GPU Comparison

NVIDIA
GEFORCE

NVIDIA RTX 6000D

CORE STATE GB202
VRAM 84 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2430 MHz
TDP 600 W
BUS WIDTH 448 bit
ARCHITECTURE Blackwell 2.0
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2025
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

RTX A2000

CORE STATE GA106
VRAM 6 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1200 MHz
TDP 70 W
BUS WIDTH 192 bit
ARCHITECTURE Ampere
nm
PROCESS 8 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2021

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12
3,522
1,345
geekbench_opencl
388,405
67,695
geekbench_vulkan
N/A
69,089

Analysis: NVIDIA RTX 6000D vs NVIDIA RTX A2000

Reviewing the test results for GeForce NVIDIA RTX A2000 and NVIDIA RTX 6000 GPU, the trend of competitive capability emerges. None of the GPU wins repeatedly throughout all benchmarks. This swapping of wins suggests core parity. Consumers confront a true selection with these options. Both options offer capable rendering throughput.

Over focusing on small FPS differences, potential builders can evaluate secondary considerations. energy consumption, fan noise, materials, and warranty coverage frequently play a role more than marginal performance deltas. The considerations should sway the scales. Weigh past merely performance. This whole offering is important.

When frame rates is this close, cost and extras become the deciding factors. Consider RT performance support, reconstruction support, energy efficiency, and platform stability when picking between GeForce NVIDIA RTX A2000 and NVIDIA RTX 6000 GPU. The elements might tip the balance. Consider completely. This bigger context plays a role.

When buyers uncertain between GeForce NVIDIA RTX A2000 and NVIDIA RTX 6000 GPU, feel confident that any selection delivers matching graphics throughput. This performance data confirms zero decisive victor. Make your selection on alternative factors and experience excellent rendering capability either way. Each are excellent in their particular way. Pick safely.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
RTX 6000D
RTX A2000
Core Specs
Shading Units
19,968
3,328 -83.3%
Shaders
19,968
3,328 -83.3%
TMUs
624
104 -83.3%
ROPs
192
48 -75.0%
SM Count
156
26 -83.3%
Clocks
Base Clock
1590 MHz
562 MHz
Boost Clock
2430 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz 28 Gbps effective
1500 MHz 12 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
84 GB
6 GB
VRAM (MB)
86,016
6,144 -92.9%
Memory Type
GDDR7
GDDR6
Memory Bus
448 bit
192 bit
Bandwidth
1.57 TB/s
288.0 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
128 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
128 MB
3 MB
Performance
Pixel Rate
466.6 GPixel/s
57.60 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
1,516.3 GTexel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
97.04 TFLOPS
7.987 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
1.516 TFLOPS (1:64)
124.8 GFLOPS (1:64)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
97.04 TFLOPS (1:1)
7.987 TFLOPS (1:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
156
26 -83.3%
Tensor Cores
624
104 -83.3%
Power
TDP
600 W
70 W
TDP (W)
600
70 -88.3%
Suggested PSU
1000 W
250 W
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
None
Architecture
Architecture
Blackwell 2.0
Ampere
GPU Name
GB202
GA106
Generation
Blackwell PRO W (x000)
Workstation Ampere (Ax000)
Process Size
5 nm
8 nm
Transistors
92,200 million
12,000 million
Die Size
750 mm²
276 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
Samsung
Density
122.9M / mm²
43.5M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
3.0
3.0
CUDA
12.0
8.6
Shader Model
6.8
6.8
Physical
Slot Width
Dual-slot
Dual-slot
Length
304 mm 12 inches
167 mm 6.6 inches
Height
137 mm 5.4 inches
69 mm 2.7 inches
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 2.1b
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
PCIe 4.0 x16
Other
Launch Price
8,565 USD
449 USD
Production
Active
End-of-life
Predecessor
Workstation Ada
Quadro Turing
Successor
Workstation Ada
View RTX 6000D Details View RTX A2000 Details