AMD Instinct MI300 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows a stark contrast in benchmark coverage between the two accelerators. The AMD Instinct MI300 has no benchmark scores listed in the database, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has a full set of ten recorded results. This absence of data for the MI300 means direct numerical comparisons are impossible across any shared workload. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER's average benchmark score is 31087, placing it at the 76th percentile of all GPUs in the database. The MI300 sits at the 50th percentile, but with an average score of 0, this percentile reflects the lack of recorded measurements rather than competitive performance.

The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER's strongest recorded result comes from the Geekbench OpenCL test, where it scores 199267. Its Vulkan result reaches 53683, and in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 it posts 5569. The PassMark suite shows a G3D score of 31811 and a GPU compute score of 18372. The older DirectX tests show scores of 360 for DirectX 9, 278 for DirectX 11, 181 for DirectX 10, and 119 for DirectX 12. The 2D graphics test records 1225. These results establish a clear performance profile for the NVIDIA card across modern and legacy APIs.

For the nearest rivals of the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER, the data shows tight competition. The NVIDIA Quadro M5000 averages 31206, which is 0.4% higher than the 4070 Ti SUPER's average. The NVIDIA GRID M60-1Q also averages 31220, again 0.4% higher. The NVIDIA RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell averages 31532, a 1.4% advantage. The NVIDIA TITAN RTX averages 31676, leading by 1.9%. These delta values indicate the 4070 Ti SUPER sits within a narrow band of performance relative to these four cards, with all rivals holding a modest edge in average score.

Where Each One Wins

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER wins decisively in every measurable category because it is the only one of the two with recorded benchmark results. It holds wins across compute workloads, graphics APIs, and legacy DirectX tests. The Geekbench OpenCL result of 199267 demonstrates strong general-purpose compute throughput, while the Vulkan score of 53683 shows capable cross-platform graphics performance. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5569 confirms modern DirectX 12 gaming and rendering capability. PassMark results reinforce this across multiple generations of DirectX.

The AMD Instinct MI300 has no wins to claim from the recorded data. Its benchmark array is empty, its average score is 0, and no nearest rivals are listed. The hardware specifications suggest a different purpose, but the database contains no measured evidence of its performance. Any assertion of a win for the MI300 would require data that is not present.

The specification table offers a separate comparison. The MI300 carries 14080 shading units, 880 texture mapping units, and no ROPs. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has 8448 shading units, 264 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. The MI300 also has no pixel rate, while the 4070 Ti SUPER records a pixel rate of 250.6 GPixel/s. Texture rates differ as well: 1496.0 GTexel/s for the MI300 versus 689.0 GTexel/s for the NVIDIA card. These figures indicate the MI300 is built for raw texture and compute throughput, while the 4070 Ti SUPER is designed for rasterized graphics output.

Architecture Differences

The two accelerators come from different architectural lineages. The AMD Instinct MI300 uses the CDNA 3.0 architecture on the Aqua Vanjaram chip, built on a 5 nm process at TSMC. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER uses the Ada Lovelace architecture on the AD103 chip, also fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC. Both share the same foundry and node, but the transistor counts diverge sharply. The MI300 contains 153,000 million transistors on a die size of 1017 mm², giving a transistor density of 150.4 million per square millimeter. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER contains 45,900 million transistors on a 379 mm² die, with a density of 121.1 million per square millimeter.

Memory subsystems differ substantially. The MI300 offers 128 GB of HBM3 across an 8192-bit bus, delivering 5.32 TB/s of bandwidth. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER provides 16 GB of GDDR6X on a 256-bit bus, with 672.3 GB/s of bandwidth. The MI300's memory clock is listed as 1300 MHz with 5.2 Gbps effective, while the 4070 Ti SUPER runs its memory at 1313 MHz with 21 Gbps effective. The bus width difference is the dominant factor in the bandwidth gap.

Clock speeds also separate the two. The MI300 has a base clock of 1000 MHz and a boost clock of 1700 MHz. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER starts at 2340 MHz base and reaches 2610 MHz boost. The NVIDIA card runs at much higher frequencies, while the AMD part relies on its massive parallel width and memory bandwidth.

Feature sets are distinct. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER includes 66 RT cores and 264 tensor cores, supporting DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. It has display outputs: 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a. The MI300 has no RT cores, no tensor cores, no display outputs, and its API support is listed as N/A for DirectX, OpenGL, and Vulkan. The MI300 is a compute accelerator without graphics output, while the 4070 Ti SUPER is a full-featured graphics card.

Power and physical characteristics differ as well. The MI300 has a TDP of 600 W, uses two 8-pin power connectors, and suggests a 1000 W power supply. It measures 267 mm in length and 111 mm in height. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER draws 285 W, uses a single 16-pin connector, and suggests a 600 W power supply. It is a triple-slot card measuring 310 mm in length, 140 mm in height, and 61 mm in width. The MI300 uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 interface, while the 4070 Ti SUPER uses PCIe 4.0 x16.

FAQ

Q: Which card has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has an average benchmark score of 31087. The AMD Instinct MI300 has an average score of 0 because no benchmarks are recorded for it.

Q: How does the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The nearest rivals all hold a small edge. The NVIDIA Quadro M5000 averages 31206, which is 0.4% higher. The NVIDIA GRID M60-1Q averages 31220, also 0.4% higher. The NVIDIA RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell averages 31532, 1.4% higher. The NVIDIA TITAN RTX averages 31676, 1.9% higher.

Q: What are the memory sizes and types of each card?

A: The AMD Instinct MI300 has 128 GB of HBM3 memory with an 8192-bit bus and 5.32 TB/s bandwidth. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has 16 GB of GDDR6X memory with a 256-bit bus and 672.3 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Which card has more shading units?

A: The AMD Instinct MI300 has 14080 shading units, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has 8448 shading units.

Q: Do both cards support the same APIs?

A: No. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The MI300 lists N/A for DirectX, OpenGL, and Vulkan, and it has no display outputs.

Q: What are the power requirements for each card?

A: The AMD Instinct MI300 has a TDP of 600 W and suggests a 1000 W power supply. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has a TDP of 285 W and suggests a 600 W power supply.

The Verdict

The data supports a clear split by intended use. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is the only one of the two with measured performance, and it delivers a full graphics feature set: 96 ROPs, 66 RT cores, 264 tensor cores, display outputs, and support for DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. Its average benchmark score of 31087 places it at the 76th percentile, with nearest rivals within 1.9% of its average. It is an end-of-life product with the GeForce 50-series listed as its successor.

The AMD Instinct MI300 has no benchmark results, no nearest rivals, and no graphics outputs. Its design targets a different workload class: 128 GB of HBM3 memory, an 8192-bit bus, 5.32 TB/s bandwidth, 14080 shading units, and 880 TMUs. Its FP32 throughput of 47.87 TFLOPS slightly exceeds the 44.10 TFLOPS of the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER, and its texture rate of 1496.0 GTexel/s more than doubles the NVIDIA card's 689.0 GTexel/s. The MI300 also has no ROPs and a 0 MPixel/s pixel rate, which confirms it does not perform rasterized graphics rendering.

For anyone requiring a graphics card with display output, modern API support, and verified benchmark performance, the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is the only option with recorded evidence. For compute-heavy workloads that prioritize memory capacity and bandwidth, the MI300's specifications indicate a different purpose, but no measured data exists to confirm its performance. The production status of the MI300 is not listed, while the 4070 Ti SUPER is marked end-of-life.

The launch MSRP of the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is 799 USD. The MI300 has no launch MSRP listed.

Specification Differences

The following fields differ between the AMD Instinct MI300 and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER.

| Specification | AMD Instinct MI300 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER |

|---|---|---|

| Series | None | GeForce 40-series |

| Chip | Aqua Vanjaram | AD103 |

| Architecture | CDNA 3.0 | Ada Lovelace |

| Generation | Instinct (MIx) | GeForce 40 |

| Transistors | 153,000 million | 45,900 million |

| Die Size | 1017 mm² | 379 mm² |

| Transistor Density | 150.4M / mm² | 121.1M / mm² |

| Base Clock | 1000 MHz | 2340 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 1700 MHz | 2610 MHz |

| Memory Clock | 1300 MHz 5.2 Gbps effective | 1313 MHz 21 Gbps effective |

| Memory Size | 128 GB | 16 GB |

| Memory Type | HBM3 | GDDR6X |

| Memory Bus Width | 8192 bit | 256 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | 5.32 TB/s | 672.3 GB/s |

| Shading Units | 14080 | 8448 |

| TMUs | 880 | 264 |

| ROPs | 0 | 96 |

| RT Cores | None | 66 |

| Tensor Cores | None | 264 |

| Pixel Rate | 0 MPixel/s | 250.6 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 1,496.0 GTexel/s | 689.0 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 47.87 TFLOPS | 44.10 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 47.87 TFLOPS (1:1) | 44.10 TFLOPS (1:1) |

| TDP | 600 W | 285 W |

| Slot Width | Not listed | Triple-slot |

| Power Connectors | 2x 8-pin | 1x 16-pin |

| Suggested PSU | 1000 W | 600 W |

| Bus Interface | PCIe 5.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |

| Display Outputs | No outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |

| DirectX Support | N/A | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |

| OpenGL Support | N/A | 4.6 |

| Vulkan Support | N/A | 1.4 |

| Length | 267 mm 10.5 inches | 310 mm 12.2 inches |

| Height | 111 mm 4.4 inches | 140 mm 5.5 inches |

| Width | Not listed | 61 mm 2.4 inches |

| Production Status | Not listed | End-of-life |

| Release Date | 2023-01-03 | 2024-01-23 |

| Predecessor | Radeon Instinct | GeForce 30 |

| Successor | None | GeForce 50 |

| Launch MSRP | None | 799 USD |

| Percentile vs All GPUs | 50 | 76 |

| Average Benchmark Score | 0 | 31087 |

| Nearest Rivals | None | Quadro M5000, GRID M60-1Q, RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell, TITAN RTX |