Fivem

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245 paired with the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT delivers a playable, though not flawless, experience in Fivem. The data indicates a system where the graphics card is the primary limiting factor at higher resolutions, while the processor provides a robust foundation for high frame rates at 1080p. The combination of a 14-core CPU and a mid-range GPU creates a balance that favors competitive frame rates over absolute visual fidelity, particularly for a multiplayer title where responsiveness is key.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data shows a clear and consistent performance degradation as resolution increases, a classic indicator of GPU-bound workload. At 1080p with Low settings, the system achieves an average of 159 FPS. Moving to 1440p at the same settings drops the average to 105 FPS, a reduction of 54 FPS. Scaling up to 4K at Low settings further reduces the average to 58 FPS. This pattern demonstrates that the rendering load at higher resolutions quickly overwhelms the GPU's capabilities.

The scaling behavior is more pronounced at higher settings. For example, at High settings, the average frame rate falls from 100 FPS at 1080p to 66 FPS at 1440p, and then to 37 FPS at 4K. This steep decline underscores that the RX 6600 XT, with its 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and 128-bit bus, is taxed heavily by the pixel count of 4K, regardless of the preset. The data suggests that 4K is only viable at Low settings, where the 58 FPS average is acceptable, but it remains far from the fluidity seen at lower resolutions.

The transition from 1080p to 1440p is the most significant step for maintaining high frame rates. At Medium settings, the average drops from 126 FPS at 1080p to 83 FPS at 1440p, a 34% decrease. The jump to 4K at Medium settings results in a 46 FPS average, which is borderline playable but shows the GPU struggling. The frame time variance, indicated by the min and max FPS at Medium settings, also increases with resolution; the 4K Medium row shows a range from 39 to 53 FPS, whereas the 1080p Medium row shows a tighter range of 107 to 144 FPS. This wider variance at 4K points to less stable frame pacing, which can be more noticeable in a multiplayer environment than a lower average frame rate.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT is the decisive component in this configuration's performance ceiling. Its specifications, including a boost clock of 2589 MHz and 2048 shading units, provide the raw computational power for the observed results. However, the 8 GB VRAM capacity and 256.0 GB/s memory bandwidth are the likely bottlenecks at higher resolutions. The data shows that at 4K Ultra, the average FPS plummets to 28, a figure that is not competitive for a fast-paced multiplayer game. This suggests that the GPU cannot sustain the memory traffic and processing demands of high-resolution textures and effects.

The GPU's percentile ranking of 70 versus all GPUs indicates it is a mid-range performer. Its average benchmark score of 24442 places it near the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630, which has a deltaPct of 0.7, and the Intel Arc A350M, with a deltaPct of -0.8. This proximity in synthetic benchmarks reinforces that the RX 6600 XT is positioned for 1080p gaming, where its 159 FPS at Low settings demonstrates its strength. The performance delta to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER is a mere 1.1%, showing that despite being from a different generation, the 6600 XT holds its own in this specific workload.

The GPU's clock speeds are crucial for the Fivem results. The game appears to favor the high boost clock, as the 1080p Low result of 159 FPS suggests the GPU is able to operate at its maximum potential without being limited by other system components. However, the 4K results show that clock speed alone cannot compensate for the memory bandwidth and capacity limitations. The 8 GB frame buffer is a critical constraint; at 4K with Ultra settings, the system likely exceeds this limit, causing the frame rate to collapse to 28 FPS. This is a clear case where the GPU's architecture, RDNA 2.0, is capable, but its physical resources are insufficient for the highest demands.

CPU Role

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245 provides a strong foundation for this gaming system, ensuring that the GPU is the primary bottleneck in most scenarios. With 14 cores and 14 threads, the processor offers ample parallel processing capability for the game's logic and network handling, which are common in multiplayer titles like Fivem. The boost clock of 5.10 GHz is particularly important for single-threaded performance, which often dictates the maximum achievable frame rate in games that are not fully optimized for multi-core usage.

The CPU's high performance is evident in its benchmark scores. A Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32924 and a single-core score of 4648 place it in the 90th percentile versus all CPUs. This indicates that the processor is not a limiting factor at 1080p, where the system achieves 159 FPS at Low settings. The data implies that the CPU can feed the GPU with enough data to maintain high frame rates, but the GPU's rendering speed becomes the constraint as resolution increases.

The CPU's nearest rivals in average benchmark score include the AMD Ryzen 9 7900 with a deltaPct of -0.5 and the Intel Core i5-14600K with a deltaPct of 0.8. This puts the Ultra 5 245 in the same performance class as these well-regarded processors, confirming its ability to handle demanding gaming workloads. The 24 MB of shared L3 cache is also beneficial, as it allows for faster access to frequently used data, reducing latency in game logic and asset streaming. The processor's 65 W TDP suggests it runs efficiently, but the core count and clocks are the primary drivers of the observed performance.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS, the optimal settings for this combination depend heavily on the target resolution and desired frame rate. For 1080p, the data shows that High settings provide an average of 100 FPS, which is a good balance between visual quality and smoothness. Pushing to Ultra reduces the average to 78 FPS, which is still playable but may not be worth the visual gain. For players prioritizing maximum frame rate, Low settings at 1080p yield 159 FPS, which is ideal for competitive play on high refresh rate monitors.

At 1440p, the Medium settings preset appears to be the sweet spot, delivering an average of 83 FPS. This is a significant drop from 1080p but remains smooth. High settings at 1440p drop to 66 FPS, which is the minimum for a comfortable experience but begins to show the GPU's limitations. Low settings at 1440p achieve 105 FPS, making it the best choice for a high frame rate experience on a 1440p panel. Ultra settings at this resolution, with a 51 FPS average, are not recommended due to the reduced fluidity.

For 4K, the options are limited. Low settings at 4K produce a 58 FPS average, which is the only 4K preset that approaches a playable frame rate. Medium settings at 4K drop to 46 FPS, which is below the threshold for smooth gameplay in a fast-paced multiplayer environment. High and Ultra settings at 4K, with averages of 37 and 28 FPS respectively, are not viable for competitive play. The data strongly suggests that 4K is outside the optimal operating range for this combo, and users should either lower the resolution or accept reduced visual settings.

How This Combo Ranks

In the database of tested combinations, this specific pairing of the Intel Core Ultra 5 245 and AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT holds a combo rank of 2608 out of 3707 combos. This places it in the lower third of all tested systems, which is a direct consequence of the mid-range GPU being paired with a high-end CPU. The rank reflects that while the processor is capable of supporting high frame rates, the GPU's performance ceiling prevents this combo from competing with systems that feature more powerful graphics cards.

The combo rank of 2608 indicates that there are 1099 other tested combinations that perform better, likely featuring GPUs with more VRAM and higher memory bandwidth. The data shows that this combo is better suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming, where it can deliver high frame rates, rather than 4K. The rank is a holistic measure, and the specific Fivem results show that the combo's weaknesses are amplified at higher resolutions. In a game like Fivem, which is CPU-intensive due to its multiplayer nature, the strong CPU helps mitigate the GPU's limitations, but it cannot overcome them entirely.

The deltaPct values for the CPU's rivals, such as the -0.4% versus the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G, show that the Ultra 5 245 is a top-tier processor. However, this does not translate into a high combo rank because the GPU is the limiting factor. The comparison to the GPU's rivals, like the 0.7% deltaPct versus the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630, illustrates that the RX 6600 XT is a solid mid-range card. The combo rank of 2608 reflects the overall system balance, which prioritizes CPU power over GPU power in this particular configuration.

Measured FPS Breakdown

1080p:

• Low: Average FPS 159. This is the highest measured frame rate for any resolution and settings combination, indicating the CPU is not a bottleneck.
• Medium: Average FPS 126, with a minimum of 107 and a maximum of 144. This shows a stable frame rate with moderate variance.
• High: Average FPS 100. A solid result that balances visual quality with performance.
• Ultra: Average FPS 78. Playable, but the drop from High suggests a significant GPU workload increase.

1440p:

• Low: Average FPS 105. A strong result that shows the GPU can handle the resolution increase with lower graphical demands.
• Medium: Average FPS 83, with a minimum of 70 and a maximum of 95. The frame rate is still smooth, but the variance is higher than at 1080p.
• High: Average FPS 66. This is at the lower end of acceptable for smooth gameplay.
• Ultra: Average FPS 51. This is below the ideal frame rate for a competitive multiplayer game.

4K:

• Low: Average FPS 58. The only 4K setting that approaches a playable frame rate.
• Medium: Average FPS 46, with a minimum of 39 and a maximum of 53. The low minimum FPS indicates potential stuttering.
• High: Average FPS 37. Not recommended for smooth gameplay.
• Ultra: Average FPS 28. This is the worst performing configuration, showing the GPU's hard limit.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution for this combo in Fivem?

A: The measured data shows that 1080p is the best resolution, with all settings presets achieving an average above 78 FPS. 1440p is also viable with Medium or Low settings, but 4K is only playable at Low settings.

Q: How does the CPU affect the frame rate at 1080p?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 245 has a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32924 and a single-core score of 4648, placing it in the 90th percentile of all CPUs. This high performance ensures the CPU is not a bottleneck at 1080p, allowing the GPU to reach its maximum output of 159 FPS at Low settings.

Q: Is the RX 6600 XT's 8 GB VRAM sufficient for this game?

A: The data indicates that 8 GB is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p, but it becomes a limiting factor at 4K. The 4K Ultra preset averages only 28 FPS, suggesting the VRAM capacity and 256.0 GB/s bandwidth are overwhelmed by high-resolution assets.

Q: What is the frame rate variance like at different settings?

A: The measured data shows that at Medium settings, the frame rate variance increases with resolution. At 1080p, the range is 107 to 144 FPS, while at 4K, it is 39 to 53 FPS. This wider variance at 4K indicates less stable frame pacing.

Q: How does this combo rank compared to other tested systems?

A: This combo ranks 2608 out of 3707 total combinations. This places it in the lower third, primarily due to the GPU's mid-range performance, despite the CPU being a top-tier part.

Q: What is the highest average FPS achievable with this hardware?

A: The highest measured average FPS is 159, achieved at 1080p with Low settings. This result indicates that the system is capable of very high frame rates when the GPU workload is minimized.