GPU Comparison

NVIDIA
GEFORCE

NVIDIA A10G

CORE STATE GA102
VRAM 24 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1710 MHz
TDP 150 W
BUS WIDTH 384 bit
ARCHITECTURE Ampere
nm
PROCESS 8 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2021
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

RTX 6000D

CORE STATE GB202
VRAM 84 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2430 MHz
TDP 600 W
BUS WIDTH 448 bit
ARCHITECTURE Blackwell 2.0
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2025

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

geekbench_opencl
158,063
388,405
geekbench_vulkan
145,863
N/A
3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12
N/A
3,522

Analysis: NVIDIA A10G vs NVIDIA RTX 6000D

Reviewing the test results for the NVIDIA A10G and NVIDIA RTX 6000 graphics card, the pattern of competitive frame rates emerges. Not one option excels consistently throughout all titles. This back-and-forth of advantages indicates core equality. Users encounter a actual choice between them. Each graphics cards achieve solid gaming capability.

As opposed to obsessing on slight FPS gains, prospective consumers should weigh alternative considerations. energy consumption, acoustics, design, and warranty quality usually matter greater than small FPS differences. These elements might affect the scales. Consider past merely frame rates. The complete offering matters.

Looking at a technical viewpoint, the NVIDIA A10G and NVIDIA RTX 6000 graphics card possess comparable hardware. Memory amount, shader cores, and interface throughput are nearly comparable. This spec equivalence supports the similar test numbers. Not one possesses a substantial specification edge. This competition is even.

To summarize, this evaluation between the NVIDIA A10G and NVIDIA RTX 6000 graphics card results in a effective draw. Benchmark deltas are minor and doubtful to affect practical sessions. Concentrate your choice on value, platform choices, and specific functionality needs. Either are excellent picks. The balance is real.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
A10G
RTX 6000D
Core Specs
Shading Units
9,216
19,968 +116.7%
Shaders
9,216
19,968 +116.7%
TMUs
288
624 +116.7%
ROPs
96
192 +100.0%
SM Count
72
156 +116.7%
Clocks
Base Clock
1320 MHz
1590 MHz
Boost Clock
1710 MHz
2430 MHz
Memory Clock
1563 MHz 12.5 Gbps effective
1750 MHz 28 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
24 GB
84 GB
VRAM (MB)
24,576
86,016 +250.0%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR7
Memory Bus
384 bit
448 bit
Bandwidth
600.2 GB/s
1.57 TB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
128 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
6 MB
128 MB
Performance
Pixel Rate
164.2 GPixel/s
466.6 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
492.5 GTexel/s
1,516.3 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
31.52 TFLOPS
97.04 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
985.0 GFLOPS (1:32)
1.516 TFLOPS (1:64)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
31.52 TFLOPS (1:1)
97.04 TFLOPS (1:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
72
156 +116.7%
Tensor Cores
288
624 +116.7%
Power
TDP
150 W
600 W
TDP (W)
150
600 +300.0%
Suggested PSU
450 W
1000 W
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS
1x 16-pin
Architecture
Architecture
Ampere
Blackwell 2.0
GPU Name
GA102
GB202
Generation
Server Ampere (Axx)
Blackwell PRO W (x000)
Process Size
8 nm
5 nm
Transistors
28,300 million
92,200 million
Die Size
628 mm²
750 mm²
Foundry
Samsung
TSMC
Density
45.1M / mm²
122.9M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
3.0
3.0
CUDA
8.6
12.0
Shader Model
6.8
6.8
Physical
Slot Width
Single-slot
Dual-slot
Length
267 mm 10.5 inches
304 mm 12 inches
Height
112 mm 4.4 inches
137 mm 5.4 inches
Outputs
No outputs
4x DisplayPort 2.1b
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
PCIe 5.0 x16
Other
Launch Price
8,565 USD
Production
End-of-life
Active
Predecessor
Tesla Turing
Workstation Ada
Successor
Server Ada
View A10G Details View RTX 6000D Details