AMD Instinct MI455X vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Comparison

AMD
RADEON

AMD Instinct MI455X

CORE STATE MI450 256CU
VRAM 432 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2400 MHz
TDP 2300 W
BUS WIDTH 24576 bit
ARCHITECTURE CDNA 5.0
nm
PROCESS 2 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2026
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

GeForce RTX 5060

CORE STATE GB206
VRAM 8 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2497 MHz
TDP 145 W
BUS WIDTH 128 bit
ARCHITECTURE Blackwell 2.0
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2025

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12
N/A
3,628
geekbench_opencl
N/A
112,787
geekbench_vulkan
N/A
113,321
passmark_directx_10
N/A
127
passmark_directx_11
N/A
200
passmark_directx_12
N/A
77
passmark_directx_9
N/A
225
passmark_g2d
N/A
1,154
passmark_g3d
N/A
20,891
passmark_gpu_compute
N/A
10,899

Analysis: AMD Instinct MI455X vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060

The Verdict

The database contains two fundamentally different products: the AMD Instinct MI455X, an enterprise accelerator with no recorded benchmark scores, and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060, a consumer graphics card with a full benchmark suite. The RTX 5060 holds the 72nd percentile among all GPUs, while the MI455X sits at the 50th percentile with an average benchmark score of zero. The data indicates the RTX 5060 is the only option for anyone needing measurable graphics or compute performance. The MI455X, with its 432 GB of HBM4 memory and 23.3 TB/s bandwidth, targets workloads where capacity and bandwidth matter, but the recorded database contains no application results to quantify that advantage. The RTX 5060 delivers 19.18 TFLOPS FP32, 30 RT cores, and a 12 Ultimate DirectX feature level, making it appropriate for gaming and mainstream compute tasks. The MI455X lacks display outputs entirely, which removes it from consideration for any interactive graphics use case.

Architecture Differences

The two chips diverge at nearly every architectural level. The MI455X uses AMD's CDNA 5.0 architecture on a 2 nm TSMC process, while the RTX 5060 uses NVIDIA's Blackwell 2.0 architecture on a 5 nm TSMC process. Transistor counts differ dramatically: the MI455X integrates 320,000 million transistors across a 2990 mm² die, whereas the RTX 5060 packs 21,900 million transistors into an 181 mm² die. Transistor density tells a different story, with the RTX 5060 at 121.0M per mm² compared to the MI455X at 107.0M per mm², indicating the NVIDIA chip achieves higher packing density despite the older process node.

The MI455X employs a massive MI450 256CU configuration with 32,768 shading units, 1,024 texture mapping units, and zero raster operation units. Its pixel rate is recorded as 0 MPixel/s, confirming it is not designed for rasterization. The RTX 5060 uses the GB206 chip with 3,840 shading units, 120 TMUs, and 48 ROPs, producing a 119.9 GPixel/s pixel rate. The RTX 5060 includes 30 RT cores and 120 tensor cores, while the MI455X has no recorded RT or tensor core counts. The MI455X's texture rate reaches 2,457.6 GTexel/s against the RTX 5060's 299.6 GTexel/s, reflecting the accelerator's focus on raw throughput rather than graphics pipeline work.

Memory subsystems could not be more different. The MI455X carries 432 GB of HBM4 across a 24,576-bit bus, yielding 23.3 TB/s bandwidth. The RTX 5060 uses 8 GB of GDDR7 on a 128-bit bus for 448.0 GB/s. Clock behavior also diverges: the MI455X runs at a 1000 MHz base and 2400 MHz boost, while the RTX 5060 starts at 2280 MHz base and reaches 2497 MHz boost. The MI455X's memory clock is 1900 MHz with 7.6 Gbps effective, compared to the RTX 5060's 1750 MHz memory clock at 28 Gbps effective.

Where Each One Wins

The RTX 5060 wins in every measurable benchmark category because the MI455X has no recorded scores. The RTX 5060 achieves its highest single-test result in Geekbench Vulkan with 113,321 points, followed closely by Geekbench OpenCL at 112,787. PassMark G3D shows 20,891 points, and PassMark GPU Compute reaches 10,899. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test returns 3,628 points. DirectX 9 and DirectX 11 results are 225 and 200 points respectively, with DirectX 10 at 127 and DirectX 12 at 77. The 2D test produces 1,154 points.

The MI455X's only recorded strengths are architectural. Its 432 GB memory capacity exceeds the RTX 5060's 8 GB by a factor of 54, and its 23.3 TB/s bandwidth is 52 times higher. FP32 throughput of 157.3 TFLOPS dwarfs the RTX 5060's 19.18 TFLOPS. Texture rate of 2,457.6 GTexel/s is 8.2 times the RTX 5060's 299.6 GTexel/s. The MI455X also supports PCIe 6.0 x16, while the RTX 5060 uses PCIe 5.0 x8. These figures suggest the MI455X is built for memory-bound or throughput-bound server workloads, but the database provides no application-level verification.

The RTX 5060 offers display connectivity with 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b outputs, while the MI455X has none. The RTX 5060 supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, whereas the MI455X lists N/A for all three APIs. The RTX 5060 is a dual-slot card measuring 241 mm long, 111 mm high, and 40 mm wide, with a single 8-pin power connector and a 300 W suggested PSU. The MI455X is an EAM Module form factor with no power connectors and a 2,700 W suggested PSU.

FAQ

Q: Does the AMD Instinct MI455X have any benchmark scores in the database?

A: No. The MI455X has an empty benchmark array, an average benchmark score of 0, and a 50th percentile ranking. The RTX 5060 has 10 recorded benchmark scores and sits at the 72nd percentile.

Q: Which GPU has more memory bandwidth?

A: The MI455X delivers 23.3 TB/s from 432 GB of HBM4 memory on a 24,576-bit bus. The RTX 5060 provides 448.0 GB/s from 8 GB of GDDR7 on a 128-bit bus.

Q: Can the MI455X output video to a display?

A: No. The database lists display outputs as "No outputs" for the MI455X. The RTX 5060 offers 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b.

Q: What is the FP32 performance difference?

A: The MI455X reaches 157.3 TFLOPS FP32, while the RTX 5060 reaches 19.18 TFLOPS FP32. Both also match their FP16 performance at a 1:1 ratio.

Q: Which card supports ray tracing?

A: Only the RTX 5060 has recorded RT cores, with 30 of them. The MI455X lists no RT core count.

Q: What are the power requirements?

A: The MI455X has a 2,300 W TDP and a 2,700 W suggested PSU. The RTX 5060 has a 145 W TDP and a 300 W suggested PSU.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head benchmark table is empty, so no direct comparisons exist. The RTX 5060's individual results provide the only measurable performance data. Its best showing comes in Geekbench Vulkan at 113,321, which is 534 points higher than its Geekbench OpenCL result of 112,787. PassMark G3D delivers 20,891, about 45% higher than PassMark GPU Compute's 10,899. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3,628 represents the most demanding modern workload in the suite. Legacy DirectX tests show lower scores, with DirectX 9 at 225, DirectX 11 at 200, DirectX 10 at 127, and DirectX 12 at 77. The PassMark G2D score of 1,154 covers 2D operations.

The nearest rivals for the RTX 5060 provide context. The AMD Radeon 860M averages 26,401, which is 0.3% higher than the RTX 5060's 26,331 average. The NVIDIA GeForce MX550 records 26,421, also 0.3% higher. The AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary reaches 26,553, 0.8% higher. The AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT averages 26,011, which is 1.2% lower than the RTX 5060. These deltas are small, placing the RTX 5060 in a tightly contested performance band. The MI455X has no nearest rivals listed, reinforcing its absence from the benchmark landscape.

The FP32 throughput gap between the two cards is stark: 157.3 TFLOPS versus 19.18 TFLOPS, an 8.2-fold difference. Texture rate shows a similar ratio at 2,457.6 GTexel/s versus 299.6 GTexel/s. The MI455X's 2,300 W TDP is 15.9 times higher than the RTX 5060's 145 W, indicating the performance differential comes at a substantial power cost. The MI455X's 2 nm process node gives it a transistor count advantage, 320,000 million versus 21,900 million, but the RTX 5060's higher transistor density of 121.0M per mm² versus 107.0M per mm² shows NVIDIA extracts more packing efficiency from its smaller chip.

Specification Differences

The two products differ in every major specification category. The MI455X uses a 2 nm process, while the RTX 5060 uses 5 nm. Both come from TSMC. The MI455X has 320,000 million transistors on a 2990 mm² die; the RTX 5060 has 21,900 million on 181 mm². Transistor density favors the RTX 5060 at 121.0M per mm² versus 107.0M per mm².

Clock speeds: the MI455X runs 1000 MHz base and 2400 MHz boost, while the RTX 5060 runs 2280 MHz base and 2497 MHz boost. Memory clocks are 1900 MHz for the MI455X and 1750 MHz for the RTX 5060, with effective speeds of 7.6 Gbps and 28 Gbps respectively. Memory capacity is 432 GB of HBM4 versus 8 GB of GDDR7. Bus widths are 24,576 bit versus 128 bit, and bandwidth is 23.3 TB/s versus 448.0 GB/s.

Compute resources: the MI455X has 32,768 shading units, 1,024 TMUs, and 0 ROPs. The RTX 5060 has 3,840 shading units, 120 TMUs, and 48 ROPs. RT cores: none recorded for the MI455X, 30 for the RTX 5060. Tensor cores: none recorded for the MI455X, 120 for the RTX 5060. Pixel rates are 0 MPixel/s versus 119.9 GPixel/s, and texture rates are 2,457.6 GTexel/s versus 299.6 GTexel/s. FP32 and FP16 both show 157.3 TFLOPS for the MI455X and 19.18 TFLOPS for the RTX 5060.

Power and physical specs: TDP is 2,300 W versus 145 W. The MI455X is an EAM Module with no power connectors; the RTX 5060 is dual-slot with 1x 8-pin. Suggested PSU is 2,700 W versus 300 W. Bus interface is PCIe 6.0 x16 versus PCIe 5.0 x8. Display outputs are none versus 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b. API support: the MI455X lists N/A for DirectX, OpenGL, and Vulkan; the RTX 5060 supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The RTX 5060 measures 241 mm by 111 mm by 40 mm. Release dates: the MI455X launched 2026-07-22, and the RTX 5060 launched 2025-05-18. The RTX 5060 has a launch MSRP of 299 USD.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
Instinct MI455X
RTX 5060
Core Specs
Shading Units
32,768
3,840 -88.3%
Shaders
32,768
3,840 -88.3%
TMUs
1,024
120 -88.3%
ROPs
0
48 +∞%
Compute Units
256
—
SM Count
—
30
Clocks
Base Clock
1000 MHz
2280 MHz
Boost Clock
2400 MHz
2497 MHz
Memory Clock
1900 MHz 7.6 Gbps effective
1750 MHz 28 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
432 GB
8 GB
VRAM (MB)
442,368
8,192 -98.1%
Memory Type
HBM4
GDDR7
Memory Bus
24576 bit
128 bit
Bandwidth
23.3 TB/s
448.0 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
32 KB (per CU)
128 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
192 MB
32 MB
Performance
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
119.9 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
2,457.6 GTexel/s
299.6 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
157.3 TFLOPS
19.18 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
2.458 TFLOPS (1:64)
299.6 GFLOPS (1:64)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
157.3 TFLOPS (1:1)
19.18 TFLOPS (1:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
—
30
Tensor Cores
—
120
Matrix Cores
1,024
—
Power
TDP
2300 W
145 W
TDP (W)
2,300
145 -93.7%
Suggested PSU
2700 W
300 W
Power Connectors
None
1x 8-pin
Architecture
Architecture
CDNA 5.0
Blackwell 2.0
GPU Name
MI450 256CU
GB206
Generation
Instinct (MIx)
GeForce 50
Process Size
2 nm
5 nm
Transistors
320,000 million
21,900 million
Die Size
2990 mm²
181 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
TSMC
Density
107.0M / mm²
121.0M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
—
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
—
4.6
Vulkan
—
1.4
OpenCL
3.0
3.0
CUDA
—
12.0
Shader Model
—
6.9
Physical
Slot Width
EAM Module
Dual-slot
Length
—
241 mm 9.5 inches
Height
—
111 mm 4.4 inches
Outputs
No outputs
1x HDMI 2.1b3x DisplayPort 2.1b
Bus Interface
PCIe 6.0 x16
PCIe 5.0 x8
Other
Launch Price
—
299 USD
Production
—
Active
Predecessor
Radeon Instinct
GeForce 40
Successor
—
GeForce 60
View Instinct MI455X Details View GeForce RTX 5060 Details