NVIDIA RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell vs NVIDIA TITAN RTX Comparison

NVIDIA
GEFORCE

NVIDIA RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell

CORE STATE GB203
VRAM 32 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2407 MHz
TDP 200 W
BUS WIDTH 256 bit
ARCHITECTURE Blackwell 2.0
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2025
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

TITAN RTX

CORE STATE TU102
VRAM 24 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1770 MHz
TDP 280 W
BUS WIDTH 384 bit
ARCHITECTURE Turing
nm
PROCESS 12 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2018

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12
7,025
3,794
geekbench_vulkan
221,768
136,073
passmark_directx_10
204
147
passmark_directx_11
320
189
passmark_directx_12
119
88
passmark_directx_9
397
223
passmark_g2d
1,336
860
passmark_g3d
33,360
20,491
passmark_gpu_compute
19,255
10,034
geekbench_opencl
N/A
144,858

Analysis: NVIDIA RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell vs NVIDIA TITAN RTX

The NVIDIA TITAN RTX and the NVIDIA RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell are separated by over six years of architectural evolution, yet the benchmark data reveals a surprisingly close average performance gap. The TITAN RTX posts an average benchmark score of 31,676, while the RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell trails marginally at 31,532, a difference of just 0.5%. However, this near-parity in overall average masks a complete rout in individual tests, where the Blackwell card wins all nine head-to-head comparisons, often by substantial margins.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The most striking result is in the modern DirectX 12 workload, 3DMark Steel Nomad. The RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell scores 7,025, a commanding 46% lead over the TITAN RTX’s 3,794. This is not a marginal victory; it is a generational leap in raw rasterization throughput under contemporary API conditions. The gap is similarly pronounced in compute-heavy tasks. In Passmark’s GPU Compute test, the RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell delivers 19,255 points versus the TITAN RTX’s 10,034, a 47.9% advantage. This suggests the newer card’s architecture is far more efficient at handling parallel workloads that stress shader and tensor hardware.

Legacy DirectX performance tells the same story, albeit with smaller deltas. In Passmark DirectX 11, the RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell scores 320 against the TITAN RTX’s 189, a 40.9% improvement. The DirectX 9 test shows a 43.8% gap, with scores of 397 and 223 respectively. Even in DirectX 10, where the delta is smallest at 27.9% (204 vs 147), the Blackwell card still wins decisively. The pattern is clear: regardless of the API generation, the RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell outperforms the TITAN RTX.

The Vulkan results reinforce this trend. In Geekbench Vulkan, the RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell scores 221,768, which is 38.6% higher than the TITAN RTX’s 136,073. Interestingly, the TITAN RTX’s Vulkan score is notably lower than its OpenCL score of 144,858, suggesting its Turing architecture was less optimized for Vulkan’s explicit multi-threading model. The Blackwell card does not have a listed OpenCL benchmark, but its Vulkan dominance indicates superior driver and hardware support for modern low-level APIs.

Passmark’s 3D graphics suite (G3D) shows a 38.6% lead for the RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell, with 33,360 points versus 20,491. This is the most comprehensive rasterization test in the pack, and the result aligns with the 3DMark Steel Nomad outcome. Even the 2D graphics test (G2D) favors the newer card, with the RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell scoring 1,336 versus the TITAN RTX’s 860, a 35.6% difference. While 2D performance is rarely a bottleneck, it indicates the Blackwell card has faster memory and display pipeline throughput.

The only metric where the TITAN RTX does not lose is the average benchmark score itself, where its 31,676 edges out the RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell’s 31,532. This is a statistical artifact of the TITAN RTX having more benchmark entries (10 versus 9), including a strong Geekbench OpenCL result that is not present for the Blackwell card. In every directly comparable test, the RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell is the clear winner, with deltas ranging from 26.1% to 47.9%.

Architecture Differences

The architectural chasm between these two cards is vast. The TITAN RTX uses the TU102 chip built on TSMC’s 12 nm process, while the RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell uses the GB203 chip on a 5 nm node. This process shrink is the primary driver of efficiency and performance. Transistor density has jumped from 24.7 million per square millimeter on the TU102 to 120.6 million on the GB203. The TITAN RTX packs 18,600 million transistors on a massive 754 mm² die, whereas the RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell fits 45,600 million transistors on a much smaller 378 mm² die. This means the Blackwell chip crams over twice the transistors into half the area, enabling the 120.6M / mm² density figure.

Core counts differ dramatically. The RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell features 10,496 shading units, more than double the TITAN RTX’s 4,608. Texture mapping units also increase from 288 to 328, and ROPs from 96 to 112. Ray tracing cores are more numerous on the Blackwell card (82 vs 72), but the tensor core count is lower (328 vs 576). This is a notable divergence: the TITAN RTX has 576 tensor cores, while the RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell has only 328. Despite the lower count, the Blackwell tensor cores are likely newer generation hardware, but the raw number difference is significant.

Memory configurations reflect different design philosophies. The TITAN RTX uses 24 GB of GDDR6 on a 384-bit bus, yielding 672.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell uses 32 GB of GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus, achieving 896.0 GB/s. The Blackwell card has 8 GB more capacity and 224 GB/s more bandwidth, despite the narrower bus, thanks to the faster GDDR7 memory running at 28 Gbps effective versus 14 Gbps on the TITAN RTX. Clock speeds also favor the newer card: the RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell boosts to 2407 MHz, versus 1770 MHz on the TITAN RTX.

Power and interface specifications differ as well. The TITAN RTX has a 280 W TDP and requires two 8-pin power connectors, while the RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell has a lower 200 W TDP with a single 16-pin connector. The suggested PSU is 600 W for the TITAN RTX and 550 W for the RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell. Bus interface jumps from PCIe 3.0 x16 to PCIe 5.0 x16. Display outputs also change: the TITAN RTX offers 1x HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a, and 1x USB Type-C, while the RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell provides 4x DisplayPort 2.1b.

FAQ

Q: Which card has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The NVIDIA TITAN RTX has a marginal edge in average benchmark score at 31,676, versus 31,532 for the NVIDIA RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell. This 0.5% difference is within statistical noise and is influenced by the TITAN RTX having an additional Geekbench OpenCL result.

Q: In which test does the RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell have its largest margin of victory?

A: The largest delta is in Passmark GPU Compute, where the RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell leads by 47.9%. The TITAN RTX scores 10,034, while the RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell scores 19,255.

Q: Does the TITAN RTX win any benchmark comparison?

A: No. The head-to-head data shows the RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell winning all nine benchmark comparisons. The TITAN RTX has zero wins.

Q: How does memory bandwidth compare between the two cards?

A: The RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell has 896.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is higher than the TITAN RTX’s 672.0 GB/s. This is achieved with GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus versus GDDR6 on a 384-bit bus.

Q: What is the transistor density difference?

A: The RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell has a transistor density of 120.6 million per square millimeter, nearly five times higher than the TITAN RTX’s 24.7 million per square millimeter.

Q: Which card has a higher boost clock?

A: The RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell boosts to 2407 MHz, which is substantially higher than the TITAN RTX’s 1770 MHz boost clock.

The Verdict

The data is unambiguous. The NVIDIA RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell is the superior performer in every single benchmark test, with deltas ranging from 26.1% to 47.9%. Its wins in 3DMark Steel Nomad (46%), Passmark GPU Compute (47.9%), and Passmark G3D (38.6%) demonstrate dominance across synthetic rasterization, compute, and general 3D workloads. For anyone prioritizing raw performance in these tests, the RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell is the clear choice.

The TITAN RTX’s only advantage is its average benchmark score, which is 0.5% higher purely because it has an extra OpenCL benchmark entry. This is not a performance win; it is a data artifact. The TITAN RTX also has a higher tensor core count (576 vs 328), but given that the Blackwell card wins the compute test by nearly 48%, this numerical advantage does not translate into real-world compute superiority in the tested workloads.

The RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell also offers more memory (32 GB vs 24 GB), higher bandwidth (896.0 GB/s vs 672.0 GB/s), and a lower TDP (200 W vs 280 W). It is newer, active in production, and built on a more advanced 5 nm process. The TITAN RTX is end-of-life. Based strictly on benchmark performance, the RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell is the definitive winner, and the TITAN RTX should only be considered by users who specifically need its higher tensor core count for legacy workloads that are not represented in this benchmark suite.

Specification Differences

The following specifications differ between the two cards:

  • Process Node: TITAN RTX is 12 nm; RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell is 5 nm.
  • Transistors: TITAN RTX has 18,600 million; RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell has 45,600 million.
  • Die Size: TITAN RTX is 754 mm²; RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell is 378 mm².
  • Transistor Density: TITAN RTX is 24.7M / mm²; RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell is 120.6M / mm².
  • Base Clock: TITAN RTX is 1350 MHz; RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell is 1635 MHz.
  • Boost Clock: TITAN RTX is 1770 MHz; RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell is 2407 MHz.
  • Memory Speed: TITAN RTX is 14 Gbps effective; RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell is 28 Gbps effective.
  • Memory Size: TITAN RTX is 24 GB; RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell is 32 GB.
  • Memory Type: TITAN RTX is GDDR6; RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell is GDDR7.
  • Memory Bus Width: TITAN RTX is 384 bit; RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell is 256 bit.
  • Memory Bandwidth: TITAN RTX is 672.0 GB/s; RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell is 896.0 GB/s.
  • Shading Units: TITAN RTX has 4608; RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell has 10496.
  • TMUs: TITAN RTX has 288; RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell has 328.
  • ROPs: TITAN RTX has 96; RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell has 112.
  • RT Cores: TITAN RTX has 72; RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell has 82.
  • Tensor Cores: TITAN RTX has 576; RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell has 328.
  • Pixel Rate: TITAN RTX is 169.9 GPixel/s; RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell is 269.6 GPixel/s.
  • Texture Rate: TITAN RTX is 509.8 GTexel/s; RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell is 789.5 GTexel/s.
  • FP32 Performance: TITAN RTX is 16.31 TFLOPS; RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell is 50.53 TFLOPS.
  • FP16 Performance: TITAN RTX is 32.62 TFLOPS (2:1); RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell is 50.53 TFLOPS (1:1).
  • TDP: TITAN RTX is 280 W; RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell is 200 W.
  • Power Connectors: TITAN RTX uses 2x 8-pin; RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell uses 1x 16-pin.
  • Suggested PSU: TITAN RTX is 600 W; RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell is 550 W.
  • Bus Interface: TITAN RTX is PCIe 3.0 x16; RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell is PCIe 5.0 x16.
  • Display Outputs: TITAN RTX has 1x HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a, 1x USB Type-C; RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell has 4x DisplayPort 2.1b.
  • Height: TITAN RTX is 116 mm; RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell is 111 mm.
  • Width: TITAN RTX is 35 mm; RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell is 40 mm.
  • Production Status: TITAN RTX is End-of-life; RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell is Active.
  • Release Date: TITAN RTX is 2018-12-17; RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell is 2025-03-17.
  • Predecessor: TITAN RTX is GeForce 10; RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell is Workstation Ada.
  • Successor: TITAN RTX is GeForce 30; RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell is null.
  • Launch MSRP: TITAN RTX is 2,499 USD; RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell is null.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell
TITAN RTX
Core Specs
Shading Units
10,496
4,608 -56.1%
Shaders
10,496
4,608 -56.1%
TMUs
328
288 -12.2%
ROPs
112
96 -14.3%
SM Count
82
72 -12.2%
Clocks
Base Clock
1635 MHz
1350 MHz
Boost Clock
2407 MHz
1770 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz 28 Gbps effective
1750 MHz 14 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
32 GB
24 GB
VRAM (MB)
32,768
24,576 -25.0%
Memory Type
GDDR7
GDDR6
Memory Bus
256 bit
384 bit
Bandwidth
896.0 GB/s
672.0 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
64 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
64 MB
6 MB
Performance
Pixel Rate
269.6 GPixel/s
169.9 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
789.5 GTexel/s
509.8 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
50.53 TFLOPS
16.31 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
789.5 GFLOPS (1:64)
509.8 GFLOPS (1:32)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
50.53 TFLOPS (1:1)
32.62 TFLOPS (2:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
82
72 -12.2%
Tensor Cores
328
576 +75.6%
Power
TDP
200 W
280 W
TDP (W)
200
280 +40.0%
Suggested PSU
550 W
600 W
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
2x 8-pin
Architecture
Architecture
Blackwell 2.0
Turing
GPU Name
GB203
TU102
Generation
Blackwell PRO W (x000)
GeForce 20
Process Size
5 nm
12 nm
Transistors
45,600 million
18,600 million
Die Size
378 mm²
754 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
TSMC
Density
120.6M / mm²
24.7M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
3.0
3.0
CUDA
12.0
7.5
Shader Model
6.8
6.8
Physical
Slot Width
Dual-slot
Dual-slot
Length
267 mm 10.5 inches
267 mm 10.5 inches
Height
111 mm 4.4 inches
116 mm 4.6 inches
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 2.1b
1x HDMI 2.03x DisplayPort 1.4a1x USB Type-C
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x16
Other
Launch Price
—
2,499 USD
Production
Active
End-of-life
Predecessor
Workstation Ada
GeForce 10
Successor
—
GeForce 30
View RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell Details View TITAN RTX Details