GPU Comparison

AMD
RADEON

AMD Radeon 610M

CORE STATE Mendocino
VRAM System Shared
CLOCK SPEED 1900 MHz
TDP 15 W
BUS WIDTH System Shared
ARCHITECTURE RDNA 2.0
nm
PROCESS 6 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2022
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

RTX 6000D

CORE STATE GB202
VRAM 84 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2430 MHz
TDP 600 W
BUS WIDTH 448 bit
ARCHITECTURE Blackwell 2.0
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2025

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

geekbench_opencl
4,535
388,405
geekbench_vulkan
6,353
N/A
3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12
N/A
3,522

Analysis: AMD Radeon 610M vs NVIDIA RTX 6000D

The graphics card comparison between AMD AMD Radeon 610M GPU and RTX 6000 (NVIDIA) indicates impressively matched performance. Each cards alternate wins over multiple titles, with none claiming a clear lead. The score data demonstrates this assessment. Not one option wins repeatedly. Those have a genuine selection between them.

If frame rates is remarkably similar, value and functionality become the main factors. Look at RT performance performance, reconstruction support, energy efficiency, and platform quality when deciding between AMD AMD Radeon 610M GPU and RTX 6000 (NVIDIA). These factors might tip the choice. Weigh completely. This larger picture is important.

If performance is extremely similar, cost and features get the deciding variables. Look at real-time ray tracing support, reconstruction technology, TDP, and platform quality when picking between AMD AMD Radeon 610M GPU and RTX 6000 (NVIDIA). All these variables can sway the choice. Evaluate comprehensively. The complete context counts.

For people conflicted between AMD AMD Radeon 610M GPU and RTX 6000 (NVIDIA), feel assured that each pick offers matching gaming results. This score figures supports no clear leader. Make your determination on alternative elements and experience excellent rendering throughput either way. Either are excellent in this particular right. Go with confidently.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
610M
RTX 6000D
Core Specs
Shading Units
128
19,968 +15500.0%
Shaders
128
19,968 +15500.0%
TMUs
8
624 +7700.0%
ROPs
4
192 +4700.0%
Compute Units
2
SM Count
156
Clocks
Base Clock
1500 MHz
1590 MHz
Boost Clock
1900 MHz
2430 MHz
Memory Clock
System Shared
1750 MHz 28 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
System Shared
84 GB
VRAM (MB)
86,016
Memory Type
System Shared
GDDR7
Memory Bus
System Shared
448 bit
Bandwidth
System Dependent
1.57 TB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
128 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
2 MB
128 MB
L0 Cache
32 KB per WGP
Performance
Pixel Rate
7.600 GPixel/s
466.6 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
15.20 GTexel/s
1,516.3 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
486.4 GFLOPS
97.04 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
30.40 GFLOPS (1:16)
1.516 TFLOPS (1:64)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
972.8 GFLOPS (2:1)
97.04 TFLOPS (1:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
2
156 +7700.0%
Tensor Cores
624
Power
TDP
15 W
600 W
TDP (W)
15
600 +3900.0%
Suggested PSU
1000 W
Power Connectors
None
1x 16-pin
Architecture
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
Blackwell 2.0
GPU Name
Mendocino
GB202
Generation
Navi II IGP (Mendocino Mobile)
Blackwell PRO W (x000)
Process Size
6 nm
5 nm
Transistors
92,200 million
Die Size
100 mm²
750 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
TSMC
Density
122.9M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
2.0
3.0
CUDA
12.0
Shader Model
6.8
6.8
Physical
Slot Width
IGP
Dual-slot
Length
304 mm 12 inches
Height
137 mm 5.4 inches
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
4x DisplayPort 2.1b
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
PCIe 5.0 x16
Other
Launch Price
8,565 USD
Production
End-of-life
Active
Predecessor
Vega II IGP
Workstation Ada
Successor
Navi III IGP
View Radeon 610M Details View RTX 6000D Details