GPU Comparison

NVIDIA
GEFORCE

NVIDIA PG506-232

CORE STATE GA100
VRAM 24 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1440 MHz
TDP 165 W
BUS WIDTH 3072 bit
ARCHITECTURE Ampere
nm
PROCESS 7 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2021
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

RTX A400

CORE STATE GA107
VRAM 4 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1762 MHz
TDP 50 W
BUS WIDTH 64 bit
ARCHITECTURE Ampere
nm
PROCESS 8 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

geekbench_opencl
225,124
22,844
geekbench_vulkan
N/A
22,237

Analysis: NVIDIA PG506-232 vs NVIDIA RTX A400

The graphics card evaluation between NVIDIA RTX A400 by NVIDIA and NVIDIA NVIDIA PG506-232 graphics card indicates remarkably competitive performance. These GPUs exchange leads over multiple tests, with none claiming a definitive advantage. The performance results confirms this observation. Neither graphics card wins steadily. Consumers encounter a actual dilemma in this matchup.

Considering a engineering angle, NVIDIA RTX A400 by NVIDIA and NVIDIA NVIDIA PG506-232 graphics card feature equivalent specs. Video memory size, shader cores, and bus bandwidth are closely equivalent. The hardware equality accounts for the close score figures. Not one maintains a considerable engineering advantage. The playing field is fair.

Based on a engineering standpoint, NVIDIA RTX A400 by NVIDIA and NVIDIA NVIDIA PG506-232 graphics card feature comparable capabilities. VRAM capacity, processing processors, and memory bandwidth are virtually equivalent. The spec balance justifies the similar score figures. No has a significant technical advantage. The matchup is even.

Ultimately, consumers could select based on specific requirements rather than benchmark frame rates alone. Either NVIDIA RTX A400 by NVIDIA and NVIDIA NVIDIA PG506-232 graphics card achieve strong visual results for the intended price points. The selection rests on individual priorities. Each pick is good. Buyers couldn't go amiss here.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
PG506-232
RTX A400
Core Specs
Shading Units
3,584
768 -78.6%
Shaders
3,584
768 -78.6%
TMUs
224
24 -89.3%
ROPs
96
16 -83.3%
SM Count
56
6 -89.3%
Clocks
Base Clock
930 MHz
1417 MHz
Boost Clock
1440 MHz
1762 MHz
Memory Clock
1215 MHz 2.4 Gbps effective
1500 MHz 12 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
24 GB
4 GB
VRAM (MB)
24,576
4,096 -83.3%
Memory Type
HBM2
GDDR6
Memory Bus
3072 bit
64 bit
Bandwidth
933.1 GB/s
96.00 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
128 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
24 MB
2 MB
Performance
Pixel Rate
138.2 GPixel/s
28.19 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
322.6 GTexel/s
42.29 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
10.32 TFLOPS
2.706 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
5.161 TFLOPS (1:2)
42.29 GFLOPS (1:64)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
10.32 TFLOPS (1:1)
2.706 TFLOPS (1:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
6
Tensor Cores
224
24 -89.3%
Power
TDP
165 W
50 W
TDP (W)
165
50 -69.7%
Suggested PSU
450 W
250 W
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS
None
Architecture
Architecture
Ampere
Ampere
GPU Name
GA100
GA107
Generation
Server Ampere (Axx)
Workstation Ampere (Ax000)
Process Size
7 nm
8 nm
Transistors
54,200 million
8,700 million
Die Size
826 mm²
200 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
Samsung
Density
65.6M / mm²
43.5M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
OpenCL
3.0
3.0
CUDA
8.0
8.6
Shader Model
6.8
Physical
Slot Width
Dual-slot
Single-slot
Length
267 mm 10.5 inches
163 mm 6.4 inches
Height
112 mm 4.4 inches
69 mm 2.7 inches
Outputs
No outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
PCIe 4.0 x8
Other
Production
End-of-life
Active
Predecessor
Tesla Turing
Quadro Turing
Successor
Server Ada
Workstation Ada
View PG506-232 Details View RTX A400 Details