AMD Instinct MI300 vs AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data for the AMD Instinct MI300 and the AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE show no overlapping benchmark results. The Instinct MI300 has an empty benchmark record, with an average benchmark score of 0 and a percentile rank of 50 among all GPUs. The Radeon RX 7650 GRE, in contrast, holds two recorded benchmark scores: 2,336 in 3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12 and 83,109 in geekbench_opencl, resulting in an average benchmark score of 42,723 and a percentile rank of 83.

Because the head-to-head benchmark array is empty, direct numerical comparisons between these two cards cannot be drawn from the database. The Instinct MI300's lack of any benchmark entries means its performance data is entirely absent, while the RX 7650 GRE's scores place it ahead of several near rivals. The RX 7650 GRE trails the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER by 1.2 percent (average score 43,223), the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB by 1.2 percent (average score 43,262), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile by 1.3 percent (average score 43,268), and the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 by 1.3 percent (average score 43,301). Those delta percentages are all negative, indicating the RX 7650 GRE sits slightly below each of those four rivals in average benchmark score.

The absence of any benchmark data for the Instinct MI300 means its performance cannot be quantified relative to the RX 7650 GRE or any other GPU in the database. The wins count reinforces this: winsA is 0 and winsB is 0, so neither card shows a recorded advantage in head-to-head testing. The data confirms that the RX 7650 GRE is a measured, benchmarked product with a clear standing among its peers, while the Instinct MI300 remains unmeasured in the database, leaving its competitive position undefined.

FAQ

Q: What is the average benchmark score for the AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE?

A: The average benchmark score recorded for the RX 7650 GRE is 42,723, based on two tests: 2,336 in 3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12 and 83,109 in geekbench_opencl.

Q: How does the RX 7650 GRE compare to its nearest rivals in average benchmark score?

A: The RX 7650 GRE is 1.2 percent behind the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER (average score 43,223) and the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB (average score 43,262). It is also 1.3 percent behind the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile (average score 43,268) and the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 (average score 43,301).

Q: What benchmark scores are recorded for the AMD Instinct MI300?

A: The database records no benchmarks for the Instinct MI300. Its average benchmark score is 0, and its percentile rank among all GPUs is 50.

Q: What is the percentile rank of the RX 7650 GRE among all GPUs?

A: The RX 7650 GRE ranks in the 83rd percentile among all GPUs, which places it well above the Instinct MI300's 50th percentile rank.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the RX 7650 GRE?

A: The launch MSRP for the AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE is 279 USD.

Q: Which card has a higher transistor count?

A: The AMD Instinct MI300 has 153,000 million transistors, far exceeding the RX 7650 GRE's 13,300 million transistors.

The Verdict

The data indicates a clear split between these two AMD products. The AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE is a measured, benchmarked graphics card with an 83rd percentile standing, an average benchmark score of 42,723, and a launch MSRP of 279 USD. Its nearest rivals are all NVIDIA cards with average scores within 1.3 percent, so its performance tier is tightly clustered. For anyone selecting a card for standard graphics workloads, the RX 7650 GRE is the only one in this comparison with recorded performance data, and that data shows it competes directly with the RTX 4070 SUPER and similar GPUs.

The AMD Instinct MI300 has no benchmark scores in the database, an average score of 0, and a 50th percentile rank. That 50th percentile is a neutral midpoint, but without any recorded measurements it cannot be positioned as a competitor to the RX 7650 GRE in any benchmark-driven analysis. The MI300 is an accelerator with 128 GB of HBM3 memory and a 5.32 TB/s bandwidth, which are server-class specifications, but the database does not contain any performance results to confirm how those specifications translate into real-world scores. The verdict from the data is straightforward: the RX 7650 GRE is the benchmarked consumer option, while the Instinct MI300's performance remains unrecorded and therefore unverified in this database.

Specification Differences

The two cards differ across nearly every specification field. The Instinct MI300 uses a 5 nm process node from TSMC, while the RX 7650 GRE uses a 6 nm node, also from TSMC. The MI300 has 153,000 million transistors on a 1017 mm² die, producing a transistor density of 150.4M per mm². The RX 7650 GRE has 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die, with a density of 65.2M per mm².

Clock speeds differ substantially. The MI300 has a base clock of 1000 MHz and a boost clock of 1700 MHz, with no game clock listed. The RX 7650 GRE has a base clock of 1720 MHz, a boost clock of 2695 MHz, and a game clock of 2350 MHz. Memory clocks also differ: the MI300 runs at 1300 MHz with 5.2 Gbps effective, while the RX 7650 GRE runs at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective.

Memory configurations are far apart. The MI300 has 128 GB of HBM3 on a 8192 bit bus, delivering 5.32 TB/s of bandwidth. The RX 7650 GRE has 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128 bit bus, delivering 288.0 GB/s. The MI300's bandwidth is roughly 18 times higher, though that figure is not explicitly stated in the database.

Compute resources also diverge. The MI300 has 14,080 shading units, 880 texture mapping units, and 0 ROPs, with a pixel rate of 0 MPixel/s and a texture rate of 1,496.0 GTexel/s. Its FP32 and FP16 performance are both 47.87 TFLOPS (1:1). The RX 7650 GRE has 2,048 shading units, 128 TMUs, 64 ROPs, and 32 ray tracing cores. Its pixel rate is 172.5 GPixel/s, texture rate is 345.0 GTexel/s, and FP32 and FP16 are both 22.08 TFLOPS (1:1).

Power and physical specifications differ as well. The MI300 has a TDP of 600 W, uses 2x 8-pin power connectors, and requires a suggested PSU of 1000 W. Its length is 267 mm (10.5 inches) and height is 111 mm (4.4 inches). The RX 7650 GRE has a TDP of 170 W, uses 1x 8-pin power connector, requires a suggested PSU of 450 W, is dual-slot, and measures 204 mm (8 inches) in length and 115 mm (4.5 inches) in height.

Bus interfaces and display outputs differ. The MI300 uses PCIe 5.0 x16 and has no display outputs. The RX 7650 GRE uses PCIe 4.0 x8 and provides 1x HDMI 2.1a and 3x DisplayPort 2.1. API support also separates them: the MI300 lists DirectX, OpenGL, and Vulkan as N/A, while the RX 7650 GRE supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Architecture Differences

The architectural split is fundamental. The Instinct MI300 uses the CDNA 3.0 architecture on the Aqua Vanjaram chip, part of the Instinct (MIx) generation. The RX 7650 GRE uses the RDNA 3.0 architecture on the Navi 33 chip, codenamed Hotpink Bonefish, from the Radeon RX 7000 series and Navi III generation.

The MI300 has no ray tracing cores listed, while the RX 7650 GRE has 32. The MI300 also has no ROPs (0), which is consistent with a compute-focused accelerator rather than a rasterization-oriented graphics card. The RX 7650 GRE has 64 ROPs, enabling its 172.5 GPixel/s pixel rate, while the MI300's pixel rate is 0 MPixel/s.

Cache and feature details are not fully specified in the database, but the available fields show clear differences. The MI300's memory is HBM3 with a 8192 bit bus, a design aimed at massive bandwidth for data-center workloads. The RX 7650 GRE's memory is GDDR6 on a 128 bit bus, a conventional consumer graphics configuration. The MI300 has no display outputs and no graphics API support, confirming its role as a compute accelerator. The RX 7650 GRE has full display outputs and API support, confirming its role as a consumer graphics card.

The production status also differs. The RX 7650 GRE is listed as Active, with a release date of 2025-02-06 and a predecessor of Navi II and successor of Navi IV. The MI300 has no production status listed, a release date of 2023-01-03, and a predecessor of Radeon Instinct with no successor recorded.

Where Each One Wins

Based strictly on the recorded data, the AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE wins in every measurable category. It has benchmark scores, an average score of 42,723, an 83rd percentile rank, a launch MSRP of 279 USD, and full graphics API support. Its nearest rivals are all within 1.3 percent, so it sits in a competitive performance band around the RTX 4070 SUPER and Quadro M6000 series. For any use case that requires measured graphics performance, display output, or consumer API support, the RX 7650 GRE is the clear choice from the data.

The AMD Instinct MI300 wins in specification-level categories where the database records its advantages. It has a smaller process node (5 nm vs 6 nm), a far larger transistor count (153,000 million vs 13,300 million), a larger die (1017 mm² vs 204 mm²), higher FP32 and FP16 compute (47.87 TFLOPS vs 22.08 TFLOPS), higher texture rate (1,496.0 GTexel/s vs 345.0 GTexel/s), and vastly more memory (128 GB HBM3 vs 8 GB GDDR6) with higher bandwidth (5.32 TB/s vs 288.0 GB/s). Its 8192 bit memory bus and PCIe 5.0 x16 interface also exceed the RX 7650 GRE's 128 bit bus and PCIe 4.0 x8 interface.

However, those specification wins do not translate into benchmark wins in the database, because no benchmarks are recorded for the MI300. The wins count is 0 for both cards. For workloads that rely on raw compute throughput, memory capacity, and bandwidth, the MI300's specifications suggest an advantage, but the lack of measured performance means that advantage is unverified. For workloads that require rasterization, ray tracing, display outputs, or DirectX/OpenGL/Vulkan support, the RX 7650 GRE is the only card with recorded capability. The data-driven conclusion is that the RX 7650 GRE wins in all measured benchmarks and practical graphics use cases, while the MI300 wins only in unmeasured specification comparisons.