AMD Radeon 610M vs NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data does not contain any direct head-to-head benchmark results between the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server and the AMD Radeon 610M. The database shows each product's benchmarks from different test suites, so the comparison must be drawn from their respective average scores and nearest rival positions.

The NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server has a single recorded benchmark: 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, with a score of 5996. Its average benchmark score is 5996, placing it in the 34th percentile of all GPUs in the database. The AMD Radeon 610M has two recorded benchmarks: Geekbench OpenCL with a score of 4535, and Geekbench Vulkan with a score of 6353. Its average benchmark score is 5444, placing it in the 32nd percentile.

The average scores are close in absolute terms: 5996 for the NVIDIA part versus 5444 for the AMD part. That is a difference of 552 points, or roughly 10.1% in favor of the NVIDIA product when comparing the two average figures. However, the individual tests are not comparable directly since they measure different workloads; the NVIDIA result comes exclusively from a DX12 graphics test, while the AMD results come from compute-oriented OpenCL and Vulkan tests.

Looking at the nearest rival data, the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server sits within a very tight cluster. Its closest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M at 6000, a delta of -0.1%. The AMD Radeon RX 6400 also scores 6001, again -0.1%. On the other side, the AMD FirePro W4100 scores 5987, a delta of 0.2%, and the NVIDIA Quadro K4000M scores 5986, also 0.2%. This indicates the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server's recorded score is essentially tied with four other products, all within a 15-point range. The benchmark results place it in a narrow band where no meaningful performance separation exists among these five products.

The AMD Radeon 610M's nearest rivals tell a similar story of tight clustering. The NVIDIA Quadro M4000 scores 5467, a delta of -0.4% against the AMD part's 5444 average. The AMD Radeon R7 M365X scores 5416, a delta of 0.5%. The AMD Radeon R7 M440 scores 5483, a delta of -0.7%. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M scores 5501, a delta of -1.0%. The AMD Radeon 610M's average sits within a 85-point spread across these four rivals. The data shows both products are mid-pack performers relative to their own nearest rival groups, with neither product showing a dominant lead over its immediate competitors.

Where Each One Wins

The benchmark distribution indicates different strengths. The NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server wins on raw graphics throughput in the DX12 Steel Nomad test, scoring 5996. That test is a modern, demanding DirectX 12 workload that stresses geometry, rasterization, and compute simultaneously. The AMD Radeon 610M does not have a result in that test, so the NVIDIA part is the only one with a direct DX12 graphics score.

The AMD Radeon 610M wins on Vulkan performance within its own benchmark set, scoring 6353 in Geekbench Vulkan. That score exceeds the NVIDIA part's 5996 in Steel Nomad, but again, these are different test suites measuring different aspects of GPU behavior. The AMD part also has a Geekbench OpenCL score of 4535, which is lower than its Vulkan score by 1818 points, a 28.6% gap. The data indicates the AMD Radeon 610M performs substantially better under Vulkan than under OpenCL in the Geekbench suite.

For use-case segmentation, the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server is a server-class accelerator with a 600 W TDP, 96 GB of GDDR7 memory, and a 512-bit bus. It is designed for workloads that require large memory capacity and high bandwidth. The AMD Radeon 610M is an integrated graphics processor (IGP) with a 15 W TDP, system-shared memory, and no dedicated VRAM. It is designed for portable devices with modest graphics demands. The recorded data shows the NVIDIA part has a pixel rate of 502.5 GPixel/s versus 7.6 GPixel/s for the AMD part, a 66-fold difference. The texture rate is 1,968.0 GTexel/s versus 15.2 GTexel/s, a 129-fold difference. The FP32 throughput is 126.0 TFLOPS versus 486.4 GFLOPS, a 259-fold difference.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from entirely different architectural lineages. The NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server uses the GB202 chip, built on the Blackwell 2.0 architecture, fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC. It belongs to the Server Blackwell (Bxx) generation and succeeds Server Hopper. The AMD Radeon 610M uses the Mendocino chip, built on RDNA 2.0, fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC. It belongs to the Navi II IGP (Mendocino Mobile) generation and succeeds Vega II IGP.

The transistor counts differ dramatically. The NVIDIA chip has 92,200 million transistors on a 750 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 122.9 million per mm². The AMD chip has no recorded transistor count, but its die size is 100 mm². The NVIDIA die is 7.5 times larger in area. The process node difference is one generation apart: 5 nm versus 6 nm.

The compute resources are starkly different. The NVIDIA part has 24,064 shading units, 752 texture mapping units, 192 render output units, 188 ray tracing cores, and 752 tensor cores. The AMD part has 128 shading units, 8 TMUs, 4 ROPs, and 2 ray tracing cores. The NVIDIA part has no recorded tensor core equivalent in the AMD data, as tensor cores are an NVIDIA-specific feature. The AMD part has no tensor core field recorded. The ray tracing core counts are 188 versus 2, a 94-fold difference.

Memory architecture differs fundamentally. The NVIDIA part uses 96 GB of GDDR7 on a 512-bit bus, with 1.79 TB/s of bandwidth and a memory clock of 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective). The AMD part uses system-shared memory with system-dependent bandwidth and no dedicated memory clock. This means the AMD IGP relies on the host system's RAM, while the NVIDIA card has its own dedicated high-bandwidth memory pool.

The clock behavior also differs. The NVIDIA part has a base clock of 1590 MHz and a boost clock of 2617 MHz. The AMD part has a base clock of 1500 MHz and a boost clock of 1900 MHz. The NVIDIA boost clock is 717 MHz higher, a 37.7% advantage. The NVIDIA part's FP16 throughput matches its FP32 at 126.0 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio), while the AMD part's FP16 is 972.8 GFLOPS, exactly double its FP32 of 486.4 GFLOPS (2:1 ratio).

Power and physical specifications diverge completely. The NVIDIA part has a 600 W TDP, requires a 1000 W power supply, uses a single 16-pin connector, and occupies a dual-slot form factor with dimensions of 267 mm length, 111 mm height, and 40 mm width. The AMD part has a 15 W TDP, no power connectors, no suggested power supply, and is an IGP with no recorded dimensions. The bus interface differs: PCIe 5.0 x16 for NVIDIA versus PCIe 4.0 x8 for AMD. Display outputs are 4x DisplayPort 2.1b for NVIDIA versus portable device dependent for AMD.

Both parts support the same API levels: DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The production status differs: the NVIDIA part is Active, released on March 17, 2025, while the AMD part is End-of-life, released on September 19, 2022.

The Verdict

The data supports a clear segmentation. The NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server is a server-class accelerator with massive compute resources, dedicated high-bandwidth memory, and a 600 W power envelope. The AMD Radeon 610M is an integrated graphics solution with a 15 W power envelope, system-shared memory, and a small compute footprint. The recorded numbers show the NVIDIA part outperforms the AMD part by factors of 66 in pixel rate, 129 in texture rate, and 259 in FP32 throughput.

For users who need server-grade rendering, large memory pools, or ray tracing workloads, the NVIDIA part is the only viable option based on the data. Its 96 GB GDDR7 memory and 1.79 TB/s bandwidth are designed for datasets that far exceed the system-shared memory available to an IGP. Its 188 ray tracing cores versus 2 for the AMD part indicates a substantial advantage in ray-traced workloads.

For users who need an integrated graphics solution for a portable device, the AMD Radeon 610M is the appropriate choice. Its 15 W TDP requires no additional power connectors and no dedicated cooling beyond what a laptop or compact system provides. Its Vulkan score of 6353 in Geekbench shows it can handle modern API workloads reasonably well for an IGP. The NVIDIA part cannot be used in such a scenario; it requires a 1000 W power supply and a dual-slot chassis.

The percentile rankings are similar: 34th for the NVIDIA part versus 32nd for the AMD part. Neither product dominates its respective category. The NVIDIA part's nearest rivals are all within 0.2% of its score, meaning the database shows no significant performance differentiator among those five products. The AMD part's nearest rivals are within 1.0%, also showing a tight cluster. The data does not support a claim of superiority for either product beyond their intended use cases.

The production status tells a story: the NVIDIA part is Active and newly released, while the AMD part is End-of-life and has been superseded by Navi III IGP. The NVIDIA part's predecessor is Server Hopper and its successor is Server Rubin. The AMD part's predecessor is Vega II IGP and its successor is Navi III IGP. The data suggests the AMD part is a mature, legacy product, while the NVIDIA part is at the start of its lifecycle.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server has an average benchmark score of 5996, while the AMD Radeon 610M has an average of 5444. The NVIDIA part is 552 points higher, a 10.1% advantage.

Q: What is the memory configuration difference?

A: The NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server has 96 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 512-bit bus with 1.79 TB/s bandwidth. The AMD Radeon 610M uses system-shared memory with system-dependent bandwidth and no dedicated memory bus width.

Q: How do the power requirements compare?

A: The NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server has a 600 W TDP, requires a 1000 W suggested power supply, and uses a single 16-pin power connector. The AMD Radeon 610M has a 15 W TDP, requires no power connectors, and has no suggested power supply.

Q: Do both GPUs support the same APIs?

A: Yes, both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Q: What is the production status of each product?

A: The NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server is Active and was released on March 17, 2025. The AMD Radeon 610M is End-of-life and was released on September 19, 2022.

Q: Which GPU has more ray tracing cores?

A: The NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server has 188 ray tracing cores. The AMD Radeon 610M has 2 ray tracing cores.

Specification Differences

| Specification | NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server | AMD Radeon 610M |

|---|---|---|

| Chip | GB202 | Mendocino |

| Architecture | Blackwell 2.0 | RDNA 2.0 |

| Generation | Server Blackwell (Bxx) | Navi II IGP (Mendocino Mobile) |

| Process Node | 5 nm | 6 nm |

| Transistors | 92,200 million | Not recorded |

| Die Size | 750 mm² | 100 mm² |

| Transistor Density | 122.9M / mm² | Not recorded |

| Base Clock | 1590 MHz | 1500 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 2617 MHz | 1900 MHz |

| Memory Clock | 1750 MHz 28 Gbps effective | System Shared |

| Memory Size | 96 GB | System Shared |

| Memory Type | GDDR7 | System Shared |

| Memory Bus Width | 512 bit | System Shared |

| Memory Bandwidth | 1.79 TB/s | System Dependent |

| Shading Units | 24064 | 128 |

| TMUs | 752 | 8 |

| ROPs | 192 | 4 |

| Ray Tracing Cores | 188 | 2 |

| Tensor Cores | 752 | Not recorded |

| Pixel Rate | 502.5 GPixel/s | 7.6 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 1,968.0 GTexel/s | 15.2 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 126.0 TFLOPS | 486.4 GFLOPS |

| FP16 | 126.0 TFLOPS (1:1) | 972.8 GFLOPS (2:1) |

| TDP | 600 W | 15 W |

| Slot Width | Dual-slot | IGP |

| Power Connectors | 1x 16-pin | None |

| Suggested PSU | 1000 W | Not recorded |

| Bus Interface | PCIe 5.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x8 |

| Display Outputs | 4x DisplayPort 2.1b | Portable Device Dependent |

| Dimensions | 267 mm x 111 mm x 40 mm | Not recorded |

| Production Status | Active | End-of-life |

| Release Date | 2025-03-17 | 2022-09-19 |

| Predecessor | Server Hopper | Vega II IGP |

| Successor | Server Rubin | Navi III IGP |

| Percentile vs All GPUs | 34 | 32 |

| Average Benchmark Score | 5996 | 5444 |