GPU Comparison

AMD
RADEON

AMD Radeon 660M

CORE STATE Rembrandt
VRAM System Shared
CLOCK SPEED 1900 MHz
TDP 40 W
BUS WIDTH System Shared
ARCHITECTURE RDNA 2.0
nm
PROCESS 6 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2022
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

GeForce RTX 3090

CORE STATE GA102
VRAM 24 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1695 MHz
TDP 350 W
BUS WIDTH 384 bit
ARCHITECTURE Ampere
nm
PROCESS 8 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2020

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

geekbench_opencl
12,876
173,788
geekbench_vulkan
14,748
53,927
3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12
N/A
5,118
passmark_directx_10
N/A
182
passmark_directx_11
N/A
220
passmark_directx_12
N/A
110
passmark_directx_9
N/A
268
passmark_g2d
N/A
1,063
passmark_g3d
N/A
26,645
passmark_gpu_compute
N/A
15,356

Analysis: AMD Radeon 660M vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090

If analyzing NVIDIA RTX 3090 graphics card with AMD Radeon 660M by AMD, a performance difference becomes obviously noticeable. NVIDIA RTX 3090 graphics card takes the lead in essentially each scenario we executed. This delta is notable enough to influence everyday graphics performance. Players might observe enhanced performance. The verdict is clear.

AMD Radeon 660M by AMD has difficulty to rival NVIDIA RTX 3090 graphics card's raw throughput. For price-conscious builders, AMD Radeon 660M by AMD could nonetheless offer reasonable results, but people wanting premium experience should invest toward NVIDIA RTX 3090 graphics card. This benchmark difference is significantly substantial to overlook. Demanding scenarios notably highlight this gap. This cost difference provides rewards in capability.

When users weighing a acquisition decision, NVIDIA RTX 3090 graphics card emerges as the preferred selection. Its dependable benchmark edge over AMD Radeon 660M by AMD establishes it the better choice for demanding users. Weigh your personal requirements, however the data leads toward NVIDIA RTX 3090 graphics card. Form an educated decision. This performance margin is measurable and considerable.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
660M
RTX 3090
Core Specs
Shading Units
384
10,496 +2633.3%
Shaders
384
10,496 +2633.3%
TMUs
24
328 +1266.7%
ROPs
16
112 +600.0%
Compute Units
6
SM Count
82
Clocks
Base Clock
1500 MHz
1395 MHz
Boost Clock
1900 MHz
1695 MHz
Memory Clock
System Shared
1219 MHz 19.5 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
System Shared
24 GB
VRAM (MB)
24,576
Memory Type
System Shared
GDDR6X
Memory Bus
System Shared
384 bit
Bandwidth
System Dependent
936.2 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
128 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
2 MB
6 MB
L0 Cache
32 KB per WGP
Performance
Pixel Rate
30.40 GPixel/s
189.8 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
45.60 GTexel/s
556.0 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
1,459.2 GFLOPS
35.58 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
91.20 GFLOPS (1:16)
556.0 GFLOPS (1:64)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
2.918 TFLOPS (2:1)
35.58 TFLOPS (1:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
6
82 +1266.7%
Tensor Cores
328
Power
TDP
40 W
350 W
TDP (W)
40
350 +775.0%
Suggested PSU
750 W
Power Connectors
None
1x 12-pin
Architecture
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
Ampere
GPU Name
Rembrandt
GA102
Generation
Navi II IGP (Rembrandt Mobile)
GeForce 30
Process Size
6 nm
8 nm
Transistors
13,100 million
28,300 million
Die Size
208 mm²
628 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
Samsung
Density
63.0M / mm²
45.1M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
2.0
3.0
CUDA
8.6
Shader Model
6.8
6.8
Physical
Slot Width
IGP
Triple-slot
Length
336 mm 13.2 inches
Height
140 mm 5.5 inches
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 1.4a
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
PCIe 4.0 x16
Other
Launch Price
1,499 USD
Production
End-of-life
End-of-life
Predecessor
Vega II IGP
GeForce 20
Successor
Navi III IGP
GeForce 40
View Radeon 660M Details View GeForce RTX 3090 Details