AMD Instinct MI350P vs AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data contains no direct head-to-head benchmark comparisons between the AMD Instinct MI350P and the AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT. The database lists an average benchmark score of 12,710 for the RX 7600M XT, while the MI350P shows an average benchmark score of 0 with an empty benchmark array. This means the MI350P has no recorded benchmark results at all in the database, making a direct performance comparison impossible from the available measurements.

The RX 7600M XT does have ten individual benchmark entries. Its strongest result is in Geekbench OpenCL with a score of 74,869, followed by Geekbench Vulkan at 27,793. The Passmark G3D score sits at 13,907, while Passmark GPU Compute reaches 7,140. The DirectX results are notably lower: Passmark DirectX 9 scores 175, DirectX 11 scores 137, DirectX 10 scores 76, and DirectX 12 scores 58. The Passmark G2D score is 894. These results place the RX 7600M XT at the 52nd percentile among all GPUs in the database.

The MI350P holds the 50th percentile among all GPUs, but since its average benchmark score is zero and no individual benchmarks are recorded, its percentile placement must be interpreted cautiously. The database does not provide any test scores for the MI350P to analyze.

For the RX 7600M XT, the nearest rivals in the database show how tightly clustered its performance is. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 averages 12,773, which is 0.5% higher than the RX 7600M XT. The NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm averages 12,625, coming in 0.7% lower. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590 averages 12,830, which is 0.9% higher, and the AMD Radeon Pro 455 also averages 12,831, also 0.9% higher. These four rivals all fall within a 1% band around the RX 7600M XT's average score, indicating that the mobile GPU delivers performance comparable to older desktop and workstation parts from a previous generation.

The gap between the two cards in theoretical specifications is enormous, but without benchmark scores for the MI350P, the head-to-head section can only report what the database actually shows: one card has extensive benchmark coverage and the other has none.

Where Each One Wins

The RX 7600M XT wins in every category where recorded data exists, simply because the MI350P has no recorded benchmark scores. The RX 7600M XT's OpenCL score of 74,869 indicates strong general-purpose compute capability, while its Vulkan score of 27,793 shows solid graphics API performance. The Passmark G3D result of 13,907 suggests competent Direct3D rendering performance for gaming workloads.

The MI350P's strengths must be inferred from its specification sheet rather than measured performance. Its FP32 throughput of 36.04 TFLOPS is nearly double the RX 7600M XT's 20.23 TFLOPS. Its FP16 performance of 36.04 TFLOPS with a 1:1 ratio differs fundamentally from the RX 7600M XT's 40.45 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio. The MI350P's texture rate of 1,126.4 GTexel/s is more than triple the RX 7600M XT's 316.0 GTexel/s. The pixel rate comparison is extreme: the MI350P records 0 MPixel/s while the RX 7600M XT delivers 158.0 GPixel/s.

Memory capacity and bandwidth favor the MI350P overwhelmingly. The MI350P carries 144 GB of HBM3e memory across an 8192-bit bus, delivering 8.19 TB/s of bandwidth. The RX 7600M XT has 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with 288.0 GB/s. That is an 18x difference in capacity and roughly a 28x difference in bandwidth, which points to entirely different workload domains.

Architecture Differences

The MI350P uses the CDNA 4.0 architecture built on a 3 nm process at TSMC. The RX 7600M XT uses RDNA 3.0 on a 6 nm process, also at TSMC. The MI350P integrates 73,000 million transistors on a 1190 mm² die, while the RX 7600M XT integrates 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die. Transistor density is similar: 61.3M per mm² for the MI350P versus 65.2M per mm² for the RX 7600M XT, which makes sense given the different node sizes.

The MI350P is built around the MI350 128CU chip with 8192 shading units and 512 TMUs. It has no ROPs, no RT cores, and no tensor cores listed. The RX 7600M XT uses the Navi 33 chip with 2048 shading units, 128 TMUs, 64 ROPs, and 32 RT cores. The MI350P's lack of ROPs and its 0 MPixel/s pixel rate confirm that it is not designed for rasterized graphics output, and its display outputs are listed as "No outputs." The RX 7600M XT lists "Portable Device Dependent" for display outputs, consistent with its mobile gaming GPU positioning.

Clock behavior differs sharply. The MI350P has a base clock of 1000 MHz and a boost clock of 2200 MHz. The RX 7600M XT has a base clock of 1280 MHz, a game clock of 2023 MHz, and a boost clock of 2469 MHz. The RX 7600M XT actually runs at higher clock speeds despite its larger process node, while the MI350P compensates with far more compute units and memory bandwidth.

Memory architecture is fundamentally different. The MI350P uses HBM3e with an 8192-bit bus width and 2000 MHz memory clock running at 8 Gbps effective. The RX 7600M XT uses GDDR6 with a 128-bit bus and 2250 MHz memory clock running at 18 Gbps effective. The MI350P's bandwidth of 8.19 TB/s versus 288.0 GB/s reflects the HBM versus GDDR design split.

Power and physical characteristics also diverge. The MI350P has a TDP of 600 W, requires a 1000 W suggested PSU, uses a dual-slot design with a single 16-pin power connector, and measures 267 mm in length, 111 mm in height, and 40 mm in width. The RX 7600M XT has a TDP of 120 W, lists no power connectors (the IGP form factor means it draws power from the host system), and has no recorded dimensions. The MI350P connects via PCIe 5.0 x16, while the RX 7600M XT uses PCIe 4.0 x16.

API support separates the two completely. The MI350P lists DirectX, OpenGL, and Vulkan as "N/A." The RX 7600M XT supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. This confirms the MI350P is a compute accelerator without graphics API exposure, while the RX 7600M XT is a fully featured consumer graphics processor.

The release timeline differs as well. The RX 7600M XT was released on January 3, 2023, with a predecessor of Polaris Mobile. The MI350P has a release date of May 6, 2026, with a predecessor of Radeon Instinct. The RX 7600M XT is marked as Active in production status, while the MI350P has no recorded production status.

The Verdict

The data supports only one clear conclusion: these two products occupy different segments and should be selected based on workload requirements, not direct competition. The RX 7600M XT is the only one with recorded benchmark scores, so any user needing verified performance data can look at its 12,710 average benchmark score and its 52nd percentile placement. Its nearest rivals all fall within 1% of its average score, which indicates the RX 7600M XT performs in line with older high-end GPUs like the GTX 670 and GTX 590.

The MI350P has no recorded benchmarks, zero average score, and no graphics API support. Its specifications point toward data center compute workloads: 144 GB of HBM3e memory, 8.19 TB/s bandwidth, 36.04 TFLOPS FP32, and a 600 W TDP. The 0 MPixel/s pixel rate and absent display outputs mean it cannot drive a monitor. Selecting the MI350P makes sense only for compute acceleration where memory capacity and bandwidth dominate. Selecting the RX 7600M XT makes sense for graphics rendering, gaming, and general-purpose compute on a mobile platform, where its 120 W TDP and portable form factor fit.

The RX 7600M XT delivers 20.23 TFLOPS FP32 and 40.45 TFLOPS FP16 with a 2:1 ratio, which suits graphics workloads where FP16 is used as a throughput booster. The MI350P delivers 36.04 TFLOPS in both FP32 and FP16 at a 1:1 ratio, which suits compute workloads that require consistent precision across formats. The MI350P has more shading units (8192 versus 2048), more TMUs (512 versus 128), and vastly more memory bandwidth, but the RX 7600M XT has ROPs and RT cores that the MI350P lacks entirely.

Users should pick the RX 7600M XT when they need a working graphics card with API support, display outputs, and proven benchmark results. Users should pick the MI350P when they need a high-bandwidth compute accelerator with no graphics requirements. Neither part is a substitute for the other.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT has an average benchmark score of 12,710. The AMD Instinct MI350P has an average benchmark score of 0 with no recorded benchmark entries.

Q: What is the memory capacity difference?

A: The MI350P has 144 GB of HBM3e memory, while the RX 7600M XT has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory.

Q: Which GPU supports DirectX?

A: The RX 7600M XT supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2). The MI350P lists DirectX as N/A.

Q: How do the transistor counts compare?

A: The MI350P has 73,000 million transistors on a 1190 mm² die. The RX 7600M XT has 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die.

Q: What are the TDP ratings?

A: The MI350P has a TDP of 600 W. The RX 7600M XT has a TDP of 120 W.

Q: Which GPU has ray tracing cores?

A: The RX 7600M XT has 32 RT cores. The MI350P has no RT cores listed.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Instinct MI350P | AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT |

|---|---|---|

| Architecture | CDNA 4.0 | RDNA 3.0 |

| Process node | 3 nm | 6 nm |

| Transistors | 73,000 million | 13,300 million |

| Die size | 1190 mm² | 204 mm² |

| Base clock | 1000 MHz | 1280 MHz |

| Boost clock | 2200 MHz | 2469 MHz |

| Memory size | 144 GB | 8 GB |

| Memory type | HBM3e | GDDR6 |

| Memory bus width | 8192 bit | 128 bit |

| Memory bandwidth | 8.19 TB/s | 288.0 GB/s |

| Shading units | 8192 | 2048 |

| TMUs | 512 | 128 |

| ROPs | 0 | 64 |

| RT cores | None | 32 |

| FP32 performance | 36.04 TFLOPS | 20.23 TFLOPS |

| FP16 performance | 36.04 TFLOPS (1:1) | 40.45 TFLOPS (2:1) |

| Pixel rate | 0 MPixel/s | 158.0 GPixel/s |

| Texture rate | 1,126.4 GTexel/s | 316.0 GTexel/s |

| TDP | 600 W | 120 W |

| Slot width | Dual-slot | IGP |

| Power connectors | 1x 16-pin | None |

| Bus interface | PCIe 5.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |

| Display outputs | No outputs | Portable Device Dependent |

| DirectX support | N/A | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |

| OpenGL support | N/A | 4.6 |

| Vulkan support | N/A | 1.4 |

| Release date | 2026-05-06 | 2023-01-03 |

| Predecessor | Radeon Instinct | Polaris Mobile |

| Percentile vs all GPUs | 50 | 52 |

| Average benchmark score | 0 | 12,710 |