Fivem

Fivem

AVERAGE FPS
75
good

This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 75 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 28 35 44 56
1440p QHD 50 64 80 101
1080p Full HD 75 97 121 154

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 56
3840x2160 Medium 44
3840x2160 High 35
3840x2160 Ultra 28
2560x1440 Low 101
2560x1440 Medium 80
2560x1440 High 64
2560x1440 Ultra 50
1920x1080 Low 154
1920x1080 Medium 121
1920x1080 High 97
1920x1080 Ultra 75

Fivem with Intel Core Ultra 5 245 + Intel Arc B580, In-Depth Analysis

# Fivem with Intel Core Ultra 5 245 + Intel Arc B580

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245 paired with the Intel Arc B580 produces a Fivem experience that scales predictably across resolutions, with the CPU demonstrating strong headroom while the GPU becomes the primary constraint at higher settings. Benchmark results show the combo ranking 2788th out of 3707 tested combinations, placing it in the lower-middle portion of the database, yet the measured frame rates reveal a workable configuration for 1080p and 1440p gaming. The data indicates that this pairing delivers playable performance at 1080p across all settings, with diminishing returns as resolution increases and graphical presets escalate.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data shows a clear pattern of performance degradation as resolution increases from 1920x1080 to 3840x2160. At Low settings, the average frame rate drops from 154 FPS at 1080p to 101 FPS at 1440p, then further to 56 FPS at 4K. This represents a 35% reduction from 1080p to 1440p and a 45% reduction from 1440p to 4K, indicating that the GPU is increasingly burdened at higher pixel counts.

At High settings, the scaling is steeper: 97 FPS at 1080p falls to 64 FPS at 1440p and 35 FPS at 4K. The 1440p to 4K transition shows a 45% performance loss, while the 1080p to 1440p drop is 34%. This pattern suggests that the Arc B580's 12 GB GDDR6 memory and 192-bit bus width are being saturated at 4K, particularly when combined with High preset geometry and texture demands.

The Medium preset provides the most complete data set, including minimum and maximum frame times. At 1080p Medium, the average is 121 FPS with a minimum of 103 FPS and maximum of 140 FPS. At 1440p Medium, the average drops to 80 FPS with a range of 68 to 92 FPS. At 4K Medium, the average falls to 44 FPS with a minimum of 38 FPS and maximum of 51 FPS. The frame time consistency degrades noticeably at 4K, with the gap between minimum and average widening from 18 FPS at 1080p to 6 FPS at 4K, suggesting memory bandwidth limitations are causing occasional hitches.

Ultra settings produce the lowest frame rates across all resolutions, with 75 FPS at 1080p, 50 FPS at 1440p, and 28 FPS at 4K. The scaling from 1440p to 4K shows a 44% drop, while the 1080p to 1440p reduction is 33%. This consistent percentage loss across presets indicates that the limiting component at higher resolutions is the GPU's raw throughput, as the CPU's multi-threaded capabilities remain sufficient even at 4K Ultra.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo rank of 2788 out of 3707 tested combinations places this pairing in the 25th percentile overall, meaning roughly three-quarters of tested combos deliver higher average frame rates in Fivem. This relatively low rank reflects the fact that the Arc B580's raw graphics performance, while competent, does not place it among the top-tier cards in the database.

Looking at the GPU's standing relative to its nearest rivals, the Arc B580's average benchmark score of 23021 sits within a tight cluster. The AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP scores 23061, a delta of -0.2%, meaning the B580 is essentially performance-equivalent to that older AMD card in synthetic tests. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 scores 22895, putting the B580 ahead by 0.6%. Conversely, the RTX 3080 scores 23172, placing the B580 0.7% behind it, and the NVIDIA P106-100 scores 23249, with the B580 trailing by 1%. These narrow margins indicate that the Arc B580 competes with a range of cards spanning multiple generations, but does not decisively outperform any of them.

The CPU's percentile rank of 90 versus all processors is much stronger, with an average benchmark score of 48995. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G at 49196 (delta -0.4%), the AMD Ryzen 9 7900 at 49228 (delta -0.5%), the Intel Xeon Gold 5318H at 48698 (delta +0.6%), and the Intel Core i5-14600K at 48618 (delta +0.8%). This places the Core Ultra 5 245 in elite company, barely trailing the Ryzen 9 7900 and slightly ahead of the i5-14600K. The CPU's strong performance relative to the GPU suggests that in Fivem, the bottleneck shifts to the graphics card at higher resolutions.

CPU Role

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245 features 14 cores and 14 threads, a configuration that reflects its Arrow Lake architecture with a 3 nm process node from TSMC. The base clock of 3.50 GHz and boost clock of 5.10 GHz provide substantial single-thread headroom, which is critical for Fivem's heavily client-side scripting and physics calculations. The CPU's 24 MB of shared L3 cache, combined with 3 MB of L2 cache per core, helps maintain smooth frame pacing during complex multiplayer scenarios.

In synthetic benchmarks, the CPU achieves a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32924 and a single-core score of 4648. The multi-core result indicates strong parallel processing capability, while the single-core score demonstrates the high clock speeds that Fivem's primary thread benefits from. PassMark results reinforce this picture, with a single-thread score of 4394 and a multi-thread score of 38706. The PassMark physics score of 2569 is particularly relevant, as Fivem's vehicle physics and collision detection rely heavily on CPU performance.

The data suggests that this CPU is rarely the limiting factor in Fivem at the measured resolutions. At 1080p Low, the average frame rate of 154 FPS is likely approaching the CPU's limits for game logic updates, but the GPU still manages to keep up. The fact that frame rates at 1080p High (97 FPS) are lower than at 1080p Low (154 FPS) indicates that the GPU is the primary constraint when graphical settings increase, even at 1080p. The CPU's 14 threads, while not hyper-threaded, provide ample parallelism for Fivem's multiple subsystems, including rendering, physics, and network code.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the measured frame rates span from 154 FPS at Low settings to 75 FPS at Ultra. The Low preset delivers the highest average, with no minimum or maximum reported, suggesting consistent performance. The Medium preset reports an average of 121 FPS with a minimum of 103 FPS and maximum of 140 FPS, showing a 24% reduction from Low. High settings produce 97 FPS average, representing a 20% drop from Medium. Ultra settings yield 75 FPS, a 23% reduction from High. The progression from Low to Ultra shows a total reduction of 51%, indicating that each preset tier imposes a significant graphical load.

At 2560x1440, the performance curve follows a similar pattern with lower absolute values. Low settings average 101 FPS, Medium averages 80 FPS with a range of 68 to 92 FPS, High averages 64 FPS, and Ultra averages 50 FPS. The step from Low to Medium is a 21% reduction, Medium to High is 20%, and High to Ultra is 22%. The 1440p results show that Medium remains playable with a minimum above 60 FPS, while High dips slightly below the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay.

At 3840x2160, the frame rates become more marginal. Low settings average 56 FPS, Medium averages 44 FPS with a minimum of 38 FPS and maximum of 51 FPS, High averages 35 FPS, and Ultra averages 28 FPS. Only the Low preset maintains an average above 60 FPS, while Medium and High fall below the standard 60 FPS target. The Ultra preset at 4K produces an average below 30 FPS, making it unsuitable for competitive play. The minimum frame rate of 38 FPS at 4K Medium indicates that even the mid-tier preset can experience noticeable stutters in dense multiplayer scenarios.

GPU Role

The Intel Arc B580 is built on the Xe2-HPG architecture with a 5 nm process node from TSMC, featuring 2560 shading units, 160 texture mapping units, and 80 render output units. The GPU operates at a base clock of 2670 MHz with a boost clock of 2670 MHz, providing consistent performance without thermal throttling under typical loads. The 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus delivers 456.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p gaming but becomes a constraint at 4K with high-detail textures.

The GPU's memory configuration is notable for its capacity, as 12 GB exceeds the requirements of most current titles at 1080p and 1440p. However, the 192-bit bus width, while adequate, does not provide the bandwidth necessary for smooth 4K performance at higher presets. The pixel rate of 213.6 GPixel/s and texture rate of 427.2 GTexel/s indicate that the GPU can process geometry efficiently, but the FP32 throughput of 13.67 TFLOPS is modest compared to higher-tier cards.

In synthetic benchmarks, the Arc B580 achieves a PassMark G3D score of 15748 and a DirectX 12 score of 76. The Geekbench Vulkan score of 109672 and OpenCL score of 92821 demonstrate respectable compute capability, which benefits games that offload certain tasks to the GPU. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3068 places the card in a mid-range position, consistent with its measured Fivem performance. The GPU's 68th percentile ranking among all GPUs indicates that it outperforms roughly two-thirds of tested cards, but the Fivem results show that this game's specific demands can push it to its limits at higher resolutions.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal balance between visual quality and performance for this combo is the Medium preset at 1920x1080. This configuration delivers an average of 121 FPS with a minimum of 103 FPS, ensuring smooth gameplay even during intense multiplayer moments with multiple vehicles and players. The minimum frame rate of 103 FPS provides a comfortable buffer above the 60 FPS threshold, allowing for consistent responsiveness in Fivem's fast-paced scenarios.

For users prioritizing maximum visual fidelity at 1080p, the High preset at 97 FPS average is still playable, though the lack of reported minimum frame times means stutters cannot be ruled out. The Ultra preset at 1080p, averaging 75 FPS, remains above 60 FPS but offers diminishing returns in visual quality for a 23% performance hit compared to High. At 1440p, the Medium preset is the recommended choice, delivering 80 FPS average with a minimum of 68 FPS, which maintains smoothness while providing better image clarity than 1080p.

At 4K, the data suggests that only the Low preset, averaging 56 FPS, approaches playability, but it falls short of the 60 FPS target. The Medium preset at 4K, with an average of 44 FPS and minimum of 38 FPS, would likely result in noticeable frame drops during busy scenes, making it unsuitable for competitive play. For users with 4K displays, the practical choice is to run at 1440p with Medium settings or 1080p with High settings, both of which provide superior frame rates compared to native 4K at any preset.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution for this combo in Fivem?

A: The measured data indicates that 1920x1080 with Medium settings provides the best experience, delivering an average of 121 FPS with a minimum of 103 FPS. At 1440p, Medium averages 80 FPS with a minimum of 68 FPS, which is also playable, while 4K only achieves 56 FPS at Low settings.

Q: How does the Intel Arc B580 compare to its nearest GPU rivals?

A: The Arc B580's average benchmark score of 23021 is within 1% of its nearest rivals. It trails the AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP by 0.2% and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 by 0.7%, while leading the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 by 0.6% and the NVIDIA P106-100 by 1%.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the limiting factor at 1080p?

A: The data suggests the GPU becomes the limiting factor even at 1080p, as frame rates drop from 154 FPS at Low to 97 FPS at High settings. The CPU's strong single-thread performance, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4648, provides sufficient headroom for Fivem's game logic.

Q: What is the combo's overall ranking among tested systems?

A: This pairing ranks 2788th out of 3707 tested combinations in Fivem, placing it in the lower-middle portion of the database. The CPU ranks in the 90th percentile among all processors, while the GPU ranks in the 68th percentile among all GPUs.

Q: Can this combo handle 4K gaming in Fivem?

A: Native 4K is not recommended, as the highest playable preset is Low at 56 FPS average, which falls below the 60 FPS target. Medium at 4K averages 44 FPS with a minimum of 38 FPS, indicating that the GPU's 12 GB memory and 192-bit bus limit performance at this resolution.

Q: How does the Core Ultra 5 245 CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The CPU's average benchmark score of 48995 places it within 1% of its nearest competitors. It trails the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G by 0.4% and the AMD Ryzen 9 7900 by 0.5%, while leading the Intel Xeon Gold 5318H by 0.6% and the Intel Core i5-14600K by 0.8%.

Hardware Specifications

Intel Core Ultra 5 245

Cores / Threads 14 / 14
Base Clock 3500 MHz
Boost Clock 5100 MHz
TDP 65W
Socket Intel Socket 1851
View Full CPU Details →

Intel Arc B580

VRAM 12 GB GDDR6
Base Clock
Boost Clock 2670 MHz MHz
TDP 190 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for Intel Core Ultra 5 245 + Intel Arc B580 in Fivem

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 56.0
3840x2160 Medium 44.0
3840x2160 High 35.0
3840x2160 Ultra 28.0
2560x1440 Low 101.0
2560x1440 Medium 80.0
2560x1440 High 64.0
2560x1440 Ultra 50.0
1920x1080 Low 154.0
1920x1080 Medium 121.0
1920x1080 High 97.0
1920x1080 Ultra 75.0

Fivem with iUltra 5 245 + Other GPUs

See how Fivem performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Fivem with Arc B580 + Other CPUs

See how Fivem performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with iUltra 5 245 + Arc B580

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.