AMD Radeon 760M vs AMD Radeon R7 M370 Comparison

The AMD Radeon R7 M370 and the AMD Radeon 760M represent two very different eras of mobile graphics. The R7 M370 is a discrete part from the Gem System generation, built on a mature 28 nm process and aimed at mainstream laptops of its time. The Radeon 760M is a modern integrated graphics processor (IGP) from the Navi III family, fabricated on a leading-edge 4 nm node and designed to sit within a Phoenix APU. Benchmark data in the database shows a clear generational shift in performance capability, with the newer integrated solution outpacing the older discrete card in every recorded test. This analysis compares the two based solely on the recorded measurements, specifications, and architectural details available.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Radeon R7 M370 has an average benchmark score of 6764, while the AMD Radeon 760M has an average score of 6019. Despite the R7 M370’s higher average, the 760M wins both head-to-head tests in the database.

Q: How do the two GPUs compare in the Geekbench OpenCL test?

A: The AMD Radeon 760M scores 20255 in Geekbench OpenCL, while the AMD Radeon R7 M370 scores 7063. The 760M leads by 65.1 percent in this test.

Q: What is the performance difference in the Geekbench Vulkan test?

A: The AMD Radeon 760M scores 30336 in Geekbench Vulkan, compared to 6465 for the AMD Radeon R7 M370. This represents a 78.7 percent advantage for the 760M.

Q: Which GPU has a higher transistor count?

A: The AMD Radeon 760M contains 25,390 million transistors, whereas the AMD Radeon R7 M370 contains 950 million transistors. The 760M also has a higher transistor density at 142.6M per mm² versus 12.3M per mm².

Q: What are the pixel fill rates of these two GPUs?

A: The AMD Radeon 760M achieves a pixel rate of 41.58 GPixel/s, while the AMD Radeon R7 M370 achieves 7.680 GPixel/s. The texture rates are 83.17 GTexel/s for the 760M and 23.04 GTexel/s for the R7 M370.

Q: Which GPU supports DirectX 12 Ultimate?

A: The AMD Radeon 760M supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2). The AMD Radeon R7 M370 supports DirectX 12 (11_1) only.

The Verdict

The data points to a clear winner for anyone needing modern graphics performance in a low-power package. The AMD Radeon 760M dominates the head-to-head benchmarks, winning both recorded tests by substantial margins. Its 20255 OpenCL score and 30336 Vulkan score dwarf the R7 M370’s 7063 and 6465 results respectively. For compute workloads, gaming at lower settings, or any task that leverages Vulkan or modern DirectX features, the 760M is the superior choice.

The R7 M370 still has a niche. Its average benchmark score of 6764 is higher than the 760M’s 6019, which suggests that in certain aggregate workloads, the older card may hold its own. However, that advantage is not reflected in the specific head-to-head tests recorded. The R7 M370 is also a discrete GPU with dedicated 2 GB GDDR5 memory, which could be relevant for systems where shared memory bandwidth is a bottleneck. But given its end-of-life production status and older GCN 1.0 architecture, it is difficult to recommend for new purchases.

The 760M is the better pick for most users, especially those building or buying a modern thin-and-light laptop. Its active production status, 4 nm process efficiency, and support for DirectX 12 Ultimate make it more future-proof. The R7 M370 is only advisable for legacy systems where a drop-in replacement with matching memory requirements is needed, or where software compatibility with older drivers is a concern. In raw performance, the 760M’s 512 shading units, 32 texture mapping units, and 16 render output units give it a structural advantage over the R7 M370’s 384 shading units, 24 TMUs, and 8 ROPs.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database records two direct comparisons between these GPUs, and the Radeon 760M wins both decisively. In Geekbench OpenCL, the 760M posts a score of 20255 against the R7 M370’s 7063. The delta is 65.1 percent in favor of the 760M. This is a massive leap, reflecting not just a higher core count but also the architectural efficiency of RDNA 3.0 over GCN 1.0. OpenCL workloads that stress raw compute throughput, such as physics simulations or image processing, would see a substantial speedup on the 760M.

The Geekbench Vulkan test shows an even larger gap. The 760M scores 30336, while the R7 M370 scores 6465. The delta here is 78.7 percent. Vulkan is a low-level API that rewards modern hardware with better command processing and parallel execution. The 760M’s 8 ray tracing cores and support for DirectX 12 Ultimate features likely contribute to this performance, even in non-ray-traced Vulkan workloads. The R7 M370, with its older architecture and Vulkan 1.2.170 support, simply cannot keep pace.

Looking beyond the head-to-head, the average benchmark scores tell a more nuanced story. The R7 M370’s average of 6764 places it in the 38th percentile of all GPUs in the database. Its nearest rivals include the AMD FirePro M5100 (average score 6830, 1 percent slower), the NVIDIA GeForce GT 1010 (average score 6698, 1 percent faster), and the AMD Radeon R7 M460 (average score 6612, 2.3 percent faster). The R7 M370 sits in a tight cluster around the 6600 to 6900 score range, suggesting it was a mid-pack player in its generation.

The Radeon 760M’s average score of 6019 places it in the 35th percentile, slightly lower than the R7 M370. Its nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon RX 6400 (average score 6001, 0.3 percent slower), the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M (average score 6000, 0.3 percent slower), and the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server (average score 5996, 0.4 percent slower). This grouping shows that the 760M’s average score is tightly clustered around 6000, but its OpenCL and Vulkan scores pull much higher. The discrepancy between the average and the head-to-head results suggests that the 760M excels in certain API-specific tests while being more modest in others, such as PassMark’s DirectX 9 and DirectX 10 tests where it scores 65 and 19 respectively.

Specification Differences

The two GPUs differ on nearly every measurable specification. The R7 M370 uses a 28 nm process at TSMC, while the 760M uses a 4 nm process, also at TSMC. This process shrink is the primary driver of the 760M’s efficiency. The R7 M370 has a die size of 77 mm², whereas the 760M’s die is 178 mm². Transistor counts are 950 million versus 25,390 million, a 25-fold difference. The transistor density scales from 12.3M per mm² to 142.6M per mm².

Clock speeds favor the 760M in boost but not in base. The R7 M370 runs at a base clock of 875 MHz and a boost clock of 960 MHz. The 760M has a lower base clock of 800 MHz but a much higher boost clock of 2599 MHz. Memory configurations are fundamentally different. The R7 M370 has 2 GB of GDDR5 on a 128-bit bus, delivering 57.60 GB/s of bandwidth. The 760M uses system shared memory, with a bus width and bandwidth listed as system dependent. This means the 760M’s memory performance varies with the host system’s RAM, whereas the R7 M370 has fixed dedicated memory.

The shading units, TMUs, and ROPs all favor the 760M. It has 512 shading units, 32 TMUs, and 16 ROPs, compared to 384, 24, and 8 for the R7 M370. The pixel rate is 41.58 GPixel/s for the 760M versus 7.680 GPixel/s for the R7 M370. Texture rates are 83.17 GTexel/s versus 23.04 GTexel/s. FP32 compute is 5.323 TFLOPS for the 760M versus 737.3 GFLOPS for the R7 M370. The 760M also supports FP16 at 5.323 TFLOPS, while the R7 M370 has no listed FP16 capability.

The bus interface differs: PCIe 4.0 x8 for the 760M versus PCIe 3.0 x8 for the R7 M370. The 760M is an IGP with a 15 W TDP and no power connectors, while the R7 M370 has no TDP or power connector data listed. The 760M supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, Vulkan 1.4, and OpenGL 4.6. The R7 M370 supports DirectX 12 (11_1), Vulkan 1.2.170, and OpenGL 4.6. Production status is active for the 760M and end-of-life for the R7 M370. Release dates are January 30, 2024 for the 760M and May 4, 2015 for the R7 M370.

Architecture Differences

The architectural divide is stark. The R7 M370 is built on GCN 1.0, a design that debuted in 2012 and was AMD’s first unified shader architecture for compute-heavy workloads. GCN 1.0 uses a scalar and vector unit design that was efficient for its time but lacks modern features like ray tracing. The chip is codenamed Litho, and the GPU belongs to the Gem System generation, specifically the R7 M300 series. Its predecessor is Solar System, and its successor is Polaris Mobile.

The Radeon 760M is built on RDNA 3.0, AMD’s third-generation Radeon DNA architecture. RDNA 3.0 introduces a redesigned compute unit layout, improved wavefront scheduling, and dedicated ray tracing hardware. The chip is codenamed Phoenix, and the GPU is part of the Navi III IGP generation. Its predecessor is Navi II IGP, and it has no listed successor. The 760M includes 8 ray tracing cores, a feature entirely absent from the R7 M370. It also supports FP16 at a 1:1 ratio with FP32, which is a hallmark of RDNA 3.0’s dual-issue design. GCN 1.0 does not have this capability.

The process node difference is a key architectural enabler. The 4 nm TSMC process allows for a much higher transistor density, which in turn permits the 760M to pack 512 shading units and 32 TMUs into an IGP that draws only 15 W. The 28 nm process of the R7 M370 limits it to 384 shading units and 24 TMUs, despite being a discrete card with its own memory. The 760M’s boost clock of 2599 MHz is more than 2.7 times higher than the R7 M370’s 960 MHz boost, a direct result of the more advanced process.

The memory architecture also reflects the generational shift. The R7 M370 has dedicated GDDR5 memory with a fixed 57.60 GB/s bandwidth. The 760M relies on system shared memory, which is more flexible but variable in performance. This is a typical trade-off for integrated graphics, and the 760M’s high compute throughput partially compensates for the potential memory bandwidth limitations. The R7 M370’s dedicated memory is a legacy advantage, but it comes with the cost of added power and space in a laptop chassis.

API support is another differentiator. The 760M supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which includes features like mesh shaders, variable rate shading, and hardware ray tracing. The R7 M370 only supports DirectX 12 (11_1), which lacks these modern features. Vulkan support is also newer on the 760M, at version 1.4 versus 1.2.170. These API differences mean that games or applications built for the latest graphics standards will run significantly better on the 760M, even if raw compute scores are closer in some tests. The R7 M370 is effectively locked to older software paradigms.