AMD Instinct MI350P vs Intel Arc A570M Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark results between the AMD Instinct MI350P and the Intel Arc A570M. The head-to-head benchmark array is empty, and neither product has a win count against the other. This absence of comparative measurements means the analysis must rely on the individual performance characteristics and the Arc A570M's existing benchmark results.

The Intel Arc A570M has one recorded benchmark entry: a Geekbench OpenCL score of 58,239. This places the Arc A570M at the 88th percentile among all GPUs in the database. Its nearest rivals in the database show remarkably tight clustering. The AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT scores 58,392, which is 0.3% higher than the Arc A570M. The AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM scores 58,085, which is 0.3% lower. The NVIDIA P102-100 scores 58,528, 0.5% higher. The AMD Radeon PRO V710 scores 58,657, 0.7% higher. The Arc A570M sits within a 1% band of these four rivals, indicating that its OpenCL performance is closely matched to a broad range of competing products across different tiers.

The AMD Instinct MI350P has no benchmark scores recorded in the database. Its percentile versus all GPUs is 50, and its average benchmark score is 0. This reflects the absence of measured data rather than a performance rating. The MI350P's theoretical compute figures, however, are substantially higher than the Arc A570M's. The MI350P delivers 36.04 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, while the Arc A570M delivers 5.325 TFLOPS. This represents a 6.77x advantage for the MI350P in raw single-precision throughput. In FP16, the MI350P again delivers 36.04 TFLOPS with a 1:1 ratio, while the Arc A570M delivers 10.65 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio. The MI350P's FP16 output is 3.38x higher.

Memory bandwidth differences are even more pronounced. The MI350P has 8.19 TB/s of bandwidth, while the Arc A570M has 224.0 GB/s. The MI350P's bandwidth is approximately 36.6x higher. Texture rate similarly favors the MI350P at 1,126.4 GTexel/s versus 166.4 GTexel/s, a 6.77x difference. Pixel rate, however, reverses the comparison. The MI350P records 0 MPixel/s because it has no ROPs, while the Arc A570M has 64 ROPs and delivers 83.20 GPixel/s. The MI350P is not designed for rasterization output, so this metric does not apply to its intended workload.

FAQ

Q: What is the Geekbench OpenCL score for the Intel Arc A570M?

A: The Arc A570M records a Geekbench OpenCL score of 58,239, placing it at the 88th percentile among all GPUs.

Q: How does the Arc A570M compare to its nearest rivals in the database?

A: The closest rival is the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM with a score of 58,085, which is 0.3% lower. The AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT scores 0.3% higher at 58,392. The NVIDIA P102-100 scores 0.5% higher at 58,528, and the AMD Radeon PRO V710 scores 0.7% higher at 58,657.

Q: Does the AMD Instinct MI350P have any recorded benchmark scores?

A: No. The database lists no benchmarks for the MI350P, its average benchmark score is 0, and its percentile versus all GPUs is 50.

Q: What is the FP32 compute output of each product?

A: The MI350P delivers 36.04 TFLOPS, and the Arc A570M delivers 5.325 TFLOPS.

Q: What memory configuration does each product use?

A: The MI350P uses 144 GB of HBM3e on an 8192-bit bus with 8.19 TB/s bandwidth. The Arc A570M uses 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with 224.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Which product has ray tracing cores?

A: Only the Arc A570M has ray tracing cores, with 16 RT cores. The MI350P lists no RT cores.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Instinct MI350P and Intel Arc A570M represent fundamentally different architectural approaches. The MI350P uses CDNA 4.0 architecture, built on the MI350 128CU chip. The Arc A570M uses Xe-HPG architecture, built on the DG2-256 chip. These architectures target different workloads: CDNA is designed for compute acceleration, while Xe-HPG is a graphics-oriented design.

The manufacturing process differs significantly. The MI350P is fabricated on a 3 nm process at TSMC, while the Arc A570M uses a 6 nm process, also at TSMC. Transistor counts reflect this gap. The MI350P contains 73,000 million transistors on a 1190 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 61.3 million per mm². The Arc A570M contains 11,500 million transistors on a 269 mm² die, yielding 42.8 million per mm². The MI350P has 6.35x more transistors and a 4.42x larger die.

The compute resources differ sharply. The MI350P has 8,192 shading units and 512 TMUs, but zero ROPs. The Arc A570M has 2,048 shading units, 128 TMUs, and 64 ROPs. The MI350P's lack of ROPs means it cannot output pixels; the Arc A570M's ROPs enable standard graphics rasterization. The MI350P also lists no RT cores, while the Arc A570M has 16. Neither product lists tensor cores in the database.

Memory architecture is another major divergence. The MI350P uses HBM3e with 144 GB capacity, an 8192-bit bus, and 8.19 TB/s bandwidth. The Arc A570M uses GDDR6 with 8 GB capacity, a 128-bit bus, and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth. The MI350P's memory system is optimized for large datasets and high throughput, while the Arc A570M's smaller memory footprint suits mobile graphics workloads.

The API support differs completely. The MI350P lists N/A for DirectX, OpenGL, and Vulkan. The Arc A570M supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. This confirms the MI350P is not intended for consumer graphics applications, while the Arc A570M carries full modern graphics API support.

Specification Differences

Clock speeds differ. The MI350P runs at a 1000 MHz base and 2200 MHz boost. The Arc A570M runs at 900 MHz base and 1300 MHz boost. The MI350P's memory clock is 2000 MHz with 8 Gbps effective data rate; the Arc A570M's memory clock is 1750 MHz with 14 Gbps effective.

Power and physical specifications diverge substantially. The MI350P has a 600 W TDP and requires a 1000 W suggested PSU, with a 16-pin power connector and dual-slot form factor. The Arc A570M has a 75 W TDP, lists no power connector, no suggested PSU, and is classified as an IGP (integrated graphics processor). The MI350P measures 267 mm in length, 111 mm in height, and 40 mm in width. The Arc A570M has no recorded dimensions.

The bus interface differs: the MI350P uses PCIe 5.0 x16, while the Arc A570M uses PCIe 4.0 x8. Display outputs also distinguish them. The MI350P has no outputs, while the Arc A570M's outputs are described as portable device dependent.

Release dates are far apart. The MI350P has a release date of May 6, 2026. The Arc A570M was released on July 31, 2023. The Arc A570M has an active production status; the MI350P's production status is not recorded. The MI350P lists Radeon Instinct as its predecessor, while the Arc A570M has no predecessor listed.

The MI350P's FP16 ratio is 1:1, meaning equal FP16 and FP32 throughput. The Arc A570M's FP16 ratio is 2:1, meaning FP16 throughput is double FP32. The MI350P's pixel rate is 0 MPixel/s, while the Arc A570M delivers 83.20 GPixel/s.

The Verdict

The data describes two products with no overlapping performance measurements and fundamentally different design targets. The AMD Instinct MI350P is a compute accelerator. It has no display outputs, no graphics API support, no ROPs, and a 600 W TDP. Its strengths are raw compute throughput, massive memory capacity, and extremely high bandwidth. The Intel Arc A570M is a mobile graphics processor with a 75 W TDP, full graphics API support, 16 RT cores, and 64 ROPs. It has one recorded benchmark score and sits at the 88th percentile.

For users seeking general-purpose compute with enormous memory capacity, the MI350P's specification sheet shows a clear advantage. Its FP32 throughput of 36.04 TFLOPS and bandwidth of 8.19 TB/s are in a different class from the Arc A570M's 5.325 TFLOPS and 224.0 GB/s. The MI350P's 144 GB of HBM3e memory dwarfs the Arc A570M's 8 GB of GDDR6. These figures indicate the MI350P is built for large-scale data processing, scientific simulation, or AI training workloads where memory capacity and bandwidth are critical.

For graphics rendering on portable devices, the Arc A570M is the only viable option between the two. It has ROPs, RT cores, graphics API support, and display outputs. The MI350P cannot output an image at all. The Arc A570M's benchmark score of 58,239 places it within 1% of several established desktop GPUs, suggesting competitive OpenCL performance for its class.

The production status also matters. The Arc A570M is active and has been available since 2023. The MI350P has a 2026 release date and no recorded production status. The MI350P's 50th percentile rank, driven by zero benchmark entries, offers no empirical performance validation. The Arc A570M's 88th percentile rank is backed by a measured score.

The choice depends entirely on workload. Compute-heavy, memory-bound tasks with no graphics output requirement align with the MI350P's specifications. Graphics rendering, ray tracing, and portable deployment align with the Arc A570M's specifications. The database contains no comparative benchmark data, so direct performance equivalence cannot be established. The recorded figures, however, show that these products occupy separate market segments with minimal functional overlap.