GPU Comparison

AMD
RADEON

AMD Radeon 880M

CORE STATE Strix Point
VRAM System Shared
CLOCK SPEED 2900 MHz
TDP 15 W
BUS WIDTH System Shared
ARCHITECTURE RDNA 3.5
nm
PROCESS 4 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

T600 Mobile

CORE STATE TU117
VRAM 4 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1410 MHz
TDP 40 W
BUS WIDTH 128 bit
ARCHITECTURE Turing
nm
PROCESS 12 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2021

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12
535
N/A
geekbench_opencl
31,285
35,486
geekbench_vulkan
40,006
30,211

Analysis: AMD Radeon 880M vs NVIDIA T600 Mobile

For this graphics card battle, AMD Radeon 880M establishes its advantage convincingly. Whether you're streaming at 1080p, AMD Radeon 880M dependably outperforms NVIDIA NVIDIA T600 Mobile by substantial percentages. This performance delta grows notably wider at demanding detail settings. This GPU handles intensive games with efficiency. Its design superiority are clear.

NVIDIA NVIDIA T600 Mobile struggles to compete with AMD Radeon 880M's pure capability. For value-focused builders, NVIDIA NVIDIA T600 Mobile can still provide adequate capability, yet people needing top-tier results would look toward AMD Radeon 880M. This benchmark gap is significantly considerable to deny. Resource-hungry workloads specifically demonstrate this margin. This premium provides rewards in performance.

NVIDIA NVIDIA T600 Mobile struggles to keep up with AMD Radeon 880M's pure capability. In cost-sensitive buyers, NVIDIA NVIDIA T600 Mobile may still deliver sufficient capability, yet users demanding the best performance should gravitate toward AMD Radeon 880M. This gaming gap is sufficiently large to dismiss. Heavy games specifically reveal this margin. This cost difference returns rewards in visual quality.

NVIDIA NVIDIA T600 Mobile is not dismissed entirely, yet its frame rate difference versus AMD Radeon 880M is difficult to overlook. For budget-conscious consumers, NVIDIA NVIDIA T600 Mobile could nonetheless represent a choice if the reduced MSRP accounts for its lower performance. But, when maximum gaming capability, AMD Radeon 880M represents the clear winner. The determination is evident. Capability chasers will lean toward AMD Radeon 880M.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
880M
T600 Mobile
Core Specs
Shading Units
768
896 +16.7%
Shaders
768
896 +16.7%
TMUs
48
56 +16.7%
ROPs
16
32 +100.0%
Compute Units
12
SM Count
14
Clocks
Base Clock
400 MHz
780 MHz
Boost Clock
2900 MHz
1410 MHz
Memory Clock
System Shared
1500 MHz 12 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
System Shared
4 GB
VRAM (MB)
4,096
Memory Type
System Shared
GDDR6
Memory Bus
System Shared
128 bit
Bandwidth
System Dependent
192.0 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
64 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
2 MB
1024 KB
L0 Cache
32 KB per WGP
Performance
Pixel Rate
46.40 GPixel/s
45.12 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
139.2 GTexel/s
78.96 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
4.454 TFLOPS
2.527 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
278.4 GFLOPS (1:16)
78.96 GFLOPS (1:32)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
8.909 TFLOPS (2:1)
5.053 TFLOPS (2:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
12
Power
TDP
15 W
40 W
TDP (W)
15
40 +166.7%
Power Connectors
None
None
Architecture
Architecture
RDNA 3.5
Turing
GPU Name
Strix Point
TU117
Generation
Navi III IGP (Strix Point Mobile)
Quadro Turing-M (Tx000)
Process Size
4 nm
12 nm
Transistors
34,000 million
4,700 million
Die Size
233 mm²
200 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
TSMC
Density
145.9M / mm²
23.5M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 (12_1)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
2.1
3.0
CUDA
7.5
Shader Model
6.8
6.8
Physical
Slot Width
IGP
IGP
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
Portable Device Dependent
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
PCIe 3.0 x16
Other
Production
Active
End-of-life
Predecessor
Navi II IGP
Quadro Pascal-M
Successor
Ampere-MW
View Radeon 880M Details View T600 Mobile Details