NVIDIA RTX A5000 vs NVIDIA T1000 8 GB Comparison

NVIDIA
GEFORCE

NVIDIA RTX A5000

CORE STATE GA102
VRAM 24 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1695 MHz
TDP 230 W
BUS WIDTH 384 bit
ARCHITECTURE Ampere
nm
PROCESS 8 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2021
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

T1000 8 GB

CORE STATE TU117
VRAM 8 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1395 MHz
TDP 50 W
BUS WIDTH 128 bit
ARCHITECTURE Turing
nm
PROCESS 12 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2021

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12
3,783
N/A
geekbench_opencl
157,905
N/A
geekbench_vulkan
137,828
34,561
passmark_directx_10
153
N/A
passmark_directx_11
187
N/A
passmark_directx_12
87
N/A
passmark_directx_9
251
N/A
passmark_g2d
1,032
N/A
passmark_g3d
22,541
N/A
passmark_gpu_compute
12,455
N/A

Analysis: NVIDIA RTX A5000 vs NVIDIA T1000 8 GB

The NVIDIA T1000 8 GB and NVIDIA RTX A5000 are both end-of-life workstation graphics cards from NVIDIA, but they target vastly different segments of the professional market. The T1000 is a low-profile, power-efficient Turing-based solution designed for basic CAD and multi-display setups, while the RTX A5000 is a high-end Ampere-based card built for heavy 3D rendering, AI workloads, and large-scale data science. The benchmark data shows a clear hierarchy, with the RTX A5000 delivering roughly four times the raw graphics performance in the single shared test, though the T1000 holds its own in its niche due to its minimal power and space requirements.

FAQ

Q: How do the two cards compare in the Geekbench Vulkan benchmark?

A: The NVIDIA RTX A5000 scores 137,828 points in Geekbench Vulkan, while the NVIDIA T1000 8 GB scores 34,561 points. This gives the RTX A5000 a 74.9% advantage, making it nearly four times faster in this specific API test.

Q: What are the respective power consumption figures?

A: The NVIDIA T1000 8 GB has a TDP of 50 W and requires no power connectors, while the NVIDIA RTX A5000 has a TDP of 230 W and requires a single 8-pin power connector. The suggested PSU rating is 250 W for the T1000 and 550 W for the A5000.

Q: Which card has more memory and bandwidth?

A: The NVIDIA RTX A5000 features 24 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 384-bit bus, delivering 768.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The NVIDIA T1000 8 GB offers 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 160.0 GB/s.

Q: Are there differences in ray tracing and tensor core support?

A: Yes. The NVIDIA RTX A5000 includes 64 RT cores and 256 tensor cores, while the NVIDIA T1000 8 GB has none. This makes the A5000 suitable for real-time ray tracing and AI-accelerated tasks, whereas the T1000 lacks these dedicated hardware units.

Q: What is the physical size difference between the two?

A: The NVIDIA T1000 8 GB is a single-slot card measuring 156 mm in length and 69 mm in height. The NVIDIA RTX A5000 is a dual-slot card measuring 267 mm in length and 112 mm in height, making it significantly larger.

Q: How do their average benchmark scores compare?

A: The NVIDIA T1000 8 GB has an average benchmark score of 34,561, while the NVIDIA RTX A5000 has an average score of 33,622. Despite the A5000’s massive win in the head-to-head Vulkan test, its average score is slightly lower due to the inclusion of other benchmark results.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs are built on entirely different architectures and process nodes. The NVIDIA T1000 8 GB is based on the TU117 chip using the Turing architecture, manufactured on TSMC’s 12 nm process. It packs 4,700 million transistors on a die size of 200 mm², resulting in a transistor density of 23.5 million per mm². In contrast, the NVIDIA RTX A5000 uses the GA102 chip with the Ampere architecture, built on Samsung’s 8 nm process. This larger and more complex chip contains 28,300 million transistors across a 628 mm² die, achieving a density of 45.1 million per mm².

The shading core counts reflect the generational gap. The T1000 has 896 shading units, 56 texture mapping units, and 32 ROPs. The A5000 scales this up dramatically with 8,192 shading units, 256 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. A key architectural differentiator is the presence of dedicated hardware: the A5000 features 64 RT cores and 256 tensor cores, enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing and AI inference, while the T1000 has none. This makes the A5000 a true compute powerhouse for modern workloads, whereas the T1000 relies purely on traditional rasterization.

Clock speeds and memory architecture also diverge significantly. The T1000 has a base clock of 1065 MHz and a boost clock of 1395 MHz, with memory running at 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective). The A5000 boosts higher at 1695 MHz from a base of 1170 MHz, and its memory runs at 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective). The A5000’s memory subsystem is far wider, using a 384-bit bus versus the T1000’s 128-bit bus, which directly contributes to its 768.0 GB/s bandwidth versus 160.0 GB/s. The PCIe interface also differs: the T1000 uses PCIe 3.0 x16, while the A5000 supports PCIe 4.0 x16.

Where Each One Wins

The NVIDIA T1000 8 GB wins in scenarios where power efficiency and physical footprint are paramount. With a 50 W TDP, it can be powered entirely from the PCIe slot without any external power connectors, making it ideal for compact workstations, small form factor builds, or systems with limited PSU headroom. Its single-slot design and short 156 mm length allow it to fit in chassis where the A5000’s dual-slot, 267 mm profile would not. For basic office productivity, 2D CAD, or driving multiple 4K displays via its four mini-DisplayPort outputs, the T1000 provides sufficient performance without the thermal or space burden of a high-end card.

The NVIDIA RTX A5000 wins decisively in performance-critical professional workloads. Its 24 GB memory capacity is essential for large datasets, complex 3D scenes, or training machine learning models that exceed the T1000’s 8 GB limit. The inclusion of RT and tensor cores gives it a massive edge in ray-traced rendering and AI-accelerated tasks like denoising or inference. The raw compute advantage is staggering: the A5000 delivers 27.77 TFLOPS of FP32 performance versus the T1000’s 2.500 TFLOPS, a more than 11-fold increase. For professionals running heavy simulations, video editing with GPU acceleration, or multi-GPU rendering farms, the A5000 is the clear choice despite its higher power draw.

Specification Differences

The specification sheets reveal a stark contrast across nearly every category. The process node differs, with the T1000 on 12 nm and the A5000 on 8 nm, and the transistor counts are 4,700 million versus 28,300 million respectively. Die size grows from 200 mm² to 628 mm². Memory capacity jumps from 8 GB to 24 GB, type remains GDDR6 for both, but the bus width expands from 128-bit to 384-bit. Bandwidth scales from 160.0 GB/s to 768.0 GB/s.

Compute resources are drastically different: shading units go from 896 to 8,192, TMUs from 56 to 256, and ROPs from 32 to 96. The A5000 adds 64 RT cores and 256 tensor cores, which the T1000 lacks entirely. Pixel rate increases from 44.64 GPixel/s to 162.7 GPixel/s, and texture rate from 78.12 GTexel/s to 433.9 GTexel/s. FP32 throughput rises from 2.500 TFLOPS to 27.77 TFLOPS, with FP16 scaling from 5.000 TFLOPS (2:1) to 27.77 TFLOPS (1:1).

Power and physical characteristics also diverge. The T1000 has a 50 W TDP, is single-slot, and requires no power connectors, while the A5000 has a 230 W TDP, is dual-slot, and needs one 8-pin connector. Suggested PSU ratings are 250 W and 550 W respectively. The T1000 measures 156 mm x 69 mm, while the A5000 measures 267 mm x 112 mm. Display outputs are similar in count, with the T1000 offering 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a and the A5000 offering 4x DisplayPort 1.4a. The bus interface improves from PCIe 3.0 x16 to PCIe 4.0 x16. DirectX support advances from 12 (12_1) to 12 Ultimate (12_2).

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The only direct head-to-head benchmark available is Geekbench Vulkan, and the result is a landslide victory for the NVIDIA RTX A5000. The A5000 scores 137,828 points, while the NVIDIA T1000 8 GB manages 34,561 points. This represents a delta of -74.9% for the T1000, meaning the A5000 is approximately 3.99 times faster in this test. This gap is consistent with the massive differences in shading units, memory bandwidth, and clock speeds between the two cards.

Looking at the broader benchmark landscape, the RTX A5000’s average benchmark score of 33,622 is actually slightly lower than the T1000’s 34,561, which seems counterintuitive given the Vulkan result. This is explained by the A5000’s inclusion of multiple Passmark tests, where it scores lower in older DirectX versions (e.g., 153 in DirectX 10, 87 in DirectX 12) while excelling in others (22,541 in G3D and 12,455 in GPU Compute). The T1000’s single Geekbench Vulkan score of 34,561 places it in the 79th percentile of all GPUs, while the A5000 sits at the 78th percentile, showing that despite the A5000’s raw power, its overall average is dragged down by legacy API tests.

The nearest rivals for each card further illustrate their positioning. The T1000’s closest competitors include the AMD Radeon HD 7970 (34,541, delta 0.1%) and the NVIDIA TITAN V (34,355, delta 0.6%), indicating it sits in a performance tier alongside older high-end cards. The A5000’s rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB (33,694, delta -0.2%) and AMD Radeon RX 480 (33,997, delta -1.1%), showing its average score is comparable to mid-range consumer GPUs from previous generations, despite its professional feature set and massive memory pool. This data underscores that the A5000’s value lies not in raw average scores but in its specialized capabilities for workstation tasks.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
RTX A5000
T1000 8 GB
Core Specs
Shading Units
8,192
896 -89.1%
Shaders
8,192
896 -89.1%
TMUs
256
56 -78.1%
ROPs
96
32 -66.7%
SM Count
64
14 -78.1%
Clocks
Base Clock
1170 MHz
1065 MHz
Boost Clock
1695 MHz
1395 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz 16 Gbps effective
1250 MHz 10 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
24 GB
8 GB
VRAM (MB)
24,576
8,192 -66.7%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Memory Bus
384 bit
128 bit
Bandwidth
768.0 GB/s
160.0 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
64 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
6 MB
1024 KB
Performance
Pixel Rate
162.7 GPixel/s
44.64 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
433.9 GTexel/s
78.12 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
27.77 TFLOPS
2.500 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
433.9 GFLOPS (1:64)
78.12 GFLOPS (1:32)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
27.77 TFLOPS (1:1)
5.000 TFLOPS (2:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
64
—
Tensor Cores
256
—
Power
TDP
230 W
50 W
TDP (W)
230
50 -78.3%
Suggested PSU
550 W
250 W
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
None
Architecture
Architecture
Ampere
Turing
GPU Name
GA102
TU117
Generation
Workstation Ampere (Ax000)
Quadro Turing (Tx000)
Process Size
8 nm
12 nm
Transistors
28,300 million
4,700 million
Die Size
628 mm²
200 mm²
Foundry
Samsung
TSMC
Density
45.1M / mm²
23.5M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 (12_1)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
3.0
3.0
CUDA
8.6
7.5
Shader Model
6.8
6.8
Physical
Slot Width
Dual-slot
Single-slot
Length
267 mm 10.5 inches
156 mm 6.1 inches
Height
112 mm 4.4 inches
69 mm 2.7 inches
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x16
Other
Production
End-of-life
End-of-life
Predecessor
Quadro Turing
Quadro Volta
Successor
Workstation Ada
Workstation Ampere
View RTX A5000 Details View T1000 8 GB Details