GPU Comparison

AMD

RADEON

AMD Radeon RX 7900M

CORE STATE Navi 31

VRAM 16 GB

CLOCK SPEED 2090 MHz

TDP 180 W

BUS WIDTH 256 bit

ARCHITECTURE RDNA 3.0

PROCESS 5 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2023

NVIDIA

GEFORCE

PG506-232

CORE STATE GA100

VRAM 24 GB

CLOCK SPEED 1440 MHz

TDP 165 W

BUS WIDTH 3072 bit

ARCHITECTURE Ampere

PROCESS 7 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2021

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12

4,201

N/A

geekbench_opencl

129,499

225,124

geekbench_vulkan

158,760

N/A

Analysis: AMD Radeon RX 7900M vs NVIDIA PG506-232

When gaming capability is this tightly matched, this matchup between AMD's RX 7900 graphics and NVIDIA NVIDIA PG506-232 gets more complex. Both graphics cards alternate wins over multiple games. The total result is one of surprising equivalence. None of the appears as a obvious winner. The selection hinges on specific priorities.

When frame rates is so close, price and capabilities become the key considerations. Look at real-time ray tracing quality, upscaling support, power consumption, and driver support when picking between AMD's RX 7900 graphics and NVIDIA NVIDIA PG506-232. Such factors might influence the scales. Weigh completely. The bigger view matters.

The bottom line: AMD's RX 7900 graphics and NVIDIA NVIDIA PG506-232 are closely matched. No earns a undisputed nod over the rival. Allow availability and platform choices influence your eventual determination. Either options should fulfill you effectively. This is a safe choice.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION

RX 7900M

PG506-232

Core Specs

Shading Units

4,608

3,584 -22.2%

Shaders

4,608

3,584 -22.2%

TMUs

288

224 -22.2%

ROPs

192

96 -50.0%

Compute Units

—

SM Count

—

Clocks

Base Clock

1825 MHz

930 MHz

Boost Clock

2090 MHz

1440 MHz

Memory Clock

2250 MHz 18 Gbps effective

1215 MHz 2.4 Gbps effective

Memory

Memory Size

16 GB

24 GB

VRAM (MB)

16,384

24,576 +50.0%

Memory Type

GDDR6

HBM2

Memory Bus

256 bit

3072 bit

Bandwidth

576.0 GB/s

933.1 GB/s

Cache

L1 Cache

256 KB per Array

192 KB (per SM)

L2 Cache

6 MB

24 MB

L3 Cache

64 MB

—

L0 Cache

64 KB per WGP

—

Performance

Pixel Rate

401.3 GPixel/s

138.2 GPixel/s

Texture Rate

601.9 GTexel/s

322.6 GTexel/s

FP32 (TFLOPS)

38.52 TFLOPS

10.32 TFLOPS

FP64 (TFLOPS)

1,203.8 GFLOPS (1:32)

5.161 TFLOPS (1:2)

FP16 (TFLOPS)

77.05 TFLOPS (2:1)

10.32 TFLOPS (1:1)

AI/RT

RT Cores

—

Tensor Cores

—

224

Power

TDP

180 W

165 W

TDP (W)

180

165 -8.3%

Suggested PSU

—

450 W

Power Connectors

None

8-pin EPS

Architecture

RDNA 3.0

Ampere

GPU Name

Navi 31

GA100

Codename

Plum Bonito

—

Generation

Navi Mobile (RX 7000M)

Server Ampere (Axx)

Process Size

5 nm

7 nm

Transistors

57,700 million

54,200 million

Die Size

529 mm²

826 mm²

Foundry

TSMC

Density

109.1M / mm²

65.6M / mm²

AMD MCM

GCD Transistors

45,400 million

—

GCD Die Size

304.35 mm²

—

MCD Transistors

2,050 million x6

—

API Support

DirectX

12 Ultimate (12_2)

—

OpenGL

4.6

—

Vulkan

1.4

—

OpenCL

2.2

3.0

CUDA

—

8.0

Shader Model

6.8

—

Physical

Slot Width

IGP

Dual-slot

Length

—

267 mm 10.5 inches

Height

—

112 mm 4.4 inches

Outputs

Portable Device Dependent

No outputs

Bus Interface

PCIe 4.0 x16

Other

Production

Active

End-of-life

Predecessor

Polaris Mobile

Tesla Turing

Successor

—

Server Ada

View Radeon RX 7900M Details View PG506-232 Details

GPU Comparison

AMD Radeon RX 7900M

PG506-232

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

Analysis: AMD Radeon RX 7900M vs NVIDIA PG506-232

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

Related Graphics Cards

Related Comparisons