AMD FirePro M5100 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER Comparison

AMD FirePro M5100 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER represent two vastly different eras of GPU design, yet both target distinct professional and consumer workloads. The data shows a colossal performance gulf between them, but the FirePro M5100’s modest specifications and the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER’s modern feature set make them incomparable in raw compute. Benchmark results indicate the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER delivers over 6.4 times the FP32 throughput of the FirePro M5100, while the older card’s 38th percentile ranking versus all GPUs places it near the bottom of modern performance charts. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER, despite its higher percentile score of 36 in a different benchmark suite, offers architectural advantages that the FirePro cannot match, including dedicated ray tracing cores and tensor cores. This analysis breaks down the head-to-head data, use-case scenarios, architecture differences, and final recommendations strictly from the provided specifications.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The two GPUs were not tested under identical benchmark conditions, so direct comparisons rely on their respective scores and nearest rival data. The FirePro M5100 achieves a Geekbench OpenCL score of 6830, placing it 1% ahead of the AMD Radeon R7 M370 (6764) and 2% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce GT 1010 (6698). However, it trails the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675M by 1.7% (6946) and the AMD Radeon R5 M240 by 2.1% (6975). These narrow deltas indicate the FirePro M5100 sits squarely in entry-level mobile territory, with performance nearly identical to mid-range GPUs from 2013-2015.

The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER posts a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6269.5, which is essentially tied with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 (6270, 0% delta) and the AMD FirePro W600 (6223, 0.8% ahead). It falls slightly behind the AMD Radeon R7 M350 by 0.9% (6327). The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER’s nearest rivals are all within a 1% performance band, suggesting its benchmark score represents a specific workload rather than peak compute capability. Its FP32 throughput of 43.94 TFLOPS dwarfs the FirePro M5100’s 992.0 GFLOPS, a 44.3x difference in raw shader math.

Texture and pixel fill rates tell a similar story. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER achieves 686.6 GTexel/s versus the FirePro M5100’s 31.00 GTexel/s, a 22.1x advantage. Pixel rate differences are even starker: 235.4 GPixel/s versus 12.40 GPixel/s, an 18.9x gap. Memory bandwidth amplifies this divide, with the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER delivering 896.0 GB/s compared to the FirePro’s 72.00 GB/s, a 12.4x difference. These figures indicate that in any GPU-bound workload, the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER will complete tasks in a fraction of the time, though the FirePro M5100’s lower power footprint (no TDP listed) suggests it was designed for thermal-constrained environments.

Where Each One Wins

The FirePro M5100 wins exclusively in legacy compatibility and mobile form factor. Its MXM Module slot width and MXM-A (3.0) bus interface make it suitable for older professional laptops requiring replaceable graphics. The card supports DirectX 12 (11_1), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.2.170, which covers a wide range of older workstation applications. Its 2 GB GDDR5 memory on a 128-bit bus is sufficient for basic CAD or 2D design tasks, and its 640 shading units at 725-775 MHz clocks provide predictable, low-power operation. The FirePro M5100’s production status is end-of-life, so it wins in scenarios where legacy driver support or specific MXM compatibility is mandatory.

The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER wins in every modern performance category. Its 16 GB GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus enables large dataset handling and high-resolution texture loads. The 8960 shading units, 280 TMUs, and 96 ROPs deliver massive parallel throughput for rendering, simulation, and AI inference. Dedicated 70 ray tracing cores and 280 tensor cores accelerate ray-traced graphics and tensor-based workloads like DLSS or machine learning inference. The card’s DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) support, Vulkan 1.4, and HDMI 2.1b/DisplayPort 2.1b outputs make it future-proof for gaming and professional visualization. Its 350 W TDP and dual-slot design indicate it requires a desktop chassis, but the performance return is exponential. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER wins in all compute-heavy tasks, including 3D rendering, video encoding, scientific computing, and AI model training, where the FirePro M5100 cannot even begin to compete.

Architecture Differences

The architectural divide spans a decade of GPU evolution. The FirePro M5100 uses the Venus chip on GCN 1.0 architecture, fabricated on TSMC’s 28 nm process with 1,500 million transistors on a 123 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 12.2M per mm². This design dates back to 2013, targeting mobile workstations with efficiency over raw power. Its 640 shading units operate at a base clock of 725 MHz and boost up to 775 MHz, with memory clocked at 1125 MHz (4.5 Gbps effective). The GCN 1.0 architecture lacks dedicated ray tracing or tensor cores, instead relying on unified shaders for all compute tasks.

The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER employs the GB203 chip on Blackwell 2.0 architecture, built on TSMC’s 5 nm process. This chip packs 45,600 million transistors into a 378 mm² die, achieving a transistor density of 120.6M per mm² — nearly 10 times denser than the FirePro. Base clock is 2295 MHz with a boost of 2452 MHz, and memory runs at 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective). Blackwell introduces dedicated 70 ray tracing cores and 280 tensor cores, alongside 8960 shading units. The architecture supports FP16 at a 1:1 ratio (43.94 TFLOPS) matching FP32 performance, whereas the FirePro M5100 has no listed FP16 capability. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER’s PCIe 5.0 x16 interface provides vastly higher bandwidth than the FirePro’s MXM-A 3.0 bus, and its 350 W TDP indicates a power-hungry but high-performance design. The FirePro’s lack of a TDP figure suggests it was engineered for mobility, while the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is clearly a desktop-focused powerhouse.

FAQ

Q: How much faster is the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER in FP32 compute compared to the FirePro M5100?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER delivers 43.94 TFLOPS FP32, while the FirePro M5100 manages 992.0 GFLOPS, making the newer card approximately 44.3 times faster in raw shader math.

Q: Does the FirePro M5100 support ray tracing?

A: No. The FirePro M5100’s GCN 1.0 architecture has no ray tracing cores listed, while the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER includes 70 dedicated RT cores.

Q: What memory configuration does each GPU use?

A: The FirePro M5100 has 2 GB of GDDR5 on a 128-bit bus with 72.00 GB/s bandwidth. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has 16 GB of GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus with 896.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Which GPU has better benchmark percentile ranking?

A: The FirePro M5100 ranks in the 38th percentile versus all GPUs based on its Geekbench OpenCL score. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER ranks in the 36th percentile based on its 3DMark Steel Nomad score, but these are different test suites and not directly comparable.

Q: Can the FirePro M5100 run modern DirectX 12 Ultimate games?

A: No. The FirePro M5100 supports DirectX 12 (11_1), while the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), which includes features like ray tracing and mesh shaders.

Q: What is the transistor density difference between the two chips?

A: The FirePro M5100 has 12.2M transistors per mm², while the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has 120.6M per mm², a 9.9x density advantage for the newer chip.

The Verdict

The data unequivocally favors the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER for any performance-sensitive workload. Its 43.94 TFLOPS FP32, 896 GB/s memory bandwidth, and 686.6 GTexel/s texture rate represent a generational leap that the FirePro M5100 cannot approach. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER’s 16 GB GDDR7 memory allows handling of massive datasets, while its 70 RT cores and 280 tensor cores enable ray tracing and AI acceleration absent from the FirePro. Benchmarks show the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER trading blows with the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102, indicating it is a high-end contender in its own generation.

The FirePro M5100 is only suitable for legacy mobile workstations where MXM-A 3.0 compatibility is required and performance demands are minimal. Its 2 GB memory and 992 GFLOPS FP32 are adequate for basic 2D design or text-based tasks, but its end-of-life status and 38th percentile ranking signal obsolescence. For users maintaining old professional laptops, the FirePro M5100 remains functional, but for anyone building or upgrading a system today, the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is the only viable choice based on raw specifications and modern feature support. The performance gap is so wide that any comparison beyond legacy compatibility is moot.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD FirePro M5100 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER |

|---|---|---|

| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Blackwell 2.0 |

| Process Node | 28 nm | 5 nm |

| Transistors | 1,500 million | 45,600 million |

| Die Size | 123 mm² | 378 mm² |

| Transistor Density | 12.2M / mm² | 120.6M / mm² |

| Base Clock | 725 MHz | 2295 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 775 MHz | 2452 MHz |

| Memory Clock | 1125 MHz | 1750 MHz |

| Memory Size | 2 GB | 16 GB |

| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR7 |

| Memory Bus Width | 128 bit | 256 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | 72.00 GB/s | 896.0 GB/s |

| Shading Units | 640 | 8960 |

| TMUs | 40 | 280 |

| ROPs | 16 | 96 |

| RT Cores | N/A | 70 |

| Tensor Cores | N/A | 280 |

| Pixel Rate | 12.40 GPixel/s | 235.4 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 31.00 GTexel/s | 686.6 GTexel/s |

| FP32 Performance | 992.0 GFLOPS | 43.94 TFLOPS |

| FP16 Performance | N/A | 43.94 TFLOPS (1:1) |

| TDP | N/A | 350 W |

| Slot Width | MXM Module | Dual-slot |

| Power Connectors | N/A | 1x 16-pin |

| Bus Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 5.0 x16 |

| Display Outputs | Portable Device Dependent | 1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1b |

| DirectX Support | 12 (11_1) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |

| Vulkan Support | 1.2.170 | 1.4 |

| Production Status | End-of-life | Active |

| Release Date | 2013-10-15 | 2025-12-31 |

| Launch MSRP | N/A | 749 USD |