AMD Radeon 610M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M Comparison

# NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M vs AMD Radeon 610M

The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M and AMD Radeon 610M represent two very different approaches to mobile graphics, separated by nearly a decade of silicon evolution. The GTX 770M is a dedicated MXM module from the Kepler generation, while the Radeon 610M is a 6 nm integrated graphics processor built on RDNA 2.0. The database shows the GTX 770M holds a commanding lead in the only shared benchmark, but the Radeon 610M counters with a much more modern feature set and dramatically lower power draw. The GTX 770M sits at the 35th percentile among all GPUs, while the Radeon 610M ranks at the 32nd percentile, a narrow gap that belies their architectural differences.

Where Each One Wins

The GTX 770M wins in raw compute performance. In the Geekbench OpenCL test, the GTX 770M scores 8,552 against the Radeon 610M's 4,535, an 88.6% advantage. This translates directly into higher pixel and texture throughput. The GTX 770M delivers 15.94 GPixel/s and 63.76 GTexel/s, compared to 7.60 GPixel/s and 15.20 GTexel/s for the Radeon 610M. The GTX 770M also produces 1.530 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, more than three times the Radeon 610M's 486.4 GFLOPS. For applications that rely on sustained shader workloads, the GTX 770M is the clear choice.

The Radeon 610M wins in efficiency and modern API support. Its 15 W TDP is one-fifth of the GTX 770M's 75 W, making it suitable for thin-and-light notebooks where thermal headroom is minimal. The Radeon 610M also supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), Vulkan 1.4, and includes 2 ray tracing cores, while the GTX 770M is limited to DirectX 12 (11_0) and Vulkan 1.2.175. For games and applications that leverage ray tracing or the latest graphics features, the Radeon 610M provides capabilities the older Kepler part cannot match. The Radeon 610M also carries FP16 support at 972.8 GFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio, a feature entirely absent from the GTX 770M's specification.

Architecture Differences

The GTX 770M is built on NVIDIA's Kepler architecture, implemented on a 28 nm process at TSMC. The chip, codenamed GK106, contains 2,540 million transistors on a 221 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 11.5M per mm². It features 960 shading units, 80 texture mapping units, and 24 render output units. The memory subsystem consists of 3 GB of GDDR5 on a 192-bit bus, providing 96.19 GB/s of bandwidth. The GPU runs at a base clock of 706 MHz with a boost clock of 797 MHz, while memory operates at 1002 MHz (4 Gbps effective).

The Radeon 610M is built on AMD's RDNA 2.0 architecture, fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC. The chip, codenamed Mendocino, has a die size of 100 mm², though transistor count and density are not recorded in the database. It contains 128 shading units, 8 texture units, and 4 ROPs, along with 2 ray tracing cores. Memory is system shared, with bandwidth listed as system dependent. The GPU runs at a base clock of 1500 MHz and boosts to 1900 MHz, significantly higher clocks than the GTX 770M. The Radeon 610M uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, while the GTX 770M uses MXM-B (3.0).

These architectural choices explain the performance gap. The GTX 770M's dedicated GDDR5 memory and larger shader count give it a massive raw throughput advantage. The Radeon 610M compensates with higher clocks and a more efficient process, but its 128 shading units and shared memory bandwidth cannot overcome the GTX 770M's hardware resources in compute-heavy tasks.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The GTX 770M has an average benchmark score of 6,000, while the Radeon 610M scores 5,444. The GTX 770M outperforms the Radeon 610M by roughly 10% in this aggregate metric.

Q: Does the Radeon 610M support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the Radeon 610M includes 2 ray tracing cores, a feature the GTX 770M lacks entirely. This is part of its DirectX 12 Ultimate support.

Q: What memory configurations do these GPUs use?

A: The GTX 770M uses 3 GB of dedicated GDDR5 on a 192-bit bus with 96.19 GB/s bandwidth. The Radeon 610M uses system shared memory, with size, type, bus width, and bandwidth all listed as system dependent.

Q: Which GPU is more power efficient?

A: The Radeon 610M has a 15 W TDP, while the GTX 770M has a 75 W TDP. The Radeon 610M consumes one-fifth the power of the GTX 770M.

Q: What is the release date gap between these two products?

A: The GTX 770M was released on May 29, 2013, while the Radeon 610M followed on September 19, 2022, a gap of over nine years.

Q: Which GPU has better API support?

A: The Radeon 610M supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), Vulkan 1.4, and OpenGL 4.6. The GTX 770M supports DirectX 12 (11_0), Vulkan 1.2.175, and OpenGL 4.6. The Radeon 610M offers newer API versions and additional features.

Specification Differences

| Specification | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M | AMD Radeon 610M |

|---|---|---|

| Architecture | Kepler | RDNA 2.0 |

| Process Node | 28 nm | 6 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | TSMC |

| Die Size | 221 mm² | 100 mm² |

| Transistors | 2,540 million | Not recorded |

| Base Clock | 706 MHz | 1500 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 797 MHz | 1900 MHz |

| Memory | 3 GB GDDR5 | System Shared |

| Memory Bus | 192 bit | System Shared |

| Memory Bandwidth | 96.19 GB/s | System Dependent |

| Shading Units | 960 | 128 |

| TMUs | 80 | 8 |

| ROPs | 24 | 4 |

| Ray Tracing Cores | None | 2 |

| FP32 Compute | 1.530 TFLOPS | 486.4 GFLOPS |

| FP16 Compute | Not recorded | 972.8 GFLOPS (2:1) |

| Pixel Rate | 15.94 GPixel/s | 7.600 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 63.76 GTexel/s | 15.20 GTexel/s |

| TDP | 75 W | 15 W |

| Bus Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 4.0 x8 |

| DirectX Support | 12 (11_0) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |

| Vulkan Support | 1.2.175 | 1.4 |

| Release Date | 2013-05-29 | 2022-09-19 |

| Predecessor | GeForce 600M | Vega II IGP |

| Successor | GeForce 800M | Navi III IGP |

| Production Status | End-of-life | End-of-life |

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains one shared benchmark between these two GPUs: Geekbench OpenCL. The GTX 770M scores 8,552, while the Radeon 610M scores 4,535. This gives the GTX 770M an 88.6% advantage, a decisive margin that reflects its dedicated memory and substantially larger compute pipeline.

The GTX 770M's nearest rivals in the database are the AMD Radeon RX 6400 at 6,001 (0% delta), the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server at 5,996 (0.1% delta), the AMD FirePro W4100 at 5,987 (0.2% delta), and the NVIDIA Quadro K4000M at 5,986 (0.2% delta). This clustering shows the GTX 770M sits in a tightly packed performance tier where its average score of 6,000 is effectively indistinguishable from its immediate competitors.

The Radeon 610M's nearest rivals include the NVIDIA Quadro M4000 at 5,467 (-0.4% delta), the AMD Radeon R7 M365X at 5,416 (0.5% delta), the AMD Radeon R7 M440 at 5,483 (-0.7% delta), and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M at 5,501 (-1% delta). The Radeon 610M's average score of 5,444 places it in a similar tight grouping, with no rival more than 1% away.

The GTX 770M also has a Geekbench Metal score of 3,448, a test the Radeon 610M does not appear in. The Radeon 610M counters with a Geekbench Vulkan score of 6,353, a benchmark absent from the GTX 770M's results. These exclusive tests highlight the different software ecosystems each GPU targets. The GTX 770M's Metal result indicates macOS compatibility, while the Radeon 610M's Vulkan score reflects its modern API support on Windows and Linux platforms.

Looking at the broader picture, the GTX 770M holds a 10.2% average score advantage over the Radeon 610M, but the Radeon 610M's feature set is substantially more advanced. The GTX 770M's 88.6% OpenCL win is the single largest performance delta in the comparison, yet the Radeon 610M's ray tracing cores, FP16 support, and DirectX 12 Ultimate compliance mean it can run workloads the GTX 770M cannot. The recorded data shows a classic trade-off: the GTX 770M delivers raw throughput, while the Radeon 610M delivers modern capabilities at a fraction of the power draw. Neither GPU is universally superior, and the choice depends entirely on whether the workload prioritizes compute density or feature compatibility.