GPU Comparison
RADEON
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT
CORE STATE
Navi 31
VRAM
20 GB
CLOCK SPEED
2394 MHz
TDP
300 W
BUS WIDTH
320 bit
ARCHITECTURE
RDNA 3.0
PROCESS
5 nm
LAUNCH DATE
2022
VS
GEFORCE
T400
CORE STATE
TU117
VRAM
2 GB
CLOCK SPEED
1425 MHz
TDP
30 W
BUS WIDTH
64 bit
ARCHITECTURE
Turing
PROCESS
12 nm
LAUNCH DATE
2021
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12
geekbench_opencl
geekbench_vulkan
passmark_directx_10
passmark_directx_11
passmark_directx_12
passmark_directx_9
passmark_g2d
passmark_g3d
passmark_gpu_compute
Analysis: AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT vs NVIDIA T400
When analyzing AMD RX 7900 XT GPU to NVIDIA NVIDIA T400 GPU, a benchmark delta turns obviously evident. AMD RX 7900 XT GPU claims the crown in nearly all scenario we executed. The difference is significant sufficiently to affect everyday rendering performance. Users can notice smoother performance. The verdict is clear.
In conclusion, AMD RX 7900 XT GPU represents the stronger selection in this evaluation. Its gaming advantages support examination for users assembling a powerful visual system. While NVIDIA NVIDIA T400 GPU features its merits, the score figures undeniably supports AMD RX 7900 XT GPU. Make your conclusion based on this. This performance gap is significant sufficiently to matter.
DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS
SPECIFICATION
RX 7900 XT
T400
Core Specs
Shading Units
5,376
384
-92.9%
Shaders
5,376
384
-92.9%
TMUs
336
24
-92.9%
ROPs
192
16
-91.7%
Compute Units
84
—
SM Count
—
6
Clocks
Base Clock
1387 MHz
420 MHz
Boost Clock
2394 MHz
1425 MHz
Game Clock
2025 MHz
—
Shader Clock
2025 MHz
—
Memory Clock
2500 MHz
20 Gbps effective
1250 MHz
10 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
20 GB
2 GB
VRAM (MB)
20,480
2,048
-90.0%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Memory Bus
320 bit
64 bit
Bandwidth
800.0 GB/s
80.00 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
256 KB per Array
64 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
6 MB
1024 KB
L3 Cache
80 MB
—
L0 Cache
64 KB per WGP
—
Performance
Pixel Rate
459.6 GPixel/s
22.80 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
804.4 GTexel/s
34.20 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
51.48 TFLOPS
1,094.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
1.609 TFLOPS (1:32)
34.20 GFLOPS (1:32)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
103.0 TFLOPS (2:1)
2.189 TFLOPS (2:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
84
—
Matrix Cores
168
—
Power
TDP
300 W
30 W
TDP (W)
300
30
-90.0%
Suggested PSU
700 W
200 W
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
None
Architecture
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
Turing
GPU Name
Navi 31
TU117
Codename
Plum Bonito
—
Generation
Navi III
(RX 7000)
Quadro Turing
(Tx000)
Process Size
5 nm
12 nm
Transistors
57,700 million
4,700 million
Die Size
529 mm²
200 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
TSMC
Density
109.1M / mm²
23.5M / mm²
AMD MCM
GCD Transistors
45,400 million
—
GCD Die Size
304.35 mm²
—
MCD Transistors
2,050 million x6
—
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 (12_1)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
2.2
3.0
CUDA
—
7.5
Shader Model
6.8
6.8
Physical
Slot Width
Dual-slot
Single-slot
Length
276 mm
10.9 inches
—
Height
110 mm
4.3 inches
—
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1a2x DisplayPort 2.11x USB Type-C
3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x16
Other
Launch Price
899 USD
—
Production
End-of-life
End-of-life
Predecessor
Navi II
Quadro Volta
Successor
Navi IV
Workstation Ampere