 5322, which is 0.7 percent behind. The NVIDIA GeForce 930A scores 5317, and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M scores 5308.

Q: What is the architecture difference between the two GPUs?

A: The AMD Radeon 760M uses the RDNA 3.0 architecture and is built on a 4 nm process node. The AMD Radeon R7 M445 uses the older GCN 3.0 architecture and is built on a 28 nm process node.

Q: Does the R7 M445 support ray tracing?

A: No. The R7 M445 has no ray tracing cores, while the AMD Radeon 760M has 8 ray cores.

Q: What is the production status of each GPU?

A: The AMD Radeon 760M is listed as active and was released on January 30, 2024. The AMD Radeon R7 M445 is end-of-life and was released on May 14, 2016.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The only direct benchmark comparison available in the database is the Geekbench OpenCL test. The AMD Radeon 760M produces a score of 20255, and the AMD Radeon R7 M445 produces 5358. The delta is 278 percent in favor of the 760M. To put that in perspective, the 760M’s score is nearly four times the R7 M445’s score. That is not a marginal improvement; it is a generational leap.

Looking at the broader benchmark suite, the 760M has multiple recorded scores: 3DMark Steel Nomad (DX12) at 400, Geekbench Vulkan at 30336, Passmark DirectX 10 at 19, DirectX 11 at 52, DirectX 12 at 25, DirectX 9 at 65, G2D at 890, G3D at 5310, and GPU Compute at 2840. The R7 M445, by comparison, has only the Geekbench OpenCL score of 5358. This lack of data for the R7 M445 makes a full head-to-head comparison difficult, but the one shared test tells a clear story.

In the shared test, the 760M’s 20255 score is a strong result for an integrated GPU. The R7 M445’s 5358 score is typical of a low-end discrete GPU from the older generation. The 760M’s delta of 278 percent is the single largest gap between any two rival products in the database’s nearest rival lists. For context, the 760M’s nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 6400, has an average score of 6001, which is only 0.3 percent different from the 760M’s 6019. The R7 M445’s nearest rival, the Intel UHD Graphics P630, has an average score of 5370, which is just 0.2 percent different from the R7 M445’s 5358.

The head-to-head data shows that the 760M is not just faster; it is in a completely different performance class. The R7 M445’s performance is comparable to integrated graphics from its era, while the 760M approaches low-end discrete graphics from the recent generation. The only benchmark that both share is the OpenCL compute test, and the 760M wins it decisively.

Specification Differences

The two GPUs differ in nearly every key specification. The AMD Radeon 760M has a base clock of 800 MHz and a boost clock of 2599 MHz. The AMD Radeon R7 M445 has a base clock of 780 MHz and a boost clock of 920 MHz. The 760M’s memory is system shared, meaning it relies on the system’s main RAM, while the R7 M445 has 4 GB of dedicated GDDR5 memory on a 64-bit bus with a bandwidth of 32.00 GB/s. The 760M’s memory bandwidth is listed as system dependent, which is a fundamentally different configuration.

The shading units count is 512 for the 760M and 320 for the R7 M445. The texture mapping units are 32 versus 20, and the render output units are 16 versus 8. The 760M also has 8 ray cores, while the R7 M445 has none. The pixel rate is 41.58 GPixel/s for the 760M, compared to 7.360 GPixel/s for the R7 M445. The texture rate is 83.17 GTexel/s versus 18.40 GTexel/s.

The FP32 floating point performance is 5.323 TFLOPS for the 760M and 588.8 GFLOPS for the R7 M445. The FP16 performance is also 5.323 TFLOPS for the 760M and 588.8 GFLOPS for the R7 M445, both in a 1:1 ratio. The 760M has a TDP of 15 W, while the R7 M445 has no recorded TDP. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x8 for the 760M and PCIe 3.0 x8 for the R7 M445. The display outputs are motherboard dependent for the 760M and portable device dependent for the R7 M445.

The 760M supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The R7 M445 supports DirectX 12 (12_0), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.2.170. The R7 M445’s DirectX version lacks the Ultimate features of the 760M. The 760M’s transistor count is 25,390 million, while the R7 M445 has 1,550 million. The die size is 178 mm² for the 760M and 125 mm² for the R7 M445.

Architecture Differences

The core architectural difference is that the AMD Radeon 760M is built on RDNA 3.0, a modern graphics architecture designed for high efficiency and performance per watt, while the AMD Radeon R7 M445 is based on GCN 3.0, an older architecture that lacks modern features such as ray tracing. The 760M uses the Phoenix chip, and the R7 M445 uses the Meso chip. The process node is 4 nm for the 760M, compared to 28 nm for the R7 M445. This process difference is a major factor in the performance and efficiency gap.

The 760M is part of the Navi III IGP generation, while the R7 M445 is part of the Gem System generation from the R7 M400 series. The 760M’s predecessor is the Navi II IGP, and the R7 M445’s predecessor is the Solar System. The R7 M445’s successor is the Polaris Mobile, which indicates that this product line has moved on. The 760M has no successor at this time.

The memory architecture is fundamentally different. The 760M uses system shared memory, which means it has no dedicated VRAM and depends on the system’s RAM for both capacity and bandwidth. The R7 M445 has 4 GB of GDDR5 memory with a 64-bit bus and a fixed bandwidth of 32.00 GB/s. The 760M’s bandwidth is system dependent, so its real-world performance can vary widely based on the host system’s memory configuration.

The 760M has 512 shading units, 32 TMUs, 16 ROPs, and 8 ray cores. The R7 M445 has 320 shading units, 20 TMUs, and 8 ROPs. The absence of ray cores on the R7 M445 is a major feature gap. Ray tracing is a modern rendering technique that is not available on the R7 M445. The 760M also supports Vulkan 1.4, which is newer than the Vulkan 1.2.170 supported by the R7 M445. The DirectX version is also newer on the 760M, with 12_2 versus 12_0.

The transistor density is 142.6 million transistors per square millimeter for the 760M, compared to 12.4 million per square millimeter for the R7 M445. This is a direct result of the 4 nm process versus the 28 nm process. The 760M packs 25,390 million transistors into a 178 mm² die, while the R7 M445 fits 1,550 million transistors into a 125 mm² die. The R7 M445 is a smaller chip, but it is far less dense and uses an older manufacturing process. The 760M’s power is rated at 15 W, while the R7 M445 has no recorded power rating, making it difficult to compare power efficiency directly.

The slot width for both is IGP, meaning neither is a full slot card. The 760M uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface, while the R7 M445 uses PCIe 3.0 x8. The newer bus interface on the 760M allows for faster communication with the host system. The display outputs for the 760M are motherboard dependent, while the R7 M445’s are portable device dependent. This reflects their different intended roles: one is an integrated processor meant for laptops and compact systems, the other is a discrete GPU meant for older portable devices.