AMD FirePro W5130M vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16 GB Comparison

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16 GB and AMD FirePro W5130M represent two vastly different eras of GPU design. The RTX 5060 Ti is a current-generation desktop part built on a 5 nm process, while the FirePro W5130M is an end-of-life mobile workstation GPU from 2015 built on 28 nm. The benchmark data shows a clear performance hierarchy, but the details of how and where each card wins reveal the architectural gulf between them.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The most direct comparison available comes from the average benchmark scores, though the two cards share no common individual test results. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16 GB posts an average benchmark score of 4970, while the AMD FirePro W5130M scores 4904. This puts the RTX 5060 Ti ahead by roughly 1.3% in aggregate terms, a margin that is surprisingly narrow given the generational gap. The RTX 5060 Ti's nearest rival, the NVIDIA Quadro 4000, scores 4979, which is 0.2% higher, while the FirePro W5130M's closest competitor is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8 GB at 4901, a 0.1% difference.

Looking at individual workloads, the RTX 5060 Ti shows its strength in modern DirectX 12 testing. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 4019, which is a demanding, current-generation benchmark. In contrast, the FirePro W5130M has no comparable result, as its only listed benchmark is Geekbench OpenCL, where it scores 4904. The RTX 5060 Ti also has a strong Passmark G3D score of 22618, which is its highest single-test result and reflects strong overall 3D rasterization performance. The FirePro W5130M lacks any Passmark results, so no direct comparison is possible on those metrics.

The gap widens dramatically in compute-oriented tasks. The RTX 5060 Ti's Passmark GPU Compute score is 11224, while the FirePro W5130M's only compute result, Geekbench OpenCL, is 4904. Even accounting for different test methodologies, the RTX 5060 Ti's compute advantage is substantial. Both cards share a 29th percentile ranking among all GPUs, but this is misleading — the RTX 5060 Ti's percentile is based on its score of 4970, while the FirePro's is based on its sole Geekbench result. The data suggests the RTX 5060 Ti is the stronger card in nearly every measurable category, with the FirePro W5130M only competitive because its average is pulled up by a single OpenCL score.

Where Each One Wins

The RTX 5060 Ti 16 GB wins decisively in modern gaming and DirectX 12 Ultimate workloads. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 4019 demonstrates strong performance in current-generation game engines that leverage ray tracing and mesh shaders. The card's Passmark DirectX 12 score of 89, while seemingly low, is a normalized value, and its DirectX 11 score of 219 and DirectX 9 score of 238 show it handles legacy APIs reasonably well. The card's 16 GB of GDDR7 memory with 448.0 GB/s bandwidth gives it a clear edge in texture-heavy and high-resolution workloads.

The FirePro W5130M's single win is in the Geekbench OpenCL test, where it scores 4904. This is a compute-oriented benchmark, and the card's GCN 1.0 architecture with 512 shading units does show some capability in OpenCL workloads. However, this score is roughly comparable to the RTX 5060 Ti's average, and the RTX 5060 Ti's own Passmark GPU Compute score of 11224 is more than twice as high. The FirePro W5130M's advantage, if any, would be in legacy OpenCL applications that were optimized for GCN architecture — the data does not support a broader performance win.

For productivity use, the RTX 5060 Ti's Passmark G2D score of 1206 indicates strong 2D desktop performance, which is relevant for workstation tasks like CAD or photo editing. The FirePro W5130M has no comparable 2D score. The RTX 5060 Ti also supports DirectX 12 Ultimate and Vulkan 1.4, while the FirePro W5130M is limited to DirectX 12 (11_1) and Vulkan 1.2.170, meaning the RTX 5060 Ti can run newer software titles that require the latest API features.

Architecture Differences

The architectural gap between these two GPUs is enormous. The RTX 5060 Ti uses the GB206 chip built on TSMC's 5 nm process, packing 21,900 million transistors into a 181 mm² die. This yields a transistor density of 121.0M per mm². The FirePro W5130M uses the Tropo chip on a 28 nm process, with just 1,500 million transistors on a 123 mm² die, giving a density of only 12.2M per mm². The RTX 5060 Ti has nearly 15 times more transistors and a 10x higher density.

The RTX 5060 Ti features 4608 shading units, 144 texture mapping units, and 48 ROPs, along with 36 ray tracing cores and 144 tensor cores. The FirePro W5130M has just 512 shading units, 32 TMUs, and 16 ROPs, with no ray tracing or tensor cores at all. This explains the massive difference in raw throughput: the RTX 5060 Ti delivers 23.70 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and an equal 23.70 TFLOPS of FP16, while the FirePro W5130M manages only 947.2 GFLOPS of FP32 and no FP16 support.

Memory architecture also differs significantly. The RTX 5060 Ti has 16 GB of GDDR7 on a 128-bit bus, delivering 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The FirePro W5130M has just 2 GB of GDDR5 on the same 128-bit bus, yielding only 64.00 GB/s. The RTX 5060 Ti's pixel rate is 123.5 GPixel/s versus 14.80 GPixel/s for the FirePro, and its texture rate is 370.4 GTexel/s versus 29.60 GTexel/s. The RTX 5060 Ti also uses PCIe 5.0 x8, while the FirePro uses PCIe 3.0 x16, and the RTX 5060 Ti features a dual-slot cooler with a single 8-pin power connector and a 180 W TDP, whereas the FirePro W5130M has no listed power specifications.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16 GB has an average benchmark score of 4970, while the AMD FirePro W5130M scores 4904, giving the RTX 5060 Ti a small aggregate lead.

Q: Does the FirePro W5130M have any ray tracing or tensor core support?

A: No. The FirePro W5130M lists null values for both RT cores and tensor cores, while the RTX 5060 Ti has 36 ray tracing cores and 144 tensor cores.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth difference between the two cards?

A: The RTX 5060 Ti 16 GB provides 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth from 16 GB of GDDR7 memory, while the FirePro W5130M provides only 64.00 GB/s from 2 GB of GDDR5 memory.

Q: Which card supports newer graphics APIs?

A: The RTX 5060 Ti supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The FirePro W5130M supports DirectX 12 (11_1), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.2.170.

Q: How do the transistor counts compare?

A: The RTX 5060 Ti has 21,900 million transistors on a 5 nm process, while the FirePro W5130M has 1,500 million transistors on a 28 nm process.

Q: Are both cards in the same performance percentile?

A: Yes, both are in the 29th percentile of all GPUs, but this is based on different benchmark sets — the RTX 5060 Ti has 8 benchmark results, while the FirePro W5130M has only 1.

Specification Differences

| Specification | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16 GB | AMD FirePro W5130M |

|---|---|---|

| Architecture | Blackwell 2.0 | GCN 1.0 |

| Process Node | 5 nm | 28 nm |

| Transistors | 21,900 million | 1,500 million |

| Die Size | 181 mm² | 123 mm² |

| Base Clock | 2407 MHz | 900 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 2572 MHz | 925 MHz |

| Memory Size | 16 GB | 2 GB |

| Memory Type | GDDR7 | GDDR5 |

| Memory Bandwidth | 448.0 GB/s | 64.00 GB/s |

| Shading Units | 4608 | 512 |

| TMUs | 144 | 32 |

| ROPs | 48 | 16 |

| RT Cores | 36 | None |

| Tensor Cores | 144 | None |

| Pixel Rate | 123.5 GPixel/s | 14.80 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 370.4 GTexel/s | 29.60 GTexel/s |

| FP32 Performance | 23.70 TFLOPS | 947.2 GFLOPS |

| FP16 Performance | 23.70 TFLOPS | None |

| TDP | 180 W | Not specified |

| Bus Interface | PCIe 5.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |

| DirectX Support | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 (11_1) |

| Vulkan Support | 1.4 | 1.2.170 |

| Production Status | Active | End-of-life |

| Release Date | 2025-04-15 | 2015-10-01 |

The Verdict

The data points to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16 GB as the superior GPU in nearly every measurable category. Its FP32 performance of 23.70 TFLOPS is 25 times higher than the FirePro W5130M's 947.2 GFLOPS, and its memory bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s is seven times greater. The RTX 5060 Ti's 16 GB of GDDR7 memory versus 2 GB of GDDR5 makes it suitable for modern high-resolution gaming and content creation, while the FirePro W5130M would struggle with even moderate texture loads.

The FirePro W5130M's only competitive metric is its Geekbench OpenCL score of 4904, which is close to the RTX 5060 Ti's average of 4970. This suggests that in very specific OpenCL compute workloads, the older GCN architecture can still hold its own. However, the RTX 5060 Ti's Passmark GPU Compute score of 11224 demonstrates that its compute capability is far superior in more comprehensive testing.

For anyone choosing between these two, the RTX 5060 Ti 16 GB is the clear pick for modern gaming, ray tracing, AI workloads (thanks to its tensor cores), and high-bandwidth memory tasks. The FirePro W5130M is an end-of-life product with no ray tracing support, a 28 nm process from 2015, and a single benchmark result that does not reflect broad performance. The RTX 5060 Ti's active production status, newer API support, and massive architectural advantages make it the only reasonable choice for any current or future workload. The FirePro W5130M should only be considered for legacy systems requiring its specific GCN 1.0 compatibility, and even then, its 2 GB memory limit is a severe constraint.