GPU Comparison

NVIDIA
GEFORCE

NVIDIA RTX A1000

CORE STATE GA107
VRAM 8 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1462 MHz
TDP 50 W
BUS WIDTH 128 bit
ARCHITECTURE Ampere
nm
PROCESS 8 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

RTX A500 Mobile

CORE STATE GA107S
VRAM 4 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1537 MHz
TDP 30 W
BUS WIDTH 64 bit
ARCHITECTURE Ampere
nm
PROCESS 8 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2022

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12
969
N/A
geekbench_opencl
52,078
41,263
geekbench_vulkan
49,574
37,873

Analysis: NVIDIA RTX A1000 vs NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile

For this graphics card showdown, NVIDIA RTX A1000 (NVIDIA) shows its advantage obviously. Whether you're gaming at 4K, NVIDIA RTX A1000 (NVIDIA) dependably surpasses the NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile by notable amounts. This performance margin grows even larger at higher resolutions. The graphics card handles resource-hungry workloads with efficiency. Its design superiority are apparent.

For hardware ray tracing, NVIDIA RTX A1000 (NVIDIA) pulls even more beyond of the NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile. The hardware units handle demanding lighting rendering far more efficiently. Players wanting cutting-edge visuals will seriously consider NVIDIA RTX A1000 (NVIDIA). This RT superiority is considerable. Next-gen releases continually utilize ray tracing technology.

In-game tests in multiple games repeatedly benefit NVIDIA RTX A1000 (NVIDIA). From competitive genres to AAA productions, NVIDIA RTX A1000 (NVIDIA) keeps its edge. This gaming steadiness throughout different games proves inherent design benefits. Players should anticipate excellent frame rates independent of title. The flexibility is outstanding.

the NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile is not dismissed entirely, however its frame rate gap against NVIDIA RTX A1000 (NVIDIA) is challenging to deny. For cost-sensitive users, the NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile might yet make sense if its smaller asking price accounts for the reduced capabilities. However, for raw rendering throughput, NVIDIA RTX A1000 (NVIDIA) represents the clear champion. The verdict is straightforward. Speed enthusiasts will lean toward NVIDIA RTX A1000 (NVIDIA).

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
RTX A1000
RTX A500 Mobile
Core Specs
Shading Units
2,304
2,048 -11.1%
Shaders
2,304
2,048 -11.1%
TMUs
72
64 -11.1%
ROPs
32
32 0.0%
SM Count
18
16 -11.1%
Clocks
Base Clock
727 MHz
832 MHz
Boost Clock
1462 MHz
1537 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz 12 Gbps effective
1500 MHz 12 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
8 GB
4 GB
VRAM (MB)
8,192
4,096 -50.0%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Memory Bus
128 bit
64 bit
Bandwidth
192.0 GB/s
96.00 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
128 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
2 MB
2 MB
Performance
Pixel Rate
46.78 GPixel/s
49.18 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
105.3 GTexel/s
98.37 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
6.737 TFLOPS
6.296 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
105.3 GFLOPS (1:64)
98.37 GFLOPS (1:64)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
6.737 TFLOPS (1:1)
6.296 TFLOPS (1:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
18
16 -11.1%
Tensor Cores
72
64 -11.1%
Power
TDP
50 W
30 W
TDP (W)
50
30 -40.0%
Suggested PSU
250 W
Power Connectors
None
None
Architecture
Architecture
Ampere
Ampere
GPU Name
GA107
GA107S
Generation
Workstation Ampere (Ax000)
Ampere-MW (Ax000)
Process Size
8 nm
8 nm
Transistors
8,700 million
8,700 million
Die Size
200 mm²
200 mm²
Foundry
Samsung
Samsung
Density
43.5M / mm²
43.5M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
3.0
3.0
CUDA
8.6
8.6
Shader Model
6.8
6.8
Physical
Slot Width
Single-slot
IGP
Length
163 mm 6.4 inches
Height
69 mm 2.7 inches
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Portable Device Dependent
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
PCIe 4.0 x8
Other
Production
Active
End-of-life
Predecessor
Quadro Turing
Quadro Turing-M
Successor
Workstation Ada
Ada-MW
View RTX A1000 Details View RTX A500 Mobile Details