GPU Comparison

NVIDIA
GEFORCE

NVIDIA RTX 6000D

CORE STATE GB202
VRAM 84 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2430 MHz
TDP 600 W
BUS WIDTH 448 bit
ARCHITECTURE Blackwell 2.0
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2025
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

T400

CORE STATE TU117
VRAM 2 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1425 MHz
TDP 30 W
BUS WIDTH 64 bit
ARCHITECTURE Turing
nm
PROCESS 12 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2021

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12
3,522
N/A
geekbench_opencl
388,405
17,039
geekbench_vulkan
N/A
15,976

Analysis: NVIDIA RTX 6000D vs NVIDIA T400

Reviewing the test results for NVIDIA T400 and NVIDIA RTX 6000D, a picture of matched capability develops. Neither option leads consistently throughout most titles. The alternating of wins means core equality. Those confront a actual choice with these options. Both graphics cards achieve solid rendering performance.

Instead of dwelling on small performance improvements, interested consumers might evaluate alternative elements. Power efficiency, cooling, materials, and service options usually play a role more than small FPS deltas. Such considerations can sway the choice. Evaluate past merely benchmarks. The complete value proposition counts.

Game performance results likewise show competitive results between NVIDIA T400 and NVIDIA RTX 6000D. Smoothness deltas typically sit inside margin of error. These slight deltas are barely perceptible during practical gaming sessions. Either cards achieve responsive experiences. Gamers could pick assuredly between them.

In the end, buyers could pick based on price as opposed to benchmark frame rates solely. Each NVIDIA T400 and NVIDIA RTX 6000D deliver strong rendering throughput for the target segments. This determination rests on individual requirements. Both selection is good. You won't go wrong with either.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
RTX 6000D
T400
Core Specs
Shading Units
19,968
384 -98.1%
Shaders
19,968
384 -98.1%
TMUs
624
24 -96.2%
ROPs
192
16 -91.7%
SM Count
156
6 -96.2%
Clocks
Base Clock
1590 MHz
420 MHz
Boost Clock
2430 MHz
1425 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz 28 Gbps effective
1250 MHz 10 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
84 GB
2 GB
VRAM (MB)
86,016
2,048 -97.6%
Memory Type
GDDR7
GDDR6
Memory Bus
448 bit
64 bit
Bandwidth
1.57 TB/s
80.00 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
64 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
128 MB
1024 KB
Performance
Pixel Rate
466.6 GPixel/s
22.80 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
1,516.3 GTexel/s
34.20 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
97.04 TFLOPS
1,094.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
1.516 TFLOPS (1:64)
34.20 GFLOPS (1:32)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
97.04 TFLOPS (1:1)
2.189 TFLOPS (2:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
156
Tensor Cores
624
Power
TDP
600 W
30 W
TDP (W)
600
30 -95.0%
Suggested PSU
1000 W
200 W
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
None
Architecture
Architecture
Blackwell 2.0
Turing
GPU Name
GB202
TU117
Generation
Blackwell PRO W (x000)
Quadro Turing (Tx000)
Process Size
5 nm
12 nm
Transistors
92,200 million
4,700 million
Die Size
750 mm²
200 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
TSMC
Density
122.9M / mm²
23.5M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 (12_1)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
3.0
3.0
CUDA
12.0
7.5
Shader Model
6.8
6.8
Physical
Slot Width
Dual-slot
Single-slot
Length
304 mm 12 inches
Height
137 mm 5.4 inches
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 2.1b
3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x16
Other
Launch Price
8,565 USD
Production
Active
End-of-life
Predecessor
Workstation Ada
Quadro Volta
Successor
Workstation Ampere
View RTX 6000D Details View T400 Details