GPU Comparison

NVIDIA
GEFORCE

NVIDIA CMP 90HX

CORE STATE GA102
VRAM 10 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1710 MHz
TDP 320 W
BUS WIDTH 320 bit
ARCHITECTURE Ampere
nm
PROCESS 8 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2021
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

RTX A4500 Mobile

CORE STATE GA104
VRAM 16 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1500 MHz
TDP 140 W
BUS WIDTH 256 bit
ARCHITECTURE Ampere
nm
PROCESS 8 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2022

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

geekbench_opencl
69,000
105,307
geekbench_vulkan
N/A
76,960

Analysis: NVIDIA CMP 90HX vs NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile

The graphics card matchup between NVIDIA NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile GPU and the NVIDIA CMP 90HX card from NVIDIA shows impressively competitive frame rates. Both cards exchange wins across multiple titles, with none holding a clear edge. This score data supports this conclusion. Not one option dominates repeatedly. Those have a genuine decision here.

Instead of fixating on slight performance improvements, interested users can weigh additional considerations. TDP, fan noise, design, and support options often count bigger than minor performance gaps. Such variables could tip the balance. Evaluate past just frame rates. This entire offering matters.

If frame rates is so matched, value and features turn the deciding factors. Look at ray tracing support, DLSS/FSR support, power consumption, and ecosystem stability when picking between NVIDIA NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile GPU and the NVIDIA CMP 90HX card from NVIDIA. The elements can influence the scales. Think holistically. This broader perspective plays a role.

For those undecided between NVIDIA NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile GPU and the NVIDIA CMP 90HX card from NVIDIA, remain comfortable that either choice provides similar rendering performance. The test results demonstrates not a clear champion. Make your decision on other elements and enjoy capable graphics performance either way. Both are capable in this own way. Choose assuredly.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
CMP 90HX
RTX A4500 Mobile
Core Specs
Shading Units
6,400
5,888 -8.0%
Shaders
6,400
5,888 -8.0%
TMUs
200
184 -8.0%
ROPs
80
96 +20.0%
SM Count
50
46 -8.0%
Clocks
Base Clock
1500 MHz
930 MHz
Boost Clock
1710 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1188 MHz 19 Gbps effective
2000 MHz 16 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
10 GB
16 GB
VRAM (MB)
10,240
16,384 +60.0%
Memory Type
GDDR6X
GDDR6
Memory Bus
320 bit
256 bit
Bandwidth
760.3 GB/s
512.0 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
128 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
5 MB
4 MB
Performance
Pixel Rate
136.8 GPixel/s
144.0 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
342.0 GTexel/s
276.0 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
21.89 TFLOPS
17.66 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
342.0 GFLOPS (1:64)
276.0 GFLOPS (1:64)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
21.89 TFLOPS (1:1)
17.66 TFLOPS (1:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
50
46 -8.0%
Tensor Cores
200
184 -8.0%
Power
TDP
320 W
140 W
TDP (W)
320
140 -56.3%
Suggested PSU
700 W
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
None
Architecture
Architecture
Ampere
Ampere
GPU Name
GA102
GA104
Generation
Mining GPUs
Ampere-MW (Ax000)
Process Size
8 nm
8 nm
Transistors
28,300 million
17,400 million
Die Size
628 mm²
392 mm²
Foundry
Samsung
Samsung
Density
45.1M / mm²
44.4M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
3.0
3.0
CUDA
8.6
8.6
Shader Model
6.8
6.8
Physical
Slot Width
Dual-slot
Length
285 mm 11.2 inches
Height
112 mm 4.4 inches
Outputs
No outputs
Portable Device Dependent
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x4
PCIe 4.0 x16
Other
Production
End-of-life
End-of-life
Predecessor
Quadro Turing-M
Successor
Ada-MW
View CMP 90HX Details View RTX A4500 Mobile Details