NVIDIA Jetson T4000 vs NVIDIA RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell Server Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark results for the NVIDIA Jetson T4000 and the NVIDIA RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell Server. Both entries show an average benchmark score of 0 and zero wins in their competitive comparison fields. This absence of measured performance data means the analysis must rely entirely on the architectural and specification differences captured in the database.

The most significant performance indicator comes from the FP32 compute figures. The RTX PRO 4500 delivers 50.70 TFLOPS of FP32 throughput, while the Jetson T4000 provides 4.700 TFLOPS. That places the RTX PRO 4500 at roughly 10.8 times the raw single-precision compute capability of the Jetson T4000. Similarly, FP16 performance follows the same 1:1 ratio pattern for both cards, with the RTX PRO 4500 again at 50.70 TFLOPS versus 4.700 TFLOPS for the Jetson T4000.

Texture and pixel throughput tell a similar story. The RTX PRO 4500 reaches 792.1 GTexel/s and 270.5 GPixel/s, while the Jetson T4000 manages 73.44 GTexel/s and 24.48 GPixel/s. These figures translate to a 10.8-fold advantage in texture fill rate and an 11.0-fold advantage in pixel fill rate for the RTX PRO 4500. The memory bandwidth gap is equally pronounced: 800.3 GB/s for the RTX PRO 4500 versus 273.2 GB/s for the Jetson T4000, a 2.9 times difference.

The RTX PRO 4500 also holds the advantage in ray tracing and tensor core resources. It features 82 RT cores and 328 tensor cores, compared to 12 RT cores and 64 tensor cores on the Jetson T4000. The shading unit count differs by an order of magnitude as well, with 10,496 shading units on the RTX PRO 4500 versus 1,536 on the Jetson T4000.

One area where the Jetson T4000 pulls ahead is memory capacity. It carries 64 GB of LPDDR5X memory, double the 32 GB of GDDR7 found on the RTX PRO 4500. The Jetson T4000 also operates at a higher base clock of 1530 MHz versus 1215 MHz for the RTX PRO 4500, though the RTX PRO 4500 boosts to 2415 MHz while the Jetson T4000 remains fixed at 1530 MHz.

Both cards share the same 5 nm process node from TSMC and fall into the same Server Blackwell (Bxx) generation. Their percentile ranking against all GPUs in the database is identical at 50, and neither has any nearest rivals listed for comparison.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has higher FP32 compute performance?

A: The RTX PRO 4500 delivers 50.70 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, while the Jetson T4000 provides 4.700 TFLOPS. This makes the RTX PRO 4500 approximately 10.8 times faster in raw FP32 throughput.

Q: How does memory capacity differ between the two?

A: The Jetson T4000 features 64 GB of LPDDR5X memory, while the RTX PRO 4500 has 32 GB of GDDR7. The Jetson T4000 offers double the capacity, but the RTX PRO 4500 provides 800.3 GB/s bandwidth versus 273.2 GB/s for the Jetson T4000.

Q: What are the physical size differences?

A: The Jetson T4000 measures 87 mm in length, 100 mm in height, and 15 mm in width. The RTX PRO 4500 is substantially larger at 267 mm long, 111 mm high, and 40 mm wide.

Q: Do these cards support standard graphics APIs?

A: The RTX PRO 4500 supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The Jetson T4000 lists N/A for DirectX, OpenGL, and Vulkan, indicating no conventional graphics API support in the database.

Q: Which card has more tensor cores?

A: The RTX PRO 4500 has 328 tensor cores, while the Jetson T4000 has 64 tensor cores. The RTX PRO 4500 also has 82 RT cores versus 12 on the Jetson T4000.

Q: What is the power consumption difference?

A: The Jetson T4000 has a TDP of 90 W and requires no power connectors, with a suggested PSU of 250 W. The RTX PRO 4500 has a TDP of 165 W, uses a single 16-pin connector, and suggests a 450 W PSU.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs share the same 5 nm TSMC fabrication process and both belong to the Server Blackwell (Bxx) generation, but their underlying chip designs diverge significantly. The Jetson T4000 uses the GB10B chip, while the RTX PRO 4500 uses the GB203 chip. Both are built by NVIDIA, yet the RTX PRO 4500 is classified under Blackwell 2.0 architecture, whereas the Jetson T4000 falls under the base Blackwell architecture.

The die sizes are close: 391 mm² for the Jetson T4000 and 378 mm² for the RTX PRO 4500. However, the transistor counts differ dramatically. The database records 45,600 million transistors for the RTX PRO 4500, while the Jetson T4000 lists an unknown transistor count. The RTX PRO 4500 also has a recorded transistor density of 120.6M per mm², a figure not available for the Jetson T4000.

The core configurations reveal a fundamental architectural gap. The RTX PRO 4500 packs 10,496 shading units, 328 TMUs, and 112 ROPs. The Jetson T4000 offers just 1,536 shading units, 48 TMUs, and 16 ROPs. Ray tracing hardware follows the same pattern: 82 RT cores on the RTX PRO 4500 versus 12 on the Jetson T4000. Tensor core counts stand at 328 versus 64.

Clock behavior also differs. The Jetson T4000 runs at a constant 1530 MHz for both base and boost, with memory clocked at 1067 MHz (8.5 Gbps effective). The RTX PRO 4500 has a base clock of 1215 MHz but boosts to 2415 MHz, with memory at 1563 MHz (25 Gbps effective). This means the RTX PRO 4500 can scale its clock speed substantially under load, while the Jetson T4000 operates at a single fixed frequency.

Memory architecture shows both cards use a 256-bit bus width, but the memory types differ. The Jetson T4000 uses LPDDR5X, while the RTX PRO 4500 uses GDDR7. The bus interface also differs: the Jetson T4000 connects via PCIe 5.0 x8, while the RTX PRO 4500 uses PCIe 5.0 x16.

Neither card has display outputs, and both share the same predecessor (Server Hopper) and successor (Server Rubin) in the database. The Jetson T4000 was released on 2026-01-04, and the RTX PRO 4500 followed on 2026-03-16.

Specification Differences

The two cards differ across nearly every measurable specification in the database. The Jetson T4000 uses the GB10B chip, while the RTX PRO 4500 uses the GB203 chip. The architecture designation differs: Blackwell for the Jetson T4000, Blackwell 2.0 for the RTX PRO 4500.

Clock speeds diverge significantly. The Jetson T4000 has a base clock of 1530 MHz and a boost clock of 1530 MHz, with memory at 1067 MHz (8.5 Gbps effective). The RTX PRO 4500 has a base clock of 1215 MHz, a boost clock of 2415 MHz, and memory at 1563 MHz (25 Gbps effective).

Memory capacity and type differ: 64 GB LPDDR5X versus 32 GB GDDR7. Bandwidth stands at 273.2 GB/s for the Jetson T4000 and 800.3 GB/s for the RTX PRO 4500. Both use a 256-bit bus width.

Core counts show the largest gaps. The Jetson T4000 has 1,536 shading units, 48 TMUs, 16 ROPs, 12 RT cores, and 64 tensor cores. The RTX PRO 4500 has 10,496 shading units, 328 TMUs, 112 ROPs, 82 RT cores, and 328 tensor cores.

Pixel and texture rates follow the core counts: 24.48 GPixel/s and 73.44 GTexel/s for the Jetson T4000, versus 270.5 GPixel/s and 792.1 GTexel/s for the RTX PRO 4500. FP32 and FP16 performance are 4.700 TFLOPS for the Jetson T4000 and 50.70 TFLOPS for the RTX PRO 4500.

Power specifications also differ. The Jetson T4000 has a TDP of 90 W, no power connectors, a suggested PSU of 250 W, and an IGP slot width. The RTX PRO 4500 has a TDP of 165 W, one 16-pin connector, a suggested PSU of 450 W, and a single-slot width.

Physical dimensions vary in all three axes. The Jetson T4000 is 87 mm long, 100 mm high, and 15 mm wide. The RTX PRO 4500 is 267 mm long, 111 mm high, and 40 mm wide.

API support differs entirely. The Jetson T4000 lists N/A for DirectX, OpenGL, and Vulkan. The RTX PRO 4500 supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Transistor information is incomplete for the Jetson T4000, with an unknown count and no density figure. The RTX PRO 4500 records 45,600 million transistors and a density of 120.6M per mm². Die sizes are 391 mm² for the Jetson T4000 and 378 mm² for the RTX PRO 4500.

The Jetson T4000 has a launch MSRP of 1,999 USD. The RTX PRO 4500 has no launch MSRP recorded in the database.

The Verdict

The recorded data shows two GPUs designed for different roles within the same Server Blackwell generation. The RTX PRO 4500 dominates in raw compute throughput, memory bandwidth, and feature support. Its 50.70 TFLOPS FP32 performance, 800.3 GB/s bandwidth, and 82 RT cores position it as the clear choice for workloads that demand maximum processing power.

The Jetson T4000 offers double the memory capacity at 64 GB, a lower 90 W TDP, no power connectors, and a dramatically smaller physical footprint at 87 mm length. Its fixed 1530 MHz clock and 4.700 TFLOPS FP32 output indicate a focus on efficiency and integration rather than peak performance.

For applications where memory capacity and power efficiency are the primary constraints, the Jetson T4000 presents the stronger profile. For applications requiring maximum compute throughput, ray tracing capability, or standard graphics API support, the RTX PRO 4500 is the only viable option based on the database specifications.

The identical percentile ranking of 50 for both cards suggests the database considers them comparable in overall standing among all GPUs, despite their vastly different performance envelopes.

Where Each One Wins

The RTX PRO 4500 wins on every performance metric recorded in the database. It delivers 50.70 TFLOPS in both FP32 and FP16, compared to 4.700 TFLOPS for the Jetson T4000. Its texture rate of 792.1 GTexel/s and pixel rate of 270.5 GPixel/s far exceed the Jetson T4000's 73.44 GTexel/s and 24.48 GPixel/s. The memory bandwidth advantage of 800.3 GB/s versus 273.2 GB/s gives it a clear edge in data-intensive tasks.

The RTX PRO 4500 also wins on API compatibility. It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, while the Jetson T4000 lists N/A for all three. This makes the RTX PRO 4500 suitable for graphics workloads that require standard API interfaces.

The Jetson T4000 wins on memory capacity with 64 GB versus 32 GB. It also wins on power efficiency with a 90 W TDP versus 165 W, and on physical size with an 87 mm length versus 267 mm. The Jetson T4000 requires no power connectors and suggests a 250 W PSU, while the RTX PRO 4500 needs a 16-pin connector and a 450 W PSU.

The Jetson T4000 has a higher base clock at 1530 MHz versus 1215 MHz for the RTX PRO 4500, though the RTX PRO 4500's boost clock of 2415 MHz exceeds the Jetson T4000's fixed 1530 MHz.

The RTX PRO 4500 wins on transistor count with 45,600 million recorded, while the Jetson T4000 has an unknown count. The RTX PRO 4500 also has a denser package at 120.6M transistors per mm².

For server deployments where compute density and graphics API support matter most, the RTX PRO 4500 is the superior choice. For deployments where memory capacity, power draw, and physical footprint take priority, the Jetson T4000 holds the advantage.